Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Differentiation of multiple sclerosis lesions and low-grade brain tumors on MRS data: machine learning approaches

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions may have great similarities with neoplastic brain lesions in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and thus wrong diagnoses may occur. In this study, differentiation of MS and low-grade brain tumors was performed with computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) methods by magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) data. MRS data belonging to 51 MS and 39 low-grade brain tumor patients were obtained. The feature extraction from MRS data was performed by the help of peak integration (PI) and full spectra (FS) methods and the most significant features were identified. For the classification step, artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) methods were used and the differentiation between MS and brain tumor was performed automatically. Examining the results, one can conclude that data which belong to MS and low-grade brain tumor cases were automatically differentiated from each other with the help of ANN with 100% accuracy, 100% sensitivity, and 100% specificity. Using of MR spectroscopy and artificial intelligence methods may be useful as a complementary imaging technique to MR imaging in the differentiation of MS lesions and low-grade brain tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altıntaş A, Esen F (2008) Immunopathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Arch Neuropsychiatry 45(Suppl):10–14

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gabelic T, Skoric MK, Adamec I et al (2013) Tongue somatosensory-evoked potentials: evaluation of the afferent trigeminal pathway in patients with early multiple sclerosis. Clin EEG Neurosci 44:286–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Khan O, Bao F, Bernitsas E et al (2004) Prospective multi-modal MRI study to examine the effect of natalizumab on tissue injury in the brain and spinal cord in patients with RRMS. Mult Scler 20(1 Suppl):285–496

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cha S, Pierce S, Knopp EA, Johnson G, Yang C, Ton A, Litt AW, Zagzag D (2001) Dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted MR imaging of tumefactive demyelinating lesions. Am J Neuroradiol 22:1109–1116

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Huisman TA (2009) Tumor-like lesions of the brain. Cancer Imaging (Special issue A) S10

  6. Kilic AK, Kurne AT, Oguz KK et al (2012) Mass lesions in the brain: tumor or multiple sclerosis? Clinical and imaging characteristics and course from a single reference center. Turk Neurosurg 23(6):728–735

    Google Scholar 

  7. Turatti M, Gajofatto A, Bianchi MR, Ferrari S, Monaco S, Benedetti MD (2013) Benign course of tumour-like multiple sclerosis. Report of five cases and literature review. J Neurol Sci 324(1):156–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Capello E, Roccatagliata L, Pagano F et al (2001) Tumor-like multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions: neuropathological clues. Neurol Sci 22:113–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carvalho AT, Linhares P, Castro L, Sá MJ (2014) Multiple sclerosis and oligodendroglioma: an exceptional association. Case Rep Neurol Med:1–5

  10. Green AJ, Bollen AW, Berger MS, Oksenberg JR, Hauser SL (2001) Multiple sclerosis and oligodendroglioma. Mult Scler 7(4):269–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Abdoli M, Freedman MS (2015) Neuro-oncology dilemma: tumour or tumefactive demyelinating lesion. J Mult Scler 2(137):2376–0389

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kes VB, Cesarik M, Ćorić L et al (2012) Tumor-like multiple sclerosis. Acta Clin Croat 51(1):113–116

    Google Scholar 

  13. Plantone D, Renna R, Sbardella E et al (2015) Concurrence of multiple sclerosis and brain tumors. Front Neurol 6:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ponnada AN (2005) Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the monitoring of multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging 15(4 Suppl):46–57

    Google Scholar 

  15. De Stefano N, Narayanan S, Matthews PM et al (2000) Proton MR spectroscopy to assess axonal damage in multiple sclerosis and other white matter disorders. J Neuro-Oncol 6(2):121

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ge Y (2006) Multiple sclerosis: the role of MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol 27:1165–1176

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bitscha A, Bruhna H, Vougioukasa V et al (1999) Inflammatory CNS demyelination: histopathologic correlation with in vivo quantitative proton MR spectroscopy. Am J Neuroradiol 20:1619–1627

    Google Scholar 

  18. Georgiadis P, Kostopoulos S, Cavouras D, Glotsos D, Kalatzis I, Sifaki K, Malamas M, Solomou E, Nikiforidis G (2011) Quantitative combination of volumetric MR imaging and MR spectroscopy data for the discrimination of meningiomas from metastatic brain tumors by means of pattern recognition. Magn Reson Imaging 29:525–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ranjith G, Parvathy R, Vikas V, Chandrasekharan K, Nair S (2015) Machine learning methods for the classification of gliomas: initial results using features extracted from MR spectroscopy. Neuroradiol J 28(2):106–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Astrakas L, Blekas KD, Constantinou C (2011) Combining magnetic resonance spectroscopy and molecular genomics offers better accuracy in brain tumor typing and prediction of survival than either methodology alone. Int J Oncol 38:1113–1127

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. International network for pattern recognition of tumours using magnetic resonance, http://gabrmn.uab.es/interpret/. Accessed 03 Jan 2016

  22. Johnson DR, Guerin JB, Giannini C, Morris JM, Eckel LJ, Kaufmann TJ (2017) 2016 updates to the WHO brain tumor classification system: what the radiologist needs to know. RadioGraphics 37:2164–2180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fuster-Garcia E, Navarro C, Vicente J, Tortajada S, García-Gómez JM, Sáez C, Calvar J, Griffiths J, Julià-Sapé M, Howe FA, Pujol J, Peet AC, Heerschap A, Moreno-Torres À, Martínez-Bisbal MC, Martínez-Granados B, Wesseling P, Semmler W, Capellades J, Majós C, Alberich-Bayarri À, Capdevila A, Monleón D, Martí-Bonmatí L, Arús C, Celda B, Robles M (2011) Compatibility between 3T 1H SV-MRS data and automatic brain tumour diagnosis support systems based on databases of 1.5T 1H SV-MRS spectra. MAGMA 24:35–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gill SK (2013) Single voxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of childhood brain tumours. PhD Thesis, University of Birmingham

  25. Cangelosi R, Goriely A (2007) Component retention in principal component analysis with application to cDNA microarray data. Biol Direct 2:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Callot V, Galanaud D, Le Fur Y et al (2008) 1H MR spectroscopy of human brain tumours: a practical approach. Eur J Radiol 67(2):268–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Saindane AM, Cha S, Law M, Xue X, Knopp EA, Zagzag D (2002) Proton MR spectroscopy of tumefactive demyelinating lesions. Am J Neuroradiol 23:1378–1386

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Cianfoni A, Niku S, Imbesi SG (2007) Metabolite findings in tumefactive demyelinating lesions utilizing short echo time proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Am J Neuroradiol 28:272–277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Majos C, Aguilera C, Alonso J et al (2009) Proton MR spectroscopy improves discrimination between tumor and pseudotumoral lesion in solid brain masses. Am J Neuroradiol 30:544–551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Malhotra HS, Jain KK, Agarwal A (2009) Characterization of tumefactive demyelinating lesions using MR imaging and in-vivo proton MR spectroscopy. Mult Scler 15:193–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Butteriss DJ, Ismail A, Ellison DW et al (2014) Use of serial proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy to differentiate low grade glioma from tumefactive plaque in a patient with multiple sclerosis. Br J Radiol

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Sakarya University BAPK (Project No: 2015-50-02-012). The authors wish to thank all patients included in the study for their approval to the use of their MRS data for research and educational purposes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ziya Ekşi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ekşi, Z., Özcan, M.E., Çakıroğlu, M. et al. Differentiation of multiple sclerosis lesions and low-grade brain tumors on MRS data: machine learning approaches. Neurol Sci 42, 3389–3395 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04950-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04950-0

Keywords

Navigation