Automorphisms of Danielewski varieties
Introduction
We assume that the base field is an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero. Let V and W be affine algebraic varieties over . Generalized Zariski cancellation problem asks whether implies . In 1989 Danielewski [6] introduced a class of surfaces given by . Nowadays such varieties are called Danielewski surfaces. Danielewski surfaces corresponding to and provide a counterexample to the generalized Zariski cancellation problem. One of the possible ways to prove that varieties and are nonisomorphic is suggested by Makar-Limanov in [11], [12]. He computes the intersection of all kernels of locally nilpotent derivations in both cases and shows that, if , the intersection is the field , and if , the intersection is . This intersection later was named Makar-Limanov invariant.
Moreover, Makar-Limanov in [11], [12] computes generators of automorphism groups of Danielewski surfaces. This inspired a lot of works on automorphisms of Danielewski surfaces and their generalizations. In [5] Crachiola investigated automorphism groups of surfaces of the form over a field of arbitrary characteristic. In [8] Dubouloz and Poloni considered a more general class of surfaces , where and is a polynomial with coefficients in an arbitrary base field such that splits with simple roots. Generators of their automorphism groups were computed. In [14] classifications of varieties of the form up to isomorphism and up to automorphism of ambient affine 3-space are obtained. In [4] Bianchi and Veloso considered one more generalization, surfaces , where and For such surfaces it was proved that the Makar-Limanov invariant is . This allowed to compute generators of the automorphism group of the varieties .
In 2007, Dubouloz [7] considered another generalization of Danielewski surfaces. He introduced varieties given by equations of the form which was called Danielewski varieties. He proved that if and all , then the Makar-Limanov invariant of such a variety is equal to . Using this Dubouloz found counterexamples to generalized Zariski cancellation problem in arbitrary dimension.
In this paper we describe automorphism groups of Danielewski varieties. To do this we need to investigate automorphism groups of other classes of varieties. So, we proceed in three steps.
Sections 2 Derivations, 3 , 4 contain preliminaries and lemmas, which we use later.
First of all, in Section 5, we consider varieties of the form . There exists an -dimensional algebraic torus action on such a variety. We elaborate some technique, which shows that if all , then Z is rigid, that is it does not admit any nontrivial locally nilpotent derivations. Then we compute the generators of the automorphism group of Z, see Theorem 5.1. We prove that the automorphism group is a semidirect product of two groups. The first group multiply variables by invertible functions and the second one is a finite group permuting variables. If Z does not admit any invertible regular functions, is a linear algebraic group. Moreover, it is a finite extension of an algebraic torus. For generic variety Z, the automorphism group is a torus, but in special cases it has finite or discrete part, which can be rather large. We obtain criteria of commutativity, connectivity and solvability of .
Secondly, in Section 6, we investigate varieties of the form with all . Such varieties are particular cases of Danielewski varieties. In some sense these particular cases are the most interesting ones because they provide counterexamples to generalized Zariski cancellation problem. Using rigidity of Z we prove that the Makar-Limanov invariant of Y equals and all locally nilpotent derivations are replicas of a canonical one, see Definition 6.1. We compute generators of , see Proposition 6.3. The automorphism group of Y is generated by exponents of replicas of the canonical locally nilpotent derivation, the quasitorus acting by multiplying variables by constants, and swappings of variables with coinciding . Moreover, is isomorphic to a semidirect products of these subgroups, see Theorem 6.4. We prove that is never commutative and it is solvable if and only if there are no five variables with coinciding .
In Section 7, we use technique inspired by [12] to compute the group of automorphisms of an arbitrary Danielewski variety X. The main idea is to consider a filtration on and to prove that the associated graduate algebra is isomorphic to for some Y considered in Section 6. Then we prove that every automorphism of X respects this filtration, see Proposition 2.10. Using this we introduce a homomorphism . This allows to describe automorphisms of X using the description of automorphisms of Y, see Theorem 7.11. Again all locally nilpotent derivations on X are replicas of a canonical one, see Definition 7.1. The automorphism group of X is isomorphic to a semidirect product of commutative group consisting of exponents of all replicas of the canonical locally nilpotent derivation and a canonical group of X. The group is a finite extension of a torus. Every element of permutes the variables and multiplies them by constants. For generic variety X the group is trivial and is commutative. We prove that it is a criterium of commutativity of . Also we give a sufficient condition of its solvability.
