Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T13:17:32.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Institutional Lock-out of Sustainable Transport Technologies: Inherent, Intentional, Invertible?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2020

Stephen Bi*
Affiliation:
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Wissenschaftpark ‘Albert Einstein’, Telegrafenberg, 14473Potsdam, Germany. Email: stephen.bi@pik-potsdam.de

Abstract

The worldwide transportation sector remains 93% dependent on the oil industry. While other economic sectors in developed nations have begun to decarbonize in recent decades, greenhouse gas emissions from transportation have continued to rise. This article examines how automobiles came to be so dependent on a finite and socially detrimental resource when electric and ethanol-powered vehicles have always offered distinct performance advantages, and how the latter vehicles fell from socio-political favour to technological lock-out.

Type
Focus: Mobility – A Bridge Between the Past and the Present
Copyright
© 2020 Academia Europaea

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arthur, WB (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal of Nepal 99(394), 116131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, WB (1994) Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bárány, A and Grigonyté, D (2015) Measuring fossil fuel subsidies. ECFIN Economic Brief 40. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/economic_briefs/2015/pdf/eb40_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Carolan, MS (2009) Ethanol versus gasoline: the contestation and closure of a socio-technical system in the USA. Social Studies of Science 39(3), 421448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coase, R (1998) The new institutional economics. The American Economic Review 88(2), 7274.Google Scholar
David, PA (1985) Clio and the economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review 75(2), 332337.Google Scholar
David, PA (2001) Path dependence, its critics, and the quest for `historical economics’. In Hodgson, GM (ed.), The Evolution of Economic Institutions. London: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 120144.Google Scholar
del Rio, P and Unruh, GC (2012) Unlocking the unsustainable techno-institutional complex. In Marletto, G (ed.), Creating a Sustainable Economy. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 231255.Google Scholar
Dunlap, RE and McCright, AM (2011) Organized climate change denial. In Dryzek, JS, Norgaard, RB and Schlosberg, D (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 144160.Google Scholar
Dutreuil, J, Guerra, J, Grywalski, M and Mehnert, W (2008) E85 conversion kit. Senior Report, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New York. Available at https://web.stevens.edu/ses/me/fileadmin/me/senior_design/2008/group09/SRD/ME423__FALL_07__PHASE_3__GROUP9__E85_CONVERSION_KIT.pdf.Google Scholar
European Commission (2016) Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (recast). No. SWD(2016) 418 PART 1/4). Available at https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/1_en_impact_assessment_part1_v4_418.pdf.Google Scholar
European Commission, Eurostat (2016) Statistical Pocketbook: EU Transport in Figures. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/transport/facts-fundings/statistics/pocketbook-2016_en.Google Scholar
European Commission, Eurostat (2017) Consumption of Energy – Statistics Explained. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Consumption_of_energy.Google Scholar
European Commission, Eurostat (2018) Share of energy from renewable sources. Available at http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=nrg_ind_335a&lang=en.Google Scholar
InfluenceMap (2016) How much Big Oil Spends on Obstructive Climate Lobbying. London: InfluenceMap. Available at https://influencemap.org/site/data/000/173/Lobby_Spend_Report_March_2016.pdf.Google Scholar
International Energy Agency (2017) Key World Energy Statistics. Available at https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/KeyWorld2017.pdf.Google Scholar
International Energy Agency (2018). Global EV Outlook. Available at https://www.iea.org/gevo2018/.Google Scholar
Kitman, JL (2000) The secret history of lead. The Nation 20 March 2000. Available at https://www.thenation.com/article/secret-history-lead/.Google Scholar
Kohler, J (2012) Moving away from the motor car. In Marletto, G (ed.), Creating a Sustainable Economy. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 156174.Google Scholar
Kovarik, W (1998) Henry Ford, Charles Kettering and the fuel of the future. Automotive History Review 32, 727.Google Scholar
Kovarik, W (2013) Biofuels in history. In Singh, BP (ed.), Biofuel Crops: Production, Physiology and Genetics. Wallingford: CABI, 122.Google Scholar
Matulka, R (2014) The history of the electric car. Available at https://energy.gov/articles/history-electric-car.Google Scholar
Nesbit, M, Fergusson, M, Colsa, A, Ohlendorf, J, Hayes, C, Paquel, K and Schweitzer, J-P (2016) Comparative study on the differences between the EU and US Legislation on emissions in the automotive sector. Strasburg: European Parliament Document no. IP/A/EMIS/2016-02. Available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/587331/IPOL_STU(2016)587331_EN.pdf.Google Scholar
North, DC (1991) Institutions. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 5(1), 97112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Hanlon, TP (1984) General motors, Nazis, and the demise of urban rail transit. Government Publications Review 11(3), 211232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Painter, DS (1984) Oil and the Marshall Plan. Business History Review 58(3), 359383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, S (2017) EU-28: Biofuels Annual (no NL7015). USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. Global Agricultural Information Network. Available at https://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Biofuels%20Annual_The%20Hague_EU-28_6-19-2017.pdf.Google Scholar
Pierson, P (2000) Increasing returns, path dependence and the study of politics. The American Political Science Review 94(2), 251267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyes, JW (2007) Environmental policy as social policy? The impact of childhood lead exposure on crime. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 13097. Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w13097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilling, MA (2002) Technology success and failure in winner-take-all markets: the impact of learning orientation, timing and network externalities. Academy of Management Journal 45(2), 387398.Google Scholar
Seto, KC, Davis, SJ, Mitchell, RB, Stokes, EC, Unruh, GC and Ürge-Vorsatz, D (2016) Carbon lock-in: types, causes, and policy implications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 41(1), 425452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, R (2009) Ethanol corrosion in pipelines. Chemical treatment. Materials Performance. Available at https://www.slideshare.net/RameshSingh41/mp-ethanol-corrosion.Google Scholar
Unruh, GC (2000) Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28(12), 817830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) (2014) Vehicles per thousand people: U.S. vs. other world regions. Fact #841, October 6, 2014. Available at https://energy.gov/eere/vehicles/fact-841-october-6-2014-vehicles-thousand-people-us-vs-other-world-regions.Google Scholar
US Energy Information Administration (2018) How much gasoline does the United States consume? Available at https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=23&t=10.Google Scholar