Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis of Storage Roots in Cassava During Postharvest Physiological Deterioration

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Plant Molecular Biology Reporter Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 13 November 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Cassava is an important starchy and food crop; however, the commercial value of cassava is seriously constrained by postharvest physiological deterioration (PPD). In this study, the molecular mechanism underlying PPD was studied by comparative physiological and transcriptomic analyses. Physiological analyses indicated that the contents of H2O2 and malondialdehyde (MDA), and the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) all increased along with PPD development. Further transcriptomic analysis investigated the distribution of the differential expression profiling and identified a total of 10,347 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) during PPD. Notably, most of the genes encoding antioxidant enzymes and protein kinases showed significant upregulation at transcriptional levels, indicating the activation of antioxidant system and kinase-mediated signaling pathway during the PPD process. In addition, the genes involved in the starch synthesis pathway were repressed, whereas the genes associated with the starch degradation pathway were induced, thus leading to a decrease in starch content during the PPD process. Together, this study yields new insight into the transcriptional regulation network during the PPD process and provides potential gene resources for the delay of PPD in cassava.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of Hainan Province (2019RC290), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31801419), the 2020 Research Program of Sanya Yazhou Bay Science and Technology City (SKJC-2020-2-002), the Central Public-Interest Scientifc Institution Basal Research Fund for the Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (1630052017021, 1630012019009, 1630052019023), and the Central Public-Interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund for the Innovative Research Team Program of the Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (17CXTD-28, 1630052017017), and the earmarked fund for the Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System (CARS-11-HNGJC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Data curation, Yan Yan and Sihan Zhao; formal analysis, Yan Yan; funding acquisition, Yan Yan; investigation, Sihan Zhao; software, Zehong Ding and Weiwei Tie; supervision, Wei Hu; writing—original draft, Yan Yan; writing—review & editing, Wei Hu. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Hu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Key Messages

• The changes of physiological indexes during PPD process were analyzed.

• A total of 10347 differentially expressed genes were identified during PPD process.

• The DEGs involved in antioxidant system, starch metabolism, and protein kinases were identified during PPD.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, Y., Zhao, S., Ding, Z. et al. Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis of Storage Roots in Cassava During Postharvest Physiological Deterioration. Plant Mol Biol Rep 39, 607–616 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-020-01274-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-020-01274-3

Keywords

Navigation