1932

Abstract

I review the growing body of research that either directly assesses the effect of Ban the Box (BTB) on the employment prospects of those with criminal histories, tests for spillover effects operating through statistical discrimination, or assesses the labor-market impacts of related screening practices. I begin with a theoretical discussion that works through how widespread reluctance to hire those with criminal histories is likely to generate market-level employment and earnings penalties for various groups of workers, and how the size and distribution of these penalties likely depend on the information available to employers. I then turn to a review of research over the past 15 years or so that either directly assesses the impact of BTB or addresses highly related and relevant research questions. The weight of the empirical evidence suggests that BTB does not improve the employment prospects of those with criminal histories at private-sector employers, although there is some evidence of an improvement in employment prospects in the public sector. Regarding spillover effects operating through statistical discrimination, several studies indicate that BTB harms the employment prospects of African-American men. Furthermore, research on the effects of credit checks, occupational licensing, and drug testing appears to indicate that more information available to the employer improves the employment prospects of African Americans. Collectively, these findings imply that in the absence of objective information, employers place weight on stereotypes about the characteristics of black workers that are generally negative and inaccurate.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-061020-022137
2021-01-13
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/criminol/4/1/annurev-criminol-061020-022137.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-061020-022137&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Agan A, Starr S. 2018. Ban the box, criminal records, and racial discrimination: a field experiment. Q. J. Econ. 133:191–235
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Autor DH, Scarborough D. 2008. Does job testing harm minority workers? Evidence from retail establishments. Q. J. Econ. 123:219–77
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Avery B. 2019. Ban the box: U.S. cities, counties, and states adopt fair-chance policies to advance employment opportunities for people with past convictions Rep., Natl. Employ. Law Proj New York:
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Altonji JG, Pierret CR. 2001. Employer learning and statistical discrimination. Q. J. Econ. 116:1313–50
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Apel R, Sweeten G. 2010. The impact of incarceration on employment during the transition to adulthood. Soc. Prob. 57:3448–79
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ballance J, Clifford R, Shoag D 2020. “No more credit score”: employer credit check bans and signal substitution. Labour Econ 63:101769
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bartik AW, Nelson ST. 2019. Deleting a signal: evidence from pre-employment credit checks Work. Pap. 2019-137 Becker-Friedman Inst Chicago:
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Becker GA. 1971. The Economics of Discrimination Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  9. Bjerk D. 2008. Glass ceilings or sticky floors? Statistical discrimination in a dynamic model of hiring and promotion. Econ. J. 118:961–82
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Blair PQ, Chung BW. 2018. Job market signaling through occupational licensing NBER Work. Pap24791
  11. Brame R, Bushway SD, Raymond P, Turner MG 2014. Demographic patterns of cumulative arrest prevalence by age 18 and 23. Crime Delinquency 60:471–86
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bur. Justice Stat. 2020. Key statistics: correctional populations. Key Stat., Bur. Justice Stat. Washington, DC: https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=kfdetail&iid=487
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bushway SD. 1998. Labor market effects of permitting employer access to criminal history records Work. Pap., Univ. Md College Park:
  14. Bushway SD. 2004. Labor market effects of permitting employer access to criminal history records. J. Contemp. Crim. Justice 20:276–91
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cavico FJ, Mujtaba BG, Muffler S 2014. Criminal background checks in employment: an unfolding legal quandary for employers. J. Law Crim. Justice 2:141–103
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Charles KK, Guryan J. 2008. Prejudice and wages: an empirical assessment of Becker's The Economics of Discrimination. J. Political Econ 116:5773–809
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Craigie T-A. 2020. Ban the box, convictions, and public employment. Econ. Inq. 58:1425–45
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Doleac JL, Hansen B. 2020. The unintended consequences of “ban the box”: statistical discrimination and employment outcomes when criminal histories are hidden. J. Labor Econ. 38:2321–74
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Eberhardt JL. 2019. Biased: Uncovering the Hidden Prejudice that Shapes What We See, Think, and Do New York: Viking Press
    [Google Scholar]
  20. EEOC (Equal Employ. Oppor. Comm.). 2012. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission enforcement guidance on the consideration of arrest and conviction records in employment decisions under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Rep. 915.002 EEOC Washington, DC: https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/arrest_conviction.cfm
  21. Friedberg L, Hynes R, Pattison N 2017. Who benefits from bans on employer credit checks? Dep. Work. Pap. 1704 Dep. Econ., South. Methodist Univ Dallas, TX:
  22. Holzer H, Raphael S, Stoll M 2006a. How do crime and incarceration affect the employment prospects of less educated black men?. Black Males Left Behind R Mincy 67–85 Washington, DC: Urban Inst.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Holzer H, Raphael S, Stoll M 2006b. Perceived criminality, criminal background checks, and the racial hiring practices of employers. J. Law Econ. 49:2451–80
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Holzer H, Raphael S, Stoll M 2007. The effect of an applicant's criminal history on employer hiring decisions and screening practices: evidence from Los Angeles. Barriers to Reentry? The Labor Market for Released Prisoners in Post-Industrial America S Bushway, M Stoll, D Weiman 117–50 New York: Russell Sage Found.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Marchingiglio R. 2019. Statistical discrimination and the choice of licensing: evidence from ban-the-box laws Work. Pap., Northwestern Univ Evanston, IL:
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Jackson O, Zhao B. 2016. Does changing employer access to criminal histories affect ex-offender recidivism? Evidence from the 2010–2012 Massachusetts CORI reform Work. Pap. 16-31 Fed. Reserve Bank Boston:
  27. Jackson O, Zhao B. 2017. The effect of changing employers’ access to criminal histories on ex-offenders’ labor market outcomes: evidence from the 2010–2012 Massachusetts CORI reform Work. Pap 16–30 Fed. Reserve Bank Boston:
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Pager D. 2003. The mark of a criminal record. Am. J. Sociol. 108:937–75
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Pager D, Quillian L. 2005. Walking the talk? What employers say versus what they do. Am. Sociol. Rev. 70:335580
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Pager D, Western B, Bonikowski B 2009. Discrimination in low-wage labor markets: a field experiment. Am. Sociol. Rev. 74:777–99
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Phelps E. 1972. The statistical theory of racism and sexism. Am. Econ. Rev. 62:4659–61
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Raphael S. 2007. Early incarceration spells and the transition to adulthood. The Price of Independence: The Economics of Early Adulthood S Danziger, CE Rouse 278–306 New York: Russell Sage Found.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Raphael S. 2011. Improving employment prospects for former prison inmates: challenges and policy. Controlling Crime: Strategies and Tradeoffs PJ Cook, J Ludwig, J McCrary 521–72 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Raphael S. 2014. The New Scarlett Letter? Negotiating the U.S. Labor Market with a Criminal Record. Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Inst.
  35. Raphael S, Stoll M. 2013. Why Are So Many Americans in Prison? New York: Russell Sage Found.
  36. Rose E. 2020. Does banning the box help ex-offenders get jobs? Evaluating the effects of prominent example. J. Labor Econ. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Shannon SKS, Uggen C, Schnittker J, Thompson M, Wakefield S, Massoglia M 2017. The growth, scope, and spatial distribution of people with felony records in the United States, 1948–2010. Demography 54:1795–818
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Shoag D, Veuger S. 2019. Ban the box measures help high crime neighborhoods Econ. Policy Work. Pap. 2016-08 Am. Enterp. Inst Washington, DC:
  39. Soc. Hum. Resource Manag. 2010. Background checking: conducting criminal background checks Rep., Soc. Hum. Resource Manag Alexandria, VA:
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Uggen C, Vuolo M, Lageson S, Ruhland E, Whitham HK 2014. The edge of stigma: an experimental audit of the effects of low-level criminal records on employment. Criminology 52:4627–54
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Western B. 2002. The impact of incarceration on wage mobility and inequality. Am. J. Sociol. 67:4526–46
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Wozniak A. 2015. Discrimination and the effects of drug testing on black employment. Rev. Econ. Stat. 97:3548–66
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-061020-022137
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-061020-022137
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error