Skip to main content
Log in

Residual drift spectra for RC bridge columns subjected to near-fault earthquakes

  • Technical Papers
  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Permanent displacement of a bridge column can be directly measured during the inspection after near-fault earthquakes. However, the engineer needs to estimate the expected residual drift at the design stage to determine if the bridge seismic performance is satisfactory. The most direct method to estimate the residual displacement is nonlinear response history analysis, which is time consuming and cumbersome. Alternatively, an attractive but indirect method is generating estimated residual displacement spectra that depend on displacement ductility demand, column period, site conditions, and earthquake characteristics. Given the period and the expected displacement ductility demand for the column, the residual drift response spectra curves can be utilized to estimate the residual drift demand. Residual drift spectra that are applicable to RC bridge columns in different parts of the United States were developed based on nonlinear response history analyses using a comprehensive collection of recorded and synthetic near-fault ground motions and were linked to one-second spectral acceleration (S1) of the AASHTO maps. It was also found that the residual drift ratio is below one percent when S1 is less than 0.6 g.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aagaard BT, Brocher TM, Dolenc D, Dreger D, Graves RW, Harmsen S, Hartzell S, Larsen S, McCandless K, Nilsson S, Petersson NA, Rodgers A, Sjögreen B and Zoback ML (2008), “Ground-Motion Modeling of the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake, Part II: Ground-Motion Estimates for the 1906 Earthquake and Scenario Events,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 98(2): 1012–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamson NA and Somerville PG (1996), “Effects of the Hanging Wall and Footwall on Ground Motions Recorded During the Northridge Earthquake,” Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, 86(1B): 93–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2017), LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Washington, D.C.

  • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2002), LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Washington, D.C.

  • Caltrans (2004), Bridge Design Specifications, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caltrans (2006), Seismic Design Criteria (SDC), Version 1.4, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caltrans (2013), “Seismic Design Criteria (SDC),” Version 1.7, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, Li H, Wang D, Sun Z, Li G and Jin J (2016), “Research on the Influencing Factors for Residual Displacements of RC Bridge Columns Subjected to Earthquake Loading,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 14(8): 2229–2257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi H, Saiidi MS and Somerville P (2007), “Effects of Near-Fault Ground Motion and Fault-Rupture on the Seismic Response of Reinforced Concrete Bridges,” Report No. CCEER-07-06, Center for Civil Engineering Earthquake Research, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi H, Saiidi MS, Somerville P and El-Azazy S (2010), “Experimental Study of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns Subjected to Near-Fault Ground Motions,” ACI Structural Journal, 107(1): 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chioccarelli E and Iervolino I (2010), “Near-Source Seismic Demand and Pulse-Like Records: A Discussion for L’Aquila Earthquake,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 39(9): 1039–1062.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves RW and Pitarka A (2010), “Broadband Ground-Motion Simulation Using a Hybrid Approach”, Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, 100(5A): 2095–2123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harikrishnan MG and Gupta VK (2020), “Scaling of Residual Displacements in Terms of Elastic and Inelastic Spectral Displacements for Existing SDOF Systems,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 19(1): 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-020-0548-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Japan Road Association (JRA) (1996), Design Specifications of Highway Bridges, Part V: Seismic Design, Tokyo, Japan.

  • Kawashima K, MacRae GA, Hoshikuma J and Nagaya K (1998), “Residual Displacement Response Spectrum,” J. Struct. Eng., 124(5): 523–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee WK and Billington SL (2010), “Modeling Residual Displacements of Concrete Bridge Columns under Earthquake Loads Using Fiber Elements,” J. Bridge Eng., 15(3): 240–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liossatou E and Fardis MN (2015), “Residual Displacements of RC Structures as SDOF Systems,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 44(5): 713–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie K and Stojadinovic B (2004), “Residual Displacement and Post Earthquake Capacity of Highway Bridges,” 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.

  • McKenna F, Fenves GL and Scott MH (2006), OpenSees: Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California Berkeley, CA. http://opensees.berkeley.edu

  • Phan VT, Saiidi MS and Anderson JG (2005), “Near Fault (Near Field) Ground Motion Effects on Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns,” Report No. CCEER-05-07, Center for Civil Engineering Earthquake Research, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phan VT, Saiidi MS, Anderson J and Ghasemi H (2007), “Near-Fault Ground Motion Effects on Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns,” J. Struct. Eng., 133(7): 982–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Garcia J and Miranda E (2005), “Residual Displacement Ratios for Assessment of Existing Structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35(3): 315–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiidi MS and Seyed Ardakani SM (2012), “An Analytical Study of Residual Displacement in RC Bridge Columns Subjected to Near-Fault Earthquakes,” Bridge Structures, 8(1): 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyed Ardakani SM and Saiidi MS (2013), “Design of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns for Near-Fault Earthquakes,” Report No. CCEER-13-13, Center for Civil Engineering Earthquake Research, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyed Ardakani SM and Saiidi MS (2018), “Simple Method to Estimate Residual Displacement in Concrete Bridge Columns Under Near-Fault Earthquake Motions,” Engineering Structures, 176: 208–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somerville PG, Smith NF, Graves RW and Abrahamson NA (1997), “Modification of Empirical Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Relations to Include the Amplitude and Duration Effects of Rupture Directivity,” Seismological Research Letters, 68(1): 199–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somerville PG (1998), “Development of an Improved Representation of Near-Fault Ground Motions,” Proc. of the SMIP98 Seminar on Utilization of Strong-Motion Data, Oakland, CA, 1–20.

  • Somerville PG (2002), “Characterizing Near Fault Ground Motion for the Design and Evaluation of Bridges,” Proceedings of the Third National Seismic Conference and Workshop on Bridges and Highways, Portland, OR, 137–148.

  • Somerville PG, Graves RW, Collins NF, Song SG, Ni S and Cummins P (2009), “Source and Ground Motion Models of Australian Earthquakes,” Proc. of the 2009 Annual Conference of the Australian Earthquake Engineering Society, Newcastle, Australia, 1–9.

  • Terzic V, Schoettler MJ, Restrepo JI and Mahin SA (2015), “Concrete Column Blind Prediction Contest 2010: Outcomes and Observations,” PEER Report No. 2015/01, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Headquarters at the University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Shafieezadeh A and Ye A (2019), “Optimal EDPs for Post-Earthquake Damage Assessment of Extended Pile-Shaft-Supported Bridges Subjected to Transverse Spreading,” Earthquake Spectra, 35(3): 1367–1396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazgan U and Dazio A (2011), “Simulating Maximum and Residual Displacements of RC Structures: I. Accuracy,” Earthquake Spectra, 27(4): 1187–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The study presented in this paper was funded by a grant from the Federal Highway Administration under Contract No. DTFH61-07-C-00031. The support of Dr. Philip Yen, FHWA program director, is appreciated. The opinions expressed in this paper belong solely to the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the sponsor.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. M. Seyed Ardakani.

Additional information

Supported by: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) under Contract No. DTFH61-07-C-00031

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seyed Ardakani, S.M., Saiidi, M.S. & Somerville, P. Residual drift spectra for RC bridge columns subjected to near-fault earthquakes. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 20, 193–211 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-021-2014-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-021-2014-y

Keywords

Navigation