Next Article in Journal
Valganciclovir—Ganciclovir Use and Systematic Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. An Invitation to Antiviral Stewardship
Previous Article in Journal
Prevalence and Characterization of Coagulase Positive Staphylococci from Food Products and Human Specimens in Egypt
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fluoroquinolone Can Be an Effective Treatment Option for Acute Pyelonephritis When the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of Levofloxacin for the Causative Escherichia coli Is ≤16 mg/L
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mortality of Pandrug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infections in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort of 115 Episodes

by
Matthaios Papadimitriou-Olivgeris
1,*,†,
Christina Bartzavali
2,
Alexandra Georgakopoulou
3,
Fevronia Kolonitsiou
2,
Chrisavgi Papamichail
3,
Iris Spiliopoulou
2,
Myrto Christofidou
2,
Fotini Fligou
3 and
Markos Marangos
1
1
Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
2
Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
3
Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Present address: Infectious Diseases Service, Lausanne University Hospital, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Antibiotics 2021, 10(1), 76; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10010076
Submission received: 24 November 2020 / Revised: 5 January 2021 / Accepted: 12 January 2021 / Published: 15 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Resistance: The Final Frontier)

Abstract

:
Background: The increased frequency of bacteraemias caused by pandrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (PDR-Kp) has significant implications. The aim of the present study was to identify predictors associated with mortality of PDR-Kp bacteraemias. Methods: Patients with monomicrobial bacteraemia due to PDR-Kp were included. K. pneumoniae was considered PDR if it showed resistance to all available groups of antibiotics. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of meropenem, tigecycline, fosfomycin, and ceftazidime/avibactam were determined by Etest, whereas for colistin, the broth microdilution method was applied. blaKPC, blaVIM, blaNDM, and blaOXA genes were detected by PCR. Results: Among 115 PDR-Kp bacteraemias, the majority of infections were primary bacteraemias (53; 46.1%), followed by catheter-related (35; 30.4%). All isolates were resistant to tested antimicrobials. blaKPC was the most prevalent carbapenemase gene (98 isolates; 85.2%). Thirty-day mortality was 39.1%; among 51 patients with septic shock, 30-day mortality was 54.9%. Multivariate analysis identified the development of septic shock, Charlson comorbidity index, and bacteraemia other than primary or catheter-related as independent predictors of mortality, while a combination of at least three antimicrobials was identified as an independent predictor of survival. Conclusions: Mortality of PDR-Kp bloodstream infections was high. Administration of at least three antimicrobials might be beneficial for infections in critically ill patients caused by such pathogens.

1. Introduction

Klebsiella pneumoniae is a Gram-negative, encapsulated, bacterium that colonizes the gastrointestinal tract. Due to its ability to evade the immune system, it can gain entry to other tissues and cause severe infections, mainly urinary tract infections, lower respiratory-tract infection, liver abscesses, and bacteraemias [1]. K. pneumoniae has the ability to acquire resistance to different antimicrobials, rendering infections by such multidrug-resistant strains difficult to treat [2].
In the last two decades, carbapenemase-producing bacteria and especially K. pneumoniae became prevalent in many regions of the world [3]. The rise of carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae led to increased use of antimicrobials such as colistin, tigecycline, and aminoglycosides, which subsequently resulted in the emergence of resistance to the aforementioned antimicrobials [4,5]. This led to the isolation of strains resistant to all available antimicrobials, known as pandrug-resistant bacteria (PDR) [6].
While isolation of PDR strains remained rare, nowadays they are prevalent worldwide [6]. They are mainly associated with critically ill patients previously exposed to many antimicrobials [6,7,8,9,10]. Mortality of infections caused by such bacteria is high, since no effective option is available [6,7,8,9,10]. While treatment was based mainly on a combination of different antimicrobials, usually including colistin, no robust evidence exists supporting the superiority of a therapeutic regimen over another [6,7,8,9,10].
The aim of the present study was to describe the clinical characteristics, therapeutic management, and clinical outcome of bloodstream-infections (BSIs) due to PDR K. pneumoniae (PDR-Kp) in patients hospitalized in a Greek intensive care unit (ICU).

2. Results

Among 412 monomicrobial BSIs due to K. pneumoniae, 115 (27.9%) were due to PDR isolates (Supplementary Figure). The majority of infections were primary BSIs (53; 46.1%), followed by catheter-related (35; 30.4%), abdominal infections (11; 9.6%), ventilator-associated pneumonias (8; 7.0%), meningitis (four; 3.5%), urinary tract infections (three; 2.6%), and deep surgical site infections (one; 0.9%).
All 115 isolates recovered from blood cultures were resistant to penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, monobactams, quinolones, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, aminoglycosides, colistin, and tigecycline. Fosfomycin and ceftazidime/avibactam were tested among eight isolates and six isolates, respectively, all of which were resistant. blaKPC was the most prevalent carbapenemase gene (98 isolates; 85.2%), followed by co-carriage of blaKPC and blaVIM (seven; 6.1%), blaVIM (six; 5.2%), and blaNDM (four; 3.1%).
Thirty-day mortality was 39.1% (45 out of 115 episodes); among the 51 patients that developed septic shock, 30-day mortality was 54.9% (28 patients). The univariate analyses of predictors of 30-day mortality among all patients and those that developed septic shock are shown in Table 1. Multivariate analyses are shown in Table 2. Among all patients, multivariate analysis identified development of septic shock, Charlson comorbidity index, and BSI other than primary or catheter-related as independent predictors of mortality, while a combination of at least three antimicrobials was identified as an independent predictor of survival. Among patients with septic shock, BSI other than primary or catheter-related was identified as an independent predictor of 30-day mortality, while a combination of at least three antimicrobials was identified as an independent predictor of survival.
Table 3 shows the different antimicrobial regimens and the associated mortality. Figure 1 shows the survival curves of patients with PDR-Kp bacteraemias (Figure 1A) and the subgroup of patients with septic shock (Figure 1B) as a function of the number of administered antimicrobials. A combination of at least three antimicrobials was advantageous over one or two antimicrobials in the whole cohort (p=0.001) and in the subgroup of septic shock (p = 0.023).

3. Discussion

Resistance of carbapenemase-producing bacteria to the remaining antimicrobials is a major emerging healthcare problem. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest series of PDR-Kp infections. During the ten-year study period (2010–2019), PDR-Kp represented 27.9% of all K. pneumoniae bacteraemias (Supplementary Figure). This high percentage of PDR isolates could be attributed to the antibiotic selective pressure in an area with endemic carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae infections [5], lack of newer antimicrobials, and the revision by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) of tigecycline’s breakpoints rendering most isolates that previously were considered susceptible or intermediate as being resistant to tigecycline [11]. The mortality in our cohort was high (39.1%), especially in patients with septic shock (54.9%), and it was higher than previously reported [6,7,8,9,10]. Most studies were based in cohorts with a limited number of patients infected by different pathogens. Furthermore, in our cohort, all episodes were monomicrobial, which was not the case in previous ones [6,7,8,9,10]. Even though mortality was high in our study, it was significantly lower than the mortality expected when no appropriate antimicrobial treatment is available, most likely because of the synergistic in vivo effect of antimicrobial combination. As previously reported, colistin exhibited synergy when used in combination with other antimicrobials, even against colistin-resistant isolates [12]. A double carbapenem regimen was also associated with better outcomes when used against isolates with high-level carbapenem resistance [13]. Another plausible explanation was that antibiotic resistance comes at a cost of biological fitness. As shown in a previous study, K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae was practically avirulent as compared to non-carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae [14]. Choi et al. showed that when hypermucoviscous K. pneumoniae acquired colistin resistance, it led to a reduction in capsular polysaccharides production and a significant fitness cost [15].
As previously reported, septic shock was associated with the worst outcomes, especially in infections for which no effective in vitro antimicrobial is available [16,17]. Patients with catheter-related BSIs as compared to other sources (meningitis, intra-abdominal, ventilator-associated pneumonia) were associated with better outcome, underlining the importance of early and appropriate source control in the management of such infections [18,19].
At the present time, no therapy is proven to be superior for patients with PDR-Kp infections [6,7,8,9,10]. Different combinations of antimicrobials have been previously used against PDR-Kp infections with moderate success [6]. Colistin was often used because of in vitro and in vivo data supporting its use in infections caused by PDR pathogens [6,7,8,9,10,12]. In our study, even though the use of at least three antimicrobials was associated with better outcomes, no specific antimicrobial regimen showed a significant superiority (Table 3).
Newer antimicrobials might offer an important adjunction in our already limited armamentarium, since they have shown high rates of in vitro susceptibility in isolates resistant to many currently used antimicrobials. The majority of newer antimicrobials are beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations with variable activity against different types of carbapenemase genes, a novel cephalosporin (cefiderocol), a novel aminoglycoside (plazomicin), and a novel tetracycline (eravacycline) [20]. Two studies from Greece showed that 100% and 94.3% of K. pneumoniae isolates were susceptible to cefiderocol and plazomicin, respectively [21,22]. Such antimicrobials should not be considered as panacea, and their use should be prudent, since excessive use could lead to a rapid change of epidemiology with the replacement of susceptible pathogens by resistant-ones, as previously reported in our ICU after the introduction of ceftazidime/avibactam [23].
This study has several limitations. First, it is a retrospective study conducted in only one center. Even though a moderate number of patients were included, the number of BSIs was significantly higher to previous cohorts [7]. Since no guidelines exist for the treatment of such infections, the administered regimen was at the discretion of the ICU physicians and the infectious diseases consultants, explaining the different approaches seen in the present study. The study was conducted in critically ill patients, so these results may not be directly extrapolated to patients hospitalized in other wards with less severe infections. No time-kill assays were performed to confirm in vitro synergism of different antimicrobial agents.

4. Materials and Methods

This retrospective study was conducted during a ten-year period (2010–2019) in the intensive care unit (ICU) of the University General Hospital of Patras (UGHP), Greece. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the UGHP (No 858).
Patients with a monomicrobial bacteraemia due to PDR-Kp were included in the study. K. pneumoniae was considered PDR if it was resistant to all classes of antibiotics available [24]; isolates from 2010 to 2015 were considered PDR if they were resistant to penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, monobactams, quinolones, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, aminoglycosides, colistin ,and tigecycline; from 2016 to 2017, isolates were considered PDR if they were resistant to the aforementioned antimicrobials plus fosfomycin, whenever the latter was tested; from 2018 to 2019, isolates were considered PDR if they were resistant to the aforementioned antibiotics plus ceftazidime/avibactam. According to the new EUCAST definitions, K. pneumoniae strains with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) in the range of “I” were considered susceptible, and such isolates were excluded from our cohort [25]. Multiple episodes of bacteraemia from the same patient were included if a duration of at least two months occurred between two episodes.
Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Epidemiological data, comorbidities, antimicrobial administration, type of infection, septic shock, and mortality prediction scores (Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)) were obtained from patients’ chart reviews and the ICU computerized database (CriticusTM, University of Patras, Greece) [17,26]. Primary or secondary BSI was determined in accordance to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definition [27]. Infection was categorized as sepsis or septic shock according to the new sepsis definition [28]. The date of collection of the first positive blood culture was defined as infection onset.
K. pneumoniae isolates from clinical specimens from patients hospitalized in the ICU were identified by the Vitek 2 Advanced Expert System (bioMérieux, Marcy l’ Etoile, France). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by the agar disk diffusion method against imipenem, meropenem, aztreonam, amikacin, gentamicin, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, and ciprofloxacin. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of imipenem, meropenem, tigecycline, fosfomycin, and ceftazidime/avibactam were determined by Etest (bioMérieux), whereas the MIC of colistin was determined by the broth microdilution method. EUCAST criteria were used to interpret susceptibility results [25]. Carbapenemase gene presence (blaVIM, blaIMP, blaKPC, blaNDM, and blaOXA) was confirmed by PCR [29,30].
Data analysis was performed with SPSS version 23.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Fisher exact test or the chi-squared test was used for categorical variables and Mann–Whitney U-test for continuous ones. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of 30-day mortality in all patients and in the subgroup of patients with septic shock; variables with a univariate p ≤ 0.1 were included. In this study, a p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Survival curves were obtained using the Kaplan–Meier method.

