Skip to main content
Log in

A note of ground motion interpretation and site response analysis during the 2007 Bengkulu–Mentawai earthquakes, Indonesia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the interpretation of ground motions and comparison of site response analysis due to the 2007 Bengkulu–Mentawai earthquakes in Mukomuko regency, Bengkulu Province, Indonesia. Mukomuko regency was reported as the most impacted area during the earthquakes. The recorded ground motions of the Bengkulu–Mentawai earthquakes were analysed to obtain the interpretation of ground motions. Furthermore, the site response analysis to the sites in Mukomuko regency was performed to observe the spectral acceleration. The results showed that the first aftershock tends to have more played the key role in yielding the damage in Mukomuko regency. It was shown by the high level of Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) and the high ground motion parameters resulted by the first aftershock. The comparison of spectral acceleration showed that spectral acceleration of first aftershock is critical at a short period. The result also showed that the propagated seismic waves could amplify at ground surface. In general, the results of this study could provide a better understanding of earthquake impact in Mukomuko regency, Indonesia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ, Kamai R (2014) Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions. Earthquake Spectra 30(3):1025–1055. https://doi.org/10.1193/070913EQS198M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adampira M, Alielahi H, Panji M, Koohsari H (2014) Comparison of equivalent linear and nonlinear methods in seismic analysis of liquefiable site response due to near-fault incident waves: a case study. Arab J Geosci 8(5):3103–3118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1399-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansal A, Tönük G, Kurtuluş A, Çetiner B (2012) Effect of spectra scaling on site specific design earthquake characteristics based on 1D site response analysis. In: Proceedings of 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, 24-28 October

  • Arias A (1970) A measure of earthquake intensity. In: Hansen R (ed) Seismic design for nuclear power plants, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts, USA

  • Bardet JP, Tobita T (2001) NERA: a computer program for nonlinear earthquake site response analyses of layered soil deposits. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California, California, USA

  • Bommer JJ, Martinez-Pereira A (1998) The effective duration of earthquake strong motion. J Earthq Eng 3(2):127–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Bommer JJ (2005) Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25(2):93–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centre of Earthquake Strong Motion Data (CESMD) (2017) Earthquake data of the 2007 Sumatra earthquake for Sikuai Island data. CESMD. https://www.strongmotioncenter.org. Accessed on 13 April 2017

  • Chung DH, Bernreuter DL (1981) Regional relationships among earthquake magnitude scales. Rev Geophys 19(4):649–663. https://doi.org/10.1029/RG019i004p00649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas J, Aochi H (2008) A survey of techniques for predicting earthquake ground motions for engineering purposes. Surv Geophys 29(3):187–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-008-9046-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI) (2007) Learning from earthquakes observation on the southern Sumatra earthquakes of September 12–13, 2007, EERI Special Report, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, California, USA. https://eeri.org/lfe/pdf/indonesia_south_sumatra_eeri_report.pdf. Accessed 2 January 2019

  • Elgamal A, Yang Z, Lu J (2015) Cyclic1D: a computer program for seismic ground response. Technical Report, TR-No. SSRP-06/05, University of California at San Diego, California, USA

  • Elia G, di Lernia A, Rouainia M (2019) Ground motion scaling for the assessment of the seismic response of a diaphragm wall. In: Silvestri F, Moraci N (eds) Earthquake geotechnical engineering for protection and development of environment and constructions (Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering), 1st edn. CRC Press, New York, Italy, pp 2249–2257

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn WDL, Byrne PL, Martin GR (1976) Seismic response and liquefaction of sands. J Geotech Eng Div 102(GT8):841–856

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn WDL, Martin GR, Lee MKW (1978) Comparison of dynamic analyses for saturated sands. Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, ASCE, GT(S1): 472–491

  • Hancock J, Watson-Lamprey J, Abrahamson NA, Bommer JJ, Markatis A, McCoy E, Mendis R (2006) An improved method of matching response spectra of recorded earthquake ground motion using wavelets. J Earthq Eng 10(Special issue 1):67–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460609350629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock J, Bommer JJ, Stafford PJ (2008) Numbers of scaled and matched accelerograms required for inelastic dynamic analyses. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37(14):1585–1607. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heo Y, Kunnath SK, Abrahamson N (2011) Amplitude-scaled versus spectrum-matched ground motions for seismic performance assessment. J Struct Eng 137(3):278–288. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iai S, Matsunaga Y, Kameoka T (1992) Strain space plasticity model for cyclic mobility. Soils Found 32(2):1–15. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.32.2_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idriss IM, Boulanger RW (2006) Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26(1):115–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.11.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishihara K, Tatsuoka F, Yasuda S (1975) Undrained deformation and liquefaction of and under cyclic stresses. Soils Found 15(1):29–44. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.15.29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karnawati D, Satyarno I, Pramumijoyo S (2007) Learning from Bengkulu Earthquake: preliminary observation on impacts of September 12, 2007 earthquake in Bengkulu, West Sumatra, Indonesia. EERI Special Report. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, California, USA.https://www.eeri.org/lfe/pdf/indonesia_sept07_karnawati.pdf. Accessed 2 January 2019

  • Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurama YC, Farrow KT (2003) Ground motion scaling methods for different site conditions and structure characteristics. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 32(15):2425–2450. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma J, Dong L, Zhao G, Li X (2019a) Focal mechanism of mining-induced seismicity in fault zones: a case study of Yongshaba mine in China. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52(9):3341–3352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01761-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma J, Dong L, Zhao G, Li X (2019b) Ground motions induced by mining seismic events with different focal mechanisms. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 116:99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2019.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mase LZ (2015) Earthquake characteristic in Bengkulu. Teknosia 2(15):25–34 (in Indonesia)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mase LZ (2017) Liquefaction potential analysis along coastal area of Bengkulu Province due to the 2007 Mw 8.6 Bengkulu earthquake. Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences 49(6):721–736. https://doi.org/10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2017.49.6.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mase LZ (2018a) Reliability study of spectral acceleration designs against earthquakes in Bengkulu City, Indonesia. International Journal of Technology 9(5):910–924. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v9i5.62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mase LZ (2018b) One dimensional site response analysis of liquefaction potential along coastal area of Bengkulu City, Indonesia. Civil Engineering Dimension 20(2):57–69. https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.20.2.57-69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mase LZ (2018c) Performance comparison of liquefaction potential analysis methods using SPT due to the 12 September 2007 8.6 Mw earthquke along coastal area of Bengkulu. Civil Engineering Journal 25(1):53–59. https://doi.org/10.5614/jts.2018.25.1.7 (In Indonesian)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mase LZ, Somantri AK (2016) Analysis of liquefaction potential in Lempuing sub-district, Bengkulu City using critical maximum acceleration. Potensi 25(1):1–11 (in Indonesian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mase LZ, Tobita T, Likitlersuang S (2017) One-dimensional analysis of liquefaction potential: a case study in Chiang Rai Province, Northern Thailand. Journal of Japanese Society of Civil Engineers, Ser A1 (Structural Engineering/Earthquake Engineering) 73(4):I_135–I_147. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejseee.73.I_135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mase LZ, Likitlersuang S, Tobita T (2018) Analysis of seismic ground response caused during strong earthquake in Northern Thailand. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 114:113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller RD, Xia J, Park CB, Ivanov J (1999) Using MASW to map bedrock in Olathe, Kansas (expanded abstract). Journal of Society of Exploration Geophysicsics 1:433–436. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1821045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misiniyati R, Mawardi, Besperi, Razali MR, Muktadir R (2013) Mapping of liquefaction potential of coastal area using cone penetration test in Lempuing, Bengkulu City. Inersia 5(2):1–8 (in Indonesian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Misliniyati R, Mase LZ, Irsyam M, Hendriawan H, Sahadewa A (2019) Seismic response validation of simulated soil models to vertical array record during a strong earthquake. Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences 51(6):772–790. https://doi.org/10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2019.51.6.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program (NEHRP) (1998) Recommended provisions for seismic regulation for new buildings and other structures 1997 edition. Technical Report. FEMA 302, Federation Emergency Management Agency, Washington, USA

  • Olafsson S, Remseth S, Sigbjornsson R (2001) Stochastic models for simulation of strong ground motion in Iceland. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 30(9):1305–1331. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parra E (1996) Numerical modelling of liquefaction and lateral ground deformation including cyclic mobility and dilative behaviour is soil systems, PhD Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, New York, USA

  • Pender M, Orense R, Wotherspoon L, Storie L (2016) Effect of permeability on the cyclic generation and dissipation of pore pressures in saturated gravel layers. Geotechnique 66(4):313–322. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.SIP.15.P.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prevost JH (1985) A simple plasticity theory for frictional cohesionless soils. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 4(1):9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-7277(85)90030-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnabel PB, Lysmer J, Seed HB (1972) SHAKE: a computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites, Report No. EERC 72-12, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division ASCE 97(SM9): 1249-273, September 1971

  • SNI 03–1726-2002 (2002) Standard of earthquake resistance design for building. Ministry of Public Works, Jakarta, Indonesia [in Bahasa]

  • SNI 03–1726-2012 (2012) Standard of earthquake resistance design for building. National Standardization Agency, Jakarta, Indonesia [in Bahasa]

  • Streeter VL, Wylie EB, Richart FE (1974) Soil motion computations by characteristics methods. J Geotech Geoenviron 100(GT3):247–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Trifunac MD, Brady GA (1975) A study of the duration of strong earthquake ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65(3):581–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Vemuri J, Kolluru S (2020) Evaluation of ground motion scaling techniques. In: Prashant A, Sachan A, Desai C (eds) Advances in computer methods and geomechanics, Lecture notes in civil engineering, vol 55. Springer, Singapore, pp 525–535

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wood HO, Neumann F (1931) Modified Mercalli Intensity scale of 1931. Bull Seismol Soc Am 21(4):277–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z (2000) Numerical modelling of earthquake site response including dilation and liquefaction. PhD Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Columbia University, New York, USA

  • Youngs RR, Chiou SJ, Silva WJ, Humprey JR (1997) Strong ground motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):58–73. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.68.1.58

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the Centre of Earthquake Strong Motion Database (CESMD) for the time history data of the 2007 Bengkulu–Mentawai earthquakes recorded at Sikuai Island, which was used in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lindung Zalbuin Mase.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Longjun Dong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mase, L.Z. A note of ground motion interpretation and site response analysis during the 2007 Bengkulu–Mentawai earthquakes, Indonesia. Arab J Geosci 14, 99 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06344-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06344-0

Keywords

Navigation