Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:58:10.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of fall bearing-year glufosinate applications, spring nonbearing-year glufosinate applications, and spring nonbearing-year foramsulfuron applications on hair fescue (Festuca filiformis) in lowbush blueberry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2020

Scott N. White*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Plant, Food, and Environmental Sciences, Dalhousie University Faculty of Agriculture, Truro, NS, Canada
Linshan Zhang
Affiliation:
Graduate student, Department of Plant, Food, and Environmental Sciences, Dalhousie University Faculty of Agriculture, Truro, NS, Canada.
*
Author for correspondence: Scott White. 50 Pictou Road, Truro, Nova Scotia B2N 2R8, Canada. Email: scott.white@dal.ca

Abstract

Hair fescue is a common perennial grass that reduces yields in lowbush blueberry fields. This grass is suppressed with nonbearing-year foramsulfuron applications, though suppression may be improved through use of sequential glufosinate and foramsulfuron applications. The objective of this research was to determine the main and interactive effects of fall bearing-year glufosinate applications, spring nonbearing-year glufosinate applications, and spring nonbearing-year foramsulfuron applications on hair fescue. The experiment was a 2 by 2 by 2 factorial arrangement of fall bearing-year glufosinate application (0, 750 g ai ha–1), spring nonbearing-year glufosinate application (0, 750 g ai ha–1), and spring nonbearing-year foramsulfuron application (0, 35 g ai ha–1) arranged in a randomized complete block design at lowbush blueberry fields located in Parrsboro and Portapique, NS, Canada. Fall bearing-year glufosinate applications, spring nonbearing-year glufosinate applications, and spring nonbearing-year foramsulfuron applications alone provided inconsistent hair fescue suppression. Fall bearing-year glufosinate applications followed by spring nonbearing-year foramsulfuron applications, however, reduced nonbearing-year total tuft density, flowering-tuft density, and flowering-tuft inflorescence number at each site and reduced seed production at Portapique. Sequential fall bearing-year and spring nonbearing-year glufosinate applications or sequential spring nonbearing-year glufosinate and foramsulfuron applications reduced flowering-tuft density and flowering-tuft inflorescence number at each site but did not consistently reduce total tuft density. Sequential herbicide treatments reduced bearing-year seedling density and may therefore contribute to hair fescue seed bank management in lowbush blueberry.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Steve Fennimore, University of California, Davis

References

Aulakh, JS, Jhala, AJ (2015) Comparison of glufosinate-based herbicide programs for broad-spectrum weed control in glufosinate-resistant soybean. Weed Technol 29:419430 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, DM, Swanton, CJ, Hall, JC, Mersey, BG (1993) The influence of temperature and relative humidity on the efficacy of glufosinate-ammonium. Weed Res 33:139147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2019) Crop profile for lowbush blueberry in Canada, 2017. Catalogue No. A118-10/31-2017-PDF. AAFC No. 12972E. Pest Management Program. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 69 pGoogle Scholar
Beyers, JT, Smeda, RJ, Johnson, WG (2002) Weed management programs in glufosinate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 16:267273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chahal, PS, Jhala, AJ (2015) Herbicide programs for control of glyphosate-resistant volunteer corn in glufosinate-resistant soybean. Weed Technol 29:431443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coetzer, E, Al-Khatib, K, Peterson, DE (2002) Glufosinate efficacy on Amaranthus species in glufosinate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 16:326331Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, York, AC, Batts, RB, Jennings, KM (2000) Weed management in glufosinate- and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 14:7788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delbridge, R, Hildebrand, P (1995) Monilinia blight of lowbush blueberry. Lowbush Blueberry Factsheet. Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture and Marketing. 4 p Google Scholar
Eaton, LJ, Glen, RW, Wyllie, JD (2004) Efficient mowing for pruning wild blueberry fields. Small Fruits Rev 3:123131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, IV, Alders, LE, Nickerson, NL, Vander Kloet, SP (1979) The biological flora of Canada. 1. Vaccinium angustifolium Ait., sweet lowbush blueberry. Can Field Natural 93:415430Google Scholar
Hildebrand, PD, McRae, KB, Lu, X (2001) Factors affecting flower infection and disease severity of lowbush blueberry by Botrytis cinerea. Can J Plant Pathol 23:364370 Google Scholar
Ismail, AA, Hanson, EJ (1982) Interaction of method and date of pruning on growth and productivity of the lowbush blueberry. Can J Plant Sci 62:677682 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, DB, Norsworthy, JK, Scott, RC (2014) Herbicide programs for controlling glyphosate-resistant johnonsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in glufosinate-resistant soybean. Weed Technol 28:1018Google Scholar
Landry, RL, Stephenson, IV, Woolam, BC (2016) Glufosinate rate and timing for control of glyphosate-resistant rhizomatous johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in glufosinate-resistant soybean. Int J Agron 2016, Article ID 8040235. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8040235 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCully, KV, Sampson, MG, Watson, AK (1991) Weed survey of Nova Scotia lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium) fields. Weed Sci 39:180185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritts, MP, Hancock, JF (1984) Independence of life history parameters in populations of Vaccinium angustifolium (Ericaceae). Bull Torr Botan Club 111:451461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takano, HK, Beffa, R, Preston, C, Westra, P, Dayan, FE (2019) Reactive oxygen species trigger the fast action of glufosinate. Planta 249:18371849 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Wychen, LR, Harvey, RG, Vangessel, MJ, Rabaey, TL, Bach, DJ (1999) Efficacy and crop response to glufosinate-based weed management in PAT-transformed sweet corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 13:104111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, SN (2018) Determination of Festuca filiformis seedbank characteristics, seedling emergence and herbicide susceptibility to aid management in lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium). Weed Res 58:112120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, SN (2019) Evaluation of herbicides for hair fescue (Festuca filiformis) management and potential seedbank reduction in lowbush blueberry. Weed Technol 33:840846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, SN, Boyd, NS, Van Acker, RC (2012) Growing degree-day models for predicting lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.) ramet emergence, tip dieback, and flowering in Nova Scotia, Canada. HortScience 47:10141021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, SN, Kumar, SK (2017) Potential role of sequential glufosinate and foramsulfuron applications for management of fescue (Festuca spp.) in wild blueberry. Weed Technol 31:100110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiesbrook, ML, Johnson, WG, Hart, SE, Bradley, PR, Wax, LM (2001) Comparison of weed management systems for narrow-row, glyphosate- and glufosinate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 15:122128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, GW (2004) The wild blueberry industry––past. Small Fruits Rev 3:1118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarborough, DE, Cote, JD (2014) Pre- and post-emergence applications of herbicides for control of resistant fine-leaf sheep fescue in wild blueberry fields in Maine. Proc North American Blueberry Research and Extension Workers Conference, June 23–26, 2014, Atlantic City, NJ. https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/45990/PDF/1/play/ Google Scholar
Zhang, L (2017) Management of perennial grasses in wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium) fields. MSc thesis, Dalhousie University, Truro, NS, Canada. 173 pGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L, White, SN, Olson, AR, Pruski, K (2018) Evaluation of flazasulfuron for hair fescue (Festuca filiformis) suppression and wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.) tolerance. Can J Plant Sci 98:12931303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar