Abstract
This paper argues that the relationship between the individual and the whole in holism can be solved from the two dimensions of emergence and identity. Emergence addresses whether the whole has irreducible properties, and identity explains the relationship between the individual and the individual as a collective member. From the perspective of emergence, collective intention is a combination of common content in individual intentions. It has only composition but no whole emergence, and this combination makes intentionality take a collective form. From the perspective of identity, individuals and individuals as collective members are consistent. The “collective” in collective intention refers to the common part of the individual’s intention, and its actual bearer is still the individual participating in the “common part”. Collective intention can be reduced to individual properties and their mutual relations, which are rooted in the relational existence of people.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddorf, M. (2017). Phenomenal consciousness, collective mentality and collective moral responsibility. Philosophical Studies, 174, 2769–2786.
Bratman, M. (1992). Shared Intention. Ethics, 106, 97–113.
Diriwächter, R. (2008). Genetic Ganzheitspsychologie. In R. Diriwächter & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Striving for the whole: Creating theoretical Syntheses (pp. 21–45). Somerset: Transaction Publishers.
Diriwächter, R. (2012). Völkerpsychologie. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 43–57). New York: Oxford University Press.
Durkheim, E. (1994). On Social Facts. In M. Martin & L. McIntyre (Eds.) In Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science (pp. 433–440). Cambridge: MIT Press. (Original work published in French in 1895).
Gilbert, M. (1989). On Social Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gilbert, M. (1990). Walking Together: A Paradigmatic Social Phenomenon. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 15, 177–194.
Gilbert, M. (2000). Sociality and Responsibility: New Essays in Plural Subject Theory. Lanham/Boulder/New York/London: Rowman and Littlefield.
Gilbert, M. (2009). Shared intention and personal intentions. Philosophical Studies, 144, 167–187.
Gold, N., & Sugden, R. (2007). Collective intentions and team agency. The Journal of Philosophy, 104(3), 109–137.
Healey, R. (1991). Holism and nonseparability. The Journal of Philosophy, 88, 393–421.
Hiromatsu, W. (2002). Heidegger and the Reification World (Zhao, Z. M., & Trans). Nanjing Social Science, 2002(6), 1–8. (in Chinese). (Original work published in Japanese in 1993).
Le Bon. (2011). Psychologie Des Foule (Dai, G. N., & Trans). Beijing, New World Press. (in Chinese). (Original work published in French in 1895).
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 4, 34–36.
Marx, K. (2012). Anthology of Marx and Engels. Beijing: People’s Press. (in Chinese). (Original work published in German in 1844).
Pettit, P., & Schweikard, D. (2006). Joint actions and group agents. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 36(1), 18–39.
Plato. (2017). The Republic (Guo, B. H., & Zhang, Z. M., & Trans). Beijing: The Commercial Press. (in Chinese). (Original work published in B.C.337).
Reiners, S. (2020). Our Science Must Establish Itself: On the Scientific Status of Lazarus and Steinthal’s Völkerpsychologie. The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 10, 1.
Rousseau, J. (2003).Du Contrat Social (He, Z. W. Trans). Beijing, The Commercial Press. (in Chinese). (Original work published in French in 1762).
Scheler, M. (1954). The Nature of Sympathy. London: Routledge.
Schmid, H. B. (2018). The subject of ‘we intend’. Phenomenological Cognitive Scienc, 17, 231–243.
Searle, J. (1990). Collective Intentions and Actions. In P. Cohen, J. Morgan & M. E. Pollack (Eds.), Intentions in Communication (pp. 401–420). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Searle, J. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.
Searle, J. (2010). Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sellars, W. (1968). Science and Metaphysics. In Variations on Kantian Themes. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
The Book of Rites. (2014). the Doctrine of the Mean (p. 1629). Nanjing: Nanjing University Press. (in Chinese).
Tuomela, R. (2005). We-Intentions revisited. Philosophical Studies, 125, 327–369.
Tuomela, R., & Miller, K. (1988). We-Intentions. Philosophical Studies, 53, 367–389.
Valsiner, J. (2009). Cultural psychology today: Innovations and Oversights. Culture & Psychology, 15, 83–95.
Velleman, J. D. (1997). How to Share an Intention. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 57, 29–51.
Walther, G. (1923). Zur Ontologie der sozialen Gemeinschaften. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung, 6, 1–158.
Weber, M. (1922). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, M. Weber (Ed.), Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr. (Original work published in German in 1913).
Wundt, W. (1992). Ethnopsychology: Language, myth, and custom (Liu, S. N. Trans). Journal of World Peoples Studies, 3, 23–27. (in Chinese). (Original work published in German in 1900. Wundt, W. (1900).Völkerpsychologie. Eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythus und Sitte. Leipzig: Kröner).
Yamamoto, T. (2017). Cultural Psychology of Differences and EMS: a New Theoretical Framework for Understanding. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 51, 345–358.
Funding
This study was funded by the National Social Science Fund of China (18BZX036).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, H. Wholeness and Collective Intention. Integr. psych. behav. 56, 206–217 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09591-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09591-8