Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Influence of the Rootstocks on Biochemical and Bioactive Compound Content of ‘0900 Ziraat’ Sweet Cherry Fruit

Einfluss verschiedener Veredlungsunterlagen auf den Gehalt biochemischer und bioaktiver Inhaltsstoffe in Früchten der Süßkirschensorte ‘0900 Ziraat’

  • Original Article / Originalbeitrag
  • Published:
Erwerbs-Obstbau Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study was conducted to determine the effects of different rootstocks (Ma × Ma 14, GiselA 5, GiselA 6 and SL 64) on quality properties and bioactive compounds of ‘0900 Ziraat’ sweet cherry fruit. Fruit weight, thickness and length of Ma × Ma 14 and SL 64 was higher than the GiselA 5 and GiselA 6. Firmness of GiselA 6 was lower than the other rootstocks (Ma × Ma 14, GiselA 5 and SL 64). The chroma value of GiselA 5 was greater than the other rootstocks, whereas the hue angle of SL 64 was lower than the other rootstocks. While the lowest SSC and acidity was obtained in GiselA 5, the highest vitamin C was determined in Ma × Ma 14. Total phenolics and total flavonoids, thus antioxidant activity of GiselA 6 and SL 64 rootstocks was higher than Ma × Ma 14 and GiselA 5 rootstocks. Catechin was the major phenolic acid in ‘0900 Ziraat’ sweet cherry fruit. GiselA 6 had higher catechin and 4‑hydroxybenzoic acid content than the other rootstocks. As a result, it was revealed that sweet cherry rootstocks were effective on bioactive compounds and fruit quality characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aglar E, Yıldız K (2014) Influence of rootstocks (Gisela 5, Gisela 6, Ma x Ma, SL 64) on performance of 0900 Ziraat sweet cherry. J Basic Appl Sci 10:60–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benzie IFF, Strain JJ (1996) The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of antioxidant power: the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem 239:70–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beyhan O, Elmastas M, Gedikli (2010) Total phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity of leaf, dry fruit, and fresh fruit of feijoa (Acca sellowiana, Myrtaceae). J Med Plants Res 4:1065–1072

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blazkova J, Hlusickova I, Blazek J (2002) Fruit weight, firmness and soluble solids content during ripening of Karesova cv. sweet cherry. HortScience 29:92–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Blois MS (1958) Antioxidant determinations by the use of a stable free radical. Nature 26:1199–1200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantin CM, Pinochet J, Gogorcena Y, Moreno MA (2010) Growth, yield and fruit quality of ‘Van’ and ‘Stark Hardy Giant’ sweet cherry cultivars as influenced by grafting on different rootstocks. Sci Hortic 123:329–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang CC, Yang MH, Wen HM, Chern JC (2002) Estimation of total flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colorimetric methods. J Food Drug Anal 10:178–182

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Čmelik Z, Druzic Orlic J (2008) Performance of some sweet cherry cultivars on ‘Weiroot 158’ rootstock. Acta Hortic 795:345–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisosto CH, Crisosto GM, Metheney P (2003) Consumer acceptance of ‘Brooks’ and ‘Bing’ cherries is mainly dependent on fruit SSC and visual skin color. Postharvest Biol Technol 28(1):159–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daza A, Garcia-Galavis PA, Grande MJ, Santamaria C (2008) Fruit quality parameters of “Pioneer” Japanese plum produced on eight different rootstocks. Sci Hortic 118:206–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Mula HM, Castillo S, Martı’nez-Romero D, Valero D, Zapata PJ, Guillen F, Serrano M (2009) Sensory, nutritive and functional properties of sweet cherry as affected by cultivar and ripening stage. Food Sci Technol Int 15:535–543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fazzari M, Fukumoto L, Mazza G, Livrea MA, Tesoriere L, Di Marco L (2008) In vitro bioavailability of phenolic compounds from five cultivars of frozen sweet cherries (Prunus avium L.). J Agric Food Chem 56:3561–3568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferretti G, Bacchetti T, Belleggia A, Neri D (2010) Cherry antioxidants: from farm to table. Molecules 15(10):6993–7005

  • Gonçalves B, Moutinho-Pereira J, Santos A, Silva AP, Bacelar E, Correia C, Rosa E (2006) Scion–rootstock interaction affects the physiology and fruit quality of sweet cherry. Tree Physiol 26:93–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hajagos A, Spornberger A, Modl P, Vegvari G (2012) The effect of rootstocks on the development of fruit quality parameters of some sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars, ‘Regina’ and ‘Kordia’, during the ripening process. Acta Univ Sapientiae Agric Environ 4:59–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobek L, Seruga M, Voca S, Sindrak Z, Dobricevic N (2009) Flavonol and phenolic acid composition of sweet cherries (cv. Lapins) produced on six different vegetative rootstocks. Sci Hortic 123:23–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez S, Garı’n A, Betra’n JA, Gogorcena Y, Moreno MA (2007) Influence of different vigour cherry rootstocks on leaves and shoots mineral composition. Sci Hortic 112:73–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim DO, Heo HJ, Kim YJ, Yang HS, Lee CY (2005) Sweet and sour cherry phenolics and their protective effects on neuronal cells. J Agric Food Chem 53:9921–9927

