Skip to main content
Log in

Yeast and bacteria co-culture-based lipid production through bioremediation of palm oil mill effluent: a statistical optimization

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present study, a co-culture of yeast (Lipomyces starkeyi) and bacterium (Bacillus cereus) was used to optimize lipid accumulation capability and simultaneous treatment of wastewater using palm oil mill effluent (POME) as a carbon source. The influence of process parameters (i.e., inoculum composition, pH, temperature, and time) on the lipid accumulation and the chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal were optimized using design of experiments (DoE) as a statistical tool. The DoE results suggested that the maximum lipid accumulation of 2.95 g/L and COD removal efficiency of 86.54% could be obtained while the inoculum composition, pH, temperature, and incubation time were 50:50, 6.50, 32.5 °C, and 90 h, respectively. The predicted results were very close to the experimental results (< 5% deviation); hence, the proposed model could be useful to predict the lipid accumulation and COD removal performance of a yeast and bacteria co-culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Naik SN, Goud VV, Rout PK, Dalai AK (2010) Production of first and second generation biofuels: a comprehensive review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14(2):578–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yousuf A, Sultana S, Monir MU, Karim A, Rahmaddulla SRB (2017) Social business models for empowering the biogas technology. Energy Sources, Part B 12(2):99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Islam MA, Yousuf A, Karim A, Pirozzi D, Khan MR, Ab WZ (2018) Bioremediation of palm oil mill effluent and lipid production by Lipomyces starkeyi: a combined approach. J Clean Prod 172:1779–1787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nayak M, Karemore A, Sen R (2016) Performance evaluation of microalgae for concomitant wastewater bioremediation, CO2 biofixation and lipid biosynthesis for biodiesel application. Algal Res 16:216–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bala JD, Lalung J, Ismail N (2015) Studies on the reduction of organic load from palm oil mill effluent (POME) by bacterial strains. Int J Recyl Org Waste Agric 4(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Karim A, Islam MA, Mohammad Faizal CK, Yousuf A, Howarth M, Dubey BN et al (2018) Enhanced biohydrogen production from citrus wastewater using anaerobic sludge pretreated by an electroporation technique. Ind Eng Chem Res 58(2):573–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Karim A, Islam MA, Yousuf A, Khan MMR, Faizal CKM (2019) Microbial lipid accumulation through bioremediation of palm oil mill wastewater by Bacillus cereus. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 7(17):14500–14508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Islam MA, Karim A, Woon CW, Ethiraj B, Cheng CK, Yousuf A, Rahman Khan MM (2017) Augmentation of air cathode microbial fuel cell performance using wild type Klebsiella variicola. RSC Adv 7(8):4798–4805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gidden J, Denson J, Liyanage R, Ivey DM, Lay JO (2009) Lipid compositions in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis during growth as determined by MALDI-TOF and TOF/TOF mass spectrometry. Int J Mass Spectrom 283(1):178–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pirozzi D, Fiorentino N, Impagliazzo A, Sannino F, Yousuf A, Zuccaro G, Fagnano M (2015) Lipid production from Arundo donax grown under different agronomical conditions. Renew Energy 77:456–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Karim A, Gerliani N, Aïder M (2020) Kluyveromyces marxianus: an emerging yeast cell factory for applications in food and biotechnology. Int J Food Microbiol 333:108818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kendrick A, Ratledge C (1992) Lipid formation in the oleaginous mould Entomophthora exitalis grown in continuous culture: effects of growth rate, temperature and dissolved oxygen tension on polyunsaturated fatty acids. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 37(1):18–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dong T, Knoshaug EP, Pienkos PT, Laurens LM (2016) Lipid recovery from wet oleaginous microbial biomass for biofuel production: a critical review. Appl Energy 177:879–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Karim A, Islam MA, Khalid ZB, Faizal, CKM, Khan, MMR, Yousuf A. (2020) Microalgal cell disruption and lipid extraction techniques for potential biofuel production. Microalgae Cultivation for Biofuels Production. Elsevier, p. 129-47

  15. Garay LA, Boundy-Mills KL, German JB (2014) Accumulation of high-value lipids in single-cell microorganisms: a mechanistic approach and future perspectives. J Agric Food Chem 62(13):2709–2727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tapia E, Anschau A, Coradini AL, Franco TT, Deckmann AC (2012) Optimization of lipid production by the oleaginous yeast Lipomyces starkeyi by random mutagenesis coupled to cerulenin screening. AMB Express 2(1):64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Brigham CJ, Kurosawa K, Rha C, Sinskey AJ (2011) Bacterial carbon storage to value added products. J Microb Biochem Technol 2011:S3

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar M, Sundaram S, Gnansounou E, Larroche C, Thakur IS (2018) Carbon dioxide capture, storage and production of biofuel and biomaterials by bacteria: a review. Bioresour Technol 247:1059–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheirsilp B, Suwannarat W, Niyomdecha R (2011) Mixed culture of oleaginous yeast Rhodotorula glutinis and microalga Chlorella vulgaris for lipid production from industrial wastes and its use as biodiesel feedstock. New Biotechnol 28(4):362–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao P, Yu X, Li J, Tang X, Huang Z (2014) Enhancing lipid productivity by co-cultivation of Chlorella sp. U4341 and Monoraphidium sp. FXY-10. J Biosci Bioeng 118(1):72–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cai S, Hu C, Du S (2007) Comparisons of growth and biochemical composition between mixed culture of alga and yeast and monocultures. J Biosci Bioeng 104(5):391–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cheah WY, Show PL, Juan JC, Chang J-S, Ling TC (2018) Waste to energy: the effects of Pseudomonas sp. on Chlorella sorokiniana biomass and lipid productions in palm oil mill effluent. Clean Techn Environ Policy 20(9):2037–2045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. O’Reilly A, Scott J (1995) Defined coimmobilization of mixed microorganism cultures. Enzym Microb Technol 17(7):636–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Abdelhamid SA, Hussein AA, Asker MS, El Sayed OH, Mohamed SS (2019) Optimization of culture conditions for biodiesel production from Egyptian isolate Penicillium commune NRC2016. Bull Natl Res Cent 43(1):15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shoaib A, Bhran A, Rasmey A-H, Mikky Y (2018) Optimization of cultural conditions for lipid accumulation by Aspergillus wentii Ras101 and its transesterification to biodiesel: application of response surface methodology. 3 Biotech 8(10):417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Subhash GV, Mohan SV (2014) Lipid accumulation for biodiesel production by oleaginous fungus Aspergillus awamori: influence of critical factors. Fuel 116:509–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang Y, Yang Y, Ma F, Xuan L, Xu Y, Huo H, Zhou D, Dong S (2015) Optimization of Chlorella vulgaris and bioflocculant-producing bacteria co-culture: enhancing microalgae harvesting and lipid content. Lett Appl Microbiol 60(5):497–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rajendhran J, Krishnakumar V, Gunasekaran P (2002) Optimization of a fermentation medium for the production of Penicillin G acylase from Bacillus sp. Lett Appl Microbiol 35(6):523–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Madani S, Gheshlaghi R, Mahdavi MA, Sobhani M, Elkamel A (2015) Optimization of the performance of a double-chamber microbial fuel cell through factorial design of experiments and response surface methodology. Fuel 150:434–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ranjan D, Mishra D, Hasan S (2011) Bioadsorption of arsenic: an artificial neural networks and response surface methodological approach. Ind Eng Chem Res 50(17):9852–9863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Savic I, Gajic D, Stojiljkovic S, Savic I, Di Gennaro S (2014) Modelling and optimization of methylene blue adsorption from aqueous solution using bentonite clay. Comput-Aided Chem Eng: Elsevier 33:1417–1422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Federation WE, Association APH (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association (APHA), Washington

    Google Scholar 

  33. Islam MA, Woon CW, Ethiraj B, Cheng CK, Yousuf A, Khan MMR (2016) Ultrasound driven biofilm removal for stable power generation in microbial fuel cell. Energy Fuel 31(1):968–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Karim A, Yousuf A, Islam MA, Naif YH, Faizal CKM, Alam MZ, Pirozzi D (2018) Microbial lipid extraction from Lipomyces starkeyi using irreversible electroporation. Biotechnol Prog 34(4):838–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mishra P, Ameen F, Zaid RM, Singh L, Ab Wahid Z, Islam MA et al (2019) Relative effectiveness of substrate-inoculum ratio and initial pH on hydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent: kinetics and statistical optimization. J Clean Prod 228:276–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ghafari S, Aziz HA, Isa MH, Zinatizadeh AA (2009) Application of response surface methodology (RSM) to optimize coagulation–flocculation treatment of leachate using poly-aluminum chloride (PAC) and alum. J Hazard Mater 163(2):650–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Venkataraman A, Rosenbaum MA, Perkins SD, Werner JJ, Angenent LT (2011) Metabolite-based mutualism between Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 and Enterobacter aerogenes enhances current generation in bioelectrochemical systems. Energy Environ Sci 4(11):4550–4559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim C, Song YE, Lee CR, Jeon B-H, Kim JR (2016) Glycerol-fed microbial fuel cell with a co-culture of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 and Klebsiella pneumonae J2B. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 43(10):1397–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Islam MA, Karim A, Mishra P, Dubowski JJ, Yousuf A, Sarmin S et al (2020) Microbial synergistic interactions enhanced power generation in co-culture driven microbial fuel cell. Sci Total Environ 738:140138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cheah WY, Show PL, Juan JC, Chang J-S, Ling TC (2018) Enhancing biomass and lipid productions of microalgae in palm oil mill effluent using carbon and nutrient supplementation. Energy Convers Manag 164:188–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Islam MA, Ong HR, Ethiraj B, Cheng CK, Khan MMR (2018) Optimization of co-culture inoculated microbial fuel cell performance using response surface methodology. J Environ Manag 225:242–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang R, Xue S, Zhang D, Zhang Q, Wen S, Kong D, Yan C, Cong W (2015) Construction and characteristics of artificial consortia of Scenedesmus obliquus-bacteria for S. obliquus growth and lipid production. Algal Res 12:436–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lilly VG, Barnett HL. (1951) Physiology of the fungi. Physiology of the fungi

  44. Sadabad HR, Gholikandi GB (2017) Harvesting direct electricity from municipal waste-activated sludge simultaneous with its aerobic stabilization process: investigation and optimization. J Environ Chem Eng 5(1):1174–1185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhao S, Wang Y-L, Li T, Zhang S-L, Cong F-D (2017) Exploration on mixed cultivation of Lactobacillus, yeast and Bacillus subtilis. Chem Biomol Eng 1(2):45

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ali TH, El-Gamal MS, El-Ghonemy DH, Awad GE, Tantawy AE (2017) Improvement of lipid production from an oil-producing filamentous fungus, Penicillium brevicompactum NRC 829, through central composite statistical design. Ann Microbiol 67(9):601–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Fakas S, Galiotou-Panayotou M, Papanikolaou S, Komaitis M, Aggelis G (2007) Compositional shifts in lipid fractions during lipid turnover in Cunninghamella echinulata. Enzym Microb Technol 40(5):1321–1327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ali TH, El-Ghonemy DH (2014) Optimization of culture conditions for the highest lipid production from some oleaginous fungi for biodiesel preparation. Asian J Appl Sci:2(05)

Download references

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE), Malaysia, through Universiti Malaysia Pahang (FRGS RDU 160150 and PRGS 180317).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Che Ku Mohammad Faizal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 242 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karim, A., Islam, M.A., Mishra, P. et al. Yeast and bacteria co-culture-based lipid production through bioremediation of palm oil mill effluent: a statistical optimization. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 13, 2947–2958 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01275-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01275-6

Keywords

Navigation