Abstract
The new experimental data on the dynamics of diffraction efficiency (DE) of superimposed volume reflection holograms with a grating period of \({\sim}\)250 nm is obtained at their simultaneous recording in the photopolymer material BAYFOL HX TP. The character and parameters of their interaction are established when exposure of one hologram is delayed relative to the other one. It is revealed that the DE dynamics is practically not affected by variations in diffusion time of monomer in the range \(0.12<t_{D}<0.17\) s, but the transient behavior of the photopolymerization parameter \(\tau_{p}\), which increased in our experiments from 5 to 15 s, becomes considerably visible. The well-known equations of the photoinduced variation in the photopolymer refraction index are improved with account for the character of variation in the parameter \(\tau_{p}\). The calculated dependences of DE dynamics obtained with refined formulas are in good agreement with experimental data (mean square deviation is \({\sim}2\%\)).
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
L. Dhar, K. Curtis, M. Tackitt, M. Schilling, S. Campbell, W. Wilson, A. Hill, C. Boyd, N. Levinos, and A. Harris, ‘‘Holographic storage of multiple high-capacity digital data pages in thick photopolymer systems,’’ Opt. Lett. 23, 1710–1712 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.23.001710
F.-K. Bruder, H. Bang, T. Fäcke, R. Hagen, D. Hönel, E. Orselli, Ch. Rewitz, T. Rölle, D. Vukicevic, and G. Walze, ‘‘Precision holographic optical elements in bayfol HX photopolymer,’’ Proc. SPIE 9771, 977103 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2209636
M. Watanabe, T. Matsuyama, D. Kodama, and T. Hotta, ‘‘Mass-produced color graphic arts holograms,’’ Proc. SPIE 3637, 204–212 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.343773
F.-K. Bruder, T. Fäcke, and T. Rölle, ‘‘The chemistry and physics of bayfol HX film holographic photopolymer,’’ Polymers 9, 472–494 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9100472
G. Zhao and P. Mouroulis, ‘‘Diffusion model of hologram formation in dry photopolymer materials,’’ J. Mod. Opt. 41, 1929–1939 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500349414551831
J. T. Sheridan and J. R. Lawrence, ‘‘Nonlocal-response diffusion model of holographic recording in photopolymer,’’ J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 17, 1108–1114 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.17.001108
M. R.Gleeson and J. T. Sheridan, ‘‘A review of the modeling of free-radical photopolymerization in the formation of holographic gratings,’’ J. Opt. A.: Pure Appl. Opt. 11, 024008 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/1464-4258/11/2/024008
F.-K. Bruder, F. Deuber, T. Fäcke, R. Hagen, D. Hönel, D. Jurbergs, T. Rölle, and M.-S. Weiser, ‘‘Reaction-diffusion model applied to high resolution BayfolR HX photopolymer,’’ Proc. SPIE 7619, 76190I (2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.841956
S. Piazzolla and B. K. Jenkins, ‘‘Dynamics during holographic exposure in photopolymers for single and multiplexed gratings,’’ J. Mod. Opt. 46, 2079–2110 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500349908231394
S. Piazzolla and B. K. Jenkins, ‘‘First-harmonic diffusion model for holographic grating formation in photopolymers,’’ J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 17, 1147–1157 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.17.001147
V. V. Shelkovnikov, E. V. Vasil’ev, T. N. Gerasimova, E. F. Pen, and A. I. Plekhanov, ‘‘Dynamics of pulsed recording of holographic diffraction gratings in photopolymer materials,’’ Opt. Spectrosc. 99, 806–815 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1134/1.2135860
D. Jurbergs, F. Bruder, F. Deuber, T. Fäcke, R. Hagen, D. Hönel, T. Rölle, M.-S. Weiser, and A. Volkov, ‘‘New recording materials for the holographic industry,’’ Proc. SPIE 7233, 72330K (2009). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.809579
Yu. N. Denisyuk, ‘‘The imaging of the optical properties of an object in a wave field of radiation scattered by it,’’ Opt. Spectrosc. 15, 271 (1963).
S. A. Babin, E. V. Vasil’ev, V. I. Kovalevskii, E. F. Pen, A. I. Plekhanov, and V. V. Shelkovnikov, ‘‘Methods and devices for testing holographic photopolymer materials,’’ Avtometriya 39 (2), 57–70 (2003).
E. F. Pen, RF Patent No. 165622, Byull., No. 30 (2016).
M. Moothanchery, I. Naydenova, and V. Toal, ‘‘Study of the shrinkage caused by holographic grating formation in acrylamide based photopolymer film,’’ Opt. Express 19, 13395–13404 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.013395
W. K. Smothers, B. M. Monroe, A. M. Weber, and D. E. Keys, ‘‘Photopolymers for holography,’’ Proc. SPIE 1212, 20–29 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.17963
M. R. Gleeson, J. V. Kelly, C. E. Close, F. T. O’Neill, and J. T. Sheridan, ‘‘Effects of absorption and inhibition during grating formation in photopolymer materials,’’ J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 23, 2079–2088 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.23.002079
H. Kogelnik, ‘‘Coupled wave theory for thick hologram gratings,’’ Bell Syst. Tech. J. 48, 2909–2947 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1969.tb01198.x
M. R. Gleeson, S. Liu, and J. T. Sheridan, ‘‘Improvement of photopolymer materials for holographic data storage,’’ J. Mater. Sci. 44, 6090–6099 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3840-x
J. Guo, M. R. Gleeson, S. Liu, and J. T. Sheridan, ‘‘Analysis of the effects of viscosity, volume, and temperature in photopolymer material for holographic applications,’’ Proc. SPIE 8776, 87760J (2013). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2018330
M. R. Gleeson, Sh. Liu, R. R. McLeod, et al., ‘‘Nonlocal photopolymerization kinetics including multiple termination mechanisms and dark reactions. Part II. Experimental validation,’’ J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 26, 1746–1754 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.26.001746
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author thanks E. V. Vasil’ev for fruitful discussion of the investigation results.
Funding
The work is supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (state registration no. AAAA-A17-117053110007-0).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated by E. Oborin
About this article
Cite this article
Pen, E.F. Dynamics of Diffraction Efficiency of Superimposed Volume Reflection Holograms at Their Simultaneous Recording in Photopolymer Material. Optoelectron.Instrument.Proc. 56, 340–349 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S875669902004010X
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S875669902004010X