Skip to main content
Log in

Bridging the Gap between the Meaning of Natural Language and Mental Content

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since Frege, mental content (conscious content) has been distinguished from the meaning of natural language and not regarded mental content as the meaning of language expression. This anti-psychological view cuts off the connection between the meaning of language and mental content, giving rise to the failures in solving the problems of mind. Instead of thinking about linguistic meaning and mental content separately, philosophers of mind put more emphasis on mental content and even equate the meaning of linguistic expressions with it. Therefore, the issues that what the relationship between linguistic meaning and mental content is and how they are connected are not well answered so far. The author argues in this paper that: 1) People attach meaning to symbols through communication activities when they have mental contents, thus forming the language, which is also a process of achieving psychological certainty in turn; 2) the relationship between linguistic meaning and mental content is similar to the interdependent relationship between monetary value and the use value of commodities. Without the latter, the former will lose its source, and the former also affects the latter. Philosophers of mind pay little attention to the interplay between language and mental content. Based on the above arguments and previous theories, this paper conceives a general model of the generation of linguistic meaning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionsim: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, M. J., & Fulle, C. (2015). Symbolic interactionism. Sociopedia.isa, https://doi.org/10.1177/205684601561.

  • Chiesa, C. (1997). Wittgenstein et la fin du psychologisme. Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger, 187(2), 183–194.

  • Davidson, D. (1984). Theories of Meaning and Learnable Languages. In Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (pp. 3–16). New York: Clarendon Press.

  • Dummett, M. (1973). Frege: Philosophy of Language. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M. (1993a) What is a Theory of Meaning?(II). In The Seas of Language (pp. 34–93). Oxford: Clarendon.

  • Dummett, M. (1993b). Origins of Analytical Philosophy. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fllesdal, D. (1999). Mind and Meaning. Philosophical Studies, 94(1), 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. (1975). The Language of Thought. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. (1994). The Elm and the Expert. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J., & Pylyshyn, Z. (1988). Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis. Cognition, 28, 3–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1960). On sense and reference. In P. Geach & & M. Black (Eds.), Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege (pp. 56–78). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunther, Y. H. (2003). Essays on Nonconceptual Content. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.

  • Harman, G. (1973). Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1–3), 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. (2020). The Language of Thought Hypothesis. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Online at https://www.iep.utm.edu/lot-hypo/

  • Kind, A. (2020). Qualia. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Online at https://www.iep.utm.edu/qualia/

  • Kneale, W., & Kneale, M. (1962). The Development of Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmar, D. (2006). Mirror Neurons and the Phenomenology of Intersubjectivity. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 5, 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, K. (2003). Donald Davidson. New York: Cambridge university press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lund, N. (2003). Language and Thought, London; New York: Routledge.

  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society: from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R. G. (1998). Language conventions make simple. Journal of Philosophy, 95(4), 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R. G. (2004). Varieties of Meaning. Gambridge: the MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, V. C. (2009). Symbol Grounding in Computational Systems: A Paradox of Intentions. Minds and Machines, 19(4), 529–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pataut, F. (1996). An Anti-Realist Perspective on Language, Thought, Logic and the History of Analytic Philosophy: An Interview with Michael Dummett. Philosophical investigations, 19(1), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke, C. (2001). Does Perception Have a Nonconceptual Content? Journal of Philosophy, 99, 239–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, D. (2020). Mental Representation. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Online at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mental-representation/

  • Quine, W. V. O. (1951). Two Dogmas of Empiricism. Philosophical Review, 60: 20–43. Reprinted in From a Logical Point of View, pp. 20–46.

  • Reed, B. (2008). Certainty. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Online at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/certainty/.

  • Rescorla, M. (2019). The Language of Thought Hypothesis. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Online at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/language-thought/.

  • Rescorla, M. (2020).  The Computational Theory of Mind. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Online at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/computational-mind/.

  • Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y.-J. (2007). “Vygotsky’s Neglected Legacy”: Cultural-Historical Activity Theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1905), On Denoting. Mind, 14: 479–493. Reprinted in Bertrand Russell, Logic and Knowledge, London: George Allen and Unwin, 1956, 41–56.

  • Searle, J. (1980). Minds, Brains, and Programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 417–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smagorinsky, P. (2001). If Meaning Is Constructed, What Is It Made from? Toward a Cultural Theory of Reading. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 133–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speaks, J. (2019). Theories of meaning. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Online at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/meaning/.

  • Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2007). A praxical solution of the symbol grounding problem. Minds and Machines, 17(4), 369–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tye, M. (2017). Qualia. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Online at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qualia/.

  • Vygotsky, L. (1986). translation newly revised and edited by Alex Kozulin. Thought and Language. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London England: The MIT Press.

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical Investigations, G.E.M. Anscombe and R. Rhees (eds.), G.E.M. Anscombe (trans.), Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On Certainty. G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright (Eds.), G.E.M. Anscombe and D. Paul (trans.), Oxford: Blackwell.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This financial support is provided by Major Program of National Fund of Philosophy and Social Science of China (18ZDA032).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuquan Huo.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huo, S. Bridging the Gap between the Meaning of Natural Language and Mental Content. Integr. psych. behav. 56, 163–179 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09596-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09596-3

Keywords

Navigation