5. Conclusions

The incidence of infections by PDR-Kp was high in an area where carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae is endemic. Mortality of PDR-Kp BSI was high, especially among patients with septic shock. Administration of at least three antimicrobials might be beneficial for the treatment of BSI caused by such pathogens in critically ill patients, but further studies are needed to elucidate the best therapeutic approach.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/10/1/76/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.C., F.F., and M.M.; methodology: C.B., A.G., F.K., C.P., I.S., and F.F.; formal analysis: M.C. and M.P.-O.; investigation: M.P.-O., C.B., F.K., A.G., and C.P.; resources: I.S.; data curation: M.P.-O.; writing—original draft preparation: M.P.-O.; writing—review and editing: all authors; supervision: M.M. and M.C.; project administration: M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the UGHP (No 858).

Informed Consent Statement

The Ethical Committee waived the need for informed consent.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Martin, R.M.; Bachman, M.A. Colonization, Infection, and the Accessory Genome of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Dunn, S.J.; Connor, C.; McNally, A. The evolution and transmission of multi-drug resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: The complexity of clones and plasmids. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2019, 51, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Albiger, B.; Glasner, C.; Struelens, M.J.; Grundmann, H.; Monnet, D.L.; The European Survey of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae (EuSCAPE) Working Group. Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Europe: Assessment by national experts from 38 countries, May 2015. Eurosurveillance 2015, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Gutierrez-Gutierrez, B.; Salamanca, E.; de Cueto, M.; Hsueh, P.R.; Viale, P.; Pano-Pardo, J.R.; Venditti, M.; Tumbarello, M.; Daikos, G.; Canton, R.; et al. Effect of appropriate combination therapy on mortality of patients with bloodstream infections due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (INCREMENT): A retrospective cohort study. Lancet. Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 726–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Spyropoulou, A.; Papadimitriou-Olivgeris, M.; Bartzavali, C.; Vamvakopoulou, S.; Marangos, M.; Spiliopoulou, I.; Anastassiou, E.D.; Christofidou, M. A ten-year surveillance study of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in a tertiary care Greek university hospital: Predominance of KPC- over VIM- or NDM-producing isolates. J. Med. Microbiol. 2016, 65, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Karakonstantis, S.; Kritsotakis, E.I.; Gikas, A. Pandrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: A systematic review of current epidemiology, prognosis and treatment options. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 271–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tsioutis, C.; Kritsotakis, E.I.; Maraki, S.; Gikas, A. Infections by pandrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria: Clinical profile, therapeutic management, and outcome in a series of 21 patients. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 29, 301–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Falagas, M.E.; Bliziotis, I.A.; Kasiakou, S.K.; Samonis, G.; Athanassopoulou, P.; Michalopoulos, A. Outcome of infections due to pandrug-resistant (PDR) Gram-negative bacteria. BMC Infect. Dis. 2005, 5, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Falagas, M.E.; Rafailidis, P.I.; Matthaiou, D.K.; Virtzili, S.; Nikita, D.; Michalopoulos, A. Pandrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii infections: Characteristics and outcome in a series of 28 patients. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2008, 32, 450–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kofteridis, D.P.; Andrianaki, A.M.; Maraki, S.; Mathioudaki, A.; Plataki, M.; Alexopoulou, C.; Ioannou, P.; Samonis, G.; Valachis, A. Treatment pattern, prognostic factors, and outcome in patients with infection due to pan-drug-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. 