Skip to main content
Log in

Cell Towers and the Ambient Population: a Spatial Analysis of Disaggregated Property Crime

  • Published:
European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a crime rate denominator, the ambient population has seen very limited use in a multivariate context. The current study employs a new measure of this population, constructed using cell tower location data from OpenCellID, to compare residential and ambient population-based crime rates. The chosen study area is Vancouver, BC, but the conclusions generalize to other administrations and the OpenCellID data have global coverage so the implications are applicable elsewhere. Five disaggregated property crime types are examined at the dissemination area level. Findings demonstrate striking differences in the spatial patterns of crime rates constructed using these two different measures of the population at risk. Multivariate results from spatial error models also highlight the substantial impact that the use of a theoretically informed crime rate denominator can have on pseudo R2 values, variable retention, and trends in significant relationships. Implications for theory testing and policy are discussed. In particular, the results suggest that policies designed around residential-based crime rates risk having no effect, or even of increasing crime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andresen, M. A. (2006a). Crime measures and the spatial analysis of criminal activity. The British Journal of Criminology, 46(2), 258–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M. A. (2006b). A spatial analysis of crime in Vancouver, British Columbia: a synthesis of social disorganization and routine activity theory. The Canadian Geographer, 50(4), 487–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M. A. (2011). The ambient population and crime analysis. The Professional Geographer, 63(2), 193–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M. A. (2020). Environmental criminology: evolution theory and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M. A., & Jenion, G. W. (2008). Crime prevention and the science of where people are. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19(2), 164–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M. A., & Jenion, G. W. (2010). Ambient populations and the calculation of crime rates and risk. Security Journal, 23(2), 114–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, M. A., & Malleson, N. (2013). Spatial heterogeneity in crime analysis. In M. Leitner (Ed.), Crime modeling and mapping using geospatial technologies (pp. 3–23). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggs, S. L. (1965). Urban crime patterns. American Sociological Review, 30(6), 899–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boivin, R. (2013). On the use of crime rates. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 55(2), 263–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boivin, R. (2018). Routine activity, population(s) and crime: spatial heterogeneity and conflicting propositions about the neighborhood crime-population link. Applied Geography, 95, 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boivin, R., & Felson, M. (2018). Crimes by visitors versus crimes by residents: the influence of visitor inflows. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34(2), 465–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. E., Kaufman, R. L., & Gottfredson, M. R. (1985). Risk-based crime statistics: a forecasting comparison for burglary and auto theft. Journal of Criminal Justice, 13(5), 445–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felson, M., & Boivin, R. (2015). Daily crime flows within a city. Crime Science, 4, 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanaoka, K. (2018). New insights on relationships between street crimes and ambient population: use of hourly population data estimated from mobile phone users’ locations. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45(2), 295–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harries, K. D. (1991). Alternative denominators in conventional crime rates. In P. J. Brantingham & P. L. Brantingham (Eds.), Environmental criminology (pp. 147–165). Prospect Heights: Waveland Press, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Hipp, J. R., Bates, C., Lichman, M., & Smyth, P. (2019). Using social media to measure temporal ambient population: does it help explain local crime rates? Justice Quarterly, 36(4), 718–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. (1983). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89(3), 552–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, L. W., & Forde, D. R. (1990). Routine activities and crime: an analysis of victimization in Canada. Criminology, 28(1), 137–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kounadi, O., Ristea, A., Leitner, M., & Langford, C. (2018). Population at risk: using areal interpolation and Twitter messages to create population models for burglaries and robberies. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 45(3), 205–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurland, J., Johnson, S. D., & Tilley, N. (2014). Offences around stadiums: a natural experiment on crime attraction and generation. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51(5), 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ley, D., & Smith, H. (2000). Relations between deprivation and immigrant groups in large Canadian cities. Urban Studies, 37(1), 37–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lottier, S. (1938). Distribution of criminal offences in sectional regions. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 29(3), 329–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenkamp, C. T., Cullen, F. T., & Pratt, T. C. (2003). Replicating Sampson and Groves’s test of social disorganization theory: revisiting a criminological classic. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(4), 351–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malleson, N., & Andresen, M. A. (2015a). Spatio-temporal crime hotspots and the ambient population. Crime Science, 4(1), 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malleson, N., & Andresen, M. A. (2015b). The impact of using social media data in crime rate calculations: shifting hot spots and changing spatial patterns. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 42(2).

  • Malleson, N., & Andresen, M. A. (2016). Exploring the impact of ambient population measures on London crime hotspots. Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 52–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OpenCellID. (2018). What is OpenCellID? Retrieved from http://wiki.opencellid.org/wiki/What_is_OpenCellID

  • Piza, E. L., & Gilchrist, A. M. (2018). Measuring the effect heterogeneity of police enforcement actions across spatial contexts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 54, 76–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: testing social- disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas: a study of rates of delinquency in relation to differential characteristics of local communities in American cities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W. G. (1976). Victimization surveys and criminal justice planning. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 45(2), 167–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stults, B. J., & Hasbrouck, M. (2015). The effect of commuting on city-level crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31(2), 331–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin A. Andresen.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johnson, P., Andresen, M.A. & Malleson, N. Cell Towers and the Ambient Population: a Spatial Analysis of Disaggregated Property Crime. Eur J Crim Policy Res 27, 313–333 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-020-09446-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-020-09446-3

Keywords

Navigation