Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Association Between Legal Status and Poverty Among Immigrants: A Methodological Caution

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

Using nationally representative survey data, this research note examines the association between immigrant legal status and poverty in the United States. Our objective is to test whether estimates of this association vary depending on the method used to infer legal status in survey data, focusing on two approaches in particular: (1) inferring legal status using a logical imputation method that ignores the existence of legal-status survey questions (logical approach); and (2) defining legal status based on survey questions about legal status (survey approach). We show that the two methods yield contrasting conclusions. In models using the logical approach, among noncitizens, being a legal permanent resident (LPR) is counterintuitively associated with a significantly greater net probability of being below the poverty line compared with their noncitizen peers without LPR status. Conversely, using the survey approach to measure legal status, LPR status is associated with a lower net probability of living in poverty, which is in line with a growing body of qualitative and small-sample evidence. Consistent with simulation experiments carried out by Van Hook et al. (2015), the findings call for a more cautious approach to interpreting research results based on legal status imputations and for greater attention to potential biases introduced by various methodological approaches to inferring individuals’ legal status in survey data. Consequently, the approach used for measuring legal status has important implications for future research on immigration and legal status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data set used is publicly available at https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/sipp/data/datasets.2008.html. Analysis code is available upon reasonable request from corresponding author.

Notes

  1. The lawful permanent residence (LPR) visa is often referred to as a “green card.” To minimize redundancy, we use “LPR” and “green card” interchangeably.

  2. Individuals who failed to respond to certain questions were allocated values by the Census Bureau, as is customary in most publicly released census microdata. We treat these values the same as self-reports.

  3. We omit criterion b—“Is a citizen”—from our logical imputation because our sample is already limited to noncitizen immigrants. Our focus is on lawful permanent residents and noncitizen, non-LPRs.

  4. Because of the absence of national origin information in the 2008 public-use SIPP, we are unable to identify Cuban nationals. We instead use a proxy that identifies individuals born in the Caribbean who either speak Spanish at home or identify as Hispanic.

  5. If someone’s spouse is identified as legal using any of the criteria in this list, then that individual is also coded as legal.

References

  • Altman, C. E., Heflin, C., Jun, C., & Bachmeier, J. D. (in press). The economic well-being of unauthorized immigrants in the United States: Evidence from the 1996–2008 SIPP. Population Research and Policy Review.

  • Bean, F. D., Leach, M. A., Brown, S. K., Bachmeier, J. D., & Hipp, J. R. (2011). The educational legacy of unauthorized migration: Comparisons across U.S.–immigrant groups in how parents’ status affects their offspring. International Migration Review, 45, 348–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. J. (2017). The earnings of undocumented immigrants (NBER Working Paper No. 23236). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w23236

  • Borjas, G. J., & Cassidy, H. (2019). The wage penalty to undocumented immigration. Labour Economics, 61, 101757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2019.101757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. J., & Slusky, D. J. G. (2018). Health, employment, and disability: Implications from the undocumented population (NBER Working Paper No. 24504). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w24504

  • Bustamante, A. V., Chen, J., Fang, H., Rizzo, J. A., & Ortega, A. N. (2014). Identifying health insurance predictors and the main reported reasons for being uninsured among US immigrants by legal authorization status. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 29, e83–e96. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. S., & Schpero, W. L. (2018). Household immigration status had differential impact on Medicaid enrollment in expansion and nonexpansion states. Health Affairs, 37, 394–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Homeland Security. (2019). Lawful permanent residents (LPR). Retrieved from https://www.dhs.gov/immigration-statistics/lawful-permanent-residents

  • Gleeson, S., & Gonzales, R. G. (2012). When do papers matter? An institutional analysis of undocumented life in the United States. International Migration, 50(4), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, R. G. (2016). Lives in limbo: Undocumented and coming of age in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunadi, C. (2019). On the association between undocumented immigration and crime in the United States. Oxford Economic Papers. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpz057

  • Lichter, D. T., Sanders, S. R., & Johnson, K. M. (2015). Hispanics at the starting line: Poverty among newborn infants in established gateways and new destinations. Social Forces, 94, 209–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2015). The integration of immigrants into American society. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passel, J. S., & Clark, R. L. (1998). Immigrants in New York: Their legal status, incomes, and taxes (Urban Institute report). Retrieved from http://webarchive.urban.org/publications/407432.html

  • Passel, J. S., & Cohn, D. (2014). Unauthorized immigrant totals rise in 7 states, fall in 14 (Pew Hispanic Trends report). Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/hispanic/2014/11/18/unauthorized-immigrant-totals-rise-in-7-states-fall-in-14/

  • Passel, J. S., & Cohn, D. (2018). U.S. unauthorized immigrant total dips to lowest level in a decade (Pew Hispanic Trends report). Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/hispanic/2018/11/27/u-s-unauthorized-immigrant-total-dips-to-lowest-level-in-a-decade/

  • Passel, J. S., Van Hook, J., & Bean, F. D. (2004). Estimates of the legal and unauthorized foreign-born population for the United States and selected states, based on Census 2000 (Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

  • Pourat, N., Wallace, S. P., Hadler, M. W., & Ponce, N. (2014). Assessing health care services used by California’s undocumented immigrant population in 2010. Health Affairs, 33, 840–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, J. C., Pebley, A. R., & Sastry, N. (2005). Immigration status and health insurance coverage: Who gains? Who loses? American Journal of Public Health, 95, 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hook, J., Bachmeier, J. D., Coffman, D. L., & Harel, O. (2015). Can we spin straw into gold? An evaluation of immigrant legal status imputation approaches. Demography, 52, 329–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hook, J., Brown, S. L., & Kwenda, M. N. (2004). A decomposition of trends in poverty among children of immigrants. Demography, 41, 649–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikawa, H. (2011). Immigrants raising citizens. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, S., Waidmann, T. A., & Lawton, E. (2017). Undocumented immigrants, left out of health reform, likely to continue to grow as share of the uninsured. Health Affairs, 30, 1997–2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the fellows of the Public Policy Lab of the College of Liberal Arts at Temple University for helpful comments and suggestions. Spence also acknowledges funding through a fellowship with the Public Policy Lab.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Cody Spence performed all data management and statistical analysis tasks and wrote all portions of the manuscript. James Bachmeier wrote some portions of the manuscript, reviewed and edited all portions of the manuscript, and contributed to the development of methods and interpretation of data. Claire Altman and Christal Hamilton reviewed and edited all portions of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cody Spence.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics and Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(PDF 252 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spence, C., Bachmeier, J.D., Altman, C.E. et al. The Association Between Legal Status and Poverty Among Immigrants: A Methodological Caution. Demography 57, 2327–2335 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-020-00933-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-020-00933-0

Keywords

Navigation