Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Pond Dynamics Yield Minimal Net Loss of Vegetation Cover Across an Unditched Salt Marsh Landscape

  • Special Issue: Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology Revisited
  • Published:
Estuaries and Coasts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ponds in salt marshes are often misinterpreted as a symptom of degradation, yet ponds can also be part of a cyclical process of pond formation, expansion, breaching by tidal creeks, and vegetation recovery. Pond dynamics may be altered by accelerated sea level rise, with consequences for the long-term stability of ecosystems. This study tests the prediction that ponds are in dynamic equilibrium across one of the largest expanses of unditched salt marsh in the Northeast USA by (1) examining change in pond and marsh area between 1970 and present in both ditched and unditched regions and (2) by tracking individual pond dynamics across an 87-year time series. Across all marshes, vegetated area declined by 6.3%, with losses primarily due to edge erosion. Ditched marsh had significantly less pond area than unditched marsh. In unditched marshes, we found that net pond area has remained unchanged since 1970 because the amount of marsh conversion to ponds is equivalent to the amount of pond recovery to marsh. The overall extent of ponds connected to tidal creeks is increasing relative to isolated ponds that retain water at low tide, which suggests that some rates of change may be decoupling. This may correspond to a decline in the rate of pond formation, but other factors such as an increase in pond breaching rate and a lag in vegetation recovery rate may also contribute to this pattern. A nuanced understanding of marsh ponds needs to be incorporated into marsh condition assessments and establishment of restoration priorities so that ponds are not interpreted as evidence of degradation when they are exhibiting a recovery cycle. Unditched marshes around the world are a rare resource that remains essential for advancing scientific understanding and serving as reference sites for restoration of marshes altered by past management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamowicz, Susan C., and Charles T. Roman. 2005. New England salt marsh pools: a quantitative analysis of geomorphic and geographic features. Wetlands 25 (2): 279–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, Gail M., and Marjorie L. Zeff. 1988. Tidal channel classification for a low-mesotidal salt marsh. Marine Geology 82. Elsevier: 17–32.

  • Bourn, Warren Scudder, and Clarence Cottam. 1950. Some biological effects of ditching tidewater marshes. Washington D.C.: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

  • Brown, W.W. 1978. Wetland mapping in New Jersey and New York. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 44: 303–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, James P. 2017. Long-term erosional trends along channelized salt marsh edges. Estuaries and Coasts 40 (6): 1566–1575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-017-0245-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burdick, David M., Gregg E. Moore, Susan C. Adamowicz, Geoffrey M. Wilson, and Chris R. Peter. 2019. Mitigating the legacy effects of ditching in a New England salt marsh. Estuaries and Coasts. Springer: 1–8.

  • Burnham, Kenneth P., and David Anderson. 2003. Model selection and multi-model inference. 2nd ed. Springer.

  • Cameron Engineering and Associates. 2015. Long Island tidal wetland trends analysis. Prepared for the New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corman, Sarah S., Charles T. Roman, John W. King, and Peter G. Appleby. 2012. Salt marsh mosquito-control ditches: Sedimentation, landscape change, and restoration implications. Journal of Coastal Research 28 (4): 874–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correll, Maureen D., Wouter Hantson, Thomas P. Hodgman, Brittany B. Cline, Chris S. Elphick, W. Gregory Shriver, Elizabeth L. Tymkiw, and Brian J. Olsen. 2018. Fine-scale mapping of coastal plant communities in the northeastern USA. Wetlands 39 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-018-1028-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne, Jean-Claude. 1968. Action of shore ice on the tidal flats of the St. Atlantic Geology: Lawrence estuary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, Jeffrey P., and Mark D. Bertness. 2001. Rapid shoreward encroachment of salt marsh cordgrass in response to accelerated sea-level rise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98 (25): 14218–14223. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.251209298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Escapa, Mauricio, Gerardo ME Perillo, and Oscar Iribarne. 2015. Biogeomorphically driven salt pan formation in Sarcocornia-dominated salt-marshes. Geomorphology 228. Elsevier: 147–157.

