Skip to main content
Log in

Brucellosis screening and follow-up of seropositive asymptomatic subjects among household members of shepherds in China

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To measure the seroprevalence of high-exposure populations in brucellosis endemic areas and report the outcome and duration of seropositive asymptomatic subjects, we screened 595 family members of shepherds in Jilin Province, China and then followed up 15 seropositive asymptomatic subjects for 18 months. We found that the seropositive rate of 15.5%. Nearly half of seropositive asymptomatic subjects (7/15) developed into brucellosis in the short term; others were still seropositive asymptomatic or had decreased SAT titer in a longer time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Franco MP, Mulder M, Gilman RH et al (2007) Human brucellosis. Lancet Infect Dis 7(12):775–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(07)70286-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abramson O, Rosenvasser Z, Block C et al (1991) Detection and treatment of brucellosis by screening a population at risk. Pediatr Infect Dis J 10(6):434–438. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006454-199106000-00003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gao R, Xu Y (2008) Serological surveillance of brucellosis high exposure population in Yanqing County of Beijing in 2006. Chin J Endemiol 27(3):305–307. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-4955.2008.03.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Announcement on the Handling of the Brucella Antibody Positive Incident of Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute. http://wjw.lanzhou.gov.cn/art/2020/9/15/art_4531_928158.html. Accessed 14 Nov 2020

  5. Gheita TA, Sayed S, Azkalany GS et al (2015) Subclinical sacroiliitis in brucellosis. Clinical presentation and MRI findings. Z Rheumatol 74(3):240–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-014-1465-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mesner O, Riesenberg K, Biliar N et al (2007) The many faces of human-to-human transmission of brucellosis: congenital infection and outbreak of nosocomial disease related to an unrecognized clinical case. Clin Infect Dis 45(12):e135–e140. https://doi.org/10.1086/523726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang H, Zhang S, Wang T et al (2020) Epidemiological characteristics and spatiotemporal trend analysis of human brucellosis in China, 1950–2018. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072382

  8. Ran X, Chen X, Wang M et al (2018) Brucellosis seroprevalence in ovine and caprine flocks in China during 2000-2018: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Vet Res 14(1):393. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1715-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mantecón MA, Gutiérrez P, del Pilar ZM et al (2006) Utility of an immunocapture-agglutination test and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test against cytosolic proteins from Brucella melitensis B115 in the diagnosis and follow-up of human acute brucellosis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 55(1):27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.11.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Diagnostic criteria for Brucellosis (2007). http://hbba.sacinfo.org.cn/stdDetail/c4434c8562c9fdc9ac1eb137425b0d26

  11. Alsubaie S, Almuneef M, Alshaalan M et al (2005) Acute brucellosis in Saudi families: relationship between brucella serology and clinical symptoms. Int J Infect Dis 9(4):218–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2004.07.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Deniz S, Baykam N, Celikbas A et al (2015) Screening household members of acute brucellosis cases in endemic areas and risk factors for brucellosis. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis (Larchmont, NY) 15(8):468–472. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2014.1723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tabak F, Hakko E, Mete B et al (2008) Is family screening necessary in brucellosis. Infection 36(6):575–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-008-7022-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Calfee MW, Wendling M (2012) The effects of environmental conditions on persistence and inactivation of Brucella suis on building material surfaces. Lett Appl Microbiol 54(6):504–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2012.03237.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by Health Technology Innovation Project of Jilin Province, China (Project Number: 2016J076) and Graduate Innovation Fund of Jilin University (101832020CX269). The funding agencies had no role in database design, analysis, or writing the manuscript

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qing Zhen.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOC 36 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, J., Zhang, X., Yang, H. et al. Brucellosis screening and follow-up of seropositive asymptomatic subjects among household members of shepherds in China. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 40, 1325–1328 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-04115-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-04115-z

Keywords

Navigation