Abstract
In this article, we look at how the politics of reproduction take form in Denmark when people are denied access to IVF. Approaching IVF as a selective reproductive technology, we explore IVF’s selective potential in terms of reproductive governance and reproductive citizenship by analyzing decisions by the Danish State Administration about whether people get access to IVF or not. For that purpose, we had access to assessments of people’s inability to parent that are required by law in case doubts about a person’s ability to parent arise when they seek treatment with IVF in Denmark. Through this analysis, we identify three parenthood and citizenship ideals that characterize reproductive governance and the politics of reproduction in Denmark: (1) the medically sane/sober self whose parenting and societal decisions are not influenced by self-altering medical diagnoses and/or treatment, (2) the independent, capable, and productive self that pursues a meaningful life in societal terms, and (3) the responsible self that actively invests into reproductive futures. Based on this analysis, we argue that people are unduly excluded from reproduction if they are identified as not living up to these ideals because of the intersections of their gendered, bodily, social, and economic positioning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adrian, S. 2010. Sperm Stories: Policies and Practices of Sperm Banking in Denmark and Sweden. European Journal of Women’s Studies 17 (4): 393–411.
Adrian, S., Kroløkke, C. and Rothmar Herrmann, J. 2020. Monstrous Motherhood: On the Edge of Reproductive Time. Science as Culture, In Press.
Albæk, E. 2003. Political Ethics and Public Policy: Homosexuals Between Moral Dilemmas and Political Considerations in Danish Parliamentary Debates. Scandinavian Political Studies 26 (3): 245–267.
Allison, J. 2011. Conceiving Silence: Infertility as Discursive Contradiction in Ireland. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 25 (1): 1–21.
Andersen, N.Å. 2004. The Contractualisation of the Citizen: On the Transformation of Obligation into Freedom. Soziale Systeme 10 (2): 273–291.
Andreassen, R. 2019. Mediated Kinship: Gender, Race and Sexuality in Donor Families. London: Routledge.
Bartholomaeus, C., and D.W. Riggs. 2020. Transgender and Non-binary Australians’ Experiences with Healthcare Professionals in Relation to Fertility Preservation. Culture, Health & Sexuality 22 (2): 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2019.1580388.
Bell, A.V. 2016. ‘I Don’t Consider a Cup Performance; I Consider it a Test’: Masculinity and the Medicalisation of Infertility. Sociology of Health & Illness 38 (5): 706–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12395.
Bryld, M. 2001. The Infertility Clinic and the Birth of the Lesbian: The Political Debate on Assisted Reproduction in Denmark. European Journal of Women’s Studies 8 (3): 299–312.
Clarke, A.E., L. Mamo, R.J. Fosket, J. Fishman, and J.K. Shim (eds.). 2010. Biomedicalization: Technoscience, Health, and Illness in the U.S. Durham: Duke University Press.
Connell, R. 1995. Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Dahl, U. 2018. (The promise of) Monstrous Kinship? Queer Reproduction and the Somatechnics of Sexual and Racial Difference. Somatechnics 8 (2): 195–211. https://doi.org/10.3366/soma.2018.0250.
Edelman, L. 2004. No future: queer theory and the death drive. Durham: Duke University Press.
Faircloth, C. 2013. Militant Lactivism: Attachment Parenting and Intensive Motherhood in the UK and France. New York: Berghahn.
Gammeltoft, T.M., and A. Wahlberg. 2014. Selective Reproductive Technologies. Annual Review of Anthropology 43: 201–216.
Gibbon, S., and C. Novas (eds.). 2008. Biosocialities, Genetics and the Social Sciences: making biologies and identities. New York: Routledge.
Ginsburg, F., and R. Rapp. 1991. The Politics of Reproduction. Annual Review of Anthropology 20: 311–343.
Handicapråd. 2020. Familieliv. Retrieved from https://dch.dk/familieliv.
Hvidberg, M.F., S.P. Johnsen, M. Davidsen, and L. Ehlers. 2019. A Nationwide Study of Prevalence Rates and Characteristics of 199 Chronic Conditions in Denmark. PharmacoEconomics - Open. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-0167-7.
Inchley, J., D. Currie, S. Budisavljevic, T. Torsheim, A. Jåstad, A. Cosma, and Á.M. Arnarsson (eds.). 2020. Spotlight on Adolescent Health and Well-Being. Copenhagen: WHO.
Inhorn, M. 2012. The New Arab Man: Emergent Masculinities, Technologies, and Islam in the Middle East. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Inhorn, M. 2011. Globalization and Gametes: Reproductive ‘Tourism’, Islamic Bioethics, and Middle Eastern Modernity. Anthropology & Medicine 18 (1): 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2010.525876.
Järvinen, M. (ed.). 2018. Unge, Alkohol og Stoffer: Et 10-årigt Forløbsstudie. København: Sociologisk Institut, Københavns Universitet.
Knecht, M., M. Klotz, and S. Beck. 2012. Reproductive technologies as global form: introduction. In Reproductive Technologies as Global Form: Ethnographies of Knowledge, Practices, and Transnational Encounters, ed. M. Knecht, M. Klotz, and S. Beck, 11–26. Campus: Frankfurt.
Larsen, L.T. 2015. The Problematization of Fertility Treatment: Biopolitics and IVF Policy in Denmark. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 16 (3): 318–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910x.2015.1089520.
Machin, R. 2014. Sharing Motherhood in Lesbian Reproductive Practices. BioSocieties 9 (1): 42–59.
Mohr, S. 2018. Being A Sperm Donor: Masculinity, Sexuality, and Biosociality in Denmark. New York: Berghahn Books.
Mohr, S., and L. Koch. 2016. Transforming Social Contracts: The Social and Cultural History of IVF in Denmark. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online 2: 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2016.09.001.
Morgan, L.M., and E.F. Roberts. 2009. Rights and Reproduction in Latin America. Anthropology News 50 (3): 12–16.
Morgan, L.M., and E.F. Roberts. 2012. Reproductive Governance in Latin America. Anthropology & Medicine 19 (2): 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2012.675046.
Nebeling Petersen, M. 2009. Fra barnets tarv til ligestilling - en queerteoretisk undersøgelse af Folketingets forhandlinger om kunstig befrugtning. Kvinder, Køn & Forskning 2: 30–42. https://doi.org/10.7146/kkf.v0i2.27984.
Nebeling Petersen, M. 2018. Becoming Gay Fathers Through Transnational Commercial Surrogacy. Journal of Family Issues 39 (3): 693–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x16676859.
Petryna, A. 2002. Life Exposed: Biological Citizens after Chernobyl. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rose, N. 2007. The politics of life itself: biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rothmar Herrmann, J., and C. Kroløkke. 2018. Eggs on Ice: Imaginaries of Eggs and Cryopreservation in Denmark. NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 26 (1): 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2018.1424727.
Rubin, G. 1984. Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality. In Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality, ed. C.S. Vance, 267–319. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Straszek, S. 2018. Social Fobi. Retrieved from https://www.sundhed.dk/borger/patienthaandbogen/psyke/sygdomme/angsttilstande/social-fobi/.
Sundhedsstyrelsen. 2018. Danskernes Sundhed. Den Nationale Sundhedsprofil 2017. København.
Svendsen, M.N. 2015. Selective Reproduction: Social and Temporal Imaginaries for Negotiating the Value of Life in Human and Animal Neonates. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 29 (2): 178–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/maq.12149.
Svendsen, M.N., L.E. Navne, I.M. Gjødsbøl, and M.S. Dam. 2018. A Life Worth Living: Temporality, Care, and Personhood in the Danish Welfare State. American Ethnologist 45 (1): 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12596.
Søgaard, V.F. 2018a. Babysimulator som pædagogisk styringsteknik – om magt og den frie vilje i sociale indsatser for marginaliserede unge. Dansk Sociologi 29 (2): 9–29.
Søgaard, V.F. 2018b. Når ønsket om moderskab vækker bekymring. Kvinder, Køn & Forskning 26 (4): 23–35.
Thompson, C. 2005. Making Parents. The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, T. 2009. “It’s a Bit Unmanly in a Way”: Men and Infertility in Denmark. In M. Inhorn, T. Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, H. Goldberg and M. l. C. Mosegaard (eds.), Reconceiving the Second Sex: Men, Masculinity, and Reproduction. New York: Berghahn Books. pp. 226–252.
Turner, B.S. 2001. The Erosion of Citizenship. The British Journal of Sociology 52 (2): 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071310120044944.
Turner, B.S. 2008. Citizenship, Reproduction and the State: International Marriage and Human Rights. Citizenship Studies 12 (1): 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020701794166.
Wahlberg, A. 2010. Assessing Vitality: Infertility and ‘Good Life’ in Urban China. In J. Yorke (ed.), The Right to Life and the Value of Life. Orientations in Law, Politics and Ethics. Farnham: Ashgate. pp. 371–397.
Wahlberg, A., and T. Gammeltoft (eds.). 2018. Selective Reproduction in the 21st Century. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Videbech, P. 2018. Posttraumatisk stressforstyrelse. Retrieved from https://www.sundhed.dk/borger/patienthaandbogen/psyke/sygdomme/oevrige-sygdomme/posttraumatisk-stressforstyrrelse/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
This manuscript is composed of original material that is not under review elsewhere. The studies on which the research is based comply with EU and local ethical rules. The authors confirm that they do not have any competing interests—intellectual or financial—in the research detailed in the manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mohr, S., Herrmann, J.R. The politics of Danish IVF: reproducing the nation by making parents through selective reproductive technologies. BioSocieties 17, 297–319 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-020-00217-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-020-00217-1