Abstract
As a crime rate denominator, the ambient population has seen very limited use in a multivariate context. The current study employs a new measure of this population, constructed using cell tower location data from OpenCellID, to compare residential and ambient population-based crime rates. The chosen study area is Vancouver, BC, but the conclusions generalize to other administrations and the OpenCellID data have global coverage so the implications are applicable elsewhere. Five disaggregated property crime types are examined at the dissemination area level. Findings demonstrate striking differences in the spatial patterns of crime rates constructed using these two different measures of the population at risk. Multivariate results from spatial error models also highlight the substantial impact that the use of a theoretically informed crime rate denominator can have on pseudo R2 values, variable retention, and trends in significant relationships. Implications for theory testing and policy are discussed. In particular, the results suggest that policies designed around residential-based crime rates risk having no effect, or even of increasing crime.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andresen, M. A. (2006a). Crime measures and the spatial analysis of criminal activity. The British Journal of Criminology, 46(2), 258–285.
Andresen, M. A. (2006b). A spatial analysis of crime in Vancouver, British Columbia: a synthesis of social disorganization and routine activity theory. The Canadian Geographer, 50(4), 487–502.
Andresen, M. A. (2011). The ambient population and crime analysis. The Professional Geographer, 63(2), 193–212.
Andresen, M. A. (2020). Environmental criminology: evolution theory and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Andresen, M. A., & Jenion, G. W. (2008). Crime prevention and the science of where people are. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19(2), 164–180.
Andresen, M. A., & Jenion, G. W. (2010). Ambient populations and the calculation of crime rates and risk. Security Journal, 23(2), 114–133.
Andresen, M. A., & Malleson, N. (2013). Spatial heterogeneity in crime analysis. In M. Leitner (Ed.), Crime modeling and mapping using geospatial technologies (pp. 3–23). New York: Springer.
Blau, P. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York: The Free Press.
Boggs, S. L. (1965). Urban crime patterns. American Sociological Review, 30(6), 899–908.
Boivin, R. (2013). On the use of crime rates. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 55(2), 263–277.
Boivin, R. (2018). Routine activity, population(s) and crime: spatial heterogeneity and conflicting propositions about the neighborhood crime-population link. Applied Geography, 95, 79–87.
Boivin, R., & Felson, M. (2018). Crimes by visitors versus crimes by residents: the influence of visitor inflows. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34(2), 465–480.
Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.
Cohen, L. E., Kaufman, R. L., & Gottfredson, M. R. (1985). Risk-based crime statistics: a forecasting comparison for burglary and auto theft. Journal of Criminal Justice, 13(5), 445–457.
Felson, M., & Boivin, R. (2015). Daily crime flows within a city. Crime Science, 4, 31.
Hanaoka, K. (2018). New insights on relationships between street crimes and ambient population: use of hourly population data estimated from mobile phone users’ locations. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 45(2), 295–311.
Harries, K. D. (1991). Alternative denominators in conventional crime rates. In P. J. Brantingham & P. L. Brantingham (Eds.), Environmental criminology (pp. 147–165). Prospect Heights: Waveland Press, Inc..
Hipp, J. R., Bates, C., Lichman, M., & Smyth, P. (2019). Using social media to measure temporal ambient population: does it help explain local crime rates? Justice Quarterly, 36(4), 718–748.
Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. (1983). Age and the explanation of crime. American Journal of Sociology, 89(3), 552–584.
Kennedy, L. W., & Forde, D. R. (1990). Routine activities and crime: an analysis of victimization in Canada. Criminology, 28(1), 137–152.
Kounadi, O., Ristea, A., Leitner, M., & Langford, C. (2018). Population at risk: using areal interpolation and Twitter messages to create population models for burglaries and robberies. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 45(3), 205–220.
Kurland, J., Johnson, S. D., & Tilley, N. (2014). Offences around stadiums: a natural experiment on crime attraction and generation. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51(5), 5–28.
Ley, D., & Smith, H. (2000). Relations between deprivation and immigrant groups in large Canadian cities. Urban Studies, 37(1), 37–62.
Lottier, S. (1938). Distribution of criminal offences in sectional regions. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 29(3), 329–344.
Lowenkamp, C. T., Cullen, F. T., & Pratt, T. C. (2003). Replicating Sampson and Groves’s test of social disorganization theory: revisiting a criminological classic. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(4), 351–373.
Malleson, N., & Andresen, M. A. (2015a). Spatio-temporal crime hotspots and the ambient population. Crime Science, 4(1), 10.
Malleson, N., & Andresen, M. A. (2015b). The impact of using social media data in crime rate calculations: shifting hot spots and changing spatial patterns. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 42(2).
Malleson, N., & Andresen, M. A. (2016). Exploring the impact of ambient population measures on London crime hotspots. Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 52–63.
OpenCellID. (2018). What is OpenCellID? Retrieved from http://wiki.opencellid.org/wiki/What_is_OpenCellID
Piza, E. L., & Gilchrist, A. M. (2018). Measuring the effect heterogeneity of police enforcement actions across spatial contexts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 54, 76–87.
Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: testing social- disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774–802.
Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas: a study of rates of delinquency in relation to differential characteristics of local communities in American cities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Skogan, W. G. (1976). Victimization surveys and criminal justice planning. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 45(2), 167–206.
Stults, B. J., & Hasbrouck, M. (2015). The effect of commuting on city-level crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31(2), 331–350.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson, P., Andresen, M.A. & Malleson, N. Cell Towers and the Ambient Population: a Spatial Analysis of Disaggregated Property Crime. Eur J Crim Policy Res 27, 313–333 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-020-09446-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-020-09446-3