Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Victimization Prevention and Awareness on College Campuses: Interconnection Between Title IX and #MeToo

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The #MeToo movement centers on raising awareness of risky situations for victimization and encourages the general community to intervene in these situations. Similarly, sexual violence awareness programming that take place on college campuses throughout the academic year can prime individuals to be active bystanders. Except for a handful of systematically evaluated bystander intervention programs, however, it is unclear how informal sexual violence awareness programming affects actual intervention behaviors. The link between prior victimization and bystander intervention is also not well understood. Given these gaps in research, the current study examines how exposure to sexual violence awareness programming and prior victimization are associated with bystander intervention. In particular, we consider the intersection of prior sexual victimization and participating in sexual violence awareness programming on campus. Utilizing a sample of 735 college students from a four-year southeastern university, the results of the current study demonstrate victims of sexual violence who attend sexual violence awareness programming are less likely to intervene. The findings of the current study highlight the importance of program design and suggest that increased attention to the problem of sexual violence does not necessarily translate into bystander intervention. Overall, this may run counter to goals of the #MeToo movement and deserves further attention. Avenues for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. At the IHE where data were collected for the current study, SV awareness programming, such as Denim Day, Luminary, Walk A Mile, and Take Back the Night, are associated with the study university’s Title IX office to some extent as part of Sexual Assault Awareness Month.

  2. It is possible that even though the training is required, students do not recall completing the training. This item likely reflects if the student remembered completing the training or not.

References

  • Abbey, A. (2002). Alcohol-related sexual assault: A common problem among college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, supplement, (s14), 118-128.

  • Abbey, A., Zawacki, T., Buck, P. O., Clinton, A. M., & McAuslan, P. (2001). Alcohol and sexual assault. Alcohol Research & Health: The Journal of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 25(1), 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P. (2015). Maximum likelihood is better than multiple imputation: Part II. Retrieved from https://statisticalhorizons.com/ml-is-better-than-mi

  • Anderson, V. N., Simpson-Taylor, D., & Herrmann, D. J. (2004). Gender, age, and rape-supportive rules. Sex Roles, 50(1–2), 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, E. A., & Hamilton, L. T. (2013). Paying for the party. Harvard University Press.

  • Bannon, R. S., Brosi, M. W., & Foubert, J. D. (2013). Sorority women’s and fraternity men’s rape myth acceptance and bystander intervention attitudes. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 50(1), 72–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banyard, V. L., & Moynihan, M. M. (2011). Variation in bystander behavior related to sexual and intimate partner violence prevention: Correlates in a sample of college students. Psychology of Violence, 1(4), 287–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banyard, V. L., Plante, E. G., & Moynihan, M. M. (2004). Bystander education: Bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention. Journal of Community Psychology, 32(1), 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banyard, V. L., Moynihan, M. M., & Plante, E. G. (2007). Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(4), 463–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, K., & Klaus, P. (2005). Violent victimization of college students, 1995–2002. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report.

  • Bennett, S., Banyard, V. L., & Garnhart, L. (2014). To act or not to act, that is the question? Barriers and facilitators of bystander intervention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(3), 476–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L., Banyard, V. L., & Moynihan, M. M. (2014). College students as helpful bystanders against sexual violence: Gender, race, and year in college moderate the impact of perceived peer norms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(3), 350–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burn, S. M. (2009). A situational model of sexual assault prevention through bystander intervention. Sex Roles, 60(11–12), 779–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, L. C., Lee, H., & Fisher, B. S. (2019). Less safe in the ivory tower: Campus sexual assault policy in the trump administration. Victims & Offenders, 14(8), 979–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark-Parsons, R. (2019). “I see you, I believe you, I stand with you”: #MeToo and the performance of networked feminist visibility. Feminist Media Studies, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1628797.

  • Coker, A. L., Cook-Craig, P. G., Williams, C. M., Fisher, B. S., Clear, E. R., Garcia, L. S., & Hegge, L. M. (2011). Evaluation of Green Dot: An active bystander intervention to reduce sexual violence on college campuses. Violence Against Women, 17(6), 777–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coker, A. L., Bush, H. M., Fisher, B. S., Swan, S. C., Williams, C. M., Clear, E. R., & DeGue, S. (2016). Multi-college bystander intervention evaluation for violence prevention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 50(3), 295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daigle, L. E., Fisher, B. S., & Stewart, M. (2009). The effectiveness of sexual victimization prevention among college students: A summary of “what works”. Victims and Offenders, 4(4), 398–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daigle, L. E., Johnston, T., Azimi, A., & Felix, S. N. (2019). Violent and sexual victimization among American and Canadian college students: Who is more at risk and are the risk factors invariant? Journal of School Violence, 18(2), 226–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. M., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 377–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Heer, B., & Jones, L. (2017). Measuring sexual violence on campus: Climate surveys and vulnerable groups. Journal of School Violence, 16(2), 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond-Welch, B. K., Hetzel-Riggin, M. D., & Hemingway, J. A. (2016). The willingness of college students to intervene in sexual assault situations: Attitude and behavior differences by gender, race, age, and community of origin. Violence and Gender, 3(1), 49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, P., Krueger, J. I., Greitemeyer, T., Vogrincic, C., Kastenmüller, A., Frey, D., Heense, M., Wicher, M., & Kainbacher, M. (2011). The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 517–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B. S., Sloan, J. J., Cullen, F. T., & Lu, C. (1998). Crime in the ivory tower: The level and sources of student victimization. Criminology, 36(3), 671–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B. S., Daigle, L. E., & Cullen, F. T. (2010). What distinguishes single from recurrent sexual victims? The role of lifestyle-routine activities and first-incident characteristics. Justice Quarterly, 27(1), 102–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gainey, R., Alper, M., & Chappell, A. T. (2011). Fear of crime revisited: Examining the direct and indirect effects of disorder, risk perception, and social capital. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(2), 120–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, S. E. (2017). The woman who created #MeToo long before hashtags. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/20/us/me-too-movement-tarana-burke.html

  • Gidycz, C. A., Orchowski, L. M., King, C. R., & Rich, C. L. (2008). Sexual victimization and health-risk behaviors: A prospective analysis of college women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(6), 744–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gidycz, C. A., Orchowski, L. M., & Berkowitz, A. D. (2011). Preventing sexual aggression among college men: An evaluation of social norms and bystander intervention program. Violence Against Women, 17(6), 720–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossbard, J., Geisner, I. M., Neighbors, C., Kilmer, J. R., & Larimer, M. E. (2007). Are drinking games sports? College athlete participation in drinking games and alcohol-related problems. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 68(1), 97–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, T. C. (2003). Violent victimization of college students. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report.

  • Hayes, B. E. (2018). Benefits and challenges of using life history calendars to research intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Violence, 33(3), 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, B. E. (2019). Bystander intervention to abusive behavior on social networking websites. Violence Against Women, 25(4), 463–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, B. E., O’Neal, E. N., Meeker, K. A., Steele, S. A., Brady, P. Q., & Bills, M. A. (2018). Assessing online strategies aimed at enhancing campus safety. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 10(2), 112–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henson, B., Fisher, B. S., & Reyns, B. W. (2020). There is virtually no excuse: The frequency and predictors of college students' bystander intervention behaviors directed at online victimization. Violence Against Women, 26(5), 505–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoxmeier, J. C., O’Connor, J., & McMahon, S. (2018). Undergraduate students as bystanders to sexual violence risks: Differences in reported intervention opportunities and behaviors by racial identity. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, DOI: 0886260518790593.

  • Jouriles, E. N., Krauss, A., Vu, N. L., Banyard, V. L., & McDonald, R. (2018). Bystander programs addressing sexual violence on college campuses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of program outcomes and delivery methods. Journal of American College Health, 66(6), 457–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, E. M., Ashooh, E., & Lowrey-Kinberg, B. (2020). Racial differences in conceptualizing legitimacy and trust in police. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(2), 190–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinsasser, A., Jouriles, E. N., McDonald, R., & Rosenfield, D. (2015). An online bystander intervention program for the prevention of sexual violence. Psychology of Violence, 5(3), 227–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, C. P., Lindquist, C. H., Warner, T. D., Fisher, B. S., & Martin, S. L. (2007). The campus sexual assault (CSA) study. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10(3), 215–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? New York: Appleton-Century-Croft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck, M., Bryman, A. E., & Liao, T. F. (2011). Suppression effect. In M. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T. F. Liao (Eds.), The sage encyclopedia of social science research methods (pp. 985–991). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, C. H., & Krebs, C. P. (2017). Campus climate surveys. In C. Kaukinen, M. Hughes Miller, & R. A. Powers (Eds.), Addressing violence against women on college campuses (pp. 217–229). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K., & Ullman, S. E. (2016). Alcohol and sexual assault victimization: Research findings and future directions. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 31, 82–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maas, M. K., McCauley, H. L., Bonomi, A. E., & Leija, S. G. (2018). “I was grabbed by my pussy and its# NotOkay”: A twitter backlash against Donald Trump’s degrading commentary. Violence Against Women, 24(14), 1739–1750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, S., & Farmer, G. L. (2009). The bystander approach: Strengths-based sexual assault prevention with at-risk groups. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 19(8), 1042–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E., Tancredi, D.J., McCauley, H.L., Decker, M.R., Virata, M.C.D., Anderson, H.A., … & Silverman, J.G. (2012). Coaching boys into men: A cluster randomized controlled trail of a dating violence prevention program. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(5), 431–438.

  • Moylan, C. A., Javorka, M., Bybee, D., Stotzer, R. L., & Carlson, M. (2019). Campus-level variation in the prevalence of student experiences of sexual assault and intimate partner violence. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 10(3), 397–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, M. M., Banyard, V. L., Arnold, J. S., Eckstein, R. P., & Stapleton, J. G. (2010). Engaging intercollegiate athletes in preventing and intervening in sexual and intimate partner violence. Journal of American College Health, 59(3), 197–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrott, D. J., Tharp, A. T., Swartout, K. M., Miller, C. A., Hall, G. C. N., & George, W. H. (2012). Validity for an integrated laboratory analogue of sexual aggression and bystander intervention. Aggressive Behavior, 38(4), 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, D. L., Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999). Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois rape myth acceptance scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 33(1), 27–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, T. C., Turanovic, J. J., Fox, K. A., & Wright, K. A. (2014). Self-control and victimization: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 52(1), 87–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyns, B. W., Randa, R., & Henson, B. (2016). Preventing crime online: Identifying determinants of online preventive behaviors using structural equation modeling and canonical correlation analysis. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 18(1), 38–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salazar, L. F., Vivolo-Kantor, A., Hardin, J., & Berkowitz, A. (2014). A web-based sexual violence bystander intervention for male college students: Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(9), e203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreck, C. J. (1999). Criminal victimization and low self-control: An extension and test of a general theory of crime. Justice Quarterly, 16(3), 633–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. D., DeKeseredy, W. S., Tait, D., & Alvi, S. (2001). Male peer support and a feminist routing activities theory: Understanding sexual assault on the college campus. Justice Quarterly, 18(3), 623–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, L. A., Devlin, A. S., Chrisler, J. C., & Vyse, S. A. (1993). Gender role and attitudes toward rape in male and female college students. Sex Roles, 29(1–2), 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turanovic, J. J., & Pratt, T. C. (2014). “Can’t stop, won’t stop”: Self-control, risky lifestyles, and repeat victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30(1), 29–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013, S. 47, 113th Cong. § 904 (2013).

  • Wade, L. (2017). American hookup: The new culture of sex on campus. New York: WW Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology, Sam Houston State University, P.O. Box 2296, Huntsville, TX, 77341-2996, USA

    Andia M. Azimi & Jessica C. Fleming

  2. School of Criminal Justice, University of Cincinnati, P.O. Box 210389, Cincinnati, OH, 45221-0389, USA

    Brittany E. Hayes

Authors
  1. Andia M. Azimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jessica C. Fleming
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Brittany E. Hayes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andia M. Azimi.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azimi, A.M., Fleming, J.C. & Hayes, B.E. Victimization Prevention and Awareness on College Campuses: Interconnection Between Title IX and #MeToo. Am J Crim Just 46, 33–50 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09586-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09586-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation