Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of different surface and subsurface drip irrigation levels on growth traits, tuber yield, and irrigation water use efficiency of potato crop

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increased water demands and climate change have reduced agricultural water resources in areas that experience water shortages. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted in an arid region of Saudi Arabia to evaluate the effects of two drip irrigation systems [surface (DI) and subsurface (SDI)] and three irrigation levels [100%, 70%, and 50% of crop evapotranspiration (I100, I70, and I50, respectively)] on the growth traits, tuber yield, and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) during the 2017 and 2018 growing seasons. θv was 13.74 and 23.85% lower under the DI system and 11.90 and 24.14% lower under the SDI system with the I70 and I50 treatments, respectively, than with the I100 treatment, and was also lower under the DI system than under the SDI system. The fresh and dry vegetative parts of the plants were heavier with the I100 treatment under the SDI system than with the I70 and I50 treatments under the DI system, and the leaf area indexes were also significantly lower with I70 and I50 than with I100 but were not affected by the irrigation system. The fresh and dry tuber yields were lowest with the I50 treatment (23.97 and 3.93 Mg ha−1, respectively), followed by I70 (28.61 and 4.98 Mg ha−1, respectively), and I100 (34.43 and 6.67 Mg ha−1, respectively) and were higher under the SDI system than under the DI system. By contrast, IWUE was highest with the I50 treatment (6.49 and 7.02 kg m−3) and lowest with the I100 treatment (5.62 and 5.85 kg m−3) under the DI and SDI systems, respectively. These findings indicate that full irrigation (I100) with the SDI system maximizes potato yield but decreases IWUE, whereas integration of the SDI system with deficit irrigation is effective in improving water productivity due to less water being consumed, allowing these practices to be used under scarce water conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmadi SH, Andersen MN, Plauborg F, Poulsen RT, Jensen CR, Sepaskhah AR, Hansen S (2010a) Effects of irrigation strategies and soils on field grown potatoes: yield and water productivity. Agric Water Manag 97:1923–1930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi SH, Andersen MN, Plauborg F, Poulsen RT, Jensen CR, Sepaskhah AR, Hansen S (2010b) Effects of irrigation strategies and soils on field-grown potatoes: gas exchange and xylem [ABA]. Agric Water Manag 97:1486–1494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi SH, Agharezaee M, Kamgar-Haghighi AA, Sepaskhah AR (2014) Effects of dynamic and static deficit and partial root zone drying irrigation strategies on yield, tuber sizes distribution, and water productivity of two field grown potato cultivars. Agric Water Manag 134:126–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed B, Sultana M, Chowdhury M, Akhter S, Alam M (2017) Growth and yield performance of potato varieties under different planting dates, Bangladesh. Agron J 20(1):25–29

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Ghobari HM, Dewidar AZ (2018) Integrating deficit irrigation into surface and subsurface drip irrigation as a strategy to save water in arid regions. Agric Water Manag 209:55–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage, FAO, Rome. p 56

  • Al-Qerem RA, Suleiman AA, Shatanawi MR (2012) Assessing tomato yield and water saving under deficit Irrigation in the Jordan Valley, Jordan. J Agric Sci 8:209–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Alva K, Moore AD, Collins HP (2012) Impact of deficit irrigation on tuber yield and quality of potato cultivars. J Crop Improv 26:211–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amer KH (2011) Effect of irrigation method and quantity on squash yield and quality. Agric Water Manag 98:1197–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayars JE, Fulton A, Taylor B (2015) Subsurface drip irrigation in California—here to stay? Agric Water Manag 157:39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badr MA, El-Tohamy WA, Abouhussein SD, Gruda N (2018) Tomato yield, physiological response, water and nitrogen use efficiency under deficit and partial root zone drying irrigation in an arid region. J Appl Bot Food Qual 91:332–340

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bladia R, AbdArahman S (2016) Effect of water stress on pepper plant (Capsicum annum) var Albaladi. J Al-Baath Univ 38:103–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch D, Hoffmann CM, Märländer B (2006) Impact of water supply on photosynthesis, water use and carbon isotope discrimination of sugar beet genotypes. Eur J Agron 24:218–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Camargo DC, Montoya F, Ortega JF, Córcoles JI (2015) Potato yield and water use efficiency responses to irrigation in semiarid conditions. Agron J 107:2120–2131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Camp CR (1998) Subsurface drip irrigation: a review. Trans ASAE 41:1353–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantore V, Wassar F, Yamaç SS, Sellami MH, Albrizio R, Stellacci AM, Todorovic M (2014) Yield and water use efficiency of early potato grown under different irrigation regimes. Int J Plant Prod 8:409–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra A, Consoli S, Scicolone B (2008) Water management strategies under deficit irrigation. J Agric Eng 39:27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai Q, Gan Y, Zhao C, Xu HL, Waskom RM, Niu Y, Siddique KHM (2016) Regulated deficit irrigation for crop production under drought stress. a review. Agron Sustain Dev 36:1–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaves MM, Zarrouk O, Francisco R, Costa JM, Santos T, Regalado AP, Rodrigues ML, Lopes CM (2010) Grapevine under deficit irrigation: hints from physiological and molecular data. Ann Bot 105:661–676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Çolak YB, Yazar A, Çolak İ, Akça H, Duraktekin G (2015) Evaluation of crop water stress index (CWSI) for eggplant under varying irrigation regimes using surface and subsurface drip systems. Agric Agric Sci Procedia 4:372–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Çolak YB, Yazar A, Sesveren S, Çolak İ (2017) Evaluation of yield and leaf water potantial (LWP) for eggplant under varying irrigation regimes using surface and subsurface drip systems. Sci Hortic 219:10–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook FJ, Fitch P, Thorburn PJ, Charlesworth PB, Bristow KL (2006) Modelling trickle irrigation: comparison of analytical and numerical models for estimation of wetting front position with time. Environ Modell Softw 21:1353–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CoStat version 6.303, 2004 CoHort Software798 Lighthouse Ave. PMB 320, Monterey, C.A., p. 93940, USA

  • Dağdelen N, Başal H, Yılmaz E, Gürbüz T, Akçay S (2009) Different drip irrigation regimes affect cotton yield, water use efficiency and fiber quality in western Turkey. Agric Water Manag 96:111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwish TM, Atallah TW, Hajhasan S, Haidar A (2006) Nitrogen and water use efficiency of fertigated processing potato. Agric Water Manag 85:95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demir AD, Sahin U (2017) Effects of different irrigation practices using treated wastewater on tomato yields, quality, water productivity, and soil and fruit mineral contents. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:24856–24879

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Demirel K, Genc L, Bahar E, Inalpulat M, Smith S, Kizil U (2014) Yield estimate using spectral indices in eggplant and bell pepper grown under deficit irrigation. Fresen Environ Bull 23:1232–1237

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deshi KE, Obasi MO, Odiaka NI, Kalu BA, Ifenkwe OP (2015) Leaf area indexvalues of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) stored for different periods in different kinds of stores. IOSR J Agric Vet Sci 8(1):9–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Doorenbos J, Kassam AH (1979) Yield response to water. FAO irrigation and drainage. p. 33

  • Douh B, Boujelben A (2010) Water saving and eggplant response to subsurface drip irrigation. Agric Segment AGS/1525 1

  • Eid MAM, Abdel-Salam AA, Salem HM, Mahrous SE, Seleiman MF, Alsadon AA, Solieman TH, Ibrahim AA (2020) Interaction effects of nitrogen source and irrigation regime on tuber quality, yield, and water Use efficiency of Solanum tuberosum L. Plants 9:110

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Elhani S, Haddadi M, Csákvári E, Zantar S, Hamim A, Villányi V, Douaik A, Bánfalvi Z (2019) Effects of partial root-zone drying and deficit irrigation on yield, irrigation water-use efficiency and some potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) quality traits under glasshouse conditions. Agric Water Manag. p 224, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/105745

  • Elmaloglou S, Diamantopoulos E (2009) Simulation of soil water dynamics under subsurface drip irrigation from line sources. Agric Water Manag 96:1587–1595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Mokh F, Nagaz K, Masmoudi MM, Mechlia NB (2014) Effects of surface and subsurface drip irrigation regimes with saline water on yield and water use efficiency of potato in arid conditions of Tunisia. J Agric Environ Int Dev 108:227–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdem T, Erdem Y, Orta H, Okursoy H (2006) Water-yield relationships of potato under different irrigation methods and regimens. Sci Agric (Piracicaba, Braz.) Braz Piracicaba 63(3):226–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evett SR, Tolk JA (2009) Introduction: can water use efficiency Be modeled well enough to impact crop management? Agron J 101:423–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabeiro C, de Santa M, Olalla F, de Juan JA (2001) Yield and size of deficit irrigated potatoes. Agric Water Manag 48:255–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2017) Water for sustainable food and agriculture. A report produced for the G20 Presidency of Germany. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira TC, Gonçalves DA (2007) Crop-yield/water-use production functions of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) grown under differential nitrogen and irrigation treatments in a hot, dry climate. Agric Water Manag 90:45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geerts S, Raes D (2009) Deficit irrigation as an on-farm strategy to maximize crop water productivity in dry areas. Agric Water Manag 96:1275–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greaves GE, Wang Y-M (2017) Yield response, water productivity, and seasonal water production functions for maize under deficit irrigation water management in southern Taiwan. Plant Prod Sci 20(4):353–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield JL, Dold C (2019) Water-use efficiency: advances and challenges in a changing climate. Front Plant Sci 10:103

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ierna A, Mauromicale G (2018) Potato growth, yield and water productivity response to different irrigation and fertilization regimes. Agric Water Manag 201:21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal M, Shah SM, Mohammad W, Naway H (1999) Field response of potato subjected to water stress at different growth stages. In: Hera C, Kirda C, Moutonnet P, Nielson DR (eds) Crop yield response to deficit irrigation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 213–223

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jabro J, Leib B, Jabro A (2005) Estimating soil water content using site specific calibration of capacitance measurements from Sentek EnviroSCAN systems. Appl Eng Agric 21:393–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen CR, Svendsen H, Andersen MN, Lösch R (1993) Use of the root contact concept, an empirical leaf conductance model and pressure–volume curves in simulating crop water relations. Plant Soil 149:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic Z, Stikic R (2012) Strategies for improving water productivity and quality of agricultural crops in an Era of climate change. u. In:Tech, pp Lee TS (Ed.). Irrigation systems and practices in challenging environments, Rijeka, pp. 77–102

  • Jovanovic Z, Stikic R, Vucelic-Radovic B, Paukovic M, Brocic Z, Matovic G, Rovcanin S, Mojevic M (2010) Partial root-zone drying increases WUE, N and antioxidant content in field potatoes. Eur J Agron 33:124–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaman H, Kirda C, Sesveren S (2011) Genotypic differences of maize in grain yield response to deficit irrigation. Agric Water Manag 98:801–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karam F, Masaad R, Bachour R, Rhayem C, Rouphael Y (2009) Water and radiation use efficiencies in drip irrigated pepper (Capsicum annuum L.): response to full and deficit irrigation regimes. Eur J Hortic Sci 74:79–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Karam F, Saliba R, Skaf S, Breidy J, Rouphael Y, Balendonck J (2011) Yield and water use of eggplants (Solanum melongena L.) under full and deficit irrigation regimes. Agric Water Manag 98:1307–1316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashyap PS, Panda RK (2003) Effects of irrigation scheduling on potato crop parameters under water stressed conditions. Agric Water Manag 59:49–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassam AH, Molden D, Fereres E, Doorenbos J (2007) Water productivity: science and practice—introduction. Irrig Sci 25:185–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato Y, Abe J, Kamoshita A, Yamagishi J (2006) Genotypic variation in root growth angle in rice (Oryza sativa L.) and its association with deep root development in upland fields with different water regimes. Plant Soil 287:117–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirda C (2002) Deficit irrigation scheduling based on plant growth stages showing water stress tolerance. Deficit irrigation practice. Water Rep. FAO, Rome, pp. 3–10

  • Kirda C, Topcu S, Kaman H, Ulge AC, Yazici A, Cetin M, Derici MR (2005) Grain yield response and N-fertiliser recovery of maize under deficit irrigation. Field Crops Res 93:132–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamm FR (2016) Cotton, tomato, corn, and onion production with subsurface drip irrigation: a review. Trans ASABE 59:263–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lascano RJ, Sojka RE (2007) Preface. In: Lascano RJ, Sojka RE (Eds.). Irrigation of agricultural crops, Agronomy Monograph no. 30, 2nd edition, ASACSSA-SSSA Publishing, 664p.

  • Leskovar D, Bang H, Crosby K, Maness N, Franco A, Perkins-Veazie P (2004) Lycopene, carbohydrates, ascorbic acid and yield components of diploid and triploid watermelon cultivars are affected by de®cit irrigation. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 79(1):75–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Shahnazari A, Andersen MN, Jacobsen SE, Jensen CR (2006) Effects of deficit irrigation (DI) and partial root drying (PRD) on gas exchange, biomass partitioning, and water use efficiency in potato. Sci Hortic 109:113–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Gao Y, Sun J, Wu X, Jha SK, Zhang H, Gong X, Li Y (2017) Responses of yield, water use efficiency and quality of short-season cotton to irrigation management: interactive effects of irrigation methods and deficit irrigation. Irrig Sci 35:125–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes MS, Araus JL, van Heerden PDR, Foyer CH (2011) Enhancing drought tolerance in C(4) crops. J Exp Bot 62:3135–3153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lovelli S, Perniola M, Ferrara A, Di Tommaso T (2007) Yield response factor to water (Ky) and water use efficiency of Carthamus tinctorius L. and Solanum melongena L. Agric Water Manag 92:73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loveys BR, Stoll M, Davies WJ (2004) Physiological approaches to enhance water use efficiency in agriculture: exploiting plant signalling in novel irrigation practice. In: Bacon MA (ed) Water use efficiency in plant biology. University of Lancaster, Lancaster, pp 113–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancosu N, Snyder RL, Kyriakakis G, Spano D (2015) Water scarcity and future challenges for food production. Water 7:975–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marouelli WA, Silva WLC (2007) Water tension thresholds for processing tomatoes under drip irrigation in Central Brazil. Irrig Sci 25:411–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattar MA, Zin El-Abedin TK, Alazba AA, Al-Ghobari HM (2020) Soil water status and growth of tomato with partial root-zone drying and deficit drip irrigation techniques. Irrig Sci 38:163–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meligy MM, El-shinawy MZ, El-Behairy UA, Abou Hadid AF (2020) Impact of climate change on water requirements and the productivity on potato crop. Egy J Hortic 47:57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monnem A, Khalel S, Kahlel AS (2015) Effect of drip irrigation intervals and some antitranspirants on the water status, growth and yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). J Agric Sci Technol B 5:15–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller T, Ranquet Bouleau CR, Perona P (2016) Optimizing drip irrigation for eggplant crops in semi-arid zones using evolving thresholds. Agric Water Manag 177:54–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagaz K, El-Mokh F, Alva AK, Masmoudi MM, Ben-Mechlia N (2016) Potato response to different irrigation regimes using saline water. Irrig Drain 65:654–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngouajio M, Wang G, Goldy R (2007) Withholding of drip irrigation between transplanting and flowering increases the yield of field-grown tomato under plastic mulch. Agric Water Manag 87:285–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien PJ, Allen EJ, Firman DM (1998) REVIEW A review of some studies into tuber initiation in potato (Solanum tuberosum) crops. J Agric Sci 130:251–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obidiegwu JE, Bryan GJ, Jones HG, Prashar A (2015) Coping with drought: stress and adaptive responses in potato and perspectives for improvement. Front Plant Sci 6:542

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Odhiambo LO, Irmak S (2015) Relative evaporative losses and water balance in subsurface drip and center pivot–irrigated soybean fields. J Irrig Drain Eng 141:04015020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onder S, Caliskan ME, Onder D, Caliskan S (2005) Different irrigation methods and water stress effects on potato yield and yield components. Agric Water Manag 73:73–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passioura, J.B., Angus, J.F., 2010. In: Passioura, J.B., Angus, J.F. (Ed.), 2010. Improving productivity of crops in water-limited environments. Adv Agron. Academic Press, Cambridge vol 106. pp 37–75.

  • Patel N, Rajput TBS (2007) Effect of drip tape placement depth and irrigation level on yield of potato. Agric Water Manag 88:209–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petropoulos SA, Fernandes Â, Polyzos N, Antoniadis V, Barros L, Ferreira I (2020) The impact of Fertilization regime on the crop performance and chemical composition of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Cultivated in Central Greece. Agronomy. 10:474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Romero AP, Alarcón A, Valbuena RI, Galeano CH (2017) Physiological assessment of water stress in potato using spectral information. Front Plant Sci 8:1608

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rykaczewska K (2013) The impact of high temperature during growing season on potato cultivars with different response to environmental stresses. Am J Plant Sci 4:2386–2393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafleitner R (2009) Growing more potatoes with less water. Tropical Plant Biol 2:111–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Selim EM, Mosa AA, El-Ghamry AM (2009) Evaluation of humic substances fertigation through surface and subsurface drip irrigation systems on potato grown under Egyptian sandy soil conditions. Agric Water Manag 96:1218–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sentek (2001) Calibration of sentek pty ltd soil moisture sensors. A report published by Sentek Pty Ltd, Stepney, p 60

    Google Scholar 

  • Sezen SM, Yazar A, Daşgan Y, Yucel S, Akyıldız A, Tekin S, Akhoundnejad Y (2014) Evaluation of crop water stress index (CWSI) for red pepper with drip and furrow irrigation under varying irrigation regimes. Agric Water Manag 143:59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahnazari A, Liu F, Andersen MN, Jacobsen SE, Jensen CR (2007) Effects of partial root-zone drying on yield, tuber size and water use efficiency in potato under field conditions. Field Crops Res 100:117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shammout MW, Qtaishat T, Rawabdeh H, Shatanawi M (2018) Improving water use efficiency under deficit irrigation in the Jordan Valley. Sustainability 10:4317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao G, Zhang Z, Liu N, Yu S, Xing W (2008) Comparative effects of deficit irrigation (DI) and partial rootzone drying (PRD) on soil water distribution, water use, growth and yield in greenhouse grown hot pepper. Sci Hortic 119:11–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma SP, Leskovar DI, Crosby KM, Volder A, Ibrahim AMH (2014) Root growth, yield, and fruit quality responses of reticulatus and inodorus melons (Cucumis melo L.) to deficit subsurface drip irrigation. Agric Water Manag 136:75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shock CC, Feibert EBG (2002) Deficit irrigation of potato. In: Moutonnet P (Ed.). Deficit irrigation practices, food and agriculture organization of the united nations, Rome, Water reports 22: 47–55.

  • Şimşek M, Kaçıra M, Tonkaz T (2004) The effects of different drip irrigation regimes on watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.)] yield and yield components under semi-arid climatic conditions. Aust J Agric Res 55:1149–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sing Y, Rao SS, Regar PL (2010) Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effects on seed cotton yield, water productivity and yield response factor in shallow soils of semi-arid environment. Agric Water Manag 97:965–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steduto P, Hsiao TC, Fereres E, Raes D (2012) Crop yield response to water, FAO irrigation and drainage, paper no. 66, Rome, Italy

  • Stikic R, Savic S, Jovanovic Z, Jacobsen SE, Liu F, Jensen CR (2010) Deficit irrigation strategies: use of stress physiology knowledge to increase water use efficiency in tomato and potato. In: Sampson AN (ed) Horticulture in 21st Century Series: botanical research and practices. Nova Science Publishers, NY, pp 161–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Unlu M, Kanber R, Senyigit U, Onaran H, Diker K (2006) Trickle and sprinkler irrigation of potato (Solanumtuberosum L.) in the middle Anadolian region of Turkey. Agric Water Manage 79:43–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unver O, Bhaduri A, Hoogeveen J (2017) Water-use efficiency and productivity improvements towards a sustainable pathway for meeting future water demand. Water Sec 1:21–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vyrlas P, Sakellariou-Makrantonaki M, Kalfountzos D (2014) Aerogation: crop root-zone aeration through subsurface drip irrigation system. WSEAS Trans Environ Dev 10:250–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Walworth JL, Carling DE (2002) Tuber initiation and development in irrigated and non-irrigated potatoes. Am J Pot Res 79:387–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Du T, Qiu R, Chen J, Wang F, Li Y, Wang C, Gao L, Kang S (2017) Improved water use efficiency and fruit quality of greenhouse crops under regulated deficit irrigation in northwest China. Agric Water Manag 179:193–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazar A, Sezen SM, Sesveren S (2002) LEPA and trickle irrigation of cotton in the Southeast Anatolia Project (GAP) area in Turkey. Agric Water Manag 54:189–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan BZ, Nishiyama S, Kang Y (2003) Effects of different irrigation regimes on the growth and yield of drip-irrigated potato. Agric Water Manag 63:153–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zegbe JA, Behboudian MH, Clothier BE (2004) Partial rootzone drying is a feasible option for irrigating processing tomatoes. Agric Water Manag 68:195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zin El-Abedin TK, Mattar MA, Alazba AA, Al-Ghobari HM (2017) Comparative effects of two water-saving irrigation techniques on soil water status, yield, and water use efficiency in potato. Sci Hortic 225:525–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zin El-Abedin TK, Mattar MA, Al-Ghobari HM, Alazba AA (2019) Water-saving irrigation strategies in potato fields: effects on physiological characteristics and water use in arid region. Agronomy 9:172

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding this work through research group No (RG-1440-022).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed A. Mattar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mattar, M.A., Zin El-Abedin, T.K., Al-Ghobari, H.M. et al. Effects of different surface and subsurface drip irrigation levels on growth traits, tuber yield, and irrigation water use efficiency of potato crop. Irrig Sci 39, 517–533 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-020-00715-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-020-00715-x

Navigation