2020, 39, 965–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Papadimitriou-Olivgeris, M.; Bartzavali, C.; Nikolopoulou, A.; Kolonitsiou, F.; Mplani, V.; Spiliopoulou, I.; Christofidou, M.; Fligou, F.; Marangos, M. Impact of Tigecycline’s MIC in the Outcome of Critically Ill Patients with Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Bacteraemia Treated with Tigecycline Monotherapy-Validation of 2019′s EUCAST Proposed Breakpoint Changes. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Brennan-Krohn, T.; Pironti, A.; Kirby, J.E. Synergistic Activity of Colistin-Containing Combinations against Colistin-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Oliva, A.; D’Abramo, A.; D’Agostino, C.; Iannetta, M.; Mascellino, M.T.; Gallinelli, C.; Mastroianni, C.M.; Vullo, V. Synergistic activity and effectiveness of a double-carbapenem regimen in pandrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014, 69, 1718–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Tzouvelekis, L.S.; Miriagou, V.; Kotsakis, S.D.; Spyridopoulou, K.; Athanasiou, E.; Karagouni, E.; Tzelepi, E.; Daikos, G.L. KPC-producing, multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 258 as a typical opportunistic pathogen. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 5144–5146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Choi, M.J.; Ko, K.S. Loss of hypermucoviscosity and increased fitness cost in colistin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 23 strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 6763–6773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Papadimitriou-Olivgeris, M.; Fligou, F.; Bartzavali, C.; Zotou, A.; Spyropoulou, A.; Koutsileou, K.; Vamvakopoulou, S.; Sioulas, N.; Karamouzos, V.; Anastassiou, E.D.; et al. Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection in critically ill patients: Risk factors and predictors of mortality. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. 2017, 36, 1125–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gutierrez-Gutierrez, B.; Salamanca, E.; de Cueto, M.; Hsueh, P.R.; Viale, P.; Pano-Pardo, J.R.; Venditti, M.; Tumbarello, M.; Daikos, G.; Pintado, V.; et al. A Predictive Model of Mortality in Patients With Bloodstream Infections due to Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2016, 91, 1362–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Valles, J.; Leon, C.; Alvarez-Lerma, F. Nosocomial bacteremia in critically ill patients: A multicenter study evaluating epidemiology and prognosis. Spanish Collaborative Group for Infections in Intensive Care Units of Sociedad Espanola de Medicina Intensiva y Unidades Coronarias (SEMIUC). Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 1997, 24, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Renaud, B.; Brun-Buisson, C.; Group, I.C.-B.S. Outcomes of primary and catheter-related bacteremia. A cohort and case-control study in critically ill patients. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2001, 163, 1584–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bassetti, M.; Vena, A.; Sepulcri, C.; Giacobbe, D.R.; Peghin, M. Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Due to Gram-Negative Bacteria with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Falagas, M.E.; Skalidis, T.; Vardakas, K.Z.; Legakis, N.J.; Hellenic Cefiderocol Study Group. Activity of cefiderocol (S-649266) against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria collected from inpatients in Greek hospitals. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017, 72, 1704–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Galani, I.; Nafplioti, K.; Adamou, P.; Karaiskos, I.; Giamarellou, H.; Souli, M.; Study, C. Nationwide epidemiology of carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from Greek hospitals, with regards to plazomicin and aminoglycoside resistance. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Papadimitriou-Olivgeris, M.; Bartzavali, C.; Lambropoulou, A.; Solomou, A.; Tsiata, E.; Anastassiou, E.D.; Fligou, F.; Marangos, M.; Spiliopoulou, I.; Christofidou, M. Reversal of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae epidemiology from blaKPC- to blaVIM-harbouring isolates in a Greek ICU after introduction of ceftazidime/avibactam. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019, 74, 2051–2054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Magiorakos, A.P.; Srinivasan, A.; Carey, R.B.; Carmeli, Y.; Falagas, M.E.; Giske, C.G.; Harbarth, S.; Hindler, J.F.; Kahlmeter, G.; Olsson-Liljequist, B.; et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2012, 18, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. EUCAST. Breakpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs and Zone Diameters. Version 10; EUCAST: Växjö, Sweden, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  26. Al-Hasan, M.N.; Lahr, B.D.; Eckel-Passow, J.E.; Baddour, L.M. Predictive scoring model of mortality in Gram-negative bloodstream infection. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 948–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Horan, T.C.; Andrus, M.; Dudeck, M.A. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am. J. Infect. Control 2008, 36, 309–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Singer, M.; Deutschman, C.S.; Seymour, C.W.; Shankar-Hari, M.; Annane, D.; Bauer, M.; Bellomo, R.; Bernard, G.R.; Chiche, J.D.; Coopersmith, C.M.; et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). Jama 2016, 315, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Queenan, A.M.; Bush, K. Carbapenemases: The versatile beta-lactamases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 20, 440–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Nordmann, P.; Poirel, L.; Carrer, A.; Toleman, M.A.; Walsh, T.R. How to detect NDM-1 producers. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 718–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier curve of survival probability of patients with PDR-Kp BSIs according to number of administrated antimicrobials. (A): all patients (p = 0.001); (B): patients with septic shock (p = 0.023).
Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier curve of survival probability of patients with PDR-Kp BSIs according to number of administrated antimicrobials. (A): all patients (p = 0.001); (B): patients with septic shock (p = 0.023).
Antibiotics 10 00076 g001
Table 1. Univariate analyses of predictors of 30-day mortality in patients with pandrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (PDR-Kp) bloodstream-infection (BSI) during intensive care unit (ICU) stay.
Table 1. Univariate analyses of predictors of 30-day mortality in patients with pandrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (PDR-Kp) bloodstream-infection (BSI) during intensive care unit (ICU) stay.
CharacteristicsAll PatientsPatients with Septic Shock
Survivors
(n = 70)
Non-Survivors (n = 45)pSurvivors (n = 23)Non-Survivors (n = 28)p
Demographics
Age (years)51.5 ± 18.662.1 ± 15.40.00359.3 ± 18.559.4 ± 15.90.947
Male gender49 (70.0%)26 (57.8%)0.22917 (73.9%)18 (64.3%)0.552
Comorbidities
Diabetes mellitus9 (12.9%)10 (22.2%)0.2072 (8.7%)6 (21.4%)0.269
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease3 (4.3%)7 (15.6%)0.0470 (0.0%)4 (14.3%)0.117
Chronic heart failure3 (4.3%)8 (17.8%)0.0230 (0.0%)4 (14.3%)0.117
Chronic kidney disease1 (1.2%)1 (2.2%)1.0001 (4.3%)0 (0.0%)0.451
Malignancy6 (8.6%)9 (20.0%)0.0932 (8.7%)4 (14.3%)0.678
Immunosuppressive therapy3 (4.3%)5 (11.1%)0.2591 (4.3%)2 (7.1%)1.000
Obesity20 (28.6%)16 (35.6%)0.5375 (21.7%)11 (39.3%)0.232
Charlson comorbidity index2.5 ± 3.24.8 ± 4.30.0022.8 ± 3.04.1 ± 3.80.292
Infection data
Prior surgery (within a month form infection onset)34 (48.6%)23 (51.1%)0.85010 (43.5%)16 (57.1%)0.404
Days at risk (from ICU admission to infection onset)27.4 ± 26.521.5 ± 21.40.16830.6 ± 35.221.6 ± 22.20.464
Isolate carrying blaKPC59 (84.3%)39 (86.7%)0.79418 (78.3%)25 (89.3%)0.442
Septic shock23 (32.9%)28 (62.2%)0.002---
Type of infection
Primary BSI34 (48.6%)19 (42.2%) 12 (52.2%)10 (35.7%)
Catheter-related BSI28 (40.0%)7 (15.6%) 8 (34.8%)4 (14.3%)
Othera8 (11.4%)19 (42.2%)<0.001b3 (13.0%)14 (50.0%)0.007b
Antimicrobial treatment
Monotherapy1 (1.4%)7 (15.6%) 0 (0.0%)2 (7.1%)
Combination of two antimicrobials9 (12.9%)13 (28.9%) 1 (4.3%)7 (25.0%)
Combination of three or more antimicrobials60 (85.7%)25 (55.6%)<0.00122 (95.7%)19 (67.9%)0.015
Carbapenem-including treatment66 (94.3%)40 (88.9%)0.31021 (91.3%)26 (92.9%)1.000
Colistin-including treatment64 (91.4%)38 (84.4%)0.36622 (95.7%)25 (89.3%)0.617
Aminoglycoside-including treatment47 (67.1%)20 (44.4%)0.02016 (69.6%)14 (50.0%)0.253
Tigecycline-including treatment48 (68.6%)24 (53.3%)0.11718 (78.3%)20 (71.4%)0.749
Corticosteroid administration during infection37 (52.9%)32 (71.1%)0.05513 (56.5%)21 (75.0%)0.234
Data are number (%) of patients or mean ± standard deviation. a Eleven intra-abdominal, eight ventilator-associated pneumonia, four nosocomial meningitis, three urinary tract, and one surgical site infection. b Comparison of other types of BSIs to primary and catheter-related BSIs
Table 2. Multivariate analyses of predictors of 14-day mortality in patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) during intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization.
Table 2. Multivariate analyses of predictors of 14-day mortality in patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) during intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization.
CharacteristicsAll PatientsPatients with Septic Shock
pOR (95% CI)pOR (95% CI)
Septic shock0.0025.2 (1.8–15.0)
Charlson comorbidity index0.0121.2 (1.0–1.3)
BSI other than primary or catheter-related0.0016.4 (2.0–20.2)0.0087.4 (1.7–33.0)
Combination of at least three antimicrobials<0.0010.105 (0.032–0.344)0.0290.083 (0.009–0.774)
CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio.
Table 3. Types of antimicrobial treatment and the associated 30-day mortality.
Table 3. Types of antimicrobial treatment and the associated 30-day mortality.
Treatment RegimenSurvivors
(n = 70)
Non-Survivors
(n = 45)
Mortality
(%)
One antimicrobial1787.5
Carbapenem1480.0
Colistin02100
Gentamicin01100
Two antimicrobials91359.1
Carbapenem + Aminoglycoside2133.3
Colistin + Tigecycline01100
Carbapenem + Tigecycline2133.3
Carbapenem + Colistin51066.7
Three antimicrobials30923.1
Colistin + Tigecycline + Aminoglycoside200.0
Carbapenem + Tigecycline + Aminoglycoside15316.7
Colistin + Tigecycline + Carbapenem10533.3
Colistin + Carbapenem + Aminoglycoside100.0
Colistin + Tigecycline + Ceftazidime/avibactam100.0
Colistin + Tigecycline + Fosfomycin1150.0
Four or more antimicrobials301634.8
Carbapenem + Colistin + Tigecycline + Aminoglycoside251537.5
Carbapenem + Colistin + Tigecycline + Aminoglycoside + other antimicrobial300.0
Double carbapenem + Colistin + Tigecycline + Aminoglycoside200.0
Carbapenem + Colistin + Tigecycline + Fosfomycin01100
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Papadimitriou-Olivgeris, M.; Bartzavali, C.; Georgakopoulou, A.; Kolonitsiou, F.; Papamichail, C.; Spiliopoulou, I.; Christofidou, M.; Fligou, F.; Marangos, M. Mortality of Pandrug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infections in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort of 115 Episodes. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10010076

AMA Style

Papadimitriou-Olivgeris M, Bartzavali C, Georgakopoulou A, Kolonitsiou F, Papamichail C, Spiliopoulou I, Christofidou M, Fligou F, Marangos M. Mortality of Pandrug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infections in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort of 115 Episodes. Antibiotics. 2021; 10(1):76. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10010076

Chicago/Turabian Style

Papadimitriou-Olivgeris, Matthaios, Christina Bartzavali, Alexandra Georgakopoulou, Fevronia Kolonitsiou, Chrisavgi Papamichail, Iris Spiliopoulou, Myrto Christofidou, Fotini Fligou, and Markos Marangos. 2021. "Mortality of Pandrug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infections in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort of 115 Episodes" Antibiotics 10, no. 1: 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10010076

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop