Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Patterns of animal and plant discoveries, distribution and endemism in India—implications on the effectiveness of the protected area network

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main focus in biodiversity is to conserve species diversity with specific emphasis on endemic species. This study has analysed the distribution of endemic floral and faunal species and their representativeness in protected areas of India. The number of endemic species has been estimated as 29787 (30.35%) and 12696 (26.33%) of Indian fauna and flora respectively. Overall, 2055 animal species and 1983 plant species were discovered from India from 2009 to 2018. The number of new distributional records to India reported during the last decade is 1242 species of plants and 1086 species of animals. The species discovery data indicate that there are more species yet to be described. According to the Cramer coefficients, the elevation was strongly correlated with endemism, followed by precipitation, temperature, land cover, and biogeographic zone. The study of endemic floral and faunal species including new species and protected areas provides the first prototype national gap analysis in assessing the representativeness of coverage of protected areas. The patterns of geographic distribution of endemic species and the gap analysis present a novel finding for conservation priorities. The highest number of new species was discovered from protected areas i.e. Periyar, Mundathurai, Khangchendzonga, Mehao, Thattekadu Bird, Eravikulam, Mukurthi, Saddle Peak, Malabar, and Anamalai. Although the total area protected is significant in India, their geographic coverage is almost the contrary to patterns of endemism. The results provide a valued direction for the advancement of management strategies for biodiversity conservation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akoglu, H. (2018). User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine, 18(3), 91–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfred, J. R. B., Das, A. K., & Sanyal, A. K. (1998). Faunal diversity in India. ENVIS Centre (p. 495). Kolkata: Zoological Survey of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. J., Bode, M., Venter, O., Barnes, M. D., McGowan, J., Runge, C. A., et al. (2015). Effective conservation requires clear objectives and prioritizing actions, not places or species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(32), E4342–E4342.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • BSI. (2009-2019). Plant Discoveries: New Genera, Species, and New Records. Kolkata: Botanical Survey of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christenhusz, M. J., & Byng, J. W. (2016). The number of known plants species in the world and its annual increase. Phytotaxa, 261(3), 201–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conde, D. A., Staerk, J., Colchero, F., da Silva, R., Schöley, J., Baden, H. M., et al. (2019). Data gaps and opportunities for comparative and conservation biology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(19), 9658–9664.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dar, G. H., Khuroo, A., Reddy, C. S., & Malik, A. H. (2012). Impediment to taxonomy and its impact on biodiversity science: an Indian perspective. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, India Section B. Biological Sciences, 82(2), 235–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deuti, K. (2013). Amphibia. Endemic Animals of India (Vertebrates): 1-235+ 26 Plates. Edited by Venkataraman, K., Chattopadhyay, A., Subramanian, K. A. Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata. pp 67-137.

  • Dinesh, K. P., Radhakrishnan, C., Gururaja, K. V., & Bhatta, G. K. (2009). An annotated checklist of amphibian of India with some insights into the patterns of species discoveries, distribution and endemism (Vol. 302). Kolkata: Zoological Survey of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, S. M., & Benstead, J. P. (2005). Updated estimates of biotic diversity and endemism in Madagascar. Oryx, 39, 73–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobohm, C., Janišová, M., Steinbauer, M., Landi, S., Field, R., Vanderplank, S., et al. (2019). Global endemics-area relationships of vascular plants. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 17, 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • http://bhuvan.nrsc.gov.in/. Accessed on 27th January 2020.

  • http://earth.google.com/. Accessed on 12th January 2020.

  • http://www.wiienvis.nic.in/Database/Protected_Area_854.aspx. Accessed on 8th January 2020.

  • https://worldclim.org/data/bioclim.html. Accessed on 28th January 2020.

  • https://www.scopus.com/. Accessed on 11th December 2020.

  • https://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm/. Accessed on 11th January 2020.

  • IUCN. (2019). Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 14. http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines. Accessed 27 Mar 2020.

  • Jenkins, C. N., Van Houtan, K. S., Pimm, S. L., & Sexton, J. O. (2015). US protected lands mismatch biodiversity priorities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(16), 5081–5086.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karthikeyan, S. (2000). A statistical analysis of flowering plants of India. Flora of India introductory volume part-II (pp. 201–217). Kolkata: Botanical Survey of India.

  • Kier, G., Kreft, H., Lee, T. M., Jetz, W., Ibisch, P. L., Nowicki, C., Mutke, J., & Barthlott, W. (2009). A global assessment of endemism and species richness across island and mainland regions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(23), 9322–9327.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liebetrau, A. M. (1983). Measures of association, volume 32 of quantitative applications in the social sciences. London: Sage Publications.

  • Lindon, H., Gardiner, L. M., Brady, A., & Vorontsova, M. S. (2015). Fewer than three percent of land plants named by women: author gender over 260 years. Taxon, 64, 209–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MOEF. (1998). Implementation of Article 6 of the Convention on Biological Diversity in India. National Report. MOEF, Government of India, Delhi, India.

  • Padhye, A., Shelke, S., & Dahanukar, N. (2012). Distribution and composition of butterfly species along the latitudinal and habitat gradients of the Western Ghats of India. Check List, 8, 1196–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, S. L., Jenkins, C. N., Abell, R., Brooks, T. M., Gittleman, J. L., Joppa, L. N., et al. (2014). The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science, 344(6187), 1246752.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, R. R. (1997). Diversity of Indian flora. Proceedings of Indian National Science Academy Part B, 63, 127–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, D. V., Chandra, K., & Devi, K. (2013). Endemic fauna of Andaman and Nicobar Islands Bay of Bengal. Kolkata: Zoological Survey of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, K. N., & Reddy, C. S. (2016). Flora of Telangana State, India (pp. 1–819). Dehra Dun: Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh ISBN: 978-81-211-0935-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, C. S., Prasad, P. R. C., Murthy, M. S. R., & Dutt, C. B. S. (2004). Census of endemic flowering plants of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany, 28(3), 712–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, C. S., Brahmam, M., & Raju, V. S. (2006). Conservation prioritization of endemic plants of Eastern Ghats, India. Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany, 30(4), 755–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, C. S., Pattanaik, C., Reddy, K. N., & Raju, V. S. (2007). Census of endemic flowering plants of Kerala, India. Journal of Plant Sciences, 2(5), 489–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, C. S., Reddy, K. N., & Raju, V. S. (2008). Supplement to flora of Andhra Pradesh, India (pp. 1–148). New Delhi: Deep Publications ISBN: 81-85622-17-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, C. S., Jha, C. S., Diwakar, P. G., & Dadhwal, V. K. (2015). Nationwide classification of forest types of India using remote sensing and GIS. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187(12), 777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4990-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, C. S., Jha, C. S., Dadhwal, V. K., Harikrishna, P., Pasha, S. V., Satish, K. V., Dutta, K., Saranya, K. R. L., Rakesh, F., Rajashekar, G., & Diwakar, P. G. (2016). Quantification and monitoring of deforestation in India over eight decades (1930-2013). Biodiversity and Conservation, 25, 93–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, C. S., Saranya, K. R. L., Jha, C. S., Dadhwal, V. K., & Krishna Murthy, Y. V. N. (2017). Earth observation data for habitat monitoring in protected areas of India. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 8, 114–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, C. S., Joseph, A., Abraham, G. A., & Sabu, M. M. (2020). Micro hotspots of new species discoveries in India: flora and fauna. Current Science, 191(1), 1408–1410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, A. S., Andelman, S. J., Bakarr, M. I., Boitani, L., Brooks, T. M., Cowling, R. M., et al. (2004). Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature, 428(6983), 640–643.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, P. S., Kushwaha, S. P. S., Murthy, M. S. R., Roy, A., Kushwaha, D., Reddy, C. S., Behera, M. D., Padalia, H., Mathur, V. B., Singh, S., Jha, C. S., & Porwal, M. C. (2012). Biodiversity characterisation at landscape level: national assessment (pp. 1–254). Dehra Dun: Indian Institute of Remote Sensing ISBN 81-901418-8-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, P., Karthikeyan, K., Lakshminarasimhan, P., & Dash, S. S. (2015). Endemic vascular plants of India. Kolkata: Botanical Survey of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • SOS. (2009). State of Observed Species Report. International Institute for Species Exploration. Arizona State University. www.species.asu.edu. Accessed 27 Mar 2020.

  • Trisurat, Y. (2007). Applying gap analysis and a comparison index to protected areas in Thailand. Environmental Management, 39, 235–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • vander Werff, H., & Consiglio, T. (2004). Distribution and conservation significance of endemic species of flowering plants in Peru. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13(9), 1699–1713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman, K., Chattopadhyay, A., & Subramanian, K. A.. (Editors). (2013). Endemic Animals of India (Vertebrates): 1-235 + 26 Plates. Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata.

  • Wollenberg, K. C., Vieites, D. R., Van Der Meijden, A., Glaw, F., Cannatella, D. C., & Vences, M. (2008). Patterns of endemism and species richness in Malagasy cophyline frogs support a key role of mountainous areas for speciation. International Journal of Organic Evolution, 62(8), 1890–1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • www.ipni.org/stats.html. Accessed on 12th February, 2020.

  • ZSI. (2009-2019). Animal discoveries - new species and new records. Zoological Survey of India. Kolkata.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been carried out as part of a project on ‘Biodiversity characterisation at community level in India using Earth observation data’. We gratefully acknowledge the Department of Biotechnology and Department of Space, Government of India for supporting this research. We are grateful to the Director, NRSC, Deputy Director, RSA, NRSC, Hyderabad and Director, Indian Institute of Information Technology and Management – Kerala for providing all the necessary support to carry out the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Forest Biodiversity and Ecology Division, National Remote Sensing Centre, Indian Space Research Organisation, Balanagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500 037, India

    C. Sudhakar Reddy, Anuja Joseph, Gija Anna Abraham & Minu Merin Sabu

  2. Indian Institute of Information Technology and Management - Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 695 581, India

    Anuja Joseph, Gija Anna Abraham & Minu Merin Sabu

Authors
  1. C. Sudhakar Reddy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anuja Joseph
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gija Anna Abraham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Minu Merin Sabu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Sudhakar Reddy.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reddy, C.S., Joseph, A., Abraham, G.A. et al. Patterns of animal and plant discoveries, distribution and endemism in India—implications on the effectiveness of the protected area network. Environ Monit Assess 193, 62 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08820-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08820-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation