Skip to main content
Log in

Crack Propagation Detection Method in the Structural Fatigue Process

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Experimental Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a method for measuring crack propagation length in the structural fatigue process is presented. A convolutional neural network is presented to eliminate noise interference of matching marks and recognize crack features. The initial region of the crack band is obtained through the convolution neural network result. Based on the initial region, an improved algorithm for tip recognition is proposed to calculate the exact position coordinates for crack tips. Finally, according to the position coordinates, the information of crack length is obtained. By increasing the number of cameras, cracks in different directions and locations can be detected simultaneously. The relationship between crack propagation length and the loading values, such as force and fatigue cycles, can be obtained by the proposed method. Meanwhile, compared with measuring means of the electromagnetic vortex, the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed method are validated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Staszewski WJ, Lee BC, Traynor R (2007) Fatigue crack detection in metallic structures with lamb waves and 3D laser vibrometry. Meas Sci Technol 18:727

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Serrano AM, Welsgh GE, Gibala R (1982) An electrical method of measuring crack length during crack propagation tests of polymers. Polym Eng Sci 22:934–936

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ihn J, Chang F (2004) Detection and monitoring of hidden fatigue crack growth using a built-in piezoelectric sensor/actuator network: I. diagnostics. Smart Mater Struct 13:609–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Staszewski WJ (2004) Structural health monitoring using guided ultrasonic waves, in Advances in Smart Technologies in Structural Engineering In: Holnicki-Szulc J, Soares CM (eds). Heidelberg: Berlin, p. 117–162

  5. Cranch GA, Johnson L, Algren M, Heerschap S, Miller GA, Marunda TS, Holtz RL (2017) Crack detection in riveted lap joints using fiber laser acoustic emission sensors. Opt Express 25:19457–19467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Morton TM, Harrington RM, Bjeletich JG (1973) Acoustic emissions of fatigue crack growth. Eng Fract Mech 5:691–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. LeCun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y, Haffner P (1998) Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. P IEEE 86:2278–2324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rowley HA, Baluja S, Kanade T (1998) Neural network-based face detection. IEEE T Pattern Anal 20:23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cun YL, Boser BE, Denker JS, Henderson D, Howard RE, Hubbard WE, Jackel LD (1990) Handwritten digit recognition with a back-propagation network. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, 2(2):396–404

  10. Sermanet P, Chintala S, LeCun Y (2012) Convolutional neural networks applied to house numbers digit classification. In: Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 2012 21st International Conference on (IEEE), pp. 3288–3291

  11. LeCun Y, Huang FJ, Bottou L (2004) Learning methods for generic object recognition with invariance to pose and lighting. In: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on (IEEE), p. 104

  12. Cireşan D, Meier U, Schmidhuber J (2012) Multi-column deep neural networks for image classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1202.2745

  13. Sermanet P, LeCun Y (2011) Traffic sign recognition with multi-scale convolutional networks. In: Neural Networks (IJCNN), The 2011 International Joint Conference on (IEEE), pp. 2809–2813

  14. Deng J, Dong W, Socher R, Li L, Li K, Fei-Fei L (2009) Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009. CVPR 2009. IEEE Conference on (IEEE), pp. 248–255

  15. Jarrett K, Kavukcuoglu K, LeCun Y (2009) What is the best multi-stage architecture for object recognition? In: Computer Vision, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on (IEEE), pp. 2146–2153

  16. Rastegari M, Ordonez V, Redmon J, Farhadi A (2016) Xnor-net: Imagenet classification using binary convolutional neural networks. In: European Conference on Computer Vision (Springer), pp. 525–542

  17. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2012) ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems

  18. Chen F, Jahanshahi MR (2018) NB-CNN: deep learning-based crack detection using convolutional neural network and Naïve Bayes data fusion. IEEE T Ind Electron 65:4392–4400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jiang C, Wang Y, Wang J, Song W, Lu L (2017) Achieving ultrasensitive in vivo detection of bone crack with polydopamine-capsulated surface-enhanced Raman nanoparticle. Biomaterials 114:54–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Broberg P (2013) Surface crack detection in welds using thermography. NDT&E Int 57:69–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kamaya M (2003) A crack growth evaluation method for interacting multiple cracks. JSME Int J 46:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cha Y, Choi W, Buyukozturk O (2017) Deep learning-based crack damage detection using convolutional neural networks. Comput-Aided Civ Inf Eng 32:361–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Neogi N, Mohanta DK, Dutta PK (2014) Review of vision-based steel surface inspection systems. EURASIP J Image Vid Process 2014:50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen FC, Jahanshahi RMR (2017) NB-CNN: deep learning-based crack detection using convolutional neural network and Naïve Bayes data fusion. IEEE T Ind Electron, 65(99):4392–4400

  25. Abadi M, Agarwal A, Barham P, Brevdo E, Zheng X (2016) TensorFlow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. p. arXiv:1603.04467

  26. Raghavendra U, Fujita H, Bhandary SV, Gudigar A, Tan JH, Acharya UR (2018) Deep convolution neural network for accurate diagnosis of Glaucoma using digital fundus images. Inf Sci 441:S1914200504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bengio Y (2015) Practical recommendations for gradient-based training of deep architectures. Lect Notes Comput Sci 7700:437–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Scherer D, Müller A, Behnke S (2010) Evaluation of pooling operations in convolutional architectures for object recognition. In: International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks

  29. Liew SS, Khalil-Hani M, Bakhteri R (2016) Bounded activation functions for enhanced training stability of deep neural networks on visual pattern recognition problems. Neuro Comput 216:718–734

    Google Scholar 

  30. Maas AL, Hannun AY, Ng AY (2013) Rectifier nonlinearities improve neural network acoustic models. In: ICML Workshop on Deep Learning forAudio, Speech and Language Processing

  31. Srivastava N, Hinton G, Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Salakhutdinov R (2014) Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from Overfitting. J Mach Learn Res 15:1929–1958

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lecun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521:436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ioffe S, Szegedy C (2015) Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. In: International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning

  34. Graves A, Mohamed AR, Hinton G (2013) Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics

  35. Specht DF (1990) Probabilistic neural networks ☆. Neural Netw 3:109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhao YL, Tao QC, Qian-Wen LU, Liu MX, I. I. Institute (2018) The adaptive-canny threshold selection algorithm based on the second derivative of image gradient. Sci Technol Eng

  37. Xuan L, Hong Z (2017) An improved canny edge detection algorithm. In: 2017 8th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS)

  38. Xin C, Chen H (2010) A novel color edge detection algorithm in RGB color space. In: IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing

  39. Wang B, Fan SS (2009) An improved CANNY edge detection algorithm. In: International Workshop on Computer Science & Engineering, pp. 497–500

  40. Deng G, Cahill LW (1993) An adaptive Gaussian filter for noise reduction and edge detection. In: Nuclear Science Symposium & Medical Imaging Conference

  41. Rong W, Li Z, Wei Z, Sun L (2014) An improved canny edge detection algorithm. In: IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics & Automation

  42. Rodríguez JA, Perronnin F (2008) Local gradient histogram features for word spotting in unconstrained handwritten documents. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition (ICFHR)

  43. Wolf E (1970) Fatigue crack closure under cyclic tension. Eng Fract Mech 2:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Guo X, Liang J, Xiao Z, Cao B (2014) Digital image correlation for large deformation applied in Ti alloy compression and tension test. Optik - Int J Light Electron Optics 125:5316–5322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the financial support by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 11602201, 11772268, 1152220 and 11527803), Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Provice of China (No. 2018JQ1060).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to X. Guo.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, X., Yuan, Y. & Liu, Y. Crack Propagation Detection Method in the Structural Fatigue Process. Exp Tech 45, 169–178 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-020-00425-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-020-00425-1

Keywords

Navigation