Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:09:14.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human Sovereignty Eclipsed? Toward a Posthumanist Reading of the Traumatized Subject in J.M. Coetzee’s Disgrace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2020

Deniz Gündoğan İbrişim
Deniz Gündoğan İbrişim*
Affiliation:
Department of Comparative Literature, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA. Email: deniz@wustl.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The main aim of this article is to analyse J.M. Coetzee’s Disgrace (1999) from a posthumanist perspective. By focusing on the character David Lurie, this article analyses the complex materiality of bodies and the agentic powers of nonhuman entities in coping with individual trauma, where agency is no longer considered to be the distinguishing quality unique to humans. In so doing, it highlights the interdependence of the human and the nonhuman and the idea that environment is not a mere canvas onto which characters’ traumas are being reflected. On the contrary, it is a material-affective matrix which becomes a catalyst for making sense of the world in post-apartheid South Africa. At the same time, as this article argues, it decentres the sovereignty of the human subject.

Type
Articles
Information
European Review , Volume 29 , Issue 3: Literature in Times of Crisis and Vulnerability , June 2021 , pp. 397 - 410
Copyright
© 2020 Academia Europaea

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agamben, G (2004) The Open Man and Animal. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 37–40.Google Scholar
Alaimo, S (2010) Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Bloomington Indiana: Indiana University Press, pp. 2–10.Google Scholar
Attridge, D (2000) Age of bronze, state of grace: music and dogs in Coetzee’s “Disgrace” NOVEL. A Forum on Fiction 34(1), 98–121, doi: 10.2307/1346141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, R (2007) Apartheid and Beyond: South African Writers and the Politics of Place Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, J (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham and London: Duke University Press, pp. 2–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braidotti, R (2013) The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 40–100.Google Scholar
Braidotti, R (2018) A theoretical framework for critical posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(6), 31–61. Available at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0263276418771486 (accessed 23 April 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caruth, C (1995) Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, and History. Baltimore MD: John Hopkins University Press, pp. 5–98.Google Scholar
Coetzee, JM (1999) Disgrace. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Danta, C (2007) Like a Dog… like a Lamb: Becoming Sacrificial Animal in Kafka and Coetzee. New Literary History 38(4), 721–737, doi: 10.1353/nlh.2008.0011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felman, SF and Laub, D (1992) Testimony: Crises of Witnessing in Literature, Psychoanalysis, and History. New York: Routledge, pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
Freud, S (2003 [1920]) Beyond the Pleasure Principle. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Freud, S and Strachey, J (1989) Beyond the Pleasure Principle. Standard edn. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Herron, T (2005) The dog man: becoming animal in Coetzee’s Disgrace . Twentieth Century Literature 51(4), 467–490. https://doi.org/10.1215/0041462X-2005-1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaCapra, D (2001) Writing History, Writing Trauma. Baltimore MD: John Hopkins University Press, pp. 40–44.Google Scholar
Latour, B (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, pp.10–20.Google Scholar
Muñoz, JE (1999) Disidentifications: Queers of Color and the Performance of Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 30–35.Google Scholar
Pickering, A (1995) The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 10–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar