Skip to main content
Log in

Wholeness and Collective Intention

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper argues that the relationship between the individual and the whole in holism can be solved from the two dimensions of emergence and identity. Emergence addresses whether the whole has irreducible properties, and identity explains the relationship between the individual and the individual as a collective member. From the perspective of emergence, collective intention is a combination of common content in individual intentions. It has only composition but no whole emergence, and this combination makes intentionality take a collective form. From the perspective of identity, individuals and individuals as collective members are consistent. The “collective” in collective intention refers to the common part of the individual’s intention, and its actual bearer is still the individual participating in the “common part”. Collective intention can be reduced to individual properties and their mutual relations, which are rooted in the relational existence of people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baddorf, M. (2017). Phenomenal consciousness, collective mentality and collective moral responsibility. Philosophical Studies, 174, 2769–2786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratman, M. (1992). Shared Intention. Ethics, 106, 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diriwächter, R. (2008). Genetic Ganzheitspsychologie. In R. Diriwächter & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Striving for the whole: Creating theoretical Syntheses (pp. 21–45). Somerset: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diriwächter, R. (2012). Völkerpsychologie. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 43–57). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1994). On Social Facts. In M. Martin & L. McIntyre (Eds.) In Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science (pp. 433–440). Cambridge: MIT Press. (Original work published in French in 1895).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M. (1989). On Social Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M. (1990). Walking Together: A Paradigmatic Social Phenomenon. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 15, 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M. (2000). Sociality and Responsibility: New Essays in Plural Subject Theory. Lanham/Boulder/New York/London: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, M. (2009). Shared intention and personal intentions. Philosophical Studies, 144, 167–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, N., & Sugden, R. (2007). Collective intentions and team agency. The Journal of Philosophy, 104(3), 109–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, R. (1991). Holism and nonseparability. The Journal of Philosophy, 88, 393–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiromatsu, W. (2002). Heidegger and the Reification World (Zhao, Z. M., & Trans). Nanjing Social Science, 2002(6), 1–8. (in Chinese). (Original work published in Japanese in 1993).

  • Le Bon. (2011). Psychologie Des Foule (Dai, G. N., & Trans). Beijing, New World Press. (in Chinese). (Original work published in French in 1895).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 4, 34–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (2012). Anthology of Marx and Engels. Beijing: People’s Press. (in Chinese). (Original work published in German in 1844).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P., & Schweikard, D. (2006). Joint actions and group agents. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 36(1), 18–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (2017). The Republic (Guo, B. H., & Zhang, Z. M., & Trans). Beijing: The Commercial Press. (in Chinese). (Original work published in B.C.337).

  • Reiners, S. (2020). Our Science Must Establish Itself: On the Scientific Status of Lazarus and Steinthal’s Völkerpsychologie. The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 10, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J. (2003).Du Contrat Social (He, Z. W. Trans). Beijing, The Commercial Press. (in Chinese). (Original work published in French in 1762).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheler, M. (1954). The Nature of Sympathy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, H. B. (2018). The subject of ‘we intend’. Phenomenological Cognitive Scienc, 17, 231–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1990). Collective Intentions and Actions. In P. Cohen, J. Morgan & M. E. Pollack (Eds.), Intentions in Communication (pp. 401–420). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (2010). Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sellars, W. (1968). Science and Metaphysics. In Variations on Kantian Themes. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Book of Rites. (2014). the Doctrine of the Mean (p. 1629). Nanjing: Nanjing University Press. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuomela, R. (2005). We-Intentions revisited. Philosophical Studies, 125, 327–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuomela, R., & Miller, K. (1988). We-Intentions. Philosophical Studies, 53, 367–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2009). Cultural psychology today: Innovations and Oversights. Culture & Psychology, 15, 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velleman, J. D. (1997). How to Share an Intention. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 57, 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, G. (1923). Zur Ontologie der sozialen Gemeinschaften. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung, 6, 1–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1922). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, M. Weber (Ed.), Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr. (Original work published in German in 1913).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, W. (1992). Ethnopsychology: Language, myth, and custom (Liu, S. N. Trans). Journal of World Peoples Studies, 3, 23–27. (in Chinese). (Original work published in German in 1900. Wundt, W. (1900).Völkerpsychologie. Eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythus und Sitte. Leipzig: Kröner).

  • Yamamoto, T. (2017). Cultural Psychology of Differences and EMS: a New Theoretical Framework for Understanding. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 51, 345–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the National Social Science Fund of China (18BZX036).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haitao Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, H. Wholeness and Collective Intention. Integr. psych. behav. 56, 206–217 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09591-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09591-8

Keywords

Navigation