Skip to main content
Log in

Stepwise behavior of surface properties caused by phase inversion in a polymer blend filled with dispersed iron

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Polymer Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The surface properties, mechanical characteristics, and morphology of the PP/CPA-Fe composite based on a polymer blend of polypropylene (PP) and copolyamide (CPA) filled with dispersed iron (Fe) were studied. The effect of stepwise behavior of the surface energy and its dispersive and polar components was previously unknown and discovered for the first time when the composition of the polymer blend was varied in the entire composition range. The surface parameters were found by measuring the contact angle of the testing liquids (water and diiodomethane) and using Owens and Wendt’s approach. Stepwise behavior of the surface energy was caused by the morphology of the composite. The largest change in the surface parameters occurs in the phase inversion region, where the phases of PP and CPA-Fe are co-continuous. Below (for the structure of PP matrix with the inclusions of CPA-Fe) and above (for the structure of CPA-Fe matrix with the inclusions of PP) this interval, changes in the surface energy are minor. In the phase inversion region, the relative contributions of the polar and dispersive parts to the total surface energy were changed from 1 to 14% and from 99 to 86%, respectively that was caused by the interface interaction of the components of the blend. On the contrary, the values of elastic modulus (E) remain constant in the phase inversion region, while the largest changes occur below and above this region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig.5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Potschke P, Dr P (2003) Formation of co-continuous structures in melt-mixed immiscible polymer blends. J Macromol Sci Polymer Rev 43(1):87–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Isayev AI (2010) Encyclopedia of Polymer Blends: Vol. 1: Fundamentals. Wiley

  3. Shimizu R, Demarquette N (2000) Evaluation of surface energy of solid polymers using different models. J Appl Polym Sci 76(12):1831–1845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hubbe MA, Gardner DJ, Shen W (2015) Contact angle and wettability of cellulosic surfaces: a review of proposed mechanisms and test strategies. BioRe 10(4):8657–8749

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hameed N, Thomas SP, Abraham R, Thomas S (2007) Morphology and contact angle studies of poly(styrene-co-acrylonitrile) modified epoxy resin blends and their glass fibre reinforced composites. Express Polym Lett 1(6):345–355

  6. Garbacz T (2019) Surface free energy of extruded polymer compositions. Physicochem Probl Miner Process 55(6):1509–1516

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rudawska A, Jakubowska P, Klozinski A (2017) Surface free energy of composite materials with high calcium carbonate filler content. Polimery 62(6):434–440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jose JP, Abraham J, Maria HJ, Varughese KT, Thomas S (2016) Contact angle studies in XLPE hybrid nanocomposites with inorganic nanofillers. Macromol Symp 366(1):66–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Park S-J, Kim H-C, Kim H-Y (2002) Roles of work of adhesion between carbon blacks and thermoplastic polymers on electrical properties of composites. J Coll Interf Sci 255(1):145–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hansen CM (2007) Hansen Solubility Parameters: A User's Handbook, Second Edition, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Chapter 6, Methods of characterization – Surfaces, p.113–124

  11. Mamunya YeP (1999) Morphology and percolation conductivity of polymer blends containing carbon black. J Macrom Sci – Phys B 38(5–6):615–622

  12. YeP M, Levchenko V, Boiteux G, Seytre G, Zanoaga M, Tanasa F, Lebedev E (2016) Controlling morphology, electrical, and mechanical properties of polymer blends by heterogeneous distribution of carbon nanotubes. Polym Compos 37(8):2467–2477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tang C, Chen N, Hu X (2017) Conducting polymer nanocomposites: Recent developments and future prospects. In: Kumar V, Kalia S, Swart HC, (ed) Conducting Polymer Hybrids, Springer

  14. Taguet A, Cassagnau P, Lopez-Cuesta JM (2014) Structuration, selective dispersion and compatibilizing effect of (nano)fillers in polymer blends. Prog Polym Sci 39(8):1526–1563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ye M (2001) Polymer blends filled with carbon black: structure and electrical properties. Macromol Symp 170(1):257–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Potschke P, Bhattacharyya AR, Janke A (2003) Morphology and electrical resistivity of melt mixed blends of polyethylene and carbon nanotube filled polycarbonate. Polymer 44(26):8061–8069

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cao L, Deng S, Lin Z (2016) Enhancement of carbon nanotube particle distribution in PPS/PEEK/carbon nanotube ternary composites with sausage-like structure. Polymers 8(2):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zois H, Mamunya YP, Apekis L (2003) Structure and dielectric properties of a thermoplastic blend containing dispersed metal. Macromol Symp 198(1):461–472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mamunya YP, Muzychenko YV, Lebedev EV, Boiteux G, Seytre G, Boullanger C, Pissis P (2007) PTC effect and structure of polymer composites based on polyethylene/polyoxymethylene blend filled with dispersed iron. Polym Eng Sci 47(1):34–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang J, Wu Y, Cao Y, Li G, Liao Y (2020) Influence of surface roughness on contact angle hysteresis and spreading work. Colloid Polym Sci 298:1107–1112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chau TT, Bruckard W, Koh PTL, Nguyen AV (2009) A review of factors that affect contact angle and implications for flotation practice. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 150(2):106–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Busscher HJ, van Pelt AWJ, de Boer P, de Jong HP, Arends J (1984) The effect of surface roughening of polymers on measured contact angles of liquids. Colloids Surf 9(4):319–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Oliver JF, Huh C, Mason SG (1980) An experimental study of some effects of solid surface roughness on wetting. Colloids Surf 1:79–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Krasowska M, Terpilowski K, Chibowski E, Malysa K (2006) Apparent contact angles and time of the three phase contact formation by the bubble colliding with teflon surfaces of different roughness. Physicochem Probl Miner Process 40:293–306

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gubbeles F, Blacher S, Vanlathem E, Jerome R, Deltour R, Brouers F, Teyssie Ph (1995) Design of electrical conductive composites: key role of the morphology on the electrical properties of carbon black filled polymer blends. Macromolecules 28(5):1559–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Owens DK, Wendt RC (1969) Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci 13(8):1741–1747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sumita M, Sakata K, Asai Sh, Miyasaka K, Nakagawa H (1991) Dispersion of fillers and the electrical conductivity of polymer blends filled with carbon black. Polym Bull 25:265–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schneider RP (1997) Comparative analysis of thermodynamic approaches and diagnostic liquids for determination of contact angle-derived physicochemical parameters of solids coated with conditioning films: A practitioner’s perspective. J Adhes Sci Technol 11(1):65–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Elias L, Fenouillot F, Majeste JC, Cassagnau Ph (2007) Morphology and rheology of immiscible polymer blends filled with silica nanoparticles. Polymer 48(20):6029–6040

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kalin M, Polajnar M (2014) The wetting of steel, DLC coatings, ceramics and polymers with oils and water: The importance and correlations of surface energy, surface tension, contact angle and spreading. Appl Surf Sci 293:97–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Dumitrascu N, Borcia C (2006) Adhesion properties of polyamide-6 fibres treated by dielectric barrier discharge. Surf Coat Technol 201(3–4):1117–1123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the Science Grant Agency VEGA, project No. 2/0010/18 (Slovakia). A.M. would also like to acknowledge the support of the SAIA agency for the project and stay at Polymer Institute in Bratislava, Slovakia. The authors are grateful to the researchers of the Petru Poni Institute of Macromolecule Chemistry (Iasi, Romania) Dr. M. Zanoaga and Dr. F. Tanasa for kindly providing copolyamide polymer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Mamunya: research idea and concept, supervision, writing draft version. Misiura: experimental measurements, calculations, ordering of the references, Procházka: experimental measurements, calculations. Omastova: writing parts of the draft text, correcting, editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yevgen Mamunya.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mamunya, Y., Misiura, A., Prochazka, M. et al. Stepwise behavior of surface properties caused by phase inversion in a polymer blend filled with dispersed iron. J Polym Res 28, 44 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-021-02410-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-021-02410-7

Keywords

Navigation