Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of seismicity of Karachi city in the context of modern building codes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spectral acceleration is representative of seismic hazard in modern building codes as well as an important parameter used in seismic design these days. Karachi, an economic artery of Pakistan, is located in the vicinity of an active tectonic setting, i.e., triple junction, with uncertain seismicity. Keeping in view the modern seismic design practices, efforts are required to evaluate the seismic hazard of Karachi city in terms of spectral acceleration. This study is focused on the estimation of seismic hazard for the metropolitan city of Karachi in the context of modern building codes. The seismic potential of around 800–900-km circle was considered a threat for the city, and 13 seismic zones (A-1 to A-13) were identified as seismic sources. A seismicity model based on Gutenberg-Richter law was developed, identifying A-1 and A-11 as zones of high seismicity. The ground attenuation model recommended for the Middle East region proposed by Akkar and Bommer was utilized for the computation of different ground motion scenarios. Short-period, SS, and 1-s, S1, spectral acceleration values for considered region were calculated as 1.37 m/s2 and 0.41 m/s2, respectively. In addition, peak ground acceleration (PGA) values for Karachi city were observed to be in a range of 0.7–0.77 m/s2. The results of this study provide bases for the preparation of seismic risk maps, the estimation of earthquake insurance premiums, seismic zonation for region lying on Arabian and Indian plates, and the preliminary site evaluation of critical facilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akkar S, Bommer JJ (2007) Empirical prediction equations for peak ground velocity derived from strong-motion records from Europe and the Middle East. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:511–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkar S, Bommer JJ (2010) Empirical equations for the prediction of PGA, PGV, and spectral accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean region, and the Middle East. Seismol Res Lett 81:195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldama-Bustos G, Bommer J, Fenton C, Stafford P (2009) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for rock sites in the cities of Abu Dhabi, Dubai and Ra’s Al Khaymah, United Arab Emirates. Georisk 3:1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Algermissen ST, Perkins DM (1976) A probabilistic estimate of maximum acceleration in rock in the contiguous United States. US Geological Survey, Reston, pp 76–416

  • Al-Heety EA (2011) Variation of b–value in the earthquake frequency–magnitude distribution with depth in the intraplate regions. Int J Basic Appl Sci 11:29–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Almadani S, Al-Amri A, Fnais M, Abdelrahman K, Ibrahim E, Abdelmoneim E (2015) Seismic hazard assessment for Yanbu metropolitan area, western Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci 8:9945–9958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys N, Simpson K (1996) Prediction of vertical response spectra in Europe. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25:401–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys N, Douglas J, Sarma S, Smit P (2005) Equations for the estimation of strong ground motions from shallow crustal earthquakes using data from Europe and the Middle East: horizontal peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration. Bull Earthq Eng 3:1–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE 7-05 A (2006) Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, standard ASCE 7. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)

  • Atkinson GM, Goda K (2011) Effects of seismicity models and new ground-motion prediction equations on seismic hazard assessment for four Canadian cities. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101:176–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BCP (2007) Building code of Pakistan, Ministry of Housing and Works Islamabad, Pakistan

  • Bender B, Perkins DM (1987) SEISRISK III: a computer program for seismic hazard estimation. vol 1772. US Government Printing Office

  • Bhatia SC, Kumar MR, Gupta HK (1999) A probabilistic seismic hazard map of India and adjoining regions. Ann Geophys 42(6):1153–1164

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R, Gaur VK, Molnar P (2001) Himalayan seismic hazard. Science 293:1442–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R, Lodi S, Hough S, Bukhary S, Khan AM, Rafeeqi S (2007) Seismic hazard in Karachi, Pakistan: uncertain past, uncertain future. Seismol Res Lett 78:601–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bommer JJ, Douglas J, Strasser FO (2003) Style-of-faulting in ground-motion prediction equations. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 1(2):171–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chingtham P, Tiwari A, Yadav AK (2019) Forecasting seismic activity rates in northwest Himalaya through multivariate autoregressive forecast of seismicity algorithm. Acta Geophys 67:465–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury P, Chopra S, Kumar MR (2018) A review of seismic hazard assessment of Gujarat: a highly active intra-plate region. Earth Sci Rev 187:205–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58:1583–1606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortés-Aranda J, Mugnier J-L, Jouanne F, Vassallo R, Carcaillet J, Awan AA (2017) Holocene shortening rates and seismic hazard assessment for the frontal Potwar Plateau, NW Himalaya of Pakistan: insights from 10Be concentrations on fluvial terraces of the Mahesian Anticline. Quat Int 462:75–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das S, Gupta ID, Gupta VK (2006) A probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of northeast India. Earthquake Spectra 22(1):1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deif A, el-Hussain I, al-Jabri K, Toksoz N, el-Hady S, al-Hashmi S, al-Toubi K, al-Shijbi Y, al-Saifi M (2013) Deterministic seismic hazard assessment for Sultanate of Oman. Arab J Geosci 6:4947–4960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdik M, Doyuran V, Akkaş N, Gülkan P (1985) A probabilistic assessment of the seismic hazard in Turkey. Tectonophysics 117:295–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genç G (2004) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Eskişehir. Thesis (Master), Middle East Technical University (METU)

  • Hamlaoui M, Vanneste K, Baddari K, Louail L, Vleminckx B, Demdoum A (2017) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in the northeastern part of Algeria. Arab J Geosci 10:238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanks TC, Cornell CA Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: a beginner’s guide. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium on Current Issues Related to Nuclear Power Plant Structures, Equipment and Piping, 1994. NC State Univ Raleigh., pp 1–1

  • Hassan HM, Panza GF, Romanelli F, ElGabry MN (2017) Insight on seismic hazard studies for Egypt. Eng Geol 220:99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBC I (2006) International building code International Code Council, Inc(formerly BOCA, ICBO and SBCCI) 4051:60478–65795

  • Idriss I (1985) Evaluating seismic risk in engineering practice. Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, San Francisco Publication of: Balkema (AA)

  • Ince Y, Kurnaz TF (2018) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of Kahramanmaras Province. Turkey Arab J Geosci 11:97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaiswal K, Sinha R (2007) Probabilistic seismic-hazard estimation for peninsular India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97(1B):318–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyner WB, Boore DM (1979) Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong-motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley. California, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71(6):2011–38

  • Khattri KN, Rogers AM, Perkins DM, Algermissen ST (1984) A seismic hazard map of India and adjacent areas. Tectonophysics 108:93–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kartal RF, Beyhan G, Keskinsezer A, Kadirioğlu FT (2014) Seismic hazard analysis of Mersin Province, Turkey using probabilistic and statistical methods. Arab J Geosci 7:4443–4459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukowski N, Schillhorn T, Flueh ER, Huhn K (2000) Newly identified strike-slip plate boundary in the northeastern Arabian Sea. Geology 28:355–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindholm C, Parvez I, Kühn D (2016) Probabilistic earthquake hazard assessment for Peninsular India. J Seismol 20:629–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan AK, Thakur VC, Sharma ML, Chauhan M (2010) Probabilistic seismic hazard map of NW Himalaya and its adjoining area. India Natural Hazards 53(3):443–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood K, Rehman Z, Farooq K, Memon SA (2016) One dimensional equivalent linear ground response analysis—a case study of collapsed Margalla Tower in Islamabad during 2005 Muzaffarabad earthquake. J Appl Geophys 130:110–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maiti SK, Nath SK, Adhikari MD, Srivastava N, Sengupta P, Gupta AK (2017) Probabilistic seismic hazard model of West Bengal, India. J Earthq Eng 21:1113–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire RK (1976) FORTRAN computer program for seismic risk analysis. US Geological Survey

  • Meletti C, Galadini F, Valensise G, Stucchi M, Basili R, Barba S, Vannucci G, Boschi E (2008) A seismic source zone model for the seismic hazard assessment of the Italian territory. Tectonophysics 450:85–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meletti C, Visini F, D’Amico V, Rovida A (2016) Seismic hazard in central Italy and the 2016 Amatrice earthquake Ann Geophys 59

  • Mohamed AE-EA, El-Hadidy M, Deif A, Elenean KA (2012) Seismic hazard studies in Egypt NRIAG. J Astron Geophys 1:119–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Monalisa, Khwaja AA, Jan MQ (2007) Seismic hazard assessment of the NW Himalayan fold-and-thrust belt, Pakistan, using probabilistic approach. J Earthq Eng 11:257–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouloud H, Badreddine S (2017) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in the Constantine region, northeast of Algeria. Arab J Geosci 10:156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulargia F, Stark PB, Geller RJ (2017) Why is probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) still used? Phys Earth Planet Inter 264:63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musson R (2009) Subduction in the Western Makran: the historian’s contribution. J Geol Soc 166:387–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nath SK, Thingbaijam KK (2012) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of India. Seismol Res Lett 83(1):135–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasir A, Lenhardt W, Hintersberger E, Decker K (2013) Assessing the completeness of historical and instrumental earthquake data in austria and the surrounding areas Aust J Earth Sci 106

  • Parvez IA, Vaccari F, Panza GF (2003) A deterministic seismic hazard map of India and adjacent areas. Geophys J Int 155:489–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen MD et al. (2008) Documentation for the 2008 update of the United States national seismic hazard maps. Geological Survey (US)

  • Puri N, Jain A (2019) Microzonation of seismic hazard for the state of Haryana, India. J Geol Soc India 94:297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putti SP, Devarakonda NS, Towhata I (2019) Estimation of ground response and local site effects for Vishakhapatnam, India. Nat Hazards 97:555–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramkrishnan R, Kolathayar S, Sitharam T (2019) Seismic hazard assessment and land use analysis of Mangalore City, Karnataka, India, J Earthq Eng:1–22

  • Rehman K, Paul WB (2020) Seismicity and seismic hazard parameters in and around Pakistan. J Seismol 24:635–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehman F, Alamri AM, El-Hady SM, Harbi HM, Atef AH (2017) Seismic hazard assessment and rheological implications: a case study selected for cities of Saudi Arabia along the eastern coast of Red Sea. Arab J Geosci 10:540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarwar F, Iqbal S, Qaisar M, Rehman A, Akhtar F, Raza SM (2016) Earthquake statistics and earthquake research studies in Pakistan. Open J Earthq Res 5:97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scordilis E (2006) Empirical global relations converting M S and m b to moment magnitude. J Seismol 10:225–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah BA, Sadiq MM, Memon SA, Rehman SKU (2019) Assessment of the seismicity of Peshawar region in line with the historical data and modern building codes (ASCE-07 & IBC-2006) J Earthq Eng:1–25

  • Shreyasvi C, Venkataramana K, Chopra S, Rout MM (2019) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Mangalore and its adjoining regions, a part of Indian Peninsular: an intraplate region. Pure Appl Geophys 176:2263–2297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomos G, Pinto A, Dimova S (2008) A review of the seismic hazard zonation in national building codes in the context of eurocode 8 JRC Scientific and Technical Reports

  • Stewart J et al. (2013) GEM-PEER task 3 project: selection of a global set of ground motion prediction equations

  • Vilanova SP, Fonseca JF (2007) Probabilistic seismic-hazard assessment for Portugal. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:1702–1717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeats RS, Sieh KE, Allen CR (1997) The geology of earthquakes. Oxford University Press, USA

  • Zahran HM, Sokolov V, El-Hadidy S (2019) Deterministic seismic hazard assessment for the Makkah region, western Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci 12:476

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Pakistan Meteorological Department (PMD) is acknowledged for sharing instrumental catalog and providing necessary training for the current study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NUST Institute of Civil Engineering (NICE), School of Civil and Environmental Engineering (SCEE), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Sector H-12, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan

    Abbas Haider & Zia ur Rehman

Authors
  1. Abbas Haider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zia ur Rehman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zia ur Rehman.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Abdullah M. Al-Amri

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haider, A., Rehman, Z.u. Evaluation of seismicity of Karachi city in the context of modern building codes. Arab J Geosci 14, 65 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-06462-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-06462-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation