Abstract
Debates have become a centerpiece of the presidential nominating contest. In this essay, I explore the role debates played in the Democrats’ 2020 primaries. While debates can help voters make decisions about candidates, several aspects of the way debates are held may have unintentional impacts on the nominating process. The Democrats struggled with an oversized field of candidates, and their solutions to this challenge probably hurt the chances of several worthy candidates. Meanwhile, news outlets’ use of debates as major events that showcase their journalists and elaborate production values often overshadows the candidates on stage. In preparing for 2024’s primary debates, America’s political parties should nevertheless avoid the trap of trying to fix the debates of 2020, and focus instead on creating debate formats that best serve the interests of candidates and rank-and-file party members.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Candidates had to find donors from at least 20 states.
Further Reading
Azari, Julia R., Seth E. Masket. 2018. Intraparty Democracy and the 2016 Election. In Conventional Wisdom, Parties and Broken Barriers in the 2016 Election, edited by Jennifer C. Lucas, Christopher J. Galdieri and Tauna Starbuck Sisco, 137-162. Lexington Books.
Bai, Matt. 2014. All the Truth is Out: The Week Politics Went Tabloid. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Balz, Dan, and Haynes Johnson. 2009. The Battle for America: The Story of an Extraordinary Election. New York: Penguin Books.
Bauder, D. 2019. New rules for 2nd debate: No 1-word answers or show of hands. Associated Press, July 29. https://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory/rules-2nd-debate-word-answers-show-hands-64639411.
Best, Samuel J., and Clark Hubbard. 2000. "The Role of Televised Debates in the Presidential Nominating Process." In In Pursuit of the White House 2000: How We Choose Our Presidential Nominees, edited by William G. Mayer, 255-277. New York: Chatham House Publishers.
Brunner, J. 2019. Washington Gov. Jay Inslee struggles to get speaking time in first Democratic presidential primary debate. Seattle Times, June 27.
Fallows, J. 2008. Rhetorical Questions. The Atlantic, September. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/09/rhetorical-questions/306943/.
Galdieri, Christopher J. 2020. Donald Trump and New Hampshire Politics. New York: Palgrave Pivot. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24797-3.
Germond, Jack W., and Jules Witcover. 1985. Wake Us when It's Over: Presidential Politics of 1984. New York: Macmillan.
Goddard, T. 2019. Gillibrand Offers T-Shirts for $1 Donation. Political Wire, August 14. https://politicalwire.com/2019/08/14/gillibrand-offers-t-shirts-for-1-donation/.
Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald R. Kinder. 1987. News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Meyrowitz, Joshua. 1994. "Visible and Invisible Candidates: A Case Study in "Competing Logics" of Campaign Coverage." Political Communication 11 (2): 145-164.
Moore, David W., and Andrew E. Smith. 2015. The First Primary: New Hampshire's Outsize Role in Presidential Nominations. Lebanon: University of New Hampshire Press.
Pitofsky, M. 2019. Twitter users complain about background at Democratic debate. The Hill, December 19. https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/475416-twitter-users-complain-about-background-at-democratic-debate.
Rubin, J. 2020. Buttigieg thrives in town-hall settings. Washington Post, February 7. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/02/07/buttigieg-thrives-town-hall-settings/.
Self, John W. 2007. Debating the 1976 Debates: Establishing a Tradition of Negotiations. Presidential Studies Quarterly 37 (2): 331-348. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20619320?seq=1.
Siders, D. 2020. Klobuchar roars into contention on eve of New Hampshire primary. Politico, February 10. https://www.politico.com/news/2020/02/10/klobuchar-surges-primary-eve-new-hampshire-113561.
Sides, John, and Lynn Vavreck. 2013. The Gamble: Choice and Chance in the 2012 Presidential Election. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Task Force on Campaign Reform. 2000. "Insights and Evidence Report of the Task Force on Campaign Reform." In Campaign Reform: Insights and Evidence, edited by Larry M. Bartels and Lynn Vavreck. Ann Arbor: Unviersity of Michigan Press.
Weigel, D. 2019. Booker is getting more money and attention. But he's probably still not making the next debate. Washington Post, December 8. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/paloma/the-trailer/2019/12/08/the-trailer-booker-is-getting-more-money-and-attention-but-he-s-probably-still-not-making-the-next-debate/5dea8f66602ff1440b4dd55c/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Galdieri, C.J. Primary Debates and the Presidential Nomination Process. Soc 57, 675–679 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-020-00545-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-020-00545-9