Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental investigation of mobility and deposition characteristics of dry granular flow

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Landslides Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental investigation of mobility and deposition characteristics of dry granular flow, by a number of flume tests on silica sand no. 3 and silica sand no. 7, to interpret the effects of angle of slope, granular volume, cushion, granular structure, and granular size on the mobility and deposition characteristics of granular flow. Along a given slope, an increase of the amount of sand impaired its mobility. However, for a given amount of sand along a slope, an increase of the angle of slope resulted in a V-shaped change of the angle of mass center movement, implying the existence of a characteristic combination of the angle of slope and the amount of sand to yield the maximum mobility of granular flow. The angle of mass center movement increased while increasing the thickness of cushion, showing that the cushion impaired the mobility of granular flow. Granular structure using the mixed structures of silica sand no. 3 and silica sand no. 7 affected greatly the mobility of granular flow, by showing an inverted structure in the near runout area with the deposition of the materials in the upper half of original grading structure in the far runout area for the inverse grading structure and normal grading structure. The mobility of granular flow increased with the change in turn of the inverse grading structure, the uniform structure, and the normal grading structure. The increase of the grain sizes of granular material enhanced its mobility. In addition, the angle of mass center movement showed a more reliable assessment for the mobility of granular flow in comparison with the angle of maximum mass movement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

References

  • ASTM D2487-11 (2011) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger C, McArdell BW, Schlunegger F (2011) Direct measurement of channel erosion by debris flows, Illgraben, Switzerland. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 116(F1):F01002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boultbee N, Stead D, Schwab J, Geertsema M (2006) The Zymoetz River rock avalanche, June 2002, British Columbia, Canada. Eng Geol 83(1-3):76–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buettner KE, Guo Y, Curtis JS (2020) Development of a collisional dissipation rate model for frictional cylinders. Powder Technol 365:83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell CS (2006) Granular material flows-an overview. Powder Technol 162(3):208–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi CE, Cui Y, Liu LHD, Ng CWW, Lourenco SDN (2017) Impact mechanisms of granular flow against curved barriers. Geotech Lett 7(4):330–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosta GB, Imposimato S, Roddeman D (2009) Numerical modelling of entrainment/deposition in rock and debris-avalanches. Eng Geol 109(1-2):135–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruden DM, Hungr O (1986) The debris of the Frank slide and theories of rockslide-avalanche mobility. Can J Earth Sci 23(3):425–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies TRH (1982) Spreading of rock avalanche debris by mechanical fluidization. Rock Mech 15:9–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies TRH, McSaveney MJ (1999) Runout of dry granular avalanches. Can Geotech J 36(2):313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisbacher GH (1979) Cliff collapse and rock avalanches (sturzstroms) in the Mackenzie Mountains, northwestern Canada. Can Geotech J 16(2):309–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farin M, Mangeney A, Roche O (2014) Fundamental changes of granular flow dynamics, deposition, and erosion processes at high slope angles: insights from laboratory experiments. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 119(3):504–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federico F, Cesali C (2019) Effects of granular collisions on the rapid coarse-grained materials flow. Geotech Lett 9(3):278–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray JMNT (2018) Particle segregation in dense granular flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 50:407–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt K (1988) Catastrophic landslide deposits in the Karakoram Himalaya. Science 242:64–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu KJ (1975) Catastrophic debris streams (Sturzstroms) generated by rockfalls. Geol Soc Am Bull 86(1):129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM, Reid ME, Lahusen RG (1997) Debris-flow mobilization from landslides. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 25(1):85–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JGS 0111 (2015) Test method for density of soil particles. In: Japanese Geotechnical Society Standards: Laboratory Testing Standards of Geomaterials, vol 1. The Japanese Geotechnical Society, Tokyo

  • JGS 0131 (2015) Test method for particle size distribution of soils. In: Japanese Geotechnical Society Standards: Laboratory Testing Standards of Geomaterials, vol 1. The Japanese Geotechnical Society, Tokyo

  • JGS 0161 (2015) Test method for minimum and maximum densities of sands. In: Japanese Geotechnical Society Standards: Laboratory Testing Standards of Geomaterials, vol 1. The Japanese Geotechnical Society, Tokyo

  • Jiang YJ, Fan XY, Li T, Xiao SY (2018) Influence of particle-size segregation on the impact of dry granular flow. Powder Technol 340:39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langroudi MK, Turek S, Ouazzi A, Tardos GI (2010) An investigation of frictional and collisional powder flows using a unified constitutive equation. Powder Technol 197(1-2):97–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legros F (2002) The mobility of long-runout landslides. Eng Geol 63:301–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy SW, Tucker GE, Kean JW, Coe JA (2013) Field measurement of basal forces generated by erosive debris flows. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 118(2):589–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng CWW, Choi CE, Koo RCH, Goodwin GR, Song D, Kwan JSH (2018) Dry granular flow interaction with dual-barrier systems. Géotechnique 68(5):386–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng CWW, Choi CE, Goodwin GR (2019) Froude characterization for unsteady single-surge dry granular flows: impact pressure and runup height. Can Geotech J 56(12):1968–1978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norem H, Locat L, Schielddrop B (1990) An approach to the physics and the modeling of submarine flowslides. Mar Geotechnol 9(2):93–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schürch P, Densmore AL, Rosser NJ, McArdell BW (2011) Dynamic controls on erosion and deposition on debris-flow fans. Geology 39(9):827–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strom AL (2004) Rock avalanches of the Ardon River valley at the southern foot of the Rocky Range, Northern Caucasus, North Osetia. Landslides 1:237–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton C (1997) Coefficient restitution for collinear collisions of elastic perfectly plastic spheres. J Appl Mech 64(2):383–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou GGD, Ng CWW (2010) Numerical investigation of reverse segregation in debris flows by DEM. Granul Matter 12:507–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou GGD, Sun QC (2013) Three-dimensional numerical study on flow regimes of dry granular flows by DEM. Powder Technol 239:115–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo L, Lourenco SDN, Baudet BA (2019) Experimental insight into the particle morphology changes associated with landslide movement. Landslides 16(4):787–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

A special acknowledgement should be expressed to the Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory of the University of Tokyo, Japan that supported the implementation of the tests in this paper.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 41807268), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences - China (Grant no. XDA20030301), the “Belt & Road” International Cooperation Team for the “Light of West” Program of CAS - China (Su Lijun), and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences - China (Grant no. 2018408).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Earth Surface Process of CAS, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, 610041, China

    Fangwei Yu & Lijun Su

  2. CAS Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China

    Fangwei Yu & Lijun Su

  3. China-Pakistan Joint Research Center on Earth Sciences, CAS-HEC, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan

    Fangwei Yu & Lijun Su

  4. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Fangwei Yu & Lijun Su

  5. Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan

    Fangwei Yu

Authors
  1. Fangwei Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lijun Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lijun Su.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, F., Su, L. Experimental investigation of mobility and deposition characteristics of dry granular flow. Landslides 18, 1875–1887 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01593-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01593-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation