Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Standardization and Wound-Healing Activity of Petroleum, Ethanolic and Aqueous Extracts of Ficus Benghalensis Leaves

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal Aims and scope

An Author Correction to this article was published on 05 May 2021

This article has been updated

Wound healing is the repair process of injury on the skin and other soft tissues. After injury, an inflammatory response occurs and tissue cells below the dermis begin to increase collagen formation. Later, the epithelial tissue is regenerated. There are three stages of wound healing process: inflammation, proliferation and remodeling. Traditionally, Ficus benghalensis plant has been used for wound healing but no clear scientific data are available related to this activity. The present work was designed to explore the wound-healing efficacy of petroleum, ethanolic and aqueous extracts of F. benghalensis leaves as evaluated on excision wound models. These leaves extracts were studied for their phytochemicals by means of different chemical tests. Parameters studied include the rate of wound contraction and period of complete epithelialization of incision wound. Student’s t-test was used to analyze the results obtained from this study and confidence level P < 0.05 was considered significant. All the petroleum, ethanolic and aqueous extracts of F. benghalensis leaves were found to possess significant wound-healing activity, which was evidenced by decrease in the period of epithelialization and increase in the rate of wound contraction. The obtained results showed that all extracts of F. benghalensis leaves were capable of accelerated wound-healing activity comparable with a control drug.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Scheme 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. H. Dewangan, M. Bais, V. Jaiswal, and V. K. Verma, Pak. J. Pharm. Sci., 25, 189 – 194 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Krishna and K. Upendra, Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed., 2(4), 272 – 280 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Sabale, B. bhimani, C, Prajapali, and V. Sabale. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci., 2(11), 143 – 150 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Asif and J. N. Sharma, Res. Rev. Drugs Drug Develop., 1(2), 43 – 60 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. K. Saini, M. Singhal, and B. Srivastava, Chin. J. Nat. Med., 10(2), 0138 – 0141 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Divya, K. N. Krishna, S. Ramchandran, and M. D. Dhanaraju, Global J. Pharmacol., 5(3), 159 – 163 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Singh and N. Kant, J. Phytopharmacol., 1(2), 51 – 62 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. S. Daniel, K. S. Devi, and K. T. Augusti, Indian J. Exp. Biol., 41, 296 – 303 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. G. Mahalingam and K. Krishnan, Indian J. Biochem,, 23(4), 394 – 400 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Shukla, S. Gupta, J. K. Gambhir, et al., J. Ethnopharmacol., 92, 47–51 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Manian, N. Anusuya, P. Siddhuraju, and S. Manian, Food Chem., 107, 1000 – 1007 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. D. J. Taur, S. A. Nirmal, R. Y. Patil, and M. D. Kharya, Nat. Prod. Res., 21(14), 1266 – 1270 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Y. Gabhe, P. A. Tatke, and T. A. Khan, Indian J. Pharmacol., 38(4), 271 – 275 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Aswar, U. Aswar, B. Watkar, et al., Int. J. Green Pharm., 2(3), 170 – 173 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. H. A. Khaliq, J. Sci. Innov. Res., 6(4), 151 – 163 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. A. Patel, P. K. Patel, and M. B. Patel, J. Young Pharmacists, 2, 130 – 136 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. M. A. Patel, P. K. Patel, and M. B. Patel, Indian J Pharmacol., 42, 214 – 218 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. R. Patel and P. Gautam, Int. J. Med. Chem. Anal., 4(1), 53 – 58 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  19. OECD, Test No. 423: Acute Oral Toxicity-Acute Toxic Class Method, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4: Health Effects, OECD Publishing (2002). Available from: http: // www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/oecd-guidelines-for-thetesting-of-chemicals-section-4-health-effects_20745788; jsessionid=473a34p6eq17.delta

  20. S. K. Kulkarni, Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology (2nd Edn.), New Delhi: Vallabh Prakashan (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. S. Nayak, M. Anderson, and L. M. P. Pereira, Fitoterapia, 78, 540 – 544. (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. R. Raina, S. Prawez, P. K. Verma, and N. K. Panka, Vet. Scan., 3, 1 – 7 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  23. P. Chithra, G. B. Sajithlal, and G. Chandrakasan, J. Ethnopharmacol., 59, 179 – 186 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. P. K. Agarwal, A. Singh, K. Gaurav, et al., Indian J. Exp. Biol., 47, 32 – 40 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. M. S. Aruna, V. Sravanthi, U. J. Sri, et al., Eur. J. Pharm. Med. Res., 2(7), 329 – 332 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  26. G. P. Choudhary, Int. J. Pharm. Bio. Sci., 2, 48 – 52 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  27. G. K. Dash and P. N. Murthy, J. Nat. Prod. Plant Resourc., 1, 46 – 56 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. Raina, S. Parwer, P. K. Verma, and N. K. Pankaj, Online Vet. J., 3(1), 1 – 7 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  29. D. K. Sandeep, M. Srija, K. Suguna, et al., Int. J Nov. Trends Pharm. Sci., 5(6), 209 – 217 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  30. B. Sarkar, S. K. Jana, S. A. Kasem, and B. K. Behera, Int. J. Exp. Res. Rev., 2, 1 – 4 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  31. V. H. Thorat, Int. J. Pharmacog., 4(9), 281 – 286 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to sincerely thank to the Department of Pharmaceutical chemistry, Himalayan Institute of Pharmacy and Research, Dehradun, (Uttarakhand), India, for providing the facilities to carry out this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Asif.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imran, M., Sharma, J.N., Kamal, M. et al. Standardization and Wound-Healing Activity of Petroleum, Ethanolic and Aqueous Extracts of Ficus Benghalensis Leaves. Pharm Chem J 54, 1057–1062 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-021-02319-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-021-02319-x

Keywords

Navigation