Abstract
In April 2017, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) participated in the Gotham Shield Exercise, led by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and in collaboration with other federal agencies to test the federal, state and local government’s ability to respond to an improvised nuclear device (IND). With active engagement from CDC leadership, 266 scientific and support staff from across the agency participated in the Gotham Shield exercise. The scenario involved a 10-kiloton detonation near the Lincoln Tunnel in New Jersey. This nuclear detonation scenario provided CDC with the opportunity to test some of the all-hazards tools the agency uses during response to other national or international emergencies, such as Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and mapping tools, and apply these tools to a nuclear emergency. Geospatial analysis associated with real time data can provide near real time information for individuals and entities associated with response and recovery activities. This type of analysis can provide timely data in regard to maps and information used to properly place staging areas for Community Reception Centers (CRC), mass care locations, and other medical care and countermeasure related services. Maps showing locations of power loss, such as locations of lost or inoperable main electrical grid and substations, combined with real time data on where power is available provides valuable information for first responders and emergency managers as well as responders engaged in communicating critical public messages to affected populations in these areas. By using real-time information, response officials can direct the response, allocate scarce resources, aid in coordination efforts, and provide a more efficient means of providing critical public health and medical services. The results of the exercise highlight the importance of using geospatial analysis for response planning and effect mitigation before, during, and after a public health event of this magnitude, and the value they represent in informed decision making.
Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
References
ASTHO. Infectious Disease. https://www.astho.org/Programs/Infectious-Disease/Infrastructure/ (accessed August 2, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Davis, M., M. Reeve, and B. Altevogt, eds. (2013). Nationwide Response Issues After an Improvised Nuclear Device Attack. Workshop Summary: Institute of Medicine, https://doi.org/10.17226/18347.Search in Google Scholar
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Gotham Shield Exercise Plan. https://wss.apan.org/s/Gotham_Shield17 (accessed September 8, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Hasegawa, A., T. Ohira, M. Maeda, S. Yasumura, and K. Tanigawa. 2016. “Emergency Responses and Health Consequences after the Fukushima Accident; Evacuation and Relocation.” Clinical Oncology 28 (4): 237–44, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2016.01.002.Search in Google Scholar
Public Health Infrastructure. Public Health Infrastructure | Healthy People 2020. https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/public-health-infrastructure (accessed September 12, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Hifld. HIFLD Open Data. https://hifld-geoplatform.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets (accessed September 11, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
IAEA. The Fukushima Daiichi Accident. December 07, 2018. https://www.iaea.org/publications/10962/the-fukushima-daiichi-accident (accessed April 8, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Ichiseki, H. 2013. “Features of Disaster-related Deaths after the Great East Japan Earthquake.” The Lancet 381 (9862): 204, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60091-4.Search in Google Scholar
Liu, J., W. W. Piegorsch, A. Grant Schissler, and S. L. Cutter. 2017. “Autologistic Models for Benchmark Risk or Vulnerability Assessment of Urban Terrorism Outcomes.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 181 (3): 803–23, https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12323.Search in Google Scholar
Medical Countermeasures | CDC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/phpr/readiness/mcm.html (accessed August 2, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Medina, R. M., L. K. Siebeneck, and G. F. Hepner. 2011. “A Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Analysis of Spatiotemporal Patterns of Terrorist Incidents in Iraq 2004–2009.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 34 (11): 862–82, https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610x.2011.611933.Search in Google Scholar
Murthy, B. P., N. Krishna, T. Jones, A. Wolkin, R. N. Avchen, and S. J. Vagi. 2019. “Public Health Emergency Risk Communication and Social Media Reactions to an Errant Warning of a Ballistic Missile Threat — Hawaii, January 2018.” MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 68 (7): 174–76, https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6807a2.Search in Google Scholar
National Level Exercise 2018. National Level Exercise 2018 | FEMA.gov. 2018. https://www.fema.gov/nle (accessed August 2, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
National Nuclear Security Administration. Energy.gov. https://www.energy.gov/nnsa/national-nuclear-security-administration (accessed September 12, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
National Response Framework - FEMA.gov. https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/1466014682982-9bcf8245ba4c60c120aa915abe74e15d/National_Response_Framework3rd.pdf (accessed August 2, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Nevada National Security Site. https://www.nnss.gov/pages/programs/FRMAC/FRMAC.html (accessed August 2, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Nuclear/Radiological Incident Annex to the Response and Recovery Federal Interagency Operational Plans. October 2016. Nuclear/Radiological Incident Annex to the Response and Recovery Federal Interagency Operational Plans. October 2016. https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/1478636264406-cd6307630737c2e3b8f4e0352476c1e0/NRIA_FINAL_110216.pdf (accessed August 2, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Pike, J. webmaster. "Homeland Security." PLANNING SCENARIOS: Executive Summaries: Radiological Attack - Radiological Dispersal Devices. https://www.globalsecurity.org/security/library/report/2004/hsc-planning-scenarios-jul04_11.htm (accessed August 2, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Planning Guidance for a Response to a Nuclear Detonation. Planning Guidance for a Response to a Nuclear Detonation | FEMA.gov. https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/24879 (accessed August 2, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
RadResponder Network. RadResponder. https://www.radresponder.net/ (accessed August 2, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Survey123 for ARC GIS “ESRI 2019”. https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/survey123/overview (accessed August 7, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Tanigawa, K., Y. Hosoi, N. Hirohashi, Y. Iwasaki, and K. Kamiya. 2012. “Loss of Life after Evacuation: Lessons Learned from the Fukushima Accident.” The Lancet 379 (9819): 889–91, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60384-5.Search in Google Scholar
"Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation to the General Assembly." United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) Reports Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation, UNSCEAR 2013 Report, Part I, 2014. https://www.unscear.org/unscear/en/publications/2013_1.html.Search in Google Scholar
US Census Bureau. 2004. 2004. December 14, 2015. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/ahs/data/2004.html (accessed September 12, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
World Health Organization. December 08, 2010. Public Health Infrastructure and Knowledge. https://www.who.int/trade/distance_learning/gpgh/gpgh6/en/index1.html (accessed August 2, 2018).Search in Google Scholar
Yasumura, S., A. Goto, S. Yamazaki, and M.r. Reich. 2012. “Excess Mortality among Relocated Institutionalized Elderly after the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster.” Public Health 127 (2): 186–88, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2012.10.019.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