The author is grateful to Ivan Arzhantsev and Alexander Gaifullin for useful discussions. He is also grateful to the referee for useful comments and suggestions.
Section snippets
Derivations
Let A be a commutative associative algebra over . A linear mapping is called a derivation if it satisfies the Leibniz rule for all . A derivation is locally nilpotent (LND) if for every there is a positive integer n such that . A derivation is semisimple if there exists a basis of A consisting of ∂-semi-invariants. Recall that is a ∂-semi-invariant if for some .
If we have an algebraic action of the additive group on A, we obtain a
m-suspensions
Let X be an affine algebraic variety. Given a nonconstant regular function , we can define a new affine variety called a suspension over X. In [13] infinitely transitivity of -action on the smooth locus of Y is proved in case . LNDs on suspensions are investigated in [3]. Recall that a variety is called flexible if the tangent space at every regular point is generated by tangent vectors to orbits of some -actions. In [1] it is proved that for an
m-suspensions over a line
In this section we investigate m-suspensions over a line. The results of this section we use in the next two sections to describe automorphism group of an m-suspension over a line, when all weights of the m-suspension are greater than one and when the unique weight equals one and all the others are greater than one. The second case is a particular case of Danielewski varieties.
During this section we use the following denotation , , . We can do a linear
Automorphisms of m-suspensions over a line with weights ≥2
In this section we give an explicit list of generators of automorphism group of an m-suspension over a line, when all weights of the m-suspension are greater than one. We obtain a decomposition of the automorphism group to a semidirect product of its subgroups. This allows to obtain a criteria for automorphism group of such an m-suspension to be commutative and solvable. During this section we denote , where , , and for all i we have . We assume that
Danielewski varieties with constant coefficients
During this section let , be an m-suspension over line with the unique weight equal to one and all other weights greater than one, i.e. for all . We assume that is a monic polynomial of degree with zero coefficient of . Such variety is a particular case of a Danielewski variety. We say that Y is a Danielewski variety with constant coefficients. We give an explicit lists of generators of automorphism group and describe as a semidirect product
Main results
During this section by X we denote a Danielewski variety where , for all we have , and for some polynomials .
There is a nontrivial LND of . Definition 7.1 Let us define the canonical LND on X by Remark 7.2 If all are constants, then Danielewski variety X is an m-suspension over a line considered in Section 6 and the canonical derivation coincides with the
References (15)
- et al.
Locally nilpotent derivations and automorphism groups of certain Danielewski surfaces
J. Algebra
(2017) - et al.
On a class of Danielewski surfaces in affine 3-space
J. Algebra
(2009) - et al.
Flexible varieties and automorphism groups
Duke Math. J.
(2013) - et al.
The automorphism group of a rigid affine variety
Math. Nachr.
(2017) - et al.
Flag varieties, toric varieties, and suspensions: three instances of infinite transitivity
Sb. Math.
(2012) On automorphisms of Danielewski surfaces
J. Algebraic Geom.
(2006)- W. Danielewski, On a cancellation problem and automorphism groups of affine algebraic varieties, Warsaw, Preprint,...
Cited by (10)
Modified Makar-Limanov and Derksen invariants
2024, Journal of Pure and Applied AlgebraOn generalised Danielewski and Asanuma varieties
2023, Journal of AlgebraIsotropy subgroups of some almost rigid domains
2023, Journal of Pure and Applied AlgebraMODIFIED DERKSEN INVARIANT
2023, arXiv
- 1
The author was supported by the Foundation for the Advancement of Theoretical Physics and Mathematics “BASIS”.