Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:08:50.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Did Chartism Petition For? Mass Petitions in the British Movement for Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2019

Malcolm Chase
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chartism was in effect Britain’s civil rights movement and petitioning was at its heart: it defined who the Chartists were as well as the “other” against which they were implacably opposed. Its history has been effectively narrated around its three national petitions (1839, 1842, and 1848), and its decline almost habitually and directly linked to circumstances surrounding the last of these. More than 3.3 million people signed the 1842 National Petition. Chartism’s history after 1842 is partly one of how the State learned to manage the movement in general and petitioning in particular. The question posed by the title is deliberately ambiguous: What did the Chartists petition for and, equally, why did they bother? The first issue will be answered by a close reading of the three texts (surprisingly not undertaken by previous historians of the movement). The second will answered through an analysis of the wider uses of petitioning. The third issue addressed by this article is how petitioning constructed Chartism. In every contributing locality, canvassing was a major intervention in political life. The subscriptional community created by its petitions were “the people,” a term that clearly included not only men but also women and children. This was a different and wider meaning of the term “the people” from that used by Chartism’s opponents and it was a profound departure. Petitioning shaped, articulated, and mobilized the politics of a nascent working class, “banded together in one solemn and holy league” but excluded from economic and political power.

Type
Special Issue Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 43 , Issue 3: The Transformation of Petitioning , Fall 2019 , pp. 531 - 551
Copyright
© Social Science History Association, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archival Sources

Benbow, William (1832) Grand National Holiday and Congress of the Productive Classes &c. London: Benbow.Google Scholar
Birmingham Journal, June 9, 1838; August 25, 1838.Google Scholar
Charter, February 17, 1839; March 24, 1839; April 7, 1839; July 14, 1839.Google Scholar
Chartist Circular, May 14, 1842.Google Scholar
Chartist National Convention Papers, British Library Additional Manuscripts 34245A.Google Scholar
Companion to the Almanac and Year-book of General Information for 1850. London: Knight, 1849.Google Scholar
Companion to the Almanac and Year-book of General Information for 1853. London: Knight, 1852.Google Scholar
Correspondence and Papers of the General Convention of the Industrial Classes, British Library, Additional Manuscripts, 34245A.Google Scholar
Fife Herald, June 14, 1838; June 3, 1841.Google Scholar
Hansard, House of Commons Debates, 3rd series, May 2, 1842, vol. 62, col. 1376–81 (text of 1842 National Petition).Google Scholar
Hansard, House of Commons Debates, 3rd series, May 3, 1842, vol. 63, col. 33, 35, 70.Google Scholar
Home Office Criminal Petitions, Series 2, The National Archives, HO/18/21/01, parts 1–3.Google Scholar
Hone, William, and Cruickshank, George (1819) The Political House That Jack Built. London: William Hone.Google Scholar
John O’Groats Journal, September 7, 1838.Google Scholar
Leeds Times, May 11, 1839.Google Scholar
Leicestershire Mercury, November 10, 1838, November 13, 1841Google Scholar
McDouall’s Chartist and Republican Journal, May 25, 1841.Google Scholar
National Petition of the Industrious Classes (Leeds, 1842), copy in British Library Additional Manuscripts 27835, fol. 189.Google Scholar
Northern Liberator, July 20, 1839.Google Scholar
Northern Star, August 11, June, 16, 8, 1838; April 20, 1839; June 15, 1839; October 19, 1839; February 13, 1841; October 16, 1841; November 13, 1841; March 27, 1841; November 27, 1841; May 7, 1842; June 25, 1842; May 15, 1842; May 28, 1842; November 18, 1848; November 25, 1848; December 2, 1848; July 7, 1849; September 1, 1849.Google Scholar
Operative, January 27, 1839; April 28, 1839.Google Scholar
People’s Charter: Being the Outline of an Act to Provide for the Just Representation of the People of Great Britain and Ireland in the Commons House of Parliament. London: Hetherington – reprinted in Gammage, Robert (1894) The History of the Chartist Movement, from its commencement down to the present time, Part 1. London: Holyaoke, 1854.Google Scholar
People’s Journal, January 2, 1846.Google Scholar
Scotsman, June 16, 1838.Google Scholar
Select Committee on Petitions Relating to an Act for Settling Disputes between Masters and Workmen in Cotton Manufacture, Parliamentary Papers 1802–3, vol. VIII (889), June 16, 1803.Google Scholar
Select Committee on Bill for the Regulation of Factories, Parliamentary Papers 1831–2, vol. XV (706), August 8, 1832.Google Scholar
Ten Hours’ Advocate, January 9, 1847.Google Scholar
Worcestershire Chronicle, August 23 and 30, September 13, December 13, 1838.Google Scholar
York Herald, April 15, 1848.Google Scholar

