Abstract
Organ preservation is a prerequisite for an urgent increase in the availability of organs for solid organ transplantation (SOT). An increasing amount of expanded criteria donor (ECD) organs are used clinically. Currently, the paradigm of organ preservation is shifting from simple reduction of cellular metabolic activity to maximal simulation of an ex vivo physiological microenvironment. An ideal organ preservation technique should not only preserve isolated organs but also offer the possibility of rehabilitation and evaluation of organ function prior to transplantation. Based on the fact that mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) possess strong regeneration properties, the combination of MSCs with machine perfusion (MP) is expected to be superior to conventional preservation methods. In recent years, several studies have attempted to use this strategy for SOT showing promising outcomes. With better organ function during ex vivo preservation and the potential of utilization of organs previously deemed untransplantable, this strategy is meaningful for patients with organ failure to help overcome organ shortage in the field of SOT.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Solid organ transplantation (SOT) is an optimal, lifesaving treatment choice for patients with life-threatening organ failure. However, there is a considerable imbalance between the demand and supply of donor organs worldwide. For example, kidney transplantation data from the OPTN/SRTR 2018 annual report demonstrated that by the end of the year, the total number of patients on the organ waiting list was nearly 90,000 in the USA, whereas only about 22,000 kidney transplants were conducted in the whole year (Hart et al. 2020). The limited donor pool has become the major obstacle for the widespread clinical application of transplants. Therefore, there is an urgent need to explore more available organs. Transplantation of organs from an expanded criteria donor (ECD) emerges as an alternative in cases where organs from standard criteria donation (SCD) cannot be found. However, compared with organs from SCD, those from ECD are significantly more prone to ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, which is associated with an increased risk of inferior transplant outcomes, including delayed graft function (DGF) and worse long-term graft survival and function (Fellmann et al. 2020; Pascual et al. 2008; Renkens et al. 2005).
Thus, there is a need for adopting novel approaches before transplantation and higher requirements for better evaluation to ensure the quality of the retrieved organs. Organ preservation is an important part of this process. The most widely used donor organ preservation technique is cold static preservation (CSP). Recently developed machine perfusion (MP) has shown its advantages over conventional methods in many aspects (Moers et al. 2009; Tingle et al. 2019). One of these aspects is the possibility of enabling active interventions during preservation (Hosgood et al. 2015). Different interventions, including pharmacologic and/or gene- or cell-based therapies, have been attempted to rehabilitate the viability of grafts with MP. Among them, treatment with mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) is a promising strategy.
MSCs are a type of multipotent progenitor cells, which are characterized by a typical spindle shape and the ability to differentiate into chondrocytes, osteoblasts and adipocytes. On their surface, MSCs express high levels of the mesenchymal markers CD105, CD90 and CD73 but do not express the hematopoietic markers CD45, CD34, CD14, CD79a, CD11b and HLA-DR (Dominici et al. 2006). Functionally, MSCs exhibit immune evasive properties accompanied by high immunoregulatory, anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, anti-oxidant and regenerative abilities. Based on these features, MSCs are used in the recovery of several acute diseases, including acute kidney injury, bone repair (Todeschi et al. 2015), acute myocardial infarction (Yannarelli et al. 2013) and acute cerebral infarction (Zong et al. 2017). In the field of SOT, during the last decade, considerable efforts have been channelized towards enabling MSCs to facilitate graft repair. However, despite promising outcomes in animal models, clinical application of MSCs resulted in no remarkable effect (Reinders et al. 2018). One of the major reasons for the disappointing results is the low in situ amounts of infused cells, as it has been reported that the majority of intravenously injected MSCs are trapped in the lungs, liver and spleen (Zhang et al. 2007). Additionally, owing to the harsh microenvironment in vivo after transplantation, the number of surviving MSCs is also rare (Zhang et al. 2018). Moreover, administration of a high concentration of MSCs is not a feasible alternative, as the risk of lethal pulmonary thromboembolism is unbearable (Furlani et al. 2009).
However, the combination of MSCs with MP can effectively overcome the above-mentioned hurdles. With this technique, MSCs can efficiently reach the microvessels of isolated organs, which allows an adequate number of cells to settle in the local site. Meanwhile, ex vivo preservation creates a microenvironment without an allogeneic immune attack, which is in favor of MSC survival and function. These advances enable complete utilization of the potential of MSCs during ex vivo preservation, turning organ preservation from passive storage to active preconditioning and accelerative resuscitation.
In this review, by summarizing the available studies, we intend to provide an integral and updated view of the current understanding of the combination of MSCs with MP for organ preservation. Depending on this strategy, the organs that would previously be discarded may now be reconsidered acceptable for transplantation, which is meaningful for increasing the size of the donor pool and for promoting the therapeutic effect of organ transplant in organ failure patients in the future.
A brief introduction to organ preservation
Preservation of functionality of isolated grafts is a prerequisite for an effective transplantation. The basic principles of organ preservation are (i) suppression of cellular metabolism to the lowest level minimizing tissue injury and (ii) maximal simulation of the physiologic microenvironment (Salehi et al. 2018).
Organ preservation methods include CSP and MP. CSP is the oldest technique for organ preservation in the transplantation community. Hypothermia can reduce cell metabolic activity and, to a certain extent, minimize graft injury during ex vivo procurement and transport (Bae et al. 2012). Lapchinsky et al. were the first to introduce this method in 1960 in which they concluded that with the help of hypothermic blood, isolated canine kidney could be kept for 24 h and was sufficient for subsequent kidney reimplantation surgery (Lapchinsky 1960). Thereafter, the development of the University of Wisconsin (UW) solution by Belzer et al. initiated the golden age of CSP for human SOT (Wahlberg et al. 1987). Nowadays, apart from UW, multiple other solutions such as the Celsior solution, the Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate solution and the Institut Georges Lopez-1 solution (Dondéro et al. 2010; OʼCallaghan et al. 2014; Schneeberger et al. 2009) have demonstrated alternative effects in terms of utility and patient outcomes post-transplantation.
CSP has been regarded as the standard proposal for most organ preservation in the past decades. However, the increased number of suboptimal graft transplantation cases and the demand for prolonged storage time due to distant geographical areas highlight the limits of CSP (Pirenne 2010). These aspects, together with defects such as cell swelling, acidosis and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production during CSP, have led to the development of MP, as a novel procedure in organ preservation. The MP system consists of a machine pump, preservation solution, circuit, optional temperature control and oxygenation control devices (Fig. 1). Depending on the temperature, this strategy can be divided into hypothermic (HMP, 0–10 °C), subnormothermic (SNMP, approximately 21 °C) and normothermic MP (NMP, 37 °C).
HMP was first started in the 1960s and is one of the most well-developed paradigms. The continuous flow of preservative solution through the vasculature of the donor organ enhances the penetration of the solution within the organ, thus providing better nutrient supplementation. In cases where the solution is oxygenated and renewed, oxygen demand can be fulfilled and metabolic waste can be timely washed out. Under these circumstances, cellular damage is expected to remain at a minimum level and preserved organ function remains closer to the baseline level. Multiple pre-clinical results suggest that this proposal is superior to conventional CSP for the protection of multiple cell structures (Michel et al. 2015; Tozzi et al. 2013). In terms of clinical kidney transplantation, it has become the preferred choice for the preservation of suboptimal kidneys (Gallinat et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2017).
Compared with HMP, SNMP and NMP are thought to be a method of organ preservation that mimics physiological conditions closely. During HMP, oxygenation is always necessary for avoiding ischemia injury, as cellular metabolism is more active at nearly normal temperatures than that in hypothermia. The simulated physiological conditions enable further mitigation of tissue injury and permit a longer preservation time. Brasile et al. investigated the effects of an acellular perfusate for the preservation of canine auto-transplant kidneys during 18 h with warm perfusion at 32 °C (SNMP) compared with HMP. Immediate life-sustaining function after transplantation was observed in the SNMP group, whereas the HMP group did not result in similar restorative effects. This evidence indicates the superior preservation effects of SNMP over HMP (Brasile et al. 2002). Another advantage of SNMP and NMP over CSP is that the normal cellular metabolic activity at these temperatures allows for the continuous evaluation and real-time feedback of graft function prior to transplantation and can provide additional information for selection of transplantable grafts. This is especially useful when considering the transplantation of marginal organs. For example, based on ex situ NMP parameters, such as arterial blood flow, the rate of bile production and ejection fraction, organs that would previously be excluded can now be deemed suitable for transplantation. A small number of clinical cases reported that organs initially declined for transplantation were subsequently transplanted into patients and patients experienced an unremarkable recovery (Hosgood et al. 2016; Watson et al. 2017). The most considerable clinical experience has been observed during lung transplantation, in which oxygenation, hemodynamic and respiratory data and macroscopic appearance serve as key parameters to determine the transplantability of otherwise discarded organs (Wallinder et al. 2012). Finally, based on normal cellular metabolic activity, the near-normothermic microenvironment offers a platform for ex vivo MSC-based therapy. By active preconditioning with these highly regenerative cells, the function of isolated organs can be further improved during ex vivo preservation.
Theoretical basis of combining mesenchymal stromal cells with machine perfusion as a novel organ preservation strategy
Quality of donor organs is a major factor for rapid function resumption after transplantation and one of the key issues affecting graft quality is I/R injury (Abecassis et al. 2008). I/R injury is an inevitable process in SOT. During donor procurement, once the blood flow is stopped, the oxygen and nutrient supplies rapidly decrease to an extremely low level. To accustom to the sudden alterations in the surrounding microenvironment, cells switch from aerobic to anaerobic respiration. However, the limited energy originating from anaerobic metabolism is insufficient for normal cellular physiological activity, which leads to the disturbance of ion distribution, alteration of membrane potential and cell edema. In the postoperative period, due to improper mitochondrial function, the sudden reperfusion of oxygen induces a local but important production of ROS, which is detrimental to proteins, phospholipids and DNA (Li and Jackson 2002; Raedschelders et al. 2012). Importantly, both hypoxia (ischemia phase) and reoxygenation (reperfusion phase) are deleterious to cellular membranous structures not only for outer but also for inner cellular membranes, including the endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus, mitochondrial membranes and cytoskeletal microtubules (Kosieradzki and Rowiński 2008). The disruption of cellular membranous structures releases molecules and enzymes, which can be recognized as damage-associated molecular patterns and finally activates the inflammatory response exacerbating the injury (Bon et al. 2012). These processes constitute the basic physiopathological changes during I/R injury, including inflammation, oxidative stress and cell apoptosis. If these changes are not properly addressed, they can cause irreversible damage to the donated organs (Braza et al. 2016; Lin et al. 2014; Rabb et al. 2016).
Strong evidence suggests that MSCs have a potential ability to alleviate I/R injury in various organs, including the heart, kidneys, liver, brain and lungs (He et al. 2019; Li et al. 2015, 2018; Preda et al. 2014; Sadek et al. 2013). This evidence provides a theoretical basis for combining MSCs with MP as a novel organ preservation strategy to improve graft quality in SOT. In the following section, we discuss a few specific mechanisms underlying the protective effects of MSCs on I/R-injured organs (Fig. 2).
Compared with pharmacologic interventions that often have limited target sites, MSCs are believed to relieve this highly complex pathophysiology process through multiple modes of action. First, as MSCs have stem cell properties, they can be engrafted into organs where they can differentiate into related functional cells. The most typical case is that of liver injury. After transplantation by either an intrasplenic or intravenous route, Kuo et al. found that MSCs could engraft into the recipient liver, differentiate into functional hepatocytes and rescue liver function (Kuo et al. 2008). Second, increasing researches support the notion that the generation of a better post-injury microenvironment that favors cell survival, proliferation and dedifferentiation increases the beneficial effects of MSCs in limiting injury and in enhancing regeneration. MSCs can secrete various cytokines and growth factors, presenting paracrine activity. For example, they secrete growth factors, such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor, nerve growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor, which have been found to be beneficial for reducing neuronal cell apoptosis and for activating endogenous cellular repair programs for recovery in brain ischemia zones (Zhang et al. 2004). Similarly, cytokines such as prostaglandin E2, thrombospondin-2, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and transforming growth factor-β contribute to the balance of the inflammatory response (Meisel et al. 2004; Niu et al. 2017; Németh et al. 2009). Meanwhile, secretion of extracellular vesicles (EVs) is regarded as a special mechanism of paracrine activity presented by MSCs. EVs are heterogeneous vesicles that can be constitutively released by various types of cells, including MSCs. Biologically, EVs are important mediators of cell-to-cell communication. Multiple types of proteins, lipids, mRNAs and miRNAs are carried by EVs. After endocytosis by the target cells, these bioactive substances can modulate cell function (György et al. 2011). In a glycerol-induced renal injury model, the protective effects of MSCs on renal cells correlated with the level of miRNAs in MSCs, thereby indicating a miRNA-dependent mechanism (Collino et al. 2015). By injecting human EVs derived from MSCs (MSC-EVs) into rats suffering from I/R-induced renal injury, Ju et al. observed the presence of human hepatocyte growth factor mRNA and protein in rat tubular cells, thereby facilitating renal cell dedifferentiation and growth (Ju et al. 2015).
Recent studies have indicated that the regenerative capacity of MSCs, especially on the function of some important organelles, may be fulfilled by a direct organelle delivery approach. Compared with modulation by differentiation or paracrine actions that activate downstream effectors, direct organelle delivery is a more efficient and economical strategy. It helps recipient cells expend less time and energy on synthesis of related organelles, which is important in critical situations. Supporting this point, Spees et al. reported that by transferring mitochondria, co-cultured MSCs rescued the fate of lung epithelial cells, which could not survive under standard conditions due to defects in mitochondrial function (Spees et al. 2006).
Experimental data on combination of mesenchymal stromal cells and machine perfusion in ex vivo resuscitation of donated organs
The evidence mentioned above makes MSCs ideal candidates for ex vivo cell-based therapy in organ preservation. In recent years, the combination of MSCs and MP in ex vivo resuscitation of donated organs was attempted in the kidneys, lungs and liver and some encouraging results were obtained (Table 1).
MSCs in renal recovery
Data from a study by Pool et al. demonstrated that a small proportion of human MSCs could be detected in the lumen of glomerular kidney capillaries after 7 h of NMP with MSCs. Moreover, the retained MSCs were found to be structurally intact, thereby indicating that their potential biological activity could be maintained during perfusion (Pool et al. 2019). In their subsequent study, they found a significantly increased level of hepatocyte growth factor, together with a decrease in neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and lactic dehydrogenase in the perfusate. This evidence indicates that the infusion of MSCs during NMP can protect the isolated kidney from ischemic damage (Pool et al. 2020).
It is known that impaired energy utilization is a major challenge during organ preservation. To explore the protective role of MSCs combined with MP on energy metabolism of the isolated kidneys during ex vivo preservation, Gregorini et al. conducted a series of experiments. Donated kidneys were first subjected to a 20-min period of warm ischemia and then were preserved with continuous perfusion at 4 °C. In the experimental group, MSC-EVs were added to the HMP. MSCs were isolated from rats that highly expressed enhanced green fluorescence protein (EGFP). In the control group, only HMP was administered. After 4 h of perfusion, the kidneys were retrieved and the effluent fluid was collected for further analysis. EGFP staining showed that MSCs were successfully located in the vessels, tubules and interstitium, without signs of embolism in macrovessels/microvessels. Histologically, renal ischemia damage was ameliorated in kidneys perfused with MSC-EVs compared with that in the control group. At the gene level, the experimental group presented with multiple up-regulated genes, mainly related to cell energy metabolism and membrane transport. The authors also analyzed some markers of ischemia damage in the effluent fluid. The levels of injury markers such as lactic dehydrogenase and lactate were significantly lower in the experimental group than those in the control group, in parallel with the change in malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, which is an oxidative stress indicator. The effluent glucose level was lower in the MSC-EV group, whereas pyruvate levels showed the opposite trend. The authors concluded that via re-balancing of energy metabolism enzymatic machinery, which is vital for cell viability, the addition of MSCs during HMP protected donated organ injury (Gregorini et al. 2017).
Based on the promising experimental results, a more recent study by Brasile et al. was conducted, in which they collected five pairs of human donated kidneys for research. Kidneys in both groups were first flushed using a tissue-engineering platform with warm solution (32 °C). Once oxidative metabolism and vasodilation were adequately restored, MSCs were infused into the renal artery in the experimental group. The total preservation duration was 24 h. Kidneys were then harvested for further analysis. Histological examination revealed no evident fluorescence signal from labeled MSCs in the renal parenchyma. Meanwhile, the total cell count of MSCs in the 24-h perfusate was more than 95% of its initial amount. This evidence suggested that rather than integration into the renal tissue, perfused MSCs remained in the local microcirculatory system. Metabolically, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) concentration showed a significant increase in the MSC-treated kidneys, especially in the medulla S3 segment, where tubules are known to be the most sensitive regions to I/R injury. At the cytokine and growth factor levels, the kidneys that received MSC perfusion presented with a reduced inflammatory status, accompanied with an increased synthesis of several growth factors, including epidermal growth factor, fibroblast growth factor-2 and transforming growth factor-α, compared with those in the control group. These alterations eventually contributed to the upregulation of cell proliferation in donated kidneys, which was confirmed by a higher percentage of proliferating cell nuclear antigen and toluidine blue positive cells, indicators of DNA synthesis and cell mitosis. Altogether, these data mentioned above demonstrate a mechanism that during ex vivo perfusion, in which MSCs demonstrate an important function in the restoration of the metabolic rate, alleviation of inflammation, promotion of mitosis and subsequently favoring injured renal cell recovery (Brasile et al. 2019).
MSCs in lung function restoration
Lung graft acceptance rate remains the lowest of any SOT. It is estimated that only 15-25% of donated lungs meet the selection criteria and are finally transplanted (Pomfret et al. 2008). In order to increase suitability of lungs for clinical utilization, McAuley et al. collected human lungs from brain-dead donors that had been rejected for transplantation and were preserved in an ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) container at 36 °C. Thereafter, they determined the level of alveolar fluid clearance (AFC) in the preserved lung lobes. The AFC level represents the capacity to reabsorb alveolar edema fluid and is associated with good clinical outcomes post-transplantation (Ware et al. 1999). If the AFC level was < 10% per hour, an indicator of poor prognosis, MSCs were administered directly into the perfusate in the experimental group and were continuously perfused for 4 h. The addition of MSCs significantly increased AFC levels in the experimental group compared with those of the control group, which was preserved with perfusion only. Their study proved that the combination of MSCs with SNMP was effective in restoring the function of donor lungs and was able to expand the donor pool by utilizing non transplantable organs (McAuley et al. 2014). However, the former study did not focus on alterations in lung function or overall lung fluid balance. To investigate this aspect, Stone et al. administered human umbilical cord-derived MSCs (UC-MSCs) into the perfusate of a mouse donation after circulatory death (DCD) lung preservation model. Improved lung compliance, pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP), lung weight and neutrophil infiltration were observed in the lungs supplemented with MSCs. This indicated that protection against loss of endothelial barrier integrity and resultant edema during EVLP, MSCs enhanced EVLP-mediated reconditioning of donor lungs (Stone et al. 2017).
To determine the best dosage and route of MSC administration, Mordant et al. conducted a dose escalation study in which MSCs were delivered either through the bronchus or via the pulmonary artery during NMP. Similarly, with an increase in the parenchymal concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor and a decrease in the perfusate concentration of interleukin-8, they demonstrated that intravascular infusion of 5 × 106 MSCs/kg plus NMP showed strong protective effects on lung compliance and PaO2/FIO2 in pig DCD lungs (Mordant et al. 2016).
Microvesicles (MVs) are a type of EVs, which are 100–1000 nm in size and contain anuclear plasma membrane fragments. Previous studies demonstrated that MVs secreted from MSCs (MSC-MVs) exhibited similar biological activity in vitro and in vivo as MSCs themselves (Biancone et al. 2012; Cantaluppi et al. 2012). Further, MSC-MVs are an excellent alternative to MSCs for clinical application as they circumvent a few intrinsic limitations such as the potential of malignant transformation of MSCs and immunogenicity. In line with the studies mentioned above, results from Gennai et al. suggested that the administration of MSC-MVs contributed to the normalization of AFC level, lung weight and the improvement of some airway and hemodynamic parameters, including tracheal pressure, lung compliance, PAP and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in discarded human donated lungs. Additionally, all the beneficial effects disappeared after exposure to an anti-CD44 neutralizing antibody, thus indicating a CD44-dependent MSC-MV uptake (Gennai et al. 2015).
MSCs in liver function preservation
Yang et al. explored the combination of MSCs with NMP on DCD liver preservation. Rat liver was subjected to a 30-min period of warm ischemia and then harvested to establish a rat DCD liver model. NMP was performed continuously for 8 h during ex vivo preservation. In the combination group, BM-MSCs were injected via the portal vein immediately after the system was connected, whereas in the control group, only NMP was administered. They found that the alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels were significantly lower in the combination group, thereby indicating better preservation of liver function. Pathological score showed a parallel trend, especially in hepatocyte apoptosis. Considering that oxidative stress injury is an important aspect of hepatic I/R injury, they analyzed the levels of myeloperoxidase (MPO), MDA and glutathione (GSH) and observed mitochondrial damage in different groups. The combination of MSCs with NMP resulted in the reduction of the levels of MPO and MDA and mitochondrial damage; increased the production of GSH; and ameliorated DCD liver oxidative stress injury. The study data also provided evidence that the normal functioning of the JNK/NF-κB and AMPK pathways was restored after MSC perfusion, both of which are known to be closely related to oxidative stress (Yang et al. 2020a, 2020b). Additionally, regardless of oxidative stress, disorders in the donated liver microcirculatory structure and function are other factors that considerably affect the liver physiological function post-transplantation (Vollmar and Menger 2009). The same group reported that MSCs plus NMP pre-transplantation could also demonstrate this aspect of benefit. By inhibiting macrophage activation, by reducing microvascular leukocyte aggregation, by alleviating endothelial cell injury and by regulating ET-1/NO imbalance, this strategy effectively alleviates hepatic sinusoid congestion, maintains hepatic microcirculation homeostasis and favors the improvement of DCD liver quality (Yang et al. 2020a, 2020b).
All the above-mentioned studies focused only on in vitro alterations and lacked an in vivo analysis. To supplement the related results from in vitro experiments, Hou et al. established a rat DCD liver transplantation model. It is known that biliary epithelial cells (BECs) injury in DCD liver is a major factor for the development of graft dysfunction after transplantation and is related with an extremely high incidence of biliary tract complications (approximately 25–60%) (Desai and Neuberger 2009). To evaluate whether bone marrow–derived MSCs (BM-MSCs) combined with NMP could provide additional protective effects on BECs, they transplanted livers that were perfused with BM-MSCs plus NMP into rats in the experimental group (BM-MSCs + NMP group). Rats in the control group were transplanted with livers preserved only with NPM (NMP group). The duration of the ex vivo perfusion was 4 h. After transplantation, they found that the 14-day survival rate was significantly higher in the BM-MSCs + NMP group than in the NMP group. In terms of liver function, the levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), ALT, γ-glutamyltransferase (γ-GGT) and total bilirubin (TBil) recovered to baseline levels in the BM-MSCs + NMP group. NMP reconditioning showed some benefits in the normalization of liver function but could not completely reverse the injury. The pathological score of BECs revealed a change corresponding to that of liver function. The supplementation of BM-MSCs indeed showed its advantages in DCD liver protection (Hou et al. 2019).
Previous studies have demonstrated that preconditioning is an effective method to enhance the therapeutic effects of MSCs in vivo. By preconditioning with cytokines/chemical compounds, thermosensitive hydrogen, or genetic modifications, MSC infusion can overcome some of its major disadvantages in vivo, such as short cell survival time, limited cell function and insufficient colonization rate (Zhao et al. 2019). Cao et al. attempted to perfuse rat DCD liver grafts with BM-MSCs or heme oxygenase-1-modified BM-MSCs (HO-1/BM-MSCs) together with NMP. After 4 h of ex vivo perfusion, the liver was transplanted. Although the BM-MSC group had already demonstrated beneficial effects on survival time, liver function, proinflammatory cytokines, high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) expression, TLR4/NF-κB pathway inhibition and morphological changes compared with the control group, the HO-1/BM-MSCs group showed additional benefits (Cao et al. 2020).
Conclusion and future perspectives
In conclusion, promising experimental data have shown that the novel organ preservation strategy of combining MSCs and MP establishes a bridge between organ procurement and transplantation during which the injury caused by I/R can be substantially alleviated and the graft function can be maintained. This approach creates the possibility of a better planned course of action during the entire perioperative period. Instead of directly considering medical procedures and reducing ischemia time via a hasty decision-making process, doctors can plan and proceed at the ideal moment. We strongly believe that this strategy can pave the way for expanding the number of transplantable grafts and for improving their function, facilitating their acceptance after transplantation, which may revolutionize the practice in the field of SOT in the future.
Abbreviations
- SOT:
-
Solid organ transplantation
- ECD:
-
Expanded criteria donor
- MSCs:
-
Mesenchymal stromal cells
- MP:
-
Machine perfusion
- SCD:
-
Standard criteria donation
- I/R:
-
Ischemia/reperfusion
- DGF:
-
Delayed graft function
- CSP:
-
Cold static preservation
- UW:
-
University of Wisconsin
- ROS:
-
Reactive oxygen species
- HMP:
-
Hypothermic MP
- SNMP:
-
Subnormothermic MP
- NMP:
-
Normothermic MP
- EVs:
-
Extracellular vesicles
- MSC-EVs:
-
EVs derived from MSC
- NGAL:
-
Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin
- MDA:
-
Malondialdehyde
- EGFP:
-
Enhanced green fluorescence protein
- ATP:
-
Adenosine triphosphate
- EGF:
-
Epidermal growth factor
- EVLP:
-
Ex vivo lung perfusion
- AFC:
-
Alveolar fluid clearance
- UC-MSCs:
-
Umbilical cord-derived MSCs
- DCD:
-
Donation after circulatory death
- PAP:
-
Pulmonary arterial pressure
- MVs:
-
Microvesicles
- MSC-MVs:
-
MVs secreted from MSC
- PVR:
-
Pulmonary vascular resistance
- BECs:
-
Biliary epithelial cells
- BM-MSCs:
-
Bone marrow-derived MSCs
- MPO:
-
Myeloperoxidase
- GSH:
-
Glutathione
- ALP:
-
Alkaline phosphatase
- ALT:
-
Alanine aminotransferase
- AST:
-
Aspartate aminotransferase
- γ-GGT:
-
γ-Glutamyltransferase
- TBil:
-
Total bilirubin
- HO-1:
-
Heme oxygenase 1
- HMGB1:
-
High-mobility group box 1
References
Abecassis M, Bartlett ST, Collins AJ et al (2008) Kidney transplantation as primary therapy for end-stage renal disease: a National Kidney Foundation/Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF/KDOQITM) conference. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3(2):471–480
Bae C, Henry SD, Guarrera JV (2012) Is extracorporeal hypothermic machine perfusion of the liver better than the “good old icebox.” Curr Opin Organ Transplant 17(2):137–142
Biancone L, Bruno S, Deregibus MC, Tetta C, Camussi G (2012) Therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cell-derived microvesicles. Nephrol Dial Transplant 27(8):3037–3042
Bon D, Chatauret N, Giraud S, Thuillier R, Favreau F, Hauet T (2012) New strategies to optimize kidney recovery and preservation in transplantation. Nat Rev Nephrol 8(6):339–347
Brasile L, Henry N, Orlando G, Stubenitsky B (2019) Potentiating renal regeneration using mesenchymal stem cells. Transplantation 103(2):307–313
Brasile L, Stubenitsky BM, Booster MH et al (2002) Overcoming severe renal ischemia: the role of ex vivo warm perfusion. Transplantation 73(6):897–901
Braza F, Brouard S, Chadban S, Goldstein DR (2016) Role of TLRs and DAMPs in allograft inflammation and transplant outcomes. Nat Rev Nephrol 12(5):281–290
Cantaluppi V, Gatti S, Medica D et al (2012) Microvesicles derived from endothelial progenitor cells protect the kidney from ischemia-reperfusion injury by microRNA-dependent reprogramming of resident renal cells. Kidney Int 82(4):412–427
Cao H, Yang L, Hou B, Sun D, Lin L, Song HL, Shen ZY (2020) Heme oxygenase-1-modified bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells combined with normothermic machine perfusion to protect donation after circulatory death liver grafts. Stem Cell Res Ther 11:218
Collino F, Bruno S, Incarnato D et al (2015) AKI recovery induced by mesenchymal stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles carrying MicroRNAs. J Am Soc Nephrol 26(10):2349–2360
Desai M, Neuberger J (2009) Chronic liver allograft dysfunction. Transplant Proc 41(2):773–776
Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I et al (2006) Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 8(4):315–7
Dondéro F, Paugam-Burtz C, Danjou F, Stocco J, Durand F, Belghiti J (2010) A randomized study comparing IGL-1 to the University of Wisconsin preservation solution in liver transplantation. Ann Transplant 15(4):7–14
Fellmann M, Balssa L, Clément E, Frey P, Frontczak A, Bernardini S, Chabannes É, Guichard G, Bittard H, Kleinclauss F (2020) [Postoperative complications and long-term outcomes of transplantation with expended criteria donors transplants]. Prog Urol
Furlani D, Ugurlucan M, Ong L et al (2009) Is the intravascular administration of mesenchymal stem cells safe? Mesenchymal stem cells and intravital microscopy. Microvasc Res 77(3):370–376
Gallinat A, Moers C, Treckmann J et al (2012) Machine perfusion versus cold storage for the preservation of kidneys from donors ≥ 65 years allocated in the Eurotransplant Senior Programme. Nephrol Dial Transplant 27(12):4458–4463
Gennai S, Monsel A, Hao Q, Park J, Matthay MA, Lee JW (2015) Microvesicles derived from human mesenchymal stem cells restore alveolar fluid clearance in human lungs rejected for transplantation. Am J Transplant 15(9):2404–2412
Gregorini M, Corradetti V, Pattonieri EF et al (2017) Perfusion of isolated rat kidney with mesenchymal stromal cells/extracellular vesicles prevents ischaemic injury. J Cell Mol Med 21(12):3381–3393
György B, Szabó TG, Pásztói M et al (2011) Membrane vesicles, current state-of-the-art: emerging role of extracellular vesicles. Cell Mol Life Sci 68(16):2667–2688
Hart A, Smith JM, Skeans MA et al (2020) OPTN/SRTR 2018 Annual data report: kidney. Am J Transplant 20 Suppl s1:20–130
He H, Zeng Q, Huang G et al (2019) Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell transplantation exerts neuroprotective effects following cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury by inhibiting autophagy via the PI3K/Akt pathway. Brain Res 1707:124–132
Hosgood SA, Saeb-Parsy K, Hamed MO, Nicholson ML (2016) Successful transplantation of human kidneys deemed untransplantable but resuscitated by ex vivo normothermic machine perfusion. Am J Transplant 16(11):3282–3285
Hosgood SA, van Heurn E, Nicholson ML (2015) Normothermic machine perfusion of the kidney: better conditioning and repair. Transpl Int 28(6):657–664
Hou B, Song H, Cao H, Yang L, Sun D, Shen Z (2019) Effects of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells combined with normothermic mechanical perfusion on biliary epithelial cells donated after cardiac death in rats. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue 31(9):1137–1142
Ju GQ, Cheng J, Zhong L et al (2015) Microvesicles derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells facilitate tubular epithelial cell dedifferentiation and growth via hepatocyte growth factor induction. PLoS ONE 10(3):e0121534
Kosieradzki M, Rowiński W (2008) Ischemia/reperfusion injury in kidney transplantation: mechanisms and prevention. Transplant Proc 40(10):3279–3288
Kuo TK, Hung SP, Chuang CH et al (2008) Stem cell therapy for liver disease: parameters governing the success of using bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Gastroenterology 134(7):2111–21, 2121.e1–3
Lapchinsky AG (1960) Recent results of experimental transplantation of preserved limbs and kidneys and possible use of this technique in clinical practice. Ann N Y Acad Sci 87:539–71
Li C, Jackson RM (2002) Reactive species mechanisms of cellular hypoxia-reoxygenation injury. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 282(2):C227–C241
Li J, Zhou J, Zhang D, Song Y, She J, Bai C (2015) Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells enhance autophagy via PI3K/AKT signalling to reduce the severity of ischaemia/reperfusion-induced lung injury. J Cell Mol Med 19(10):2341–2351
Li S, Zheng X, Li H et al (2018) Mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury via inhibition of neutrophil recruitment. J Immunol Res 2018:7283703
Lin M, Li L, Li L et al (2014) The protective effect of baicalin against renal ischemia-reperfusion injury through inhibition of inflammation and apoptosis. BMC Complement Altern Med 14:19
McAuley DF, Curley GF, Hamid UI et al (2014) Clinical grade allogeneic human mesenchymal stem cells restore alveolar fluid clearance in human lungs rejected for transplantation. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 306(9):L809–L815
Meisel R, Zibert A, Laryea M, Göbel U, Däubener W, Dilloo D (2004) Human bone marrow stromal cells inhibit allogeneic T-cell responses by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-mediated tryptophan degradation. Blood 103(12):4619–4621
Michel SG, La Muraglia GM, Madariaga ML et al (2015) Twelve-hour hypothermic machine perfusion for donor heart preservation leads to improved ultrastructural characteristics compared to conventional cold storage. Ann Transplant 20:461–468
Moers C, Smits JM, Maathuis MH et al (2009) Machine perfusion or cold storage in deceased-donor kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med 360(1):7–19
Mordant P, Nakajima D, Kalaf R et al (2016) Mesenchymal stem cell treatment is associated with decreased perfusate concentration of interleukin-8 during ex vivo perfusion of donor lungs after 18-hour preservation. J Heart Lung Transplant 35(10):1245–1254
Niu J, Yue W, Le-Le Z, Bin L, Hu X (2017) Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit T cell activation by releasing TGF-β1 from TGF-β1/GARP complex. Oncotarget 8(59):99784–99800
Németh K, Leelahavanichkul A, Yuen PS et al (2009) Bone marrow stromal cells attenuate sepsis via prostaglandin E(2)-dependent reprogramming of host macrophages to increase their interleukin-10 production. Nat Med 15(1):42–49
OʼCallaghan JM, Morgan RD, Knight SR, Morris PJ, (2014) The effect of preservation solutions for storage of liver allografts on transplant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 260(1):46–55
Pascual J, Zamora J, Pirsch JD (2008) A systematic review of kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors. Am J Kidney Dis 52(3):553–586
Pirenne J (2010) Time to think out of the (ice) box. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 15(2):147–149
Pomfret EA, Sung RS, Allan J, Kinkhabwala M, Melancon JK, Roberts JP (2008) Solving the organ shortage crisis: the 7th Annual American Society of Transplant Surgeons’ State-of-the-Art Winter Symposium. Am J Transplant 8(4):745–752
Pool M, Vos J, Eijken M, van Pel M, Reinders M, Ploeg RJ, Hoogduijn MJ, Jespersen B, Leuvenink H, Moers C (2020) Treating ischemically damaged porcine kidneys with human bone marrow- and adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells during ex vivo normothermic machine perfusion. Stem Cells Dev 29:1320–1330
Preda MB, Rønningen T, Burlacu A, Simionescu M, Moskaug JØ, Valen G (2014) Remote transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells protects the heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury. Stem Cells 32(8):2123–2134
Rabb H, Griffin MD, McKay DB et al (2016) Inflammation in AKI: current understanding, key questions, and knowledge gaps. J Am Soc Nephrol 27(2):371–379
Raedschelders K, Ansley DM, Chen DD (2012) The cellular and molecular origin of reactive oxygen species generation during myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Pharmacol Ther 133(2):230–255
Reinders M, van Kooten C, Rabelink TJ, de Fijter JW (2018) Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy for solid organ transplantation. Transplantation 102(1):35–43
Renkens JJ, Rouflart MM, Christiaans MH, van den Berg-Loonen EM, van Hooff JP, van Heurn LW (2005) Outcome of nonheart-beating donor kidneys with prolonged delayed graft function after transplantation. Am J Transplant 5(11):2704–2709
Sadek EM, Afifi NM, Elfattah LI, Mohsen MA (2013) Histological study on effect of mesenchymal stem cell therapy on experimental renal injury induced by ischemia/reperfusion in male albino rat. Int J Stem Cells 6(1):55–66
Salehi S, Tran K, Grayson WL (2018) Advances in perfusion systems for solid organ preservation. Yale J Biol Med 91(3):301–312
Schneeberger S, Biebl M, Steurer W et al (2009) A prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing histidine-tryptophane-ketoglutarate versus University of Wisconsin perfusion solution in clinical pancreas transplantation. Transpl Int 22(2):217–224
Spees JL, Olson SD, Whitney MJ, Prockop DJ (2006) Mitochondrial transfer between cells can rescue aerobic respiration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(5):1283–1288
Stone ML, Zhao Y, Robert Smith J et al (2017) Mesenchymal stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles attenuate lung ischemia-reperfusion injury and enhance reconditioning of donor lungs after circulatory death. Respir Res 18(1):212
Tingle SJ, Figueiredo RS, Moir JA, Goodfellow M, Talbot D, Wilson CH (2019) Machine perfusion preservation versus static cold storage for deceased donor kidney transplantation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD011671
Todeschi MR, El Backly R, Capelli C et al (2015) Transplanted umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells modify the in vivo microenvironment enhancing angiogenesis and leading to bone regeneration. Stem Cells Dev 24(13):1570–1581
Tozzi M, Franchin M, Soldini G et al (2013) Impact of static cold storage VS hypothermic machine preservation on ischemic kidney graft: inflammatory cytokines and adhesion molecules as markers of ischemia/reperfusion tissue damage Our preliminary results. Int J Surg 11(Suppl 1):S110–S114
Vollmar B, Menger MD (2009) The hepatic microcirculation: mechanistic contributions and therapeutic targets in liver injury and repair. Physiol Rev 89:1269–1339
Wahlberg JA, Love R, Landegaard L, Southard JH, Belzer FO (1987) 72-hour preservation of the canine pancreas. Transplantation 43(1):5–8
Wallinder A, Ricksten SE, Hansson C et al (2012) Transplantation of initially rejected donor lungs after ex vivo lung perfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144(5):1222–1228
Wang W, Xie D, Hu X, Yin H, Liu H, Zhang X (2017) Effect of hypothermic machine perfusion on the preservation of kidneys donated after cardiac death: a single-center, randomized, controlled trial. Artif Organs 41:753–758
Ware LB, Golden JA, Finkbeiner WE, Matthay MA (1999) Alveolar epithelial fluid transport capacity in reperfusion lung injury after lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159(3):980–988
Watson CJ, Randle LV, Kosmoliaptsis V, Gibbs P, Allison M, Butler AJ (2017) 26-hour storage of a declined liver before successful transplantation using ex vivo normothermic perfusion. Ann Surg 265(1):e1–e2
Yang L, Cao H, Sun D, Hou B, Lin L, Shen ZY, Song HL (2020) Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells combine with normothermic machine perfusion to improve rat donor liver quality-the important role of hepatic microcirculation in donation after circulatory death. Cell Tissue Res 381:239–254
Yang L, Cao H, Sun D, Lin L, Zheng WP, Shen ZY, Song HL (2020) Normothermic machine perfusion combined with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells improves the oxidative stress response and mitochondrial function in rat donation after circulatory death livers. Stem Cells Dev 29:835–852
Yannarelli G, Dayan V, Pacienza N, Lee CJ, Medin J, Keating A (2013) Human umbilical cord perivascular cells exhibit enhanced cardiomyocyte reprogramming and cardiac function after experimental acute myocardial infarction. Cell Transplant 22(9):1651–1666
Zhang J, Li Y, Chen J et al (2004) Expression of insulin-like growth factor 1 and receptor in ischemic rats treated with human marrow stromal cells. Brain Res 1030(1):19–27
Zhang K, Shi Z, Zhou J, Xing Q, Ma S, Li Q, Zhang Y, Yao M, Wang X, Li Q, Li J, Guan F (2018) Potential application of an injectable hydrogel scaffold loaded with mesenchymal stem cells for treating traumatic brain injury. J Mater Chem B 6:2982–2992
Zhang M, Mal N, Kiedrowski M et al (2007) SDF-1 expression by mesenchymal stem cells results in trophic support of cardiac myocytes after myocardial infarction. FASEB J 21(12):3197–3207
Zhao L, Hu C, Zhang P, Jiang H, Chen J (2019) Preconditioning strategies for improving the survival rate and paracrine ability of mesenchymal stem cells in acute kidney injury. J Cell Mol Med 23:720–730
Zong X, Wu S, Li F et al (2017) Transplantation of VEGF-mediated bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells promotes functional improvement in a rat acute cerebral infarction model. Brain Res 1676:9–18
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81700553, No. 81770752).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, L., Hu, C., Han, F. et al. Combination of mesenchymal stromal cells and machine perfusion is a novel strategy for organ preservation in solid organ transplantation. Cell Tissue Res 384, 13–23 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-020-03406-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-020-03406-3