Abstract
This paper presents the interpretation of ground motions and comparison of site response analysis due to the 2007 Bengkulu–Mentawai earthquakes in Mukomuko regency, Bengkulu Province, Indonesia. Mukomuko regency was reported as the most impacted area during the earthquakes. The recorded ground motions of the Bengkulu–Mentawai earthquakes were analysed to obtain the interpretation of ground motions. Furthermore, the site response analysis to the sites in Mukomuko regency was performed to observe the spectral acceleration. The results showed that the first aftershock tends to have more played the key role in yielding the damage in Mukomuko regency. It was shown by the high level of Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) and the high ground motion parameters resulted by the first aftershock. The comparison of spectral acceleration showed that spectral acceleration of first aftershock is critical at a short period. The result also showed that the propagated seismic waves could amplify at ground surface. In general, the results of this study could provide a better understanding of earthquake impact in Mukomuko regency, Indonesia.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ, Kamai R (2014) Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions. Earthquake Spectra 30(3):1025–1055. https://doi.org/10.1193/070913EQS198M
Adampira M, Alielahi H, Panji M, Koohsari H (2014) Comparison of equivalent linear and nonlinear methods in seismic analysis of liquefiable site response due to near-fault incident waves: a case study. Arab J Geosci 8(5):3103–3118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1399-6
Ansal A, Tönük G, Kurtuluş A, Çetiner B (2012) Effect of spectra scaling on site specific design earthquake characteristics based on 1D site response analysis. In: Proceedings of 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, 24-28 October
Arias A (1970) A measure of earthquake intensity. In: Hansen R (ed) Seismic design for nuclear power plants, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts, USA
Bardet JP, Tobita T (2001) NERA: a computer program for nonlinear earthquake site response analyses of layered soil deposits. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California, California, USA
Bommer JJ, Martinez-Pereira A (1998) The effective duration of earthquake strong motion. J Earthq Eng 3(2):127–172
Boore DM, Bommer JJ (2005) Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25(2):93–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.10.007
Centre of Earthquake Strong Motion Data (CESMD) (2017) Earthquake data of the 2007 Sumatra earthquake for Sikuai Island data. CESMD. https://www.strongmotioncenter.org. Accessed on 13 April 2017
Chung DH, Bernreuter DL (1981) Regional relationships among earthquake magnitude scales. Rev Geophys 19(4):649–663. https://doi.org/10.1029/RG019i004p00649
Douglas J, Aochi H (2008) A survey of techniques for predicting earthquake ground motions for engineering purposes. Surv Geophys 29(3):187–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-008-9046-y
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI) (2007) Learning from earthquakes observation on the southern Sumatra earthquakes of September 12–13, 2007, EERI Special Report, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, California, USA. https://eeri.org/lfe/pdf/indonesia_south_sumatra_eeri_report.pdf. Accessed 2 January 2019
Elgamal A, Yang Z, Lu J (2015) Cyclic1D: a computer program for seismic ground response. Technical Report, TR-No. SSRP-06/05, University of California at San Diego, California, USA
Elia G, di Lernia A, Rouainia M (2019) Ground motion scaling for the assessment of the seismic response of a diaphragm wall. In: Silvestri F, Moraci N (eds) Earthquake geotechnical engineering for protection and development of environment and constructions (Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering), 1st edn. CRC Press, New York, Italy, pp 2249–2257
Finn WDL, Byrne PL, Martin GR (1976) Seismic response and liquefaction of sands. J Geotech Eng Div 102(GT8):841–856
Finn WDL, Martin GR, Lee MKW (1978) Comparison of dynamic analyses for saturated sands. Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, ASCE, GT(S1): 472–491
Hancock J, Watson-Lamprey J, Abrahamson NA, Bommer JJ, Markatis A, McCoy E, Mendis R (2006) An improved method of matching response spectra of recorded earthquake ground motion using wavelets. J Earthq Eng 10(Special issue 1):67–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460609350629
Hancock J, Bommer JJ, Stafford PJ (2008) Numbers of scaled and matched accelerograms required for inelastic dynamic analyses. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37(14):1585–1607. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.827
Heo Y, Kunnath SK, Abrahamson N (2011) Amplitude-scaled versus spectrum-matched ground motions for seismic performance assessment. J Struct Eng 137(3):278–288. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000340
Iai S, Matsunaga Y, Kameoka T (1992) Strain space plasticity model for cyclic mobility. Soils Found 32(2):1–15. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.32.2_1
Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2006) Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26(1):115–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.023
Ishihara K, Tatsuoka F, Yasuda S (1975) Undrained deformation and liquefaction of and under cyclic stresses. Soils Found 15(1):29–44. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.15.29
Karnawati D, Satyarno I, Pramumijoyo S (2007) Learning from Bengkulu Earthquake: preliminary observation on impacts of September 12, 2007 earthquake in Bengkulu, West Sumatra, Indonesia. EERI Special Report. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, California, USA.https://www.eeri.org/lfe/pdf/indonesia_sept07_karnawati.pdf. Accessed 2 January 2019
Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Kurama YC, Farrow KT (2003) Ground motion scaling methods for different site conditions and structure characteristics. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 32(15):2425–2450. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.335
Ma J, Dong L, Zhao G, Li X (2019a) Focal mechanism of mining-induced seismicity in fault zones: a case study of Yongshaba mine in China. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52(9):3341–3352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01761-4
Ma J, Dong L, Zhao G, Li X (2019b) Ground motions induced by mining seismic events with different focal mechanisms. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 116:99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2019.03.009
Mase LZ (2015) Earthquake characteristic in Bengkulu. Teknosia 2(15):25–34 (in Indonesia)
Mase LZ (2017) Liquefaction potential analysis along coastal area of Bengkulu Province due to the 2007 Mw 8.6 Bengkulu earthquake. Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences 49(6):721–736. https://doi.org/10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2017.49.6.2
Mase LZ (2018a) Reliability study of spectral acceleration designs against earthquakes in Bengkulu City, Indonesia. International Journal of Technology 9(5):910–924. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v9i5.62
Mase LZ (2018b) One dimensional site response analysis of liquefaction potential along coastal area of Bengkulu City, Indonesia. Civil Engineering Dimension 20(2):57–69. https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.20.2.57-69
Mase LZ (2018c) Performance comparison of liquefaction potential analysis methods using SPT due to the 12 September 2007 8.6 Mw earthquke along coastal area of Bengkulu. Civil Engineering Journal 25(1):53–59. https://doi.org/10.5614/jts.2018.25.1.7 (In Indonesian)
Mase LZ, Somantri AK (2016) Analysis of liquefaction potential in Lempuing sub-district, Bengkulu City using critical maximum acceleration. Potensi 25(1):1–11 (in Indonesian)
Mase LZ, Tobita T, Likitlersuang S (2017) One-dimensional analysis of liquefaction potential: a case study in Chiang Rai Province, Northern Thailand. Journal of Japanese Society of Civil Engineers, Ser A1 (Structural Engineering/Earthquake Engineering) 73(4):I_135–I_147. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejseee.73.I_135
Mase LZ, Likitlersuang S, Tobita T (2018) Analysis of seismic ground response caused during strong earthquake in Northern Thailand. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 114:113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.006
Miller RD, Xia J, Park CB, Ivanov J (1999) Using MASW to map bedrock in Olathe, Kansas (expanded abstract). Journal of Society of Exploration Geophysicsics 1:433–436. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1821045
Misiniyati R, Mawardi, Besperi, Razali MR, Muktadir R (2013) Mapping of liquefaction potential of coastal area using cone penetration test in Lempuing, Bengkulu City. Inersia 5(2):1–8 (in Indonesian)
Misliniyati R, Mase LZ, Irsyam M, Hendriawan H, Sahadewa A (2019) Seismic response validation of simulated soil models to vertical array record during a strong earthquake. Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences 51(6):772–790. https://doi.org/10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2019.51.6.3
National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program (NEHRP) (1998) Recommended provisions for seismic regulation for new buildings and other structures 1997 edition. Technical Report. FEMA 302, Federation Emergency Management Agency, Washington, USA
Olafsson S, Remseth S, Sigbjornsson R (2001) Stochastic models for simulation of strong ground motion in Iceland. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 30(9):1305–1331. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.64
Parra E (1996) Numerical modelling of liquefaction and lateral ground deformation including cyclic mobility and dilative behaviour is soil systems, PhD Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, New York, USA
Pender M, Orense R, Wotherspoon L, Storie L (2016) Effect of permeability on the cyclic generation and dissipation of pore pressures in saturated gravel layers. Geotechnique 66(4):313–322. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.SIP.15.P.024
Prevost JH (1985) A simple plasticity theory for frictional cohesionless soils. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 4(1):9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-7277(85)90030-0
Schnabel PB, Lysmer J, Seed HB (1972) SHAKE: a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites, Report No. EERC 72-12, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division ASCE 97(SM9): 1249-273, September 1971
SNI 03–1726-2002 (2002) Standard of earthquake resistance design for building. Ministry of Public Works, Jakarta, Indonesia [in Bahasa]
SNI 03–1726-2012 (2012) Standard of earthquake resistance design for building. National Standardization Agency, Jakarta, Indonesia [in Bahasa]
Streeter VL, Wylie EB, Richart FE (1974) Soil motion computations by characteristics methods. J Geotech Geoenviron 100(GT3):247–263
Trifunac MD, Brady GA (1975) A study of the duration of strong earthquake ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65(3):581–626
Vemuri J, Kolluru S (2020) Evaluation of ground motion scaling techniques. In: Prashant A, Sachan A, Desai C (eds) Advances in computer methods and geomechanics, Lecture notes in civil engineering, vol 55. Springer, Singapore, pp 525–535
Wood HO, Neumann F (1931) Modified Mercalli Intensity scale of 1931. Bull Seismol Soc Am 21(4):277–283
Yang Z (2000) Numerical modelling of earthquake site response including dilation and liquefaction. PhD Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Columbia University, New York, USA
Youngs RR, Chiou SJ, Silva WJ, Humprey JR (1997) Strong ground motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):58–73. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.68.1.58
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank the Centre of Earthquake Strong Motion Database (CESMD) for the time history data of the 2007 Bengkulu–Mentawai earthquakes recorded at Sikuai Island, which was used in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Longjun Dong
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mase, L.Z. A note of ground motion interpretation and site response analysis during the 2007 Bengkulu–Mentawai earthquakes, Indonesia. Arab J Geosci 14, 99 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06344-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06344-0