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kroon PA, Williamson G (1999) Hydroxycinnamates in plants and food: current and future perspective. J Sci Food Agric 79:355–361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lanauskas J, Kviklys D, Uselis N, Viškelis P, Kviklienė N, Buskienė L (2014) Rootstock effect on the performance of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cv. ‘Vytėnu rožinė’. Zemdirbyste 101:85–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long EL, Kaiser C (2010) Sweet cherry rootstocks for the Pacific Northwest a Pacific Northwest extension publication. PNW 619. Oregon State Univertsity—University of Idaho—Washington State University, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Ortega G, Garcia-Montiel F, Bayo-Canhaa A, Frutos-Ruiza C, Frutos-Tomas D (2016) Rootstock effects on the growth, yield and fruit quality of sweetcherry cv. ‘Newstar’ in the growing conditions of the Region of Murcia. Sci Hortic 198:326–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainla L, Noormets M, Moor U, Karp K, Jalakas M (2008) Effect of rootstock on taste-related properties of nordic apple cultivars. Acta Hortic 903:405–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Matilla P, Hellström J, Törrönen R (2006) Phenolic acids in berries, fruits and beverages. J Agric Food Chem 54:7193–7199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mozetic B, Trebse P, Hribar J (2002) Determination and quantitation of anthocyanins and hydroxycinnamic acids in different cultivars of sweet cherries (Prunus avium L.) from Nova Gorica region (Slovenia). Food Technol Biotechnol 40:207–212

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk B, Yıldız K, Kucuker E (2015) Effect of pre-harvest methyl jasmonate treatments on ethylene production, water-soluble phenolic compounds and fruit quality of Japanese plums. J Sci Food Agric 95:583–591

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pal MD, Mıtre I, Asanıca AC, Sestraș AF, Petıcıla AG, Mıtre V (2017) The influence of rootstock on the growth and fructification of cherry cultivars in a high density cultivation system. Not Bot Horti Agrobot 45:451–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popescu M, Popescu GC (2015) Effects of dwarfing GiselA 5 rootstock on reproductive potential, vegetative growth, and physiological features of some sweet cherry cultıvars in high-density sweet cherry orchards. Curr Trends Nat Sci 4:82–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Rato AE, Agulheiro AC, Barroso JM, Riqelme F (2008) Soil and rootstock influence on fruit quality of plums (Prunus domestica L.). Sci Hortic 118:218–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serra AT, Duarte RO, Bronze MR, Duarte CMM (2011) Identification of bioactive response in traditional cherries from Portugal. Food Chem 125:318–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sitarek M, Bartosiewicz B (2012) Influence of five clonal rootstocks on the growth, productivity and fruit quality of ‘Sylvıa’ and ‘Karına’ sweet cherry trees. J Fruit Ornam Plant Res 20:5–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinardi AM, Visai C, Bertazza G (2005) Effect of rootstock on fruit quality of two sweet cherry cultivar. Acta Hortic 667:201–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tareen MJ, Tareen MN (2004) Effect of Rootstocks on “Bing” Cherry Grown in Balochistan (Pakistan). Int J Agric Biol 1560:565–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavarini S, Gil MI, Tomás-Barberán FA, Buendia B, Remorini D, Massai R, Degl Innocenti E, Guidi L (2011) Effects of water stress and rootstocks on fruit phenolic composition and physical/chemical quality in Suncrest peach. Ann Appl Biol 158:226–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Treutter D, Feucht W, Schmid PPS (1986) Polyphenole des Phloems in Beziehung zur Inkompatibilität von Interspezifischen Prunus-Veredlungen (Prunus avium L., Prunus cerasus L.)—Flavanone und Flavanole über der Veredlungsstelle. Gartenbauwissenschaft 51:77–84

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Usenik V, Štampar F (2000) Influence of various rootstocks for cherries on p‑coumaric acid, genistein and prunin content and their involvement in the incompatibility process. Gartenbauwissenschaft 65:245–250

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Usenik V, Štampar F (2002) Influence of scion/rootstock interaction on seasonal changes of phenols. Phyton 42:279–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Usenik V, Krška B, Vičan M, Štampar F (2006) Early detection of graft incompatibility in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) using phenol analyses. Sci Hortic 109:332–338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Usenik V, Fabcic J, Stampar F (2008) Sugars, organic acids, phenolic composition and antioxidant activity of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). Food Chem 107:185–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Usenik V, Fajt N, Mikulic-Petkovsek M, Slatnar A, Stampar F, Veberic R (2010) Sweet cherry pomological and biochemical characteristics influenced by rootstock. J Agric Food Chem 58:4928–4933

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whiting DM, Lang G, Ophard D (2005) Rootstock and training system affect sweet cherry growth, yield and fruit quality. HortScience 40:582–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiting MD, Ophardt D, McFerson JR (2006) Chemical blossom thinners vary in their effect on sweet cherry fruit set, yield, fruit quality, and crop value. horttech 16:66–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yildiz K, Kilic K, Ozkan Y, Ozturk B, Kucuker E (2018) The role of pre-harvest aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) treatments on total phenolics, antioxidant capacity and fruit qualityattributes of sweet cherry cultivars. Erwerbs-Obstbau 60:221–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Whiting MD (2011) Improving ‘Bing’ sweet cherry fruit quality with plant growth regulators. Sci Hortic 127:341–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey

    Orhan Karakaya & Burhan Ozturk

  2. Suşehri Timur Karabal Vocational School, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey

    Erdal Aglar

  3. Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Sakarya University of Applied Science, Sakarya, Turkey

    Huseyin Irfan Balik

Authors
  1. Orhan Karakaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Burhan Ozturk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Erdal Aglar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Huseyin Irfan Balik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orhan Karakaya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

O. Karakaya, B. Ozturk, E. Aglar and H.I. Balik declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karakaya, O., Ozturk, B., Aglar, E. et al. The Influence of the Rootstocks on Biochemical and Bioactive Compound Content of ‘0900 Ziraat’ Sweet Cherry Fruit. Erwerbs-Obstbau 63, 247–253 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-021-00542-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-021-00542-0

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Search

Navigation