Abstract
The “use of self” is a powerful tool that social workers rely upon to facilitate treatment growth for their clients. Yet, for many ethnic and racial minority clinicians, their self contains personal, psychological, social, and cultural aspects that they must acknowledge, examine and negotiate as they enter into the clinical arena. The therapeutic world is increasingly diverse, therefore, the profession must address issues relating to researching, educating, training, supervising, and supporting clinicians from diverse backgrounds to attend with greater knowledge and self-examination. They must attend to the nuances of use of self with respect to issues of intersectionality in order to provide attuned, culturally responsive, and socially just treatment. This paper demonstrates how clinical social work practitioners can facilitate self-development and growth in clients through their strategic use of self as grounded in early British and American object relations theories and contemporary relational theory. The clinical materials in the composite case study (employed to protect the confidentiality of the clients) are used to illustrate that when clinicians embrace the challenges of working in the intercultural and interracial treatment arena and dive deeply beyond the choppy surface, there are many opportunities to further the therapeutic progress while providing a culturally sensitive and socially just clinical practice. Implications for clinical social work practice, education and research are identified.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akhtar, S. (1995). A third individuation: Immigration, identity, and the psychoanalytic process. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 43(4), 1051–1084.
Applegate, J., & Bonovitz, J. (1995). The facilitating partnership: A Winnicottian approach for social workers and other helping professionals. New York: Aronson Book.
Aron, L. (1996). The meeting of minds: Mutuality in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
Barnard, A. (2012). The self in social work. Social Work & Social Sciences Review, 15(3), 101–118.
Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond doer and done to: An Intersubjective view of thirdness. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73(1), 5–46.
Benjamin, J. (2018). Beyond doer and done to: Recognition theory, intersubjectivity and the third. New York: Routledge.
Bromberg, P. (2010). The nearness of you: Navigating selfhood, otherness, and uncertainty. In J. Petrucelli (Ed.), Knowing, not-knowing & sort-of-knowing: Psychoanalysis and the experience of uncertainty (pp. 23–44). London: Karnac Books.
Bromberg, P. (2013). Hidden in plain sight: Thoughts on imagination and the lived unconscious. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 23(1), 1–14.
Comas-Diaz, L., & Jacobsen, F. (1991). Ethnocultural transference and countertransference in the therapeutic dyad. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61(3), 392–402.
Comas-Diaz, L., & Jacobsen, F. (1995). The therapist of color and the white patient dyad: Contradictions and recognitions. Cultural Diversity and Mental Health, 1(2), 93–106.
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.
Dewane, C. J. (2006). Use of self: A primer revisited. Clinical Social Work Journal, 34(4), 543–558.
Dill-Thornton, B., & Zambrana, X. (2009). Critical thinking about inequality: An emerging lens. In B. Dill-Thornton & X. Zambrana (Eds.), Emerging intersections: Race, class, and gender in theory, policy, and practice (pp. 1–21). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Flanagan, L. (2011). Object relations theory. In J. Berzoff, L. M. Flanagan, & P. Hertz (Eds.), Inside out and outside in: Psychodynamic clinical theory and psychopathology in contemporary multicultural contexts (4th ed., pp. 118–157). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Garran, A. M. (2013). Lesson learned: Racial enactments in the treatment process. Journal of Social Work Practice, 27(3), 303–317.
Goldstein, E., Miehls, D., & Ringel, S. (2009). Advanced clinical social work practice: Relational principles and techniques. New York: Columbia University Press.
Goodman, D. (2014). The tapestry model: Exploring social identities, privilege, and oppression from an intersectional perspective. In D. Mitchell (Ed.), Intersectionality & higher education: Theory, research and praxis (2nd ed., pp. 99–108). New York: Peter Lang.
Hamilton, N. G. (1988). Self and others: Object relations theory in practice. Lanham, MD: Jason Aronson Inc.
Kissil, K., Nino, A., & Davey, M. (2013). Doing therapy in a foreign land: When the therapist is “not from here.” The American Journal of Family Therapy, 41, 134–147.
Lee, L. J. (2005). Taking off the mask: Breaking the silence—the art of naming racism in the therapy room. In M. Rastogi & E. Wieling (Eds.), Voices of color: First-person accounts of ethnic minority therapists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mahler, M. (1968). On human symbiosis and the vicissitudes of individuation (Vol. 1). New York: International Universities Press.
Mattei, L. (1999). A Latina space: Ethnicity as an intersubjective ethnic third. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 69(2), 255–268.
Mehrotra, G. (2010). Toward a continuum of intersectionality theorizing for feminist social work scholarship. Affilia Journal of Women and Social Work, 25(4), 417–430.
Mitchell, S. A. (2000). Relationality: From attachment to intersubjectivity. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
Morey, C. M. (2019). System enactment: An individual, interpersonal, and organizational perspective. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 89(2), 91–113.
Ogden, T. (1994). The analytic third: Working with intersubjective clinical facts. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 3–19.
Perez Foster, R. (1999). An intersubjective approach to cross-cultural clinical work. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 69(2), 269–291.
Racker, H. (1953). A contribution to the problem of countertransference. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 34, 313–324.
Rastogi, M., & Wieling, E. (2005). Voices of color: First-person accounts of ethnic minority therapists. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Richmond, M. (1917). Social diagnosis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Roland, A. (1996). How universal is the psychoanalytic self? Cultural pluralism and psychoanalysis: The Asian and North American experience (pp. 3–21). New York: Routledge.
Safran, J. D., & Muran, J. C. (2000). Negotiating the therapeutic alliance: A relational treatment guide. New York: Guilford Press.
Safran, J. D., Muran, J. C., Samstag, L. W., & Stevens, C. (2001). Repairing alliance ruptures. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 38(4), 406–412.
Seelye, K. (2005). The listening cure: Listening for culture in intercultural psychological treatments. Psychoanalytic Review, 92(3), 431–452.
Shaw, J. (1974). The self in social work. London, England: Routledge.
Siegel, D. J. (2008). The Neurobiology of “We”: How relationships, the mind, and the brain interact to shape who we are [CD]. Louisville, CO: Sounds True Inc.
Shonfeld-Ringel, S. (2000). Close encounters: Exclusion and marginalization as an intersubjective experience. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 71(1), 51–59.
Schore, A. N. (2012). The science and art of psychotherapy. New York: W. W. Norton.
Segal, H. (1964). Introduction to the work of Melanie Klein. New York: Basic Books.
Suslovic, B. (2020). Mitigating racial loneliness as transformative psychoanalytic work. Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society, 25, 480–489.
Tang, N. M., & Gardner, J. (1999). Race, culture and psychotherapy: Transference to minority therapists. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 68, 1–20.
Tummala-Narra, P. (2016). Expanding self-examination: Cultural context in the life and work of the therapist. Psychoanalytic theory and cultural competence in psychotherapy (pp. 199–230). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Wachtel, P. L. (1986). On the limits of therapeutic neutrality. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 22(1), 60–70.
Winnicott, D. W. (1956). Primary maternal preoccupation. In M. Paola (Ed.), Through paediatrics to psycho-analysis (pp. 300–305). New York: Basic Books.
Winnicott, D. W. (1960). The maturational process and the facilitating environment. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
Winnicott, D. W. (1962). Ego integration in child development. In The maturational processes and the Facilitating Environment, (pp. 56–63). Madison, CT: International Universities Press, 1965.
Winnicott, D. W. (1963a). From dependence towards independence in the development of the individual. In M. Masud & R. Khan (Eds.), The maturational processes and the facilitating environment (pp. 83–92). New York: International Universities Press.
Winnicott, D. W. (1963b). The development of the capacity for concern. In M. Masud & R. Khan (Eds.), The maturational processes and the facilitating environment (pp. 73–82). New York: International Universities Press.
Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Mirror-role of mother and family in child development. In R.-L. Joan (Ed.), Playing and reality (pp. 111–118). London: Tavistock.
Workers, N. A. (2017). NASW code of ethics (guide to the everyday professional conduct of social workers). Washington, DC: NASW.
Yap, R. (2015). Listening for and holding traumatic rage in an intersubjective intercultural field. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 85(4), 437–452.
Yarborough, C. (2017). Being the only one: Finding connection through the shared experience of “otherness.” Smith College Studies in Social Work, 87, 189–199.
Acknowledgements
“There is no such thing as a” PhD student, but the PhD student and her community. The author wishes to thank all those who have provided her emotional and intellectual support in the crafting and completion of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vo, P. In the Fertile Minefield: Navigating Challenges and Opportunities with Facilitating Self-development and Growth in the Intercultural and Interracial Clinical Treatment Dyad. Clin Soc Work J 49, 336–345 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-020-00775-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-020-00775-8