Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Undermatching and Noncognitive Development during the First Year of College: A Longitudinal Study of College Students in the Netherlands

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study focuses on the phenomenon of “undermatching” in relation to the development of noncognitive attributes during the first year of college. Particular attention is paid to examining the role of first-generation college student status in moderating these relationships. The analyses utilize longitudinal data from the Netherlands (N = 14,540), to test whether undermatching is associated with noncognitive development, based on measures of academic motivation, college satisfaction, and academic self-efficacy. Results indicate among first-generation students, undermatching predicts positive development of satisfaction with college and academic self-efficacy, net of other social status, demographic, and educational measures. Alternatively, among continuing-generation students, undermatching does not affect noncognitive development. The results were found to be robust to model selection. The discussion and conclusion suggest that undermatching may, in fact, promote positive development of noncognitive attributes for socially mobile students (i.e., students from families with less educational attainment).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

SOURCE: Startmonitor, 2009–2015

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. VWO (Voorbereidend Wetenschappelijk Onderwijs) = preparatory academic education.

  2. HAVO (Hoger Algemeen Vormend Onderwijs) = higher general secondary education.

References

  • Aljohani, O. (2016). A comprehensive review of the major studies and theoretical models of student retention in higher education. Higher Education Studies, 6(2), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alon, S. (2009). The evolution of class inequality in higher education: Competition, exclusion, and adaptation. American Sociological Review, 74(5), 731–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alon, S., & Tienda, M. (2005). Assessing the mismatch hypothesis: Differences in college graduation rates by institutional selectivity. Sociology of Education, 78(4), 294–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 25(4), 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1991). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, P. C. (2010). Statistical criteria for selecting the optimal number of untreated subjects matched to each treated subject when using many-to-one matching on the propensity score. American journal of epidemiology, 172(9), 1092–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastedo, M. N., & Flaster, A. (2014). Conceptual and methodological problems in research on college undermatch. Educational Researcher, 43(2), 93–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastedo, M. N., & Jaquette, O. (2011). Running in place: Low-income students and the dynamics of higher education stratification. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 318–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belasco, A. S., & Trivette, M. J. (2015). Aiming low: Estimating the scope and predictors of undermatch. Journal of Higher Education, 86(2), 233–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bewick, B., Koutsopoulou, G., Miles, J., Slaa, E., & Barkham, M. (2010). Changes in undergraduate students’ psychological well-being as they progress through university. Studies in Higher Education, 35(6), 633–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, S. E., Cortes, K. E., Lincove, J. A. (2015). Apply yourself: Racial and ethnic differences in college application (Working Paper No. 21368). National Bureau of economic research. Retrieved March 20, 2019, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w21368.

  • Borghans, L., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J. J., & Ter Weel, B. (2008). The economics and psychology of personality traits. Journal of Human Resources, 43(4), 972–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., & McPherson, M. S. (2009). Crossing the finish line: Completing college at America’s public universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, N. A., Miller, A., Woosley, S., Maxwell, N. P., & Kolze, M. (2019). Understanding the link between noncognitive attributes and college retention. Research in Higher Education, 60(2), 135–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browman, A. S., Destin, M., Carswell, L. K., & Svoboda, R. C. (2017). Perceptions of socioeconomic mobility influence academic persistence among low socioeconomic status students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, S., Macmillan, L., & Wyness, G. (2019). Mismatch in higher education: Prevalence, drivers and outcomes. UCL Institute of Education, London, UK. Retrieved June 18, 2020, from: https://mk0nuffieldfounpg9ee.kinstacdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Wyness-42856-MPO-Final-Nov19.pdf.

  • Carrell, S. E., Fullerton, R. L., & West, J. E. (2009). Does your cohort matter? Measuring peer effects in college achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(3), 439–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clogg, C. C., Petkova, E., & Haritou, A. (1995). Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. American Journal of Sociology, 100(5), 1261–1293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. (2007). Do interracial interactions matter? An examination of student-faculty contact and intellectual self-concept. Journal of Higher Education, 78(3), 249–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1971). Functional and conflict theories of educational stratification. American Sociological Review, 36(6), 1002–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Mooij, M., Geerdinck, M., Oostrom, L., & Van Weert, C. (2012). Studeren loont. Inkomens van afgestudeerden in het mbo, hbo en wetenschappelijk onderwijs. Sociaaleconomische trends, 2, 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, E. W., & Smith, J. A. (2017). Determinants of the match between student ability and college quality. Journal of Labor Economics, 35(1), 45–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, E. W., & Smith, J. A. (2020). The consequences of academic match between students and colleges. Journal of Human Resources, 55(3), 767–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutch Inspectorate of Education. (2018). The state of education in the Netherlands 2016/2017. Utrecht: Dutch inspectorate of education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, J., Huang, Z., Zhang, M., Huang, F., Li, Z., & Yuan, Q. (2018). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(1569), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, C. A., Roderick, M., Allensworth, E., Nagaoka, J., Keyes, T. S., Johnson, D. W., et al. (2012). Teaching adolescents to become learners. The role of noncognitive factors in shaping school performance: A critical literature review. Chicago: University of Chicago Consortium on Chicago School Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fostnacht, K. (2015). Undermatching and the first-year experience: Examining effect heterogeneity. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the association for the study of higher education, Denver, CO.

  • Goodchild, L. F., & Wechsler, H. S. (1997). The history of higher education. ASHE reader series (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, M. (2006). Education and non-market outcomes. In E. Hanushek & F. Welcoh (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 1, pp. 578–633). Amsterdam: Elsevier-North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. (2012). Hard evidence on soft skills. Labour Economics, 19(4), 451–464. Retrieved October 3, 2019, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3612993/.

  • Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. (2013). Fostering and measuring skills: Interventions that improve character and cognition. Discussion paper no. 7759. Bonn, Germany: IZA Institute of Labor Economics. Retrieved January 1, 2018, from https://www.iza.org/publications/dp/7750/fostering-and-measuring-skills-interventions-that-improve-character-and-cognition.

  • Hippe, R., Araújo, L., Dinis da Costa, P. (2016). Equity in education in Europe; Luxembourg (Luxembourg): Publications office of the European Union; EUR 28285 EN.

  • Hoger Onderwijs Persbureau. (2017). Hoger onderwijs bekostigen: De scenario’s. Amsterdam: HOP.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, E. A. (2017). Finding the best fit: Exploring postsecondary undermatch in Tennessee [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Michigan: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoxby, C. M., & Avery, C. (2013). The missing ‘“One-Offs”’: The hidden supply of high-achieving, low income students. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 1–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoxby, C. M., & Turner, S. (2013). Expanding college opportunities for high achieving, low income students (SIEPR 12–014). Stanford, CA: Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamhöfer, D. A., Schmitz, H., & Westphal, M. (2019). Heterogeneity in marginal non-monetary returns to higher education. Journal of the European Economic Association, 17(1), 205–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeea/jvx058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsarova, I. (2015). Higher education in the EU: Approaches, issues and trends. European parliament, directorate-general for parliamentary research services. Retrieved March 18, 2020, from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/EPRS/EPRS-IDA-554169-Higher-education-in-the-EU-FINAL.pdf.

  • Kautz, T., Heckman, J. J., Diris, R., Weel, B., & Borghans, L. (2014). Fostering and measuring skills: Improving cognitive and non-cognitive skills to promote lifetime success. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 20749. Retrieved March 13, 2019, from https://www.nber.org/papers/w20749.

  • Kim, Y. K., & Sax, L. J. (2014). The effects of student-faculty interactions on academic self-concept: Does academic major matter? Research in Higher Education, 55(8), 780–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurlaender, M., & Grodsky, E. (2013). Mismatch and the paternalistic justification for selective college admissions. Sociology of Education, 86(4), 294–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School psychology review, 31(3), 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., & Borden, V. (2019). Addressing self-selection and endogeneity in higher education research. Theory and Method in Higher Education Research, 5, 129–151.

  • Long, M. C. (2008). College quality and early adult outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 27(5), 588–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. C. (2010). Changes in the returns to education and college quality. Economics of Education Review, 29(3), 338–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, S. R. (2001). Effectively maintained inequality: Education transitions, track mobility, and social background effects. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1642–1690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manski, C. F. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies, 60(3), 531–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of educational psychology, 79(3), 280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. T. (2003). Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept: A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American psychologist, 58(5), 364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, M. J., Rockenbach, A. N., Bowman, N. A., Seifert, T. A., Wolniak, G. C., Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2016). How college affects students: 21st century evidence that higher education works. San Francisco, CA: Willey.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, W. W. (2009). Higher learning, greater good: The private and social benefits of higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Muskens, M., Frankenhuis, W. E., & Borghans, L. (2019). Low-income students in higher education: Undermatching predicts decreased satisfaction toward the final stage in college. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(7), 1296–1310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muskens, M., & Wolniak, G. C., & Borghans, L (2020). The Long-Term Consequences of College Undermatching on Career and Personal Well-Being After College. In B. Broucker, V. Borden, T. Kallenerg, & C. Milsom (Eds.), Responsibility of Higher Education Systems: What? Why? How? (pp. 51–73). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Brill.

  • Netherlands Association of Universities of Applied Sciences. (2018). Collective labour agreement of Dutch universities of applied sciences. Den haag: Vereniging Hogescholen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovink, S., Kalogrides, D., Nanney, M., & Delaney, P. (2017). College match and undermatch: Assessing student preferences, college proximity, and inequality in post-college outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 58(7), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. (1985a). College environmental influences on learning and cognitive development: A critical review and synthesis. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research. New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T. (1985b). Students’ affective development within the college environment. Journal of Higher Education, 56(6), 640–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., Pierson, C. T., Wolniak, G. C., & Terenzini, P. T. (2004). First-generation college students: Additional evidence on college experiences and outcomes. Journal of Higher Education, 75(3), 249–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., Salisbury, M. H., & Blaich, C. (2013). Design and analysis in college impact research: Which counts more? Journal of College Student Development, 54(3), 329–335.

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (Vol. 2). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., Wolniak, G. C., & Pierson, C. T. (2003). Explaining student growth in college when you don’t think you are. Journal of College Student Development, 44(1), 122–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, M. B., & St. John, E. P. (2002). Social class and college costs: Examining the financial nexus between college choice and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 73(2), 189–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, S. R. (2011). Do college student surveys have any validity? The Review of Higher Education, 35, 45–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Sage Publications.

  • Reynolds, C. L., & DesJardins, S. L. (2009). The use of matching methods in higher education research: Answering whether attendance at a 2-year institution results in differences in educational attainment. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research. Dordecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9628-0_2.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roderick, M., Coca, V., & Nagaoka, J. (2011). Potholes on the road to college: High school effects in shaping urban students’ participation in college application, four-year college enrollment, and college match. Sociology of Education, 84(3), 178–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roderick, M., Nagaoka, J., Allensworth, E., Coca, V., Correa, M., & Stoker, G. (2006). From high school to the future: A first look at Chicago public school graduates’ college enrollment, college preparation, and graduation from four-year colleges. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, A. (2015). Tradeoffs and limitations: Understanding the estimation of college undermatch. Research in Higher Education, 56(6), 566–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roksa, J., & Deutschlander, D. (2018). Applying to college: The role of family resources in academic undermatch. Teachers College Record, 120(6), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. (2008). For objective causal inference, design trumps analysis. Annals of Applied Statistics, 2, 808–840.

  • Sacerdote, B. (2001). Peer effects with random assignment: Results for dartmouth roommates. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 681–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedlacek, W. E. (2017). Measuring noncognitive variables: Improving admissions, success, and retention for underrepresented students. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, W. H. (1971). Inequality of opportunity for higher education. American Sociological Review, 36(5), 793–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R., Clark, M. H., & Steiner, P. M. (2008). Can nonrandomized experiments yield accurate answers? A randomized experiment comparing random and nonrandom assignment. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(484), 1334–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shim, S. S., Ryan, A. M., & Cassady, J. (2012). Changes in self-efficacy across the first year in college: The role of achievement goals. Educational Psychology An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 32(2), 149–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., Pender, M., & Howell, J. (2013). The full extent of student-college academic undermatch. Economics of Education Review, 32, 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebleton, M. J., Soria, K. M., & Huesman, R. L. (2014). First-generation students’ sense of belonging, mental health, and use of counseling services at public research universities. Journal of College Counseling, 17(1), 6–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, A. (2001). Cultural capital and educational attainment. Sociology, 35(4), 893–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making Sense of Cronbach’s Alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55.

  • Tiboris, M. (2014). What’s wrong with undermatching? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 48(4), 46–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titus, M. A. (2004). An examination of the influence of institutional context on student persistence at 4-year colleges and universities: A multilevel approach. Research in Higher Education, 45, 673–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoemmes, F. J., & Kim, E. S. (2011). A systematic review of propensity score methods in the social sciences. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(1), 90–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational psychologist, 39(2), 111–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Broek, A., Cuppen, J., Warps, J., Termorshuizen, T., Lodewick, J., Brukx, D, et al. (2019). Monitor beleidsmaatregelen hoger onderwijs 2018–2019. Nijmegen: ResearchNed. Retrieved September 2, 2020, from https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/binaries/rijksoverheid/documenten/rapporten/2019/08/31/monitor-beleidsmaatregelen-hoger-onderwijs-2018-2019/monitor-beleidsmaatregelen-hoger-onderwijs-2018-2019.pdf.

  • Weidman, J. (1989). Undergraduate socialization: A conceptual approach. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 5, pp. 289–322). New York: Agathon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, R., & Lynch, C. (2012). Delayed entry: The influences of family income, parental education, and parental occupation on the college transition. Journal of Higher Education, 83(5), 671–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiederkehr, V., Darnon, C., Chazal, S., Guimond, S., & Martinot, D. (2015). From social class to self-efficacy: Internalization of low social status pupils’ school performance. Social Psychology of Education, 18(4), 769–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolniak, G., & Ballerini, V. (2019). Peer effects, higher education. In P. Teixeira & J. Shin (Eds.), Encyclopedia of international higher education systems and institutions. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_84-1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Higher Education, University of Georgia, 106 Herty Drive, Athens, GA, 30602, USA

    Gregory C. Wolniak

  2. School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University, Tongersestraat 53, 6211, LM, Maastricht, The Netherlands

    Marjolein Muskens

Authors
  1. Gregory C. Wolniak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marjolein Muskens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory C. Wolniak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 7, 8, 9.

Table 7 Sample means of unadjusted and PSM-adjusted samples
Full size table
Table 8 PSM-adjusted estimates of undermatched (vs. matched-most selective) on noncognitive development
Full size table
Table 9 PSM-adjusted estimates of undermatched (vs. matched-most selective) on noncognitive development, by first-generation status
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wolniak, G.C., Muskens, M. Undermatching and Noncognitive Development during the First Year of College: A Longitudinal Study of College Students in the Netherlands. Res High Educ 62, 855–884 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-020-09620-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-020-09620-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation