Skip to main content
Log in

Results of Long-Term Observations on Stationary Transects in the Volga–Akhtuba Floodplain

  • Published:
Biology Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By the beginning of the 1970s, only two large regions with natural vegetation, namely the Volga–Akhtuba floodplain and the Volga delta, had remained in the Volga River valley. The largest part of the remaining valley had been converted into a cascade of reservoirs. The conservation of meadow, marsh, and forest plant communities in the lower reaches of the Volga River located in the semi-desert and desert zones is due to regular water releases of the Volgograd hydroelectric power station downstream. These artificial water discharges into the Lower Volga valley in the spring–summer period have taken the place of natural floods. However, in the conditions of regulated water flow, the rise in the water level decreased during floods and the duration of flooding of the floodplain ecotopes shortened. The river channel deepened along a 100-km river section in the near-dam part of the Volgograd hydroelectric power station in the northern part of the floodplain. These dams hinder water flow to the Akhtuba–Volga floodplain during spring and summer floods. They surround agricultural lands with artificial irrigation systems and settlements in the floodplain. The recreational use of the Lower Volga valley has increased in the past few decades. Before the construction of the largest Volga hydroelectric complexes (the Kama, Gorky, Kuibyshev, Volgograd, and Saratov ones) in 1954–1955, five geobotanical transects were laid out in the course of the Caspian expedition of Moscow State University. Subsequently, four of the transects were surveyed in 1982 and 2008 –2013. It was established that xerophytization and ruderalization of vegetation occurred on all transects. These phenomena were not similar in different sections of the floodplain. They were most pronounced near the Volgograd Hydroelectric Power Station and in the places of narrowing of the valley. The reduction in the height and duration of floods after the regulation of the water flow, high local grazing, and recreation pressure is the main reason for xerophytization and ruderalization of vegetation. Among the invasive species, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Conyza canadensis, Bidens frondosa, and Xanthium strumarium s.l. play the most important role in changes in the vegetative cover of the Volga–Akhtuba floodplain. Thus, not all phenomena related to the dynamics of the vegetation and flora in the Volga–Akhtuba floodplain were caused by restructuring of the Volga hydrological regime after regulation of its water flow. The invasion of alien plants, increased recreation load, and changes in the economic use of the vegetation cover in the territory have played a particular role in this process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Atlas ruslovoi morfodinamiki Nizhnei Volgi (Volgograd – Astrakhan) (Atlas of the Lower Volga Channel Mophodynamics (Volgogrd–Astrakhan)), Korotaev, V.N., Babich, D.B., and Chalov, R.S., Eds., Moscow: Mosk. Univ., 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bolgov, M.V. and Demin, A.P., Water-management and environmental problems of the Lower Volga and ways to their solution, Water Resour., 2018, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 297–305. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0321059618020116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bondareva, V.V. and Golub, V.B., Dynamics of vegetation in the Volga–Akhtuba Floodplain (by the example of a transect near the settlement of Bolkhuny), Biol. Bull. (Moscow), 2016, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 1370–1376. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359016100022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chytrý, M., Tichý, L., Holt, J., and Botta-Dukát, Z., Determination of diagnostic species with statistical fidelity measures, J. Veget. Sci., 2002, vol. 13, pp. 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02025.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Flora Europaea on CD-ROM, Tutin, T.G., Heywood, V.H., Burges, N.A., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M., and Webb, D.A., Eds., Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001, vols. 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Golub, V.B., Using vegetation relevés as a sample collection for classification of plant communities, Rastit. Rossii, 2011, no.17–18, pp. 70–83.

  7. Golub, V.B., Barmin, A.N., Iolin, M.M., Starichkova, K.A., Sorokin, A.N., Sharova, I.S., and Nikolaychuk, L.F., Estimation of vegetation dynamics along the transect in the southern part of the Volga–Akhtuba floodplain near the Khosheutovo Village, Izv. Samar. Nauchn. Tsentra Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2011, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 107–113.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Golub, V.B., Bondareva, V.V., Sorokin, A.N., and Nikolaychuk, L.F., Plant communities dominated by reed (Phragmites australis Agg.) in the Lower Volga valley, Rastit. Rossii, 2015, no. 26, pp. 26–37.

  9. Gorelits, O.V. and Zemlyanov, I.V., Modern mechanism of flooding the territory of the Volga–Akhtuba floodplain during the flood period (within the Volgograd oblast), Nauchn. Potents. Region. Sluzh. Modern., 2013, no. 2 (5), pp. 9–18.

  10. Gorelits, O.V., Zemlyanov, I.V., and Sinenko, L.G., Estimation of the morphometric characteristics of the channel when planning activities for water supply in the Lower Volga region, in Upravlenie vodno-resursnymi sistemami v ekstremal’nykh usloviyakh: sbornik dokladov mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii (Management of Water-Resource Systems under Extreme Conditions: Collection of Reports of International Conference), Moscow: Feder. Gidrogenerir. Komp. GIDROOKS, 2008, pp. 306–307.

  11. Iolin, M.M., Sorokin, A.N., Starichkova, K.A., Barmin, A.N., Nikolaichuk, L.F., and Golub, V.B., Vegetation dynamics along a transect in the Volga–Akhtuba floodplain near the Kapustin Yar Village, Povolzh. Ekol. Zh., 2011, no. 4, pp. 431–442.

  12. Kapitonova, O.A., Synopsis of macrophyte flora of the Vyatka–Kama Cis-Urals, Fitoraznoobr. Vostochn. Evropy, 2015, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 4–85.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ramensky, L.G., Uchet i opisanie rastitel’nosti (na osnove proektivnogo metoda) (Accounting and Description of Vegetation (Based on the Projective Method)), Moscow, VASKhNIL, 1937.

  14. Ramensky, L.G., Tsatsenkin, L.G., Chizhikov, O.N., and Antipin, N.A., Ekologicheskaia otsenka kormovykh ugodii po rastitel’nomu pokrovu (Ecological Assessment of Forage Lands by the Vegetation Cover), Moscow: Sel’khozgiz, 1956.

  15. Sorokin, A.N., Barmin, A.N., Iolin, M.M., Starichkova, K.A., Nikolaychuk, L.F., and Golub, V.B., Indication of environment changes on a transect in the Volga–Akhtuba floodplain near the Kapustin Yar Village by using Ramensky’s indicator values and DCA ordination, Vestn. Volzh. Univ. im. V. N. Tatishcheva, Ser. Ekol., 2010, no. 10, pp. 74–80.

  16. Starichkova, K.A., Barmin, A.N., Iolin, M.M., Sharova, I.S., Sorokin, A.N., and Nikolaichuk, L.F., Estimate of vegetation dynamics along transect in the northern part of the Volga–Akhtuba floodplain. Arid. Ekosist., 2009, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 36–48.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tarasov, M.N. and Beschetnova, E.I., Hydrochemistry of the Lower Volga during the Runoff Regulation (1935–1980), Gidrokhim. Mater., 1987, vol. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tichý, L., JUICE, software for vegetation classification, J. Veget. Sci., 2002, vol. 13, pp. 451–453. doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02069.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tichý, L., Chytrý, M., and Bruelheide, H., Statistical determination of diagnostic species for site groups of unequal size, J. Veget. Sci., 2006, vol. 17, pp. 809–818. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2006.tb02504.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsatsenkin, I.A., Vegetation and natural forage resources of the Volga–Akhtuba Floodplain and Volga Delta, in Priroda i sel’skoe khoziaistvo Volgo-Akhtubinskoi doliny i del’ty r. Volgi (Nature and Agriculture of the Volga–Akhtuba Valley and the Volga Delta), Moscow: Mosk. Univ., 1962, pp. 118–192.

  21. Zaitsev, A.A., Ivanov, V.V., Korotaev, V.N., Labutina, I.A., Luk’yanova, S.A., Tszunsyan’ Li, Rimskii-Korsakov, N.A., Rychagov, G.I., Svitoch, A.A., Sidorchuk, A.Yu., Sychev, V.A., and Chernov, A.V., Nizhniaia Volga: geomorfologiia, paleogeografiia i ruslovaia morfodinamika (Lower Volga: Geomorphology, Paleogeography and Channel Morphodynamics). Moscow, GEOS Publ., 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zelený, D. and Tichý, L., Linking JUICE and R: new developments in visualization of unconstrained ordination analysis, in 18th Workshop of European Vegetation Survey in Rome, Roma: La Sapienza Univerzita Publ. House, 2009, p. 123.

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 18-44-342001 r_mk “Estimation of the Dynamics of Vegetation Cover in the Volga–Akhtuba Floodplain as an Indicator of Ecological Processes.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to V. B. Golub or M. V. Maltsev.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This article does not contain any studies involving animals or human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Translated by N. Ruban

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Golub, V.B., Chuvashov, A.V., Bondareva, V.V. et al. Results of Long-Term Observations on Stationary Transects in the Volga–Akhtuba Floodplain. Biol Bull Russ Acad Sci 47, 1309–1317 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359020100064

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359020100064

Navigation