References

Agnés, Benoît (2013) “A Chartist Singularity? Mobilizing to Promote Democratic Petitions in Britain and France, 1838–1848.” Labour History Review (78): 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, James E. (1986) Popular Politics and the American Revolution: Petitions, the Crown, and Public Opinion. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press.Google Scholar
Chase, Malcolm (2007) Chartism: A New History. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Chase, Malcolm (2012) Early Trade Unionism: Fraternity, Skill and the Politics of Labour. London: Breviary.Google Scholar
Chase, Malcolm (2013) 1820: Disorder and Stability in the United Kingdom. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Chase, Malcolm (2018) “An Overpowering ‘Itch for Writing’: R. K. Philp, John Denman and the Culture of Self-improvement.” English Historical Review (133): 351–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, James (1994) Radical Expression: Political Language, Ritual, and Symbol in England, 1790–1850. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foster, John (1974) Class Struggle and the Industrial Revolution. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
Gammage, Robert (1894) The History of the Chartist Movement, from its commencement down to the present time, Part 1. London: Holyaoke, 1854.Google Scholar
Hanley, James G. (2002) “The Public’s Reaction to Public Health: Petitions Submitted to Parliament, 1847–1848.” Social History of Medicine (15): 393–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, Brian, and Hollis, Patricia, eds. (1979) Robert Lowery: Radical and Chartist. London: Europa.Google Scholar
Innes, Joanna (2013) “People and Power in British Politics to 1850,” in Innes, Joanna and Philp, Mark (eds.) Re-imagining Democracy in the Age of Revolutions: America, France, Britain, Ireland, 1750–1850. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 128–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knights, Mark (2012) “The 1780 Protestant Petitions and the culture of Petitioning,” in Haywood, Ian and Seed, John (eds.) The Gordon Riots: Politics, Culture and Insurrection in Late Eighteenth-Century Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 46–68.Google Scholar
Leston-Bandeira, Cristina (2017) “What Is the Point of Petitions in British Politics?,” http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/what-is-the-point-of-petitions/ (accessed February 7 2018).Google Scholar
Midgley, Clare (1992) Women Against Slavery: The British Campaigns, 1780–1870. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Miller, Henry (2012) “Popular Petitioning and the Corn Laws, 1833–46.” English Historical Review (127): 882–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Paul A. (2001) “‘And Your Petitioners &c’: Chartist Petitioning in Popular Politics 1838–48.” English Historical Review (116): 368–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Paul, and Tyrell, Alex (2000) The People’s Bread: A History of the Anti-Corn Law League. London: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Poole, Robert (2019) “Petitioners and Rebels: Petitioning for Parliamentary Reform in Regency Britain.” Social Science History 43 (3): 553–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Sarah (2013) The Political Worlds of Women: Gender and Politics in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Mike (2009) The Poetry of Chartism: Aesthetics, Politics, Memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, Robert (2008) “Chartism from Above: British Elites and the Interpretation of Chartism.” Historical Research (81): 463–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stedman Jones, Gareth (1983) Languages of Class: Studies in English Working-Class History, 1832–1982. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Dorothy (1971) The Early Chartists. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Dorothy (1993) Outsiders: Class, Gender and Nation. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Thompson, Dorothy (1996) “Who Were ‘The People’ in 1842?,” in Chase, Malcolm and Dyck, Ian (eds.) Living and Learning: Essays in Honour of J. F. C. Harrison. Aldershot, UK: Scolar: 118–32.Google Scholar