Skip to main content
Log in

An application of topological equivalence to Morse theory

  • Published:
Journal of Fixed Point Theory and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a previous paper, under the assumption that the Riemannian metric is special, the author proved some results about the moduli spaces and CW structures arising from Morse theory. By virtue of topological equivalence, this paper extends those results by dropping the assumption on the metric. In particular, we give a strong solution to the following classical question: Does a Morse function on a compact Riemannian manifold give rise to a CW decomposition that is homeomorphic to the manifold?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barraud, J., Cornea, O.: Lagrangian intersections and the Serre spectral sequence. Ann. Math. 166, 657–722 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bott, R.: Morse theory indomitable. Publ. Math. l’I.H.É.S. 68, 99–114 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Burghelea, D., Haller, S.: On the topology and analysis of a closed one form (Novikov’s theory revisited), Essays on geometry and related topics, pp. 133–175, Monogr. Enseign. Math., vol. 38. Enseignement Math., Geneva (2001)

  4. Douady, A.: Variétés à bord anguleux et voisinages tubulaires, Séminaire Henri Cartan, vol. 14, pp. 1–11 (1961–1962)

  5. Franks, J.: Morse–Smale flows and homotopy theory. Topology 18, 199–215 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenberg, M., Harper, J.: Algebraic Topology, A First Course, Mathematics Lecture Note Series, vol. 58. Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co. Inc. (1981)

  7. Irwin, M.: On the stable manifold theorem. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 2, 196–198 (1970)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Irwin, M.: On the smoothness of the composition map. Q. J. Math. Oxf. Ser. (2) 23, 113–133 (1972)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Jänich, K.: On the classification of \(O(n)\)-manifolds. Math. Ann. 176, 53–76 (1968)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Kalmbach, G.: Deformation retracts and weak deformation retracts of noncompact manifolds. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 20, 539–544 (1969)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Kalmbach, G.: On some results in Morse theory. Can. J. Math. 27, 88–105 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Latour, F.: Existence de \(1\)-formes fermées non singulières dans une classe de cohomologie de de Rham. Publ. Math. l’I.H.É.S. 80, 135–194 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Laudenbach, F.: On the Thom–Smale complex. Astérisque 205 (1992) (Appendix)

  14. Milnor, J.: Lectures on the h-Cobordism Theorem. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1965)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Milnor, J., Stasheff, J.: Characteristic Classes. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1974)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Newhouse, S., Peixoto, M.: There is a simple arc joining any two Morse–Smale flows. Astérisque 31, 16–41 (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Nitecki, Z., Shub, M.: Filtrations, decompositions, and explosions. Am. J. Math. 97, 1029–1047 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Palis, J.: On Morse–Smale dynamical systems. Topology 8, 385–404 (1968)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Palis, J., de Melo, W.: Geometric Theory of Dynamical Systems. Springer, Berlin (1982)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Palis, J., Smale, S.: Structural stability theorems, 1970 Global Analysis (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. XIV, Berkeley, Calif., 1968), pp. 223–231

  21. Qin, L.: On moduli spaces and CW structures arising from Morse theory on Hilbert manifolds. J. Topol. Anal. 2, 469–526 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Schwarz, M.: Morse Homology, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 111. Birkhäuser, Basel (1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Siebenmann, L.:The obstruction to finding a boundary for an open manifold of dimension greater than five, Ph.D. Thesis. Princeton University, Princeton (1965)

  24. Smale, S.: Morse inequalities for a dynamical system. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 66, 43–49 (1960)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Smale, S.: On dynamical systems. Bol. Soc. Mat. Mex. (2) 5, 195–198 (1960)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Smale, S.: On gradient dynamical systems. Ann. Math. 74, 199–206 (1961)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Thom, R.: Sur une partition en cellules associée à une fonction sur une variété. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 228, 973–975 (1949)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Walter, W.: Ordinary Differential Equations, Graduate Text in Mathematics, vol. 182. Springer, Berlin (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank an anonymous mathematician who meticulously read through this paper and made many helpful suggestions which lead to an improved presentation of this paper. I am indebted to my PhD advisor Prof. John Klein for his direction, his patient educating, and his continuous encouragement. This work was partially supported by NSFC11871272.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lizhen Qin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

In this appendix, we shall prove Lemma 8.2.

Suppose M is an n dimensional manifold. Suppose L is a connected and closed k dimensional submanifold of M. Let U be a closed tubular neighborhood of L such that U is diffeomorphic to a closed disk bundle over L via the exponential map. Let \(i: L \hookrightarrow U\) be the inclusion and \(\pi : U \rightarrow L\) be the smooth projection. Clearly, i and \(\pi \) are proper. Thus \(\pi ^{*}: H^{k}_{C} (L) \rightarrow H^{k}_{C}(U)\) and \(i^{*}: H^{k}_{C} (U) \rightarrow H^{k}_{C}(L)\) are isomorphisms and they are a pair of inverses, where \(H^{*}_{C}\) is the cohomology with compact support. Furthermore, \(H^{k}_{C} (L) \cong \mathbb {Z}\), its generator is an orientation of L.

Define \( H^{n}_{C}(U, U - L) = \lim _{\overrightarrow{K \subseteq L}} H^{n}(U, U-K)\), where K is compact. We can prove the inclusion \(H^{n}(U, U-\{x\}) \rightarrow H^{n}_{C}(U, U-L)\) is an isomorphism for any \(x \in L\).

Suppose \(\alpha \in H^{k}_{C}(L)\) and the Thom class \(\beta \in H^{n-k}(U, U-L)\) represent the orientation and the normal orientation of L respectively. Suppose the orientation and the normal orientation define the orientation of M.

Lemma A.1

The following cup product homomorphism is an isomorphism.

Furthermore, for all \(x \in L\), via the isomorphism \(H^{n}(U, U-\{x\}) \rightarrow H^{n}_{C}(U, U-L)\), we get \(\pi ^{*} \alpha \cup \beta \in H^{n}_{C}(U, U-L)\) represents the orientation of M in \(H^{n}(U, U-\{x\})\).

Proof

For any \(x \in L\), we have a commutative diagram

Here the vertical maps are induced by inclusions and are isomorphisms. The horizontal ones are given by cup product pairings. By excision and the basic property of Thom class, we can localize the argument near x. However, the disk bundle near x has a product structure. Now apply Künneth Formula to the upper horizontal map, which completes the proof. \(\square \)

Proof of Lemma 8.2

It suffices to prove the special case of that \(L_{i}\) is connected.

Let \(U_{2}\) be a closed tubular neighborhood of \(L_{2}\) with the smooth projection \(\pi _{2}: U_{2} \rightarrow L_{2}\). Let \(\alpha _{2} \in H^{k}_{C}(L_{2})\) be the orientation of \(L_{2}\), by the above lemma, we have \(\pi _{2}^{*} \alpha _{2} \cup \beta _{2}|_{U_{2}} = \gamma _{2} \in H^{n}_{C}(U_{2}, U_{2} - L_{2})\) represents the orientation of \(M_{2}\) on \(L_{2}\). Here \(\beta _{2}|_{U_{2}}\) is the image of \(\beta _{2}\) under the inclusion \(H^{n-k}(M_{2}, M_{2} - L_{2}) \rightarrow H^{n-k}(U_{2}, U_{2} - L_{2})\). It is the restriction of \(\beta _{2}\) to \(U_{2}\).

Let \(U_{1}' = h^{-1}(U_{2})\). Choose a closed tubular neighborhood \(U_{1}\) of \(L_{1}\) such that \(U_{1} \subseteq \mathrm {Int} U_{1}'\) and \(\pi _{1}: U_{1} \rightarrow L_{1}\) is a smooth projection. By the above lemma again, we have the following isomorphism

and

$$\begin{aligned} \pi _{1}^{*} \alpha _{1} \cup \beta _{1}|_{U_{1}} = \gamma _{1} \end{aligned}$$
(A.1)

represents the orientation of \(M_{1}\) on \(L_{1}\), where \(\beta _{1}|_{U_{1}}\) is the restriction of \(\beta _{1}\) to \(U_{1}\).

Consider the following commutative diagram:

where, \(i_{1}\), \(i_{2}\), j and \(\iota \) are inclusions. Since \(h^{*} \pi _{2}^{*} \alpha _{2} \cup h^{*} \beta _{2}|_{U_{2}} = h^{*} \gamma _{2}\), we have \(\iota ^{*} h^{*} \pi _{2}^{*} \alpha _{2} \cup \iota ^{*} h^{*} \beta _{2}|_{U_{2}} = \iota ^{*} h^{*} \gamma _{2}\). Since h preserves the orientation of \(M_{1}\) and the Thom class, we have \(\iota ^{*} h^{*} \gamma _{2} = \gamma _{1}\) and \(\iota ^{*} h^{*} \beta _{2}|_{U_{2}} = \beta _{1}|_{U_{1}}\). Thus

$$\begin{aligned} \iota ^{*} h^{*} \pi _{2}^{*} \alpha _{2} \cup \beta _{1}|_{U_{1}} = \gamma _{1}. \end{aligned}$$
(A.2)

Since the cup product pairing above is an isomorphism, by (A.1) and (A.2), we infer \(\iota ^{*} h^{*} \pi _{2}^{*} \alpha _{2} = \pi _{1}^{*} \alpha _{1}\). So we have

$$\begin{aligned} \alpha _{1}= i_{1}^{*} \pi _{1}^{*} \alpha _{1} = i_{1}^{*} \iota ^{*} h^{*} \pi _{2}^{*} \alpha _{2} = h^{*} i_{2}^{*} \pi _{2}^{*} \alpha _{2} = h^{*} \alpha _{2}. \end{aligned}$$

This completes the proof. \(\square \)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qin, L. An application of topological equivalence to Morse theory. J. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 23, 10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11784-020-00843-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11784-020-00843-z

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation