Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative Morphological Characteristics of the Results of Implantation of Decellularized and Recellularized Porcine Skin Scaffolds

  • Published:
Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine Aims and scope

The tissue reaction of pig skin to implantation of decellularized and recellularized dermal matrices on a formed wound defect was evaluated by histological methods on days 2, 5, 8, 16, and 20 after surgery. Differences in tissue response to different matrices were identified. In experimental wounds coated with decellularized dermal matrices, we observed the formation of a scar tissue, which required autodermoplasty on day 12 of the experiment. In wounds coated with recellularized dermal matrices, all layers of the skin completely recovered by day 20 after surgery with the formation of full dermal and epidermal layers. Our findings suggest that reparative morphological changes in the wound depend on the presence of fibroblasts in the implanted dermal matrix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gilevich IV, Sotnichenko AS, Melkonyan KI, Yutskevich YA, Bogdanov SB, Karakulev AV, Porkhanov VA. Patent RU No. 2717088. Method of producing acellular dermal matrix. Bull. No. 8. Published March 18, 2020.

  2. Polyakov AV, Bogdanov SB, Afanasov IM, Karakulev AV, Bogdanova YA, Zinoviev EV, Osmanov KF. Application of chitosan-based wound coatings “Chitopran” in the treatment of patients with burn trauma. Innovats. Med. Kubani. 2019;(3):25-31. Russian.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shekhter AB, Guller AE, Istranov LP, Istranova EV, Butnaru DV, Vinarov AZ, Zakharkina OL, Kurkov AV, Kantimerov DF, Antonov EN, Marisov LV, Glybochko PV. Morphology of collagen matrices for tissue engineering (biocompatibility, biodegradation, tissue response). Arkhiv Patol. 2015;77(6):29-38. Russian.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shishatskaya EI, Nikolaeva ED, Shumilova AA, Shabanov AV, Volova TG. Cultivation of multipotent mesenchymal bone marrow cells on matrixes made of resorbable bioplastotan. Klet. Transplanrol. Tkan. Inzhener. 2013;8(1):57-65. Russian.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burd A, Ahmed K, Lam S, Ayyappan T, Huang L. Stem cell strategies in burns care. Burns. 2007;33(3):282-291. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2006.08.031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chua AW, Khoo YC, Tan BK, Tan KC, Foo CL, Chong SJ. Skin tissue engineering advances in severe burns: review and therapeutic applications. Burns Trauma. 2016;4:3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41038-016-0027-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Climov M, Medeiros E, Farkash EA, Qiao J, Rousseau CF, Dong S, Zawadzka A, Racki WJ, Al-Musa A, Sachs DH, Randolph MA, Huang CA, Bollenbach TJ. Bioengineered Self-assembled Skin as an Alternative to Skin Grafts. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open. 2016;4(6):e731. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000723

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Keck M, Haluza D, Lumenta DB, Burjak S, Eisenbock B, Kamolz LP, Frey M. Construction of a Multi-Layer Skin Sub stitute: Simultaneous Cultivation of Keratinocytes and Preadipocytes on a Dermal Template. Burns. 2011;37(4):626-630. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2010.07.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leclerc T, Thepenier C, Jault P, Bey E, Peltzer J, Trouillas M, Duhamel P, Bargues L, Prat M, Bonderriter M, Lataillade JJ. Cell therapy of burns. Cell Prolif. 2011;44(Suppl 1):48-54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2184.2010.00727.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Wormald JC, Fishman JM, Juniat S, Tolley N, Birchall MA. Regenerative medicine in otorhinolaryngology. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2015;129(8):732-739. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215115001577

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. S. Sotnichenko.

Additional information

Translated from Byulleten’ Eksperimental’noi Biologii i Meditsiny, Vol. 170, No. 9, pp. 377-382, September, 2020

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sotnichenko, A.S., Gilevich, I.V., Melkonyan, K.I. et al. Comparative Morphological Characteristics of the Results of Implantation of Decellularized and Recellularized Porcine Skin Scaffolds. Bull Exp Biol Med 170, 378–383 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-021-05071-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10517-021-05071-0

Key Words

Navigation