Abstract
It is of great significance to establish sensitive and accurate pathogen detection methods, considering the continuous emergence or re-emergence of infectious diseases seriously influences the safety of human and animals. Proximity ligation assay (PLA) is developed for the sensitive protein detection and also can be used for the detection of pathogens. PLA employs aptamer or monoclonal/polyclonal antibody-nucleic acid complexes as proximity probes. When the paired proximity probes bind to the same target protein or protein complex, they will be adjacent to each other and form an amplifiable DNA sequence through ligation. Combining the specificity of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction (PCR), PLA transforms the detection of protein into the detection of DNA nucleic acid sequence. Therefore, as an ultrasensitive protein assay, PLA has great potential for quantification, localization of protein, and clinical diagnostics. In this review, we summarize the basic principles of PLA and its applications in pathogen detection.
Key Points
• Different forms of proximity ligation assay are introduced.
• Applications of proximity ligation assay in pathogen detection are summarized.
• Proximity ligation assay is an ultrasensitive method to quantify protein and pathogen.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Assarsson E, Lundberg M, Holmquist G, Björkesten J, Thorsen SB, Ekman D, Eriksson A, Rennel Dickens E, Ohlsson S, Edfeldt G, Andersson AC, Lindstedt P, Stenvang J, Gullberg M, Fredriksson S (2014) Homogenous 96-plex PEA immunoassay exhibiting high sensitivity, specificity, and excellent scalability. PLoS One 9(4):e95192. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095192
Banerjee R, Jaiswal A (2018) Recent advances in nanoparticle-based lateral flow immunoassay as a point-of-care diagnostic tool for infectious agents and diseases. Analyst 143(9):1970–1996. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8an00307f
Berggrund M, Enroth S, Lundberg M, Assarsson E, Stålberg K, Lindquist D, Hallmans G, Grankvist K, Olovsson M, Gyllensten U (2019) Identification of candidate plasma protein biomarkers for cervical cancer using the multiplex proximity extension assay. Mol Cell Proteomics 18(4):735–743. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.RA118.001208
Blazek M, Betz C, Hall MN, Reth M, Zengerle R, Meier M (2013) Proximity ligation assay for high-content profiling of cell signaling pathways on a microfluidic chip. Mol Cell Proteomics 12(12):3898–3907. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M113.032821
Blokzijl A, Nong R, Darmanis S, Hertz E, Landegren U, Kamali-Moghaddam M (2014) Protein biomarker validation via proximity ligation assays. BBA-Proteins Proteomics 1844(5):933–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2013.07.016
Borca MV, Vuono EA, Ramirez-Medina E, Azzinaro P, Berggren KA, Singer M, Rai A, Pruitt S, Silva EB, Velazquez-Salinas L, Carrillo C, Gladue DP (2019) Structural glycoprotein E2 of classical swine fever virus interacts with host protein dynactin subunit 6 (DCTN6) during the virus infectious cycle. J Virol 94(1). https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01642-19
Bruchard M, Rebe C, Derangere V, Togbe D, Ryffel B, Boidot R, Humblin E, Hamman A, Chalmin F, Berger H, Chevriaux A, Limagne E, Apetoh L, Vegran F, Ghiringhelli F (2015) The receptor NLRP3 is a transcriptional regulator of TH2 differentiation. Nat Immunol 16(8):859–870. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3202
Cesewski E, Johnson BN (2020) Electrochemical biosensors for pathogen detection. Biosens Bioelectron 159:112214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2020.112214
Darmanis S, Nong RY, Hammond M, Gu J, Alderborn A, Vänelid J, Siegbahn A, Gustafsdottir S, Ericsson O, Landegren U, Kamali-Moghaddam M (2010) Sensitive plasma protein analysis by microparticle-based proximity ligation assays. Mol Cell Proteomics 9(2):327–335. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M900248-MCP200
Darmanis S, Nong RY, Vänelid J, Siegbahn A, Ericsson O, Fredriksson S, Bäcklin C, Gut M, Heath S, Gut IG, Wallentin L, Gustafsson MG, Kamali-Moghaddam M, Landegren U (2011) ProteinSeq: high-performance proteomic analyses by proximity ligation and next generation sequencing. PLoS One 6(9):e25583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025583
Dhillon HS, Johnson G, Shannon M, Greenwood C, Roberts D, Bustin S (2016) Homogeneous and digital proximity ligation assays for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B. Biomol Detect Quantif 10:2–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdq.2016.06.003
Ebai T, Kamali-Moghaddam M, Landegren U (2015) Parallel protein detection by solid-phase proximity ligation assay with real-time PCR or sequencing. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 109:20.10.1–20.10.25. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142727.mb2010s109
Faye O, Monteiro MD, Vrancken B, Prot M, Lequime S, Diarra M, Ndiaye O, Valdez T, Tavarez S, Ramos J, da Veiga LS, Pires C, Moreira A, Tavares MF, Fernandes L, Barreto JN, Teixeira MD, Mendonça MDL, Gomes CCDL, Castellon MS, Ma L, Lemoine F, Gámbaro-Roglia F, Delaune D, Fall G, Fall IS, Diop M, Sakuntabhai A, Loucoubar C, Lemey P, Holmes EC, Faye O, Sall AA, Simon-Loriere E (2020) Genomic epidemiology of 2015-2016 Zika virus outbreak in Cape Verde. Emerg Infect Dis 26(6):1084–1090. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2606.190928
Foddai ACG, Grant IR (2020) Methods for detection of viable foodborne pathogens: current state-of-art and future prospects. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104(10):4281–4288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10542-x
Fredriksson S, Gullberg M, Jarvius J, Olsson C, Pietras K, Gustafsdottir SM, Ostman A, Landegren U (2002) Protein detection using proximity-dependent DNA ligation assays. Nat Biotechnol 20(5):473–477. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0502-473
Fredriksson S, Horecka J, Brustugun OT, Schlingemann J, Koong AC, Tibshirani R, Davis RW (2008) Multiplexed proximity ligation assays to profile putative plasma biomarkers relevant to pancreatic and ovarian cancer. Clin Chem 54(3):582–589. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2007.093195
Greenwood C, Johnson G, Dhillon HS, Bustin S (2015a) Recent progress in developing proximity ligation assays for pathogen detection. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 15(7):861–867. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737159.2015.1044440
Greenwood C, Ruff D, Kirvell S, Johnson G, Dhillon HS, Bustin SA (2015b) Proximity assays for sensitive quantification of proteins. Biomol Detect Quantif 4:10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdq.2015.04.002
Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, Liu L, Shan H, Lei CL, Hui DSC, Du B, Li LJ, Zeng G, Yuen KY, Chen RC, Tang CL, Wang T, Chen PY, Xiang J, Li SY, Wang JL, Liang ZJ, Peng YX, Wei L, Liu Y, Hu YH, Peng P, Wang JM, Liu JY, Chen Z, Li G, Zheng ZJ, Qiu SQ, Luo J, Ye CJ, Zhu SY, Zhong NS (2020) Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 382(18):1708–1720. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2002032
Gullberg M, Gústafsdóttir SM, Schallmeiner E, Jarvius J, Bjarnegård M, Betsholtz C, Landegren U, Fredriksson S (2004) Cytokine detection by antibody-based proximity ligation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(22):8420–8424. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400552101
Gullberg M, Göransson C, Fredriksson S (2011) Duolink-“in-cell co-IP” for visualization of protein interactions in situ. Nat Methods 8:i–ii. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.351
Gustafsdottir SM, Schallmeiner E, Fredriksson S, Gullberg M, Söderberg O, Jarvius M, Jarvius J, Howell M, Landegren U (2005) Proximity ligation assays for sensitive and specific protein analyses. Anal Biochem 345(1):2–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2005.01.018
Gustafsdottir SM, Nordengrahn A, Fredriksson S, Wallgren P, Rivera E, Schallmeiner E, Merza M, Landegren U (2006) Detection of individual microbial pathogens by proximity ligation. Clin Chem 52(6):1152–1160. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2005.065847
Gustafsdottir SM, Schlingemann J, Rada-Iglesias A, Schallmeiner E, Kamali-Moghaddam M, Wadelius C, Landegren U (2007) In vitro analysis of DNA-protein interactions by proximity ligation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(9):3067–3072. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0611229104
Hammond M, Wik L, Deslys JP, Comoy E, Linné T, Landegren U, Kamali-Moghaddam M (2014) Sensitive detection of aggregated prion protein via proximity ligation. Prion 8(3):261–265. https://doi.org/10.4161/pri.32231
Hansen MC, Nederby L, Henriksen MO, Hansen M, Nyvold CG (2014) Sensitive ligand-based protein quantification using immuno-PCR: a critical review of single-probe and proximity ligation assays. Biotechniques 56(5):217–228. https://doi.org/10.2144/000114164
Invitrogen (2018) TNF alpha Human ProQuantum Immunoassay Kit. PUblisher. https://www.thermofisher.com/elisa/product/TNF-alpha-Human-ProQuantum-Immunoassay-Kit/A35601
Invitrogen (2019) IFN gamma Human ProQuantum Immunoassay Kit. PUblisher. https://www.thermofisher.com/elisa/product/IFN-gamma-Human-ProQuantum-Immunoassay-Kit/A35576
Islam MA, Khatun MM, Werre SR, Sriranganathan N, Boyle SM (2013) A review of Brucella seroprevalence among humans and animals in Bangladesh with special emphasis on epidemiology, risk factors and control opportunities. Vet Microbiol 166(3–4):317–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.06.014
Jarvius M, Paulsson J, Weibrecht I, Leuchowius KJ, Andersson AC, Wahlby C, Gullberg M, Botling J, Sjoblom T, Markova B, Ostman A, Landegren U, Soderberg O (2007) In situ detection of phosphorylated platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta using a generalized proximity ligation method. Mol Cell Proteomics 6(9):1500–1509. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M700166-MCP200
Jiang XC, Zhou LX, Cheng J, Zhang H, Wang HX, Chen ZX, Shi F, Zhu CG (2014) A novel method for the sensitive detection of mutant proteins using a covalent-bonding tube-based proximity ligation assay. Anal Chim Acta 841:17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2014.06.044
Katsarou K, Bardani E, Kallemi P, Kalantidis K (2019) Viral detection: past, present, and future. Bioessays 41(10):e1900049. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201900049
Kaur H (2018) Recent developments in cell-SELEX technology for aptamer selection. BBA-Gen Subjects 1862(10):2323–2329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2018.07.029
Khan SU, Anderson BD, Heil GL, Liang S, Gray GC (2015) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the seroprevalence of influenza A(H9N2) infection among humans. J Infect Dis 212(4):562–569. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiv109
Koos B, Andersson L, Clausson CM, Grannas K, Klaesson A, Cane G, Söderberg O (2014) Analysis of protein interactions in situ by proximity ligation assays. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 377:111–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/82_2013_334
Kumar B, Veettil MV, Roy A, Chandran B (2019) Proximity ligation assay (PLA) to determine the endosomal localization of ESCRT subunit in virus-infected cells. Methods Mol Biol 1998:63–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9492-2_5
Landegren U, Al-Amin RA, Björkesten J (2018) A myopic perspective on the future of protein diagnostics. New Biotechnol 45:14–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2018.01.002
Larssen P, Wik L, Czarnewski P, Eldh M, Löf L, Ronquist KG, Dubois L, Freyhult E, Gallant CJ, Oelrich J, Larsson A, Ronquist G, Villablanca EJ, Landegren U, Gabrielsson S, Kamali-Moghaddam M (2017) Tracing cellular origin of human exosomes using multiplex proximity extension assays. Mol Cell Proteomics 16(8):502–511. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.A116.064725
Law JW, Ab Mutalib NS, Chan KG, Lee LH (2014) Rapid methods for the detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens: principles, applications, advantages and limitations. Front Microbiol 5(770):1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00770
Lebsir N, Goueslain L, Farhat R, Callens N, Dubuisson J, Jackson CL, Rouillé Y (2019) Functional and physical interaction between the Arf activator GBF1 and hepatitis C virus NS3 protein. J Virol 93(6):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01459-18
Leslie DC, Sohrabi A, Ikonomi P, McKee ML, Landers JP (2010) Size-based separations as an important discriminator in development of proximity ligation assays for protein or organism detection. Electrophoresis 31(10):1615–1622. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201000008
Leuchowius KJ, Jarvius M, Wickström M, Rickardson L, Landegren U, Larsson R, Söderberg O, Fryknäs M, Jarvius J (2010) High content screening for inhibitors of protein interactions and post-translational modifications in primary cells by proximity ligation. Mol Cell Proteomics 9(1):178–183. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M900331-MCP200
Liu WY, Zhang Q, Chen JB, Xiang R, Song HJ, Shu SN, Chen L, Liang L, Zhou JX, You L, Wu P, Zhang B, Lu YJ, Xia LM, Huang L, Yang Y, Liu F, Semple MG, Cowling BJ, Lan K, Sun ZY, Yu HJ, Liu YL (2020) Detection of COVID-19 in children in early January 2020 in Wuhan, China. N Engl J Med 382(14):1370–1371. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2003717
Lundberg M, Eriksson A, Tran B, Assarsson E, Fredriksson S (2011a) Homogeneous antibody-based proximity extension assays provide sensitive and specific detection of low-abundant proteins in human blood. Nucleic Acids Res 39(15):e102. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr424
Lundberg M, Thorsen SB, Assarsson E, Villablanca A, Tran B, Gee N, Knowles M, Nielsen BS, González Couto E, Martin R, Nilsson O, Fermer C, Schlingemann J, Christensen IJ, Nielsen HJ, Ekström B, Andersson C, Gustafsson M, Brunner N, Stenvang J, Fredriksson S (2011b) Multiplexed homogeneous proximity ligation assays for high-throughput protein biomarker research in serological material. Mol Cell Proteomics 10(4):M110.004978. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M110.004978
Martin BE, Jia K, Sun HL, Ye JQ, Hall C, Ware D, Wan XF (2015) Detection of influenza antigenic variants directly from clinical samples using polyclonal antibody based proximity ligation assays. Virology 476:151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2014.11.029
Martin BE, Bowman AS, Li L, Nolting JM, Smith DR, Hanson LA, Wan XF (2017) Detection of antigenic variants of subtype H3 swine influenza A viruses from clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol 55(4):1037–1045. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02049-16
Moyano A, Serrano-Pertierra E, Salvador M, Martínez-García JC, Rivas M, Blanco-López MC (2020) Magnetic lateral flow immunoassays. Diagnostics (Basel) 10(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10050288
Nong RY, Wu D, Yan J, Hammond M, Gu GJ, Kamali-Moghaddam M, Landegren U, Darmanis S (2013) Solid-phase proximity ligation assays for individual or parallel protein analyses with readout via real-time PCR or sequencing. Nat Protoc 8(6):1234–1248. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.070
Nordengrahn A, Gustafsdottir SM, Ebert K, Reid SM, King DP, Ferris NP, Brocchi E, Grazioli S, Landegren U, Merza M (2008) Evaluation of a novel proximity ligation assay for the sensitive and rapid detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Vet Microbiol 127(3–4):227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.08.026
Oliveira FMS, Mereiter S, Lönn P, Siart B, Shen Q, Heldin J, Raykova D, Karlsson NG, Polom K, Roviello F, Reis CA, Kamali-Moghaddam M (2018) Detection of post-translational modifications using solid-phase proximity ligation assay. New Biotechnol 45:51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.10.005
OLMInnovations (n.d.) Aspergillus Proximity Ligation Assay (PLAsp)-for the early detection of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. PUblisher. http://www.olminnovations.com/collaborations
Pacchiana R, Abbate M, Armato U, Dal Prà I, Chiarini A (2014) Combining immunofluorescence with in situ proximity ligation assay: a novel imaging approach to monitor protein-protein interactions in relation to subcellular localization. Histochem Cell Biol 142(5):593–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-014-1244-8
Pai S, Ellington AD, Levy M (2005) Proximity ligation assays with peptide conjugate ‘burrs’ for the sensitive detection of spores. Nucleic Acids Res 33(18):e162. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gni150
Pardoux É, Boturyn D, Roupioz Y (2020) Antimicrobial peptides as probes in biosensors detecting whole bacteria: a review. Molecules 25(8):1998. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25081998
Park KS (2018) Nucleic acid aptamer-based methods for diagnosis of infections. Biosens Bioelectron 102:179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2017.11.028
Poulard C, Jacquemetton J, Pham TH, Le Romancer M (2020) Using proximity ligation assay to detect protein arginine methylation. Methods 175:66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.09.007
Rajapaksha P, Elbourne A, Gangadoo S, Brown R, Cozzolino D, Chapman J (2019) A review of methods for the detection of pathogenic microorganisms. Analyst 144(2):396–411. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8an01488d
Sano T, Smith CL, Cantor CR (1992) Immuno-PCR: very sensitive antigen detection by means of specific antibody-DNA conjugates. Science 258(5079):120–122. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1439758
Schlingemann J, Leijon M, Yacoub A, Schlingemann H, Zohari S, Matyi-Toth A, Kiss I, Holmquist G, Nordengrahn A, Landegren U, Ekstrom B, Belak S (2010) Novel means of viral antigen identification: improved detection of avian influenza viruses by proximity ligation. J Virol Methods 163(1):116–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.09.008
Schweitzer B, Wiltshire S, Lambert J, O'Malley S, Kukanskis K, Zhu Z, Kingsmore SF, Lizardi PM, Ward DC (2000) Immunoassays with rolling circle DNA amplification: a versatile platform for ultrasensitive antigen detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(18):10113–10119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.170237197
Shen YM, Nie JY, Kuang LX, Zhang JY, Li HF (2020) DNA sequencing, genomes and genetic markers of microbes on fruits and vegetables. Microb Biotechnol 0(0):1–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13560
Sigma-Aldrich (2018) Duolink®In Situ PLA®Probe Anti-Rabbit MINUS. PUblisher. https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/sigma/duo92005?lang=en®ion=PH
Söderberg O, Gullberg M, Jarvius M, Ridderstrale K, Leuchowius KJ, Jarvius J, Wester K, Hydbring P, Bahram F, Larsson LG, Landegren U (2006) Direct observation of individual endogenous protein complexes in situ by proximity ligation. Nat Methods 3(12):995–1000. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth947
Söderberg O, Leuchowius KJ, Gullberg M, Jarvius M, Weibrecht I, Larsson LG, Landegren U (2008) Characterizing proteins and their interactions in cells and tissues using the in situ proximity ligation assay. Methods 45(3):227–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2008.06.014
Stadler C, Rexhepaj E, Singan VR, Murphy RF, Pepperkok R, Uhlén M, Simpson JC, Lundberg E (2013) Immunofluorescence and fluorescent-protein tagging show high correlation for protein localization in mammalian cells. Nat Methods 10(4):315–323. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2377
Sun HY, Cai SF, Wang C, Chen YX, Yang R (2020) Recent progress of nanozymes in the detection of pathogenic microorganisms. Chembiochem 21(18):2572–2584. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.202000126
Taylor RA, Podgórski T, Simons RRL, Ip S, Gale P, Kelly LA, Snary EL (2020) Predicting spread and effective control measures for African swine fever- should we blame the boars? Transbound Emerg Dis 22:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13690
Thorsen SB, Lundberg M, Villablanca A, Christensen SL, Belling KC, Nielsen BS, Knowles M, Gee N, Nielsen HJ, Brünner N, Christensen IJ, Fredriksson S, Stenvang J, Assarsson E (2013) Detection of serological biomarkers by proximity extension assay for detection of colorectal neoplasias in symptomatic individuals. J Transl Med 11(253):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-11-253
Tsai CT, Robinson PV, Cortez FJ, Elma MLB, Seftel D, Pourmandi N, Pandori MW, Bertozzi CR (2018) Antibody detection by agglutination-PCR (ADAP) enables early diagnosis of HIV infection by oral fluid analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115(6):1250–1255. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711004115
Van Wesenbeeck L, Meeuws H, De Wolf H, Stuyver L (2013) Evaluation of a proximity extension assay for the detection of H1 2009 pandemic influenza viruses. J Virol Methods 193(1):77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.05.008
Vidic J, Manzano M, Chang CM, Jaffrezic-Renault N (2017) Advanced biosensors for detection of pathogens related to livestock and poultry. Vet Res 48(11):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-017-0418-5
Vuono EA, Ramirez-Medina E, Holinka LG, Baker-Branstetter R, Borca MV, Gladue DP (2019) Interaction of structural glycoprotein E2 of classical swine fever virus with protein phosphatase 1 catalytic subunit beta (PPP1CB). Viruses 11(307):1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/v11040307
Vuono EA, Ramirez-Medina E, Berggren K, Rai A, Pruitt S, Silva E, Velazquez-Salinas L, Gladue DP, Borca MV (2020) Swine host protein coiled-coil domain-containing 115 (CCDC115) interacts with classical swine fever virus structural glycoprotein E2 during virus replication. Viruses 12(388):1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12040388
Wang YJ, Cui PF, Zhu SY, Meng T, Hao FX, Zhu GQ, Zuo WY (2018) Preparation of single-chain antibody against VP3 protein of duck hepatitis virus type 1 by phage display technology. J Virol Methods 257:73–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2018.04.010
Weibrecht I, Leuchowius KJ, Clausson CM, Conze T, Jarvius M, Howell WM, Kamali-Moghaddam M, Söderberg O (2010) Proximity ligation assays: a recent addition to the proteomics toolbox. Expert Rev Proteomics 7(3):401–409. https://doi.org/10.1586/epr.10.10
Wong YP, Othman S, Lau YL, Radu S, Chee HY (2018) Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): a versatile technique for detection of micro-organisms. J Appl Microbiol 124(3):626–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13647
Xie Q, Zhang JJ, Shao HX, Wan ZM, Tian XY, Yang JL, Pang MY, Qian K, Gao W, Wang CM, Qin AJ, Ye JQ (2016) Development of a novel immuno-PCR for detection of avian leukosis virus. J Virol Methods 236:25–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2016.06.011
Yang B, Niu Q, Yang Y, Dai P, Yuan T, Xu S, Pan X, Yang Y, Zhu GQ (2019a) Self-made Salmonella Pullorum agglutination antigen development and its potential practical application. Poult Sci 98(12):6326–6332. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez453
Yang Y, Zhang JY, Zhu CH, Meng X, Sun SH, Zhu GQ (2019b) A promising detection candidate for flagellated Salmonella spp. AMB Express 9(1):128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-019-0851-0
Yang Y, Wang PZ, Xia PP, Yang B, Dai P, Hong TQ, Li J, Meng X, El Qaidi S, Zhu GQ (2020) Rapid detection of flagellated and non-flagellated Salmonella by targeting the common flagellar hook gene flgE. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104:9719–9732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10925-0
Ybañez RHD, Ybañez AP, Nishikawa Y (2020) Review on the current trends of toxoplasmosis serodiagnosis in humans. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 10:204. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.00204
Yeh KB, Wood H, Scullion M, Russell JA, Parker K, Gnade BT, Jones AR, Whittier C, Mereish K (2019) Molecular detection of biological agents in the field: then and now. mSphere 4(6). https://doi.org/10.1128/mSphere.00695-19
Yüce M, Ullah N, Budak H (2015) Trends in aptamer selection methods and applications. Analyst 140(16):5379–5399. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5an00954e
Zhong Y, Zhao JY, Li JZ, Liao X, Chen FL (2020) Advances of aptamers screened by cell-SELEX in selection procedure, cancer diagnostics and therapeutics. Anal Biochem 598:113620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2020.113620
Zhu LQ, Ren M, Lin YQ, Ding XY, Zhang GP, Zhao X, Zhu GQ (2009) Identification of a bovine viral diarrhea virus 2 isolated from cattle in China. Acta Virol 53(2):131–134. https://doi.org/10.4149/av_2009_02_131
Funding
This study was supported by grants No. 2016YFD0500905 from the National Key Research and Development Program of China, AA18118050 from Science and Technology Major Project of Guangxi, BE2017342 from the Science and Technology Department of Jiangsu Province, and a project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
PZW and YY designed the concept of the review article. PZW wrote the manuscript, YY drawn the figures and wrote the manuscript, and GQZ and TQH critically read and corrected the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics statement
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, P., Yang, Y., Hong, T. et al. Proximity ligation assay: an ultrasensitive method for protein quantification and its applications in pathogen detection. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 105, 923–935 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-11049-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-11049-1