  • Ganju, Neil K., Zafer Defne, and Sergio Fagherazzi. 2020. Are elevation and open-water conversion of salt marshes connected? Geophysical Research Letters 47: e2019GL086703. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086703

  • Ganju, Neil K., Zafer Defne, Matthew L. Kirwan, Sergio Fagherazzi, Andrea D’Alpaos, and Luca Carniello. 2017. Spatially integrative metrics reveal hidden vulnerability of microtidal salt marshes. Nature Communications 8 (1): 14156. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gedan, K.B., B.R. Silliman, and M.D. Bertness. 2009. Centuries of human-driven change in salt marsh ecosystems. Annual Review of Marine Science 1: 117–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goudie, Alice. 2013. Characterising the distribution and morphology of creeks and pans on salt marshes in England and Wales using Google Earth. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 129. Elsevier: 112–123.

  • Harshberger, John W. 1916. The origin and vegetation of salt marsh pools. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society: 481–484.

  • Hopkinson, Charles S., James T. Morris, Sergio Fagherazzi, Wilfred M. Wollheim, and Peter A. Raymond. 2018. Lateral marsh edge erosion as a source of sediments for vertical marsh accretion. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 123. Wiley Online Library: 2444–2465.

  • Kaplan, E.L., and P. Meier. 1958. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 53: 457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karl, Jason W., Jeffrey K. Gillan, Nichole N. Barger, Jeffrey E. Herrick, and Michael C. Duniway. 2014. Interpretation of high-resolution imagery for detecting vegetation cover composition change after fuels reduction treatments in woodlands. Ecological indicators 45. Elsevier: 570–578.

  • Kearney, Michael S., and R. Eugene Turner. 2016. Microtidal marshes: can these widespread and fragile marshes survive increasing climate–sea level variability and human action? Journal of Coastal Research 32. Allen Press: 686–699. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-15-00069.1, 32, 3.

  • Kennish, Michael J. 2001. Coastal salt Marsh Systems in the U.S.: A review of anthropogenic impacts. Journal of Coastal Research 17: 731–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan, Matthew L., and J. Patrick Megonigal. 2013. Tidal wetland stability in the face of human impacts and sea-level rise. Nature 504 (7478): 53–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kopp, Robert E., Clinton J. Andrews, Anthony Broccoli, Andra Garner, Danielle Kreeger, Robin Leichenko, Ning Lin, Christopher M. Little, John A. Miller, and Jon K. Miller. 2019. New Jersey’s rising seas and changing coastal storms: report of the 2019 science and technical advisory panel. Rutgers: The State University of New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lathrop, Jr, G. Richard, J. Moody, Erin Reilly, and Rachael Sacatelli. 2017. Decision-making for coastal adaptation: Sustaining coastal salt marshes for ecosystem services along the Jersey shore: marsh futures methodology. Rutgers University Center for Remote Sensing & Spatial Analysis.

  • Lathrop, R.G., M.B. Cole, and R.D. Showalter. 2000. Quantifying the habitat structure and spatial pattern of New Jersey (U.S.A.) salt marshes under different management regimes. Wetlands Ecology and Management 8 (2/3): 163–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeMay, Lynsey E. 2007. The impact of drainage ditches on salt marsh flow patterns. Sedimentation and Morphology: Rowley River, Massachusetts. M.S. thesis, College of William and Mary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linthurst, Rick A., and Ernest D. Seneca. 1980. The effects of standing water and drainage potential on the Spartina Alterniflora-substrate complex in a North Carolina salt marsh. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 11 (1): 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0302-3524(80)80028-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mariotti, and Sergio Fagherazzi. 2013. Critical width of tidal flats triggers marsh collapse in the absence of sea-level rise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110 (14): 5353–5356. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219600110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mariotti, G. 2016. Revisiting salt marsh resilience to sea level rise: Are ponds responsible for permanent land loss? Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface 121 (7): 1391–1407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariotti, G. 2018. Marsh channel morphological response to sea level rise and sediment supply. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 209. Elsevier: 89–101.

  • Mariotti, G. 2020. Beyond marsh drowning: The many faces of marsh loss (and gain). Advances in Water Resources 144: 103710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariotti, G., A.C. Spivak, S.Y. Luk, G. Ceccherini, M. Tyrrell, and M. Eagle Gonneea. 2020. Modeling the spatial dynamics of marsh ponds in New England salt marshes. Geomorphology 365: 107262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Master, Terry L. 1992. Composition, structure, and dynamics of mixed-species foraging aggregations in a southern New Jersey salt marsh. Colonial Waterbirds 15 (1): 66–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKee, Karen L., Irving A. Mendelssohn, and Michael D. Materne. 2004. Acute salt marsh dieback in the Mississippi River deltaic plain: a drought-induced phenomenon? Global Ecology and Biogeography 13 (1): 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-882X.2004.00075.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, William H., David E. Saveikis, and Chester J. Stachecki. 1985. Guidelines for “open marsh water management” in Delaware’s salt marshes—objectives, system designs, and installation procedures. Wetlands 5 (1): 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, William R., and Frank E. Egler. 1950. Vegetation of the Wequetequock-Pawcatuck tidal-marshes, Connecticut. Ecological Monographs 20 (2): 143–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NOAA Office for Coastal Management. 2014. NOAA NGS Topobathy Lidar DEM: Post-Sandy (SC to NY). NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olofsson, Pontus, Giles M. Foody, Stephen V. Stehman, and Curtis E. Woodcock. 2013. Making better use of accuracy data in land change studies: estimating accuracy and area and quantifying uncertainty using stratified estimation. Remote Sensing of Environment 129. Elsevier: 122–131.

  • Perillo, Gerardo ME. 2019. Geomorphology of tidal courses and depressions. In Coastal Wetlands, 221–261. Elsevier.

  • Pethick, J.S. 1974. The distribution of salt pans on tidal salt marshes. Journal of Biogeography 1 (1): 57–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, K.H., S.R. Winterstein, C.M. Bunck, and P.D. Curtis. 1989. Survival analysis in telemetry studies—the staggered entry design. Journal of Wildlife Management 53 (1): 7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontius, Robert G., Emily Shusas, and Menzie McEachern. 2004. Detecting important categorical land changes while accounting for persistence. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 101 (2-3): 251–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raposa, Kenneth B., Robin L.J. Weber, Marci Cole Ekberg, and Wenley Ferguson. 2015. Vegetation dynamics in Rhode Island salt marshes during a period of accelerating sea level rise and extreme sea level events. Estuaries and Coasts 40 (3): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-015-0018-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Redfield, Alfred C. 1972. Development of a New England salt marsh. Ecological Monographs 42 (2): 201–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, William R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43 (1): 223–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Jeremiah. 2018. Effects of natural and anthropogenic forcing on Marsh channel evolution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochlin, Ilia, Mary-Jane James-Pirri, Susan C. Adamowicz, Roger J. Wolfe, Paul Capotosto, Mary E. Dempsey, Thomas Iwanejko, and Dominick V. Ninivaggi. 2012. Integrated Marsh Management (IMM): a new perspective on mosquito control and best management practices for salt marsh restoration. Wetlands Ecology and Management 20 (3): 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-012-9251-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner, Sam. 1998. Design and analysis of ecological experiments. CRC Press.

  • Schepers, Lennert, Matthew Kirwan, Glenn Guntenspergen, and Stijn Temmerman. 2017. Spatio-temporal development of vegetation die-off in a submerging coastal marsh. Limnology and Oceanography 62. Wiley online library: 137–150.

  • Schuepfer, Frederick E., Gerard P. Lennon, Richard N. Weisman, and Ralph Gabriel. 1988. Hydrodynamic model of Great Sound, New Jersey. Marine Geology 82. The Hydrodynamics and Sedimentology of a Back-Barrier Lagoon-Salt Marsh System: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-3227(88)90003-5.

  • Silliman, Brian R., Edwin Grosholz, and Mark D. Bertness. 2009. Human impacts on salt marshes: A global perspective. Univ of California Press.

  • Smith, John Bernhard. 1907. The New Jersey Salt Marsh and Its Improvement. New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Stations.

  • Smith, Joseph A.M. 2013. The role of Phragmites australis in mediating inland salt marsh migration in a mid-Atlantic estuary. PLoS One 8 (5): e65091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Joseph A.M., and L.J. Niles. 2016. Are salt marsh pools suitable sites for restoration? Wetland Science and Practice 33: 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Lotem, David Curson, Gregory M. Verutes, and Chad Wilsey. 2020. Mapping Sea level rise impacts to identify climate change adaptation opportunities in the Chesapeake and Delaware bays, USA. Wetlands Ecology and Management 28 (3): 527–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-020-09729-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theobald, David M., Don L. Stevens, White Denis, N. Scott Urquhart, Anthony R. Olsen, and John B. Norman. 2007. Using GIS to generate spatially balanced random survey designs for natural resource applications. Environmental Management 40 (1): 134–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VanZomeren, Christine M., Jacob F. Berkowitz, Candice D. Piercy, and John R. White. 2018. Restoring a degraded marsh using thin layer sediment placement: Short term effects on soil physical and biogeochemical properties. Ecological Engineering 120: 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.05.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, Robert E., David M. Burdick, and Michele Dionne. 2013. Ditching and ditch-plugging in New England salt marshes: effects on hydrology, elevation, and soil characteristics. Estuaries and Coasts 36 (3): 610–625.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wasson, Kerstin, Neil K. Ganju, Zafer Defne, Charlie Endris, Tracy Elsey-Quirk, Karen M. Thorne, Chase M. Freeman, Glenn Guntenspergen, Daniel J. Nowacki, and Kenneth B. Raposa. 2019. Understanding tidal marsh trajectories: evaluation of multiple indicators of marsh persistence. Environmental Research Letters 14. IOP Publishing: 124073.

  • Watson, Elizabeth Burke, Cathleen Wigand, Earl W. Davey, Holly M. Andrews, Joseph Bishop, and Kenneth B. Raposa. 2016. Wetland loss patterns and inundation-productivity relationships prognosticate widespread salt marsh loss for southern New England. Estuaries and Coasts 40 (3): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-016-0069-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White, G. C, and K. P Burnham. 1999. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46 Supplement: 120–138.

  • Wigand, Cathleen, Thomas Ardito, Caitlin Chaffee, Wenley Ferguson, Suzanne Paton, Kenneth Raposa, Charles Vandemoer, and Elizabeth Watson. 2017. A climate change adaptation strategy for management of coastal marsh systems. Estuaries and Coasts 40. Springer: 682–693.

  • Wilen, Bill O., and M.K. Bates. 1995. The US fish and wildlife service’s national wetlands inventory project. Vegetation 118 (1-2): 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Carol A., Zoe J. Hughes, Duncan M. FitzGerald, Charles S. Hopkinson, Vinton Valentine, and Alexander S. Kolker. 2014. Saltmarsh pool and tidal creek morphodynamics: dynamic equilibrium of northern latitude saltmarshes? Geomorphology 213: 99–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Kristin, Joseph T. Kelley, Arie Croitoru, Michele Dionne, Daniel F. Belknap, and Robert Steneck. 2009. Stratigraphic and ecophysical characterizations of salt pools: dynamic landforms of the Webhannet salt marsh, Wells, ME, USA. Estuaries and Coasts 32 (5): 855–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Kristin, Joseph T. Kelley, Benjamin R. Tanner, and Daniel F. Belknap. 2010. Probing the origins and stratigraphic signature of salt pools from north-temperate marshes in Maine, U.S.A. Journal of Coastal Research: 1007–1026. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-10-00007.1.

  • Yang, Zizang, Edward P. Myers, Adeline M. Wong, and Stephen Alston White. 2008. VDatum for Chesapeake Bay. Delaware Bay, and adjacent coastal water areas tidal datums, and sea surface topography.

  • Zeff, Marjorie L. 1999. Salt marsh tidal channel morphometry: applications for wetland creation and restoration. Restoration Ecology 7 (2): 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100X.1999.72013.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the reviewers, Rick Lathrop and Virginia Rettig, for feedback that helped improve the manuscript. We thank Larry Niles for his support and encouragement to pursue this work. We also thank Mike Kilpatrick for several of the photos used in the supplemental material. Rick Lathrop and Rachael Sacatelli shared field data that allowed for validation of our vegetation classifications.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Edwin B. Forsythe National Wildlife Refuge, Galloway, NJ, 08205, USA

    Joseph A. M. Smith

  2. Unity College, 90 Quaker Hill Road, Unity, ME, 04988, USA

    Michael Pellew

Authors
  1. Joseph A. M. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Pellew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph A. M. Smith.

Additional information

Communicated by Dennis F. Whigham

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(PDF 4.02 MB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smith, J.A.M., Pellew, M. Pond Dynamics Yield Minimal Net Loss of Vegetation Cover Across an Unditched Salt Marsh Landscape. Estuaries and Coasts 44, 1534–1546 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-020-00882-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-020-00882-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation