Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainable Intensification of Cultivated Land Use and Its Influencing Factors at the Farming Household Scale: A Case Study of Shandong Province, China

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Promoting the sustainable intensification of cultivated land use (SICL) has become crucial for ensuring a sufficient supply of grain and important agricultural products, as well as for the sustainable use of resources. Taking widely used areas of Shandong Province in China as examples, an analytical scale and level framework for SICL is constructed in this study. It measures the level of SICL through material flow analysis, constructs Tobit models to analyze the influencing factors of SICL at the farming household scale, and analyzes the transition mechanisms of SICL. The results show that the overall level of SICL in Shandong Province is low, and the spatial distribution is uneven. There are relatively more farmers participating in unsustainable intensification than in medium or low levels of SICL, with farmers working at a high level of SICL making up the smallest proportion. The factors that determine the level of SICL at which farmers work vary significantly. More male farmers operate at a low SICL level than female farmers, while females outnumber males at a high SICL level. This is mainly related to the regional distribution of age and population. Meanwhile, with larger cultivated land areas, there is a lower degree of land fragmentation, with a higher level of SICL corresponding to a smaller distance to the nearest town closer within 1–5 km from the town center. We can see the level of SICL and its processes themselves are closely related to time and space scales. Based on the above analysis, it is necessary to clarify the standard processes of SICL to adapt them to local conditions. This includes instructing managers on how to improve resource utilization, increase the sustainable development of cultivated land and establish a comprehensively efficient and functional SICL mechanism. The sustainable intensification of cultivated land use and its specific application in the new era are conducive to enriching the frontier theories and methodology of sustainable development, and are of great significance to the advancement of green agriculture and the decision-making of rural high-quality development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altieri M A, 1999. Applying agroecology to enhance the productivity of peasant farming systems in Latin America. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1(3–4): 197–217. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010078923050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Areal F J, Jones P J, Mortimer S R et al., 2018. Measuring sustainable intensification: combining composite indicators and efficiency analysis to account for positive externalities in cereal production. Land Use Policy, 75: 314–326. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao Zhiling, 2012. The construction and evaluation of regional agricultural sustainable development index system: a case study of Hengyang City. Economic Geography, 32(8): 113–116. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Xiaoqiu, Zhao Tingting, Guo Yuquan et al., 2003. Material input and output analysis of Chinese economy system. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 39(4): 538–547. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Demessie A, Ram Singh B, Lal R, 2015. Land degradation and soil carbon pool indifferent land uses and their implication for food security in Southern Ethiopia. In: Lal R et al. (eds). Sustainable Intensification to Advance Food Security and Enhance Climate Resilience in Africa. Cham: Springer, 45–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09360-4_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2009. Organic Agriculture: Glossary on Organic Agriculture. Rome: FAO, 1–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firbank L G, Elliott J, Drake B et al., 2013. Evidence of sustainable intensification among British farms. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 173: 58–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley J A, Asner G P, Costa M H et al., 2007. Amazonia revealed: forest degradation and loss of ecosystem goods and services in the amazon basin. Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, 5(1): 25–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[25:ARF-DAL]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadanakis Y, Bennett R, Park J et al., 2015. Evaluating the sustainable intensification of arable farms. Journal of Environmental Management, 150: 288–298. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnett T, Godfrey H C J, 2013. Sustainable intensification in agriculture: premises and policies. Science, 341: 3–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrero M, Thornton P K, Notenbaert A M et al., 2010. Smart investments in sustainable food production: revisiting mixed crop — livestock systems. Science, 327(5967): 822–825. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Heping, Bi Jun, Zhang Bing et al., 2007. A critical review of material flow analysis. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 27(1): 368–379. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Heping, Bi Jun, Li Xiangmei et al., 2006. Material flow analysis (MFA) of an eco-economic system: a case study of Wujin, District, Changzhou. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 26(8): 2578–2586. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Q H, Lu J C, Li M C et al., 2015. Developing planning measures to preserve farmland: a case study from China. Sustainability, 7(10): 13011–13028. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su71013011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jules P, Camilla T, Stella W, 2011. Sustainable intensification in African agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 9(1): 5–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.3763/ijas.2010.0583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamanga B C G, Waddington S R, Whitbread A M et al., 2014. Improving the efficiency of use of small amounts of nitrogen and phosphorus fertiliser on smallholder maize in central Malawi. Experimental Agriculture, 50(2): 229–249. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479713000513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassie M, Teklewold H, Jaleta M et al., 2015. Understanding the adoption of a portfolio of sustainable intensification practices in eastern and southern Africa. Land Use Policy, 42: 400–111. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.08.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Xiaojun, 2008. Research on the development of circular economy in Shandong province based on material flow method. Qingdao: Qingdao University. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Xinhong, 2005. Agricultural Irrigation Water Requirement and Its Regional Characteristic in China. Beijing: Tsinghua University (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lian Gang, Guo Xudong, Fu Bojie et al., 2005. Farmer’s perception and response towards grain-for-green program and eco-environment based on participatory rural appraisal. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 25(7): 1741–1747. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Fang, Zhang Hongqi, 2012. Sustainability assessment of land use in main agricultural production regions in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 27(7): 1138–1153. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Qing, Chen Ligen, 2013. Comprehensive evaluation and spatial partition of sustainable utilization of land in Chang-Zhu-Tan region. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 29(6): 245–253. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Long Hualou, 2012. Land use transition and rural transformation development. Progress in Geography, 31(2): 131–138. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Long H L, Liu Y S, Wu X Q et al., 2009. Spatio-temporal dynamic patterns of farmland and rural settlements in Su-Xi-Chang region: implications for building a new countryside in coastal China. Land Use Policy, 26(2): 322–333. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Xinhai, Kuang Bing, Li Jing, 2018. Regional differences and its influencing factors of cultivated land use efficiency under carbon emission constraint. Journal of Natural Resources, 33(4): 657–668. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo Xiwen, Liao Juan, Hu Lian et al., 2016. Improving agricultural mechanization level to promote agricultural sustainable development. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 32(1): 1–11. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahon N, Crute I, Di Bonito M et al., 2018. Towards a broad-based and holistic framework of sustainable intensification indicators. Land Use Policy, 77: 576–597. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao D H, He X Y, Wang Z M et al., 2019. Diverse policies leading to contrasting impacts on land cover and ecosystem services in Northeast China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240: 117961. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marrero H J, Torretta J P, Medan D, 2014. Effect of land use intensification on specialization in plant-floral visitor interaction networks in the Pampas of Argentina. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 188: 63–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.02.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Guay M O, Paquette A, Dupras J et al., 2018. The new Green Revolution: sustainable intensification of agriculture by intercropping. Science of the Total Environment, 615: 767–772. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutyasira V, Hoag D, Pendell D et al., 2018. Is sustainable intensification possible?. Evidence from Ethiopia. Sustainability, 10(11): 4174–4187. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbold T, Hudson L N, Hill S L L et al., 2015. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature, 520(7545): 45–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niu Shandong, Fang Bin, 2019. Cultivated land protection system in China from 1949 to 2019: historical evolution, realistic origin exploration and path optimization. China Land Science, 33(10): 1–12. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Niu Shandong, Lyu Xiao, Shi Yangyang, 2018. Spatial-temporal pattern of sustainable intensification of agricultural land-use in Shandong Province, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 29(2): 607–616. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Owenya M, Mariki W, Stewart A et al., 2012. Conservation agriculture and sustainable crop intensification in Karatu district, Tanzania. Integrated Crop Management, 15: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen B, Snapp S, 2015. What is sustainable intensification?. Views from experts. Land Use Policy, 46: 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phalan B, Balmford A, Green R E et al., 2011. Minimising the harm to biodiversity of producing more food globally. Food Policy, Suppl 1: S62-S71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.11.008

  • Pretty J N, 1997. The sustainable intensification of agriculture. Natural Resources Forum, 21(4): 247–256. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.1997.tb00699.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jules P, 2018. Intensification for redesigned and sustainable agricultural systems. Science, 362(6417): eaav0294. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav0294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riwthong S, Schreinemachers P, Grovermann C et al., 2015. Land use intensification, commercialization and changes in pest management of smallholder upland agriculture in Thailand. Environmental Science & Policy, 45: 11–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson L W, Ericksen P J, Chesterman S et al., 2015. Sustainable intensification in drylands: what resilience and vulnerability can tell us. Agricultural Systems, 135: 133–140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruben R, Kruseman G, Kuyvenhoven A, 2010. Strategies for sustainable intensification in east African highlands: labor use and input efficiency. Agricultural Economics, 34(2): 167–181. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0864.2006.00116.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer L A, Verburg P H, Schulp C J E, 2018. Opportunities for sustainable intensification in European agriculture. Global Environmental Change, 48: 43–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snapp S S, Blackie M J, Gilbert R A et al., 2010. Biodiversity can support a greener revolution in Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(48): 20840–20845. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1007199107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snapp S S, Grabowski P, Chikowo R et al., 2018. Maize yield and profitability tradeoffs with social, human and environmental performance: is sustainable intensification feasible? Agricultural Systems, 162: 77–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.01.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song Min, 2013. Analysis and assessment on environmental costs of arable land utilization: A case of Wuhan city, China. Population Resources and Environment, 23(12): 76–83. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Song Xiaoqing, Wu Zhifeng, Ouyang Zhu, 2014. Route of cultivated land transition research. Geographical Research, 33(3): 403–413. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Su Yong, Song Shuqiao, Sun Shuying, 2013. Calculation method for USLE equation factors based on GIS. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, (1): 206–207, 209. (in Chinese)

  • Sumberg J, 2002. The logic of fodder legumes in Africa. Food Policy, 27(3): 285–300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(02)00019-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanlauwe B, Coyne D, Gockowski J et al., 2014. Sustainable intensification and the African smallholder farmer. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 8: 15–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Guogang, Liu Yansui, Chen Yangfen, 2014. Dynamic trends and driving forces of land-use intensification in the cultivated land of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(7): 907–915. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Qian, Li Zhe, Fan Jie et al., 2012. The change and its ecological responses of cultivated land intensive use in Jiangsu coastal district. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 28(35): 186–191. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Shuxiao, Zhang Chuying, 2008. Spatial and temporal distribution of air pollutant emissions from open burning of crop residues in China. Sciencepaper Online, 3(5): 329–333. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wezel A, Soboksa G, Mcclelland S et al., 2015. The blurred boundaries of ecological, sustainable, and agroecological intensification: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35(4): 1283–1295. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0333-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willy D K, Muyanga M, Jayne T, 2019. Can economic and environmental benefits associated with agricultural intensification be sustained at high population densities?. A farm level empirical analysis. Land Use Policy, 81: 100–110. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie H L, Zhang Y W, Zeng X J et al., 2020. Sustainable land use and management research: a scientometric review. Landscape Ecology, 35: 2381–2411. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01002-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yami M, Van Asten P, 2017. Policy support for sustainable crop intensification in eastern Africa. Journal of Rural Studies, 55: 216–226. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin Changbin, Cheng Leilei, Yang Xiaomei et al., 2015a. Path decision of agriculture sustainable development based on ecocivilization. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 36(1): 15–21. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin Guanyi, Liu Liming, Qi Xiaoxing et al., 2015b. Environmental risk assessment in high intensive farming area based on material flow analysis. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 31(5): 235–243. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin Guanyi, 2016. Environmental Risk Warning of the Intensitive Agricultural Land Use Based on Material Flow Analysis. Beijing: China Agricultural University. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Dan, Hu Wanli, Liu Hongbin et al., 2016. Characteristics of residual mulching film and residual coefficient of typical crops in North China. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 32(3): 1–5. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Jilu, 2009. A thesis submitted in partially fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of master of economics. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Xinhuan, Yang Degang, Wang Changyan et al., 2012. Relationship between intensive utilization and environmental pressure of cultivated land: a case study on 780 cropland parcels in Tarim River Basin. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 20(5): 635–642. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Yinbo, Xia Zhixin, Chen Xingeng et al., 2007. Dynamics of regional sustainable development based on material flow analysis: a case study in Guangdong province. Resources Science, 29(6): 212–218. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Guishen, Wang Yichao, Tang Xiaowei et al., 2014. Evaluation of sustainability for intensive farmland ecosystem based on emergy ecological footprint. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 30(18): 159–167. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Yingxue, 2003. Synthetic evaluation of sustainable agricultural development in mountain counties. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 23(2): 223–229. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Huiyi, Sun Minghui, 2014. Main progress in the research on land use intensification. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(9): 1346–1357. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Humanities and Law, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110169, China

    Shandong Niu, Xiao Lyu & Guozheng Gu

  2. School of Geography and Tourism, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, 276826, China

    Shandong Niu, Xiao Lyu & Wenlong Peng

  3. School of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China

    Xiaoping Zhou

Authors
  1. Shandong Niu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiao Lyu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guozheng Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaoping Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wenlong Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao Lyu.

Additional information

Foundation item

Under the auspices of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41671176, 42071226), Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program (No. XLYC1807060)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niu, S., Lyu, X., Gu, G. et al. Sustainable Intensification of Cultivated Land Use and Its Influencing Factors at the Farming Household Scale: A Case Study of Shandong Province, China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 31, 109–125 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-021-1178-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-021-1178-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation