Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Generating best management practices for Avian conservation with a land-sparing agricultural system

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Here we provide guidance for the application of a land sparing production system designed to conserve forest-dependent wildlife in coffee growing regions where environmental conditions preclude coffee cultivation with a land-sharing strategy. In an Integrated Open Canopy (“IOC”) coffee system, shade trees planted with coffee may be eliminated at the discretion of the farmer to control outbreaks of leaf rust and increase yields, while an adjacent forest patch of equal or greater area than coffee is conserved. Farmers are compensated for the opportunity costs of conserving forest by the sale of carbon credits, as well as ecosystem services provided by forest patches in the form of increased pollination and pest control by forest-associated bees and birds, respectively. Previous studies have shown IOC farms support forest-dependent birds not found in shade coffee farms. To determine whether there are threshold values of IOC forest characteristics below which the conservation value of IOC farms decreases, we surveyed bird communities with point counts within IOC farms and other forest patches in Costa Rica during 2012. We detected 113 bird species, of which 49 were classified as forest-dependent. Cutpoint regression identified an area of 2.6 ha of forest, and a basal area of 25.2 m2/ha of forest, below which bird conservation value diminished. These values can serve as the foundation of best management practices for the establishment of IOC farms to afford opportunities for coffee producers to conserve biodiversity in regions where land sharing cultivation is impractical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arce VC, Raudales R, Trubey R, King DI, Chandler RB, Chandler CC (2009) Measuring and managing the environmental cost of coffee production in Latin America. Conserv Soc 7:141–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avelino J, Willocquet L, Savary S (2004) Effects of crop management patterns on coffee rust epidemics. Plant Pathol 53:541–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey BA, King DI (2019) Habitat-specific abundance and survival of Wood Thrushes in agroforestry landscapes in Honduras. Global Ecol Conserv 1(20):e00728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakermans MH, Rodewald AD, Vitz AC, Rengifo C (2012) Migratory bird use of shade coffee: the role of structural and floristic features. Agrofor Syst 85:85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks-Leite C, Ewers RM, Metzger JP (2010) Edge effects as the principal cause of area effects on birds in fragmented secondary forest. Oikos 119:918–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake JG, Loiselle BA (2001) Bird assemblages in second-growth and old-growth forests, Costa Rica: perspectives from mist nets and point counts. Auk 118:304–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock CE, Jones ZF (2004) Avian habitat evaluation: should counting birds count? Front Ecol Environ 2:403–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellón TD, Sieving KE (2006) An experimental test of matrix permeability and corridor use by an endemic understory bird. Conserv Biol 20:35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler RB, King DI (2011) Habitat quality and habitat selection of golden-winged warblers in Costa Rica: an application of hierarchical models for open populations. J Appl Ecol 48:1038–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler RB, King DI, DeStefano S (2009) N-mixture modeling of scrub-shrub bird habitat associations at multiple spatial scales in western Massachusetts beaver meadows. Auk 126:186–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler RB, King DI, Raudales R, Trubey R, Arce VJ (2013) A small-scale land-sparing approach to conserving biological diversity in tropical agricultural landscapes. Conserv Biol 27:785–795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark DB (1996) Abolishing virginity. J Trop Ecol 12:735–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison A, Hinkley D (1997) Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2012) ArcGIS desktop: release 10.2. Environmental systems research institute, Redlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Falcy MR, Estades CF (2007) Effectiveness of corridors relative to enlargement of habitat patches. Conserv Biol 21:1341–1346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraz G, Nichols JD, Hines JE, Stouffer PC, Bierregaard RO Jr, Lovejoy T (2007) A large-scale deforestation experiment: effects of patch area and isolation on Amazon birds. Science 315:238–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham CH, Blake JG (2001) Influence of patch- and landscape-level factors on bird assemblages in a fragmented tropical landscapre. Ecol Appl 11:1709–1721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guariguata MR, Ostertag R (2001) Neotropical secondary forest succession: changes in structural and functional characteristics. For Ecol Manag 148:185–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holdridge LR (1947) Determination of world plant formations from simple climatic data. Science 105:367–368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Infante F (2018) Pest management strategies against the coffee berry borer (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). J Agric Food Chem 66:5275–5280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jezeer RE, Verweij PA, Santos MJ, Boot RG (2017) Shaded coffee and cocoa-double dividend for biodiversity and small-scale farmers. Ecol Econ 140:136–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MD, Levy NJ, Kellermann JL, Robinson DE (2009) Effects of shade and bird exclusion on arthropods and leaf damage on coffee farms in Jamaica’s Blue Mountains. Agrofor Syst 76:139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karp DS, Mendenhall CD, Sandí RF, Chaumont N, Ehrlich PR, Hadly EA, Daily GC (2013) Forest bolsters bird abundance, pest control and coffee yield. Ecol Lett 16:1339–1347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kellermann JL, Johnson MD, Stercho AM, Hackett SC (2008) Ecological and economic services provided by birds on Jamaican Blue Mountain coffee farms. Conserv Biol 22:1177–1185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • King DI, Chandler RB, Smalling C, Trubey R, Raudales R, Will T (2016) Nonbreeding Golden-winged Warbler, habitat: status, conservation, and needs. In: Streby HM, Andersen DE, Buehler DA (eds) Golden-winged Warbler ecology, conservation, and habitat management studies in Avian biology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 29–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh LP, Lee TM, Sodhi NS, Ghazoul J (2010) An overhaul of the species-area approach for predicting biodiversity loss: incorporating matrix and edge effects. J Appl Ecol 47:1063–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letcher SG, Chazdon RL (2009) Rapid recovery of biomass, species richness, and species composition in a forest chronosequence in northeastern Costa Rica. Biotropica 41:608–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leyequién E, De Boer WF, Toledo VM (2010) Bird community composition in a shaded coffee agro-ecological matrix in Puebla, Mexico: the effects of landscape heterogeneity at multiple spatial scales. Biotropica 42:236–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck GW, Daily GC (2003) Tropical countryside bird assemblages: richness, composition, and foraging differ by landscape context. Ecol Appl 13:235–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendenhall CD, Sekercioglu CH, Brenes FO, Ehrlich PR, Daily GC (2011) Predictive model for sustaining biodiversity in tropical countryside. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:16313–16316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Moguel P, Toledo VM (1999) Biodiversity conservation in traditional coffee systems of Mexico. Conserv Biol 13:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadkarni NM, Schaefer D, Matelson TJ, Solano R (2004) Biomass and nutrient pools of canopy and terrestrial components in a primary and a secondary montane cloud forest, Costa Rica. For Ecol Manag 198:223–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North American Bird Conservation Initiative (2016) The State of North America’s Birds 2016. Environment and Climate Change Canada: Ottawa, Ontario. 8 pages. www.stateofthebirds.org. Accessed: September 30, 2020

  • Oksanen JF, Blanchet G, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MH and Wagner H (2013) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.0-10. http://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan

  • Perfecto I, Mas A, Dietsch T, Vandermeer J (2003) Conservation of biodiversity in coffee agroecosystems: a tri-taxa comparison in southern Mexico. Biodivers Conserv 12:1239–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto I, Vandermeer J, Mas A, Pinto LS (2005) Biodiversity, yield, and shade coffee certification. Ecol Econ 54:435–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phalan B, Balmford A, Green RE, Scharlemann JPW (2011) Minimizing the harm to biodiversity of production more food globally. Food Policy 36:S62–S71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philpott SM, Bichier P, Rice R, Greenberg R (2007) Field-testing ecological and economic benefits of coffee certification programs. Conserv Biol 21:975–985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Power AG (2010) Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philos Trans he R Soc B: Biol Sci 365:2959–2971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am Nat 132:652–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts TH (2004) Tropical forest fragments enhance pollinator activity in nearby coffee crops. Conserv Biol 18:1262–1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts TH, Daily GH, Ehrlich PH, Michener CD (2004) Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production. PNAS 101:12579–12582. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405147101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz Gutierrez V, Zipkin EF, Dhondt AA (2010) Occupancy dynamics in a tropical bird community: unexpectedly high forest use by birds classified as non-forest species. J Appl Ecol 47:621–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Clavijo LM, Bayly NJ, Quintana-Ascencio PF (2020) Habitat selection in transformed landscapes and the role of forest remnants and shade coffee in the conservation of resident birds. J Anim Ecol 89:553–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Şekercioğlu CH (2012) Bird functional diversity and ecosystem services in tropical forests, agroforests and agricultural areas. J Ornithol 153:153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şekercioğlu CH, Loarie SR, Oviedo Brenes FE, Ehrlich PR, Daily GC (2007) Persistence of forest birds in the Costa Rican agricultural countryside. Conserv Biol 21:482–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Şekercioğlu ÇH, Mendenhall CD, Oviedo-Brenes F, Horns JJ, Ehrlich PR, Daily GC (2019) Long-term declines in bird populations in tropical agricultural countryside. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116:9903–9912

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Somarriba E, Harvey CA, Samper M, Anthony F, Gonzalez J, Staver C, Rice RA (2004) The role of agroforestry in biodiversity conservation in tropical landscapes. In: Schroth G, da Fanseta GAB, Harvey CA, Gascon C, Vasconcelos HL, Izac AZ (eds) Agroforestry and biodiversity conservation in tropical landscapes. Island Press, Washington, pp 198–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles FG (1985) Conservation of forest birds in Costa Rica: problems and perspectives. In: Page 141 in Conservation of tropical forest birds: proceedings of a workshop and symposium held at the XVIII World Conference of the International Council for Bird Preservation, 7, 8, and 10 August 1982, Kings College, Cambridge, England

  • Toms JD, Lesperance ML (2003) Piecewise regression: a tool for identifying ecological thresholds. Ecology 84:2034–2041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vega FE, Infante F, Castillo A, Jamamillo J (2009) The coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): A short review, with recent findings and future research directions. Terrestrial Arthopod Rev 2:129–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

B. Carnes, A. Green, C. Moqtaderi, and J. Wilcox were all excellent field assistants. Special thanks goes to M. Gonzalez Rojas for his years of dedication in the field, and his help negotiating the nuances of the local culture. Numerous Costa Rican farmers granted access to their land, making this research possible. We thank the Cooperativa Montes de Oro and the Mesoamerican Development Institute for their hard work and collaborative spirit. This work was primarily funded by the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act. Additional funding came from the National Science Foundation and the USDA Forest Service International Programs. Javier Guevara of the Costa Rican National System of Protected Areas (SINAC) provided the necessary permits.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Massachusetts Audubon Society, Lincoln, MA, 01773, USA

    Jeffrey D. Ritterson

  2. US Forest Service Northern Research Station, Amherst, MA, 01003, USA

    David I. King

  3. Mesoamerican Development Institute, Lowell, MA, 01854, USA

    Raul Raudales & Richard Trubey

  4. Warnell School of Forest Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA

    Richard B. Chandler

Authors
  1. Jeffrey D. Ritterson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David I. King
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Raul Raudales
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Richard Trubey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Richard B. Chandler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David I. King.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ritterson, J.D., King, D.I., Raudales, R. et al. Generating best management practices for Avian conservation with a land-sparing agricultural system. Agroforest Syst 95, 395–405 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00582-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00582-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation