Skip to main content
Log in

Production and evaluation of physicochemical, rheological, and tribological properties of Cucurbita pepo L. seed oil

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, vegetable oils are seen as a safe alternative to mineral oil–based lubricants. In the present work, preliminary evaluation of the physicochemical, corrosion, thermal, rheological, and tribological properties of Cucurbita pepo L. oil (CPO) were carried out and compared with commercially available mineral oil, SAE 20W40, and other vegetable oils. The yield of CPO was found as 54.85% with iodine value, acid value, and saponification value of 105.52 ±0.12 gI2/100 g, 0.4 ±0.52 mg KOH/g, and 147.26 ±0.11 mg KOH/g respectively. Palmitic acid (13.98%), stearic acid (13.55%), oleic acid (19.53%), and linoleic acid (50.07%) were major fatty acids present in CPO. The pour and flash points of CPO were - 8±0.67 ° C and 323±0.11 ° C respectively. The viscosities of CPO were 55.39 cSt at 40°C and 11.15 cSt at 100°C. The viscosity index was 180. From the tribology tests, it was observed that the coefficient of friction and wear scar diameter of CPO (0.0459±0.0002 and 0.413±0.0389) were comparable to that of SAE 20 W40 (0.0506±0.0356 and 0.333±0.0202). The extreme pressure properties of CPO were found relatively inferior in comparison to SAE 20W40 due to the presence of commercial additive package in SAE 20W40; however, it was observed that tribological properties of CPO (coefficient of friction and wear scar diameter) were better than some of the commonly studied vegetable oils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CPO:

Cucurbita pepo L. oil

IV:

iodine value

VI:

viscosity Index

TGA:

thermogravimetric analyzer

CoF:

coefficient of friction

WSD:

wear scar diameter

References

  1. Lawal SA (2013) A review of application of vegetable oil-based cutting fluids in machining non-ferrous metals. Indian J Sci Technol 6(1):3951–3956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Madanhire I, Mbohwa C (2016) Mitigating environment impact of petroleum lubricants. Springer Nature, Switzerland

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Diphare MJ., Pilusa J, Muzenda E, Mollagee M (2013) A review of waste lubricating grease management. Second International Conference on Environment, Agriculture and Food Sciences (ICEAFS'2013) August 25-26, 2013 Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1620/ecb54179e46168026b8c6565ed8ed2290297.pdf .Accessed 12 August 2020

  4. Nagendramma P, Kaul S (2012) Development of ecofriendly/biodegradable lubricants: an overview. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16:764–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McNutt J, He Q (2016) Development of biolubricants from vegetable oils via chemical modification. J Ind Eng Chem 36(25):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.02.008

  6. Dalbey WE, Mckee RH, Goyak KO, Biles RW, Murray J, White R (2014) Acute, subchronic, and developmental toxicological properties of lubricating oil base stocks. Int J Toxicol 33(1):110–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091581813517725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nair SS, Nair KP, Rajendrakumar PK (2017) Evaluation of physicochemical, thermal and tribological properties of sesame oil (Sesamum indicum L.): a potential agricultural crop base stock for eco-friendly industrial lubricants. Int J Agric Resources, Governance and Ecol 13(1):77–90. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJARGE.2017.084037

  8. Sanjeeb A., Rajendrakumar, PK (2019) Comparative evaluation of lubricant properties of biodegradable blend of coconut and mustard oil. J Clean Prod 240:1-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118255

  9. Cecilia JA, Plata DB, Saboya RMA, de Luna FMT, Cavalcante Jr., CL, Rodríguez-Castellón E (2020) An overview of the biolubricant production process: challenges and future perspectives. Processes 8(3), 257 https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8030257

  10. Sharma UC, Sachan S (2019) Friction and wear behavior of karanja oil derived biolubricant base oil. SN Appl Sci 1:668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0706-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahmed MS, Nair KP, Khan MS et al (2020) Evaluation of date seed (Phoenix dactylifera L.) oil as crop base stock for environment friendly industrial lubricants. In: Biomass Convers Biorefin 10.1007/s13399-020-00708-y

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pathmasiri TKKS, Perera GIP, Gallage R (2019) Investigation of palm-castor oil blends as base stocks of bio-lubricant for Industrial application. Energ Source Part-A 10.1080/15567036.2019.1643425

  13. Bhaumik S, Paleu V, Pathak R, Maggirwar R, Katiyar JK, Shrma AK (2019) Tribological investigation of r-GO additived biodegradable cashew nut shells liquid as an alternative industry lubricant. Tribol Int 135:500–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2019.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheah MY, Ong HC, Zulkifli NWM, Masjuki HH, Salleh A (2019) Physicochemical and tribological properties of microalgae oil as biolubricant for hydrogen-powered engine. Int J Hydrog Energy 45(42):22364-22381. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.020

  15. de Souza MC, Goncalves JFS, Goncalves PC, Lutif SYS, Gomes JO (2019) Use of Jatropha and Moringa oils for lubricants: metalworking fluids more environmental-friendly. Ind Crop Prod 129:594–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.12.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mosarof MH, Kalam MA, Masjuki HH, Ashraful AM (2016) Evaluation of lubricating performance of biodegradable Moringa oleifera oil. Mod Environ Sci Eng 2(8):530–536. https://doi.org/10.15341/mese(2333-2581)/08.02.2016/005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Aravind A, Roy ML, Nair PK (2015) Lubricant properties of biodegradable rubber tree seed ( Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg) oil. Ind Crops Prod 74:14-1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.04.014

  18. Rani S, Joy ML, Nair R (2015) Evaluation of physiochemical and tribological properties of rice bran oil- biodegradable and potential base stoke for industrial lubricants. Ind Crop Prod 65:328–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.12.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Heikal EK, Elmelawy MS, Khalil SA, Elbasuny NM (2016) Manufacturing of environment friendly biolubricant from vegetable oils. Egypt J Pet 26:53-59 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2016.03.003

  20. El Kinawy O (2004) Comparison between Jojoba oil and other vegetable oils as a substitute to Petroleum. Energy Sources 26(7):639–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908310490438623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Singh Y, Singla A, Singh AK, Upadhyay AK (2018) Tribological characterization of Pongamia pinnata oil blended bio-lubricant. Biofuels 9(4):523–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2017.1292017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bobade SN, Khyade VB (2012) Detail study on the properties of Pongamia Pinnata ( Karanja) for the production of biofuel. Res J Chem Sci 2(7):16–20

    Google Scholar 

  23. Verma P, Sharma MP, Dwivedi G (2016) Evaluation and enhancement of cold flow properties of palm oil and its biodiesel. Energy Rep 2:8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2015.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sharma BK, Rashid U, Anwar F, Erhan SZ (2009) Lubricant properties of Moringa oil using thermal and tribological techniques. J Therm Anal Calorim 96:999–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-009-0066-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Status report “Present status of oil seed crops and vegetable oils in India”, National Food Security Mission, 2018. https://www.nfsm.gov.in/StatusPaper/NMOOP2018.pdf . Accessed 13 June 2020

  26. Bikash B, Choudhury ND, Bora DK, Kalita K (2018) Physicochemical assessment of Pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) seed oil as a viable feedstock for biodiesel production. In: Kumar S., Sani R., Yadav Y. (eds) Conference Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Recent Advances in Bioenergy Research. Springer Proceedings in Energy. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6107-3_2

  27. Mailer RJ (2004) Oilseed overview, Encyclopedia of Grain Science. Colin Wrigley, Ed, pp 380–386

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Hernández-Santos B, Rodríguez-Miranda J, Herman-Lara E, Torruco-Uco JG, Carmona-García R, Juárez-Barrientos JM (2016) Effect of oil extraction assisted by Ultrasound on the physicochemical properties and fatty acid profile of pumpkin seed oil (Cucurbita pepo). Ultrason Sonochem 31:429–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.01.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yongan C, Bingkui Z, Enhui Z, Zunlian Z (2002) Germplasm innovation by interspecific crosses in pumpkin. Cucurbita Genetic Cooperative Report, 25: 56-57. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/cbd6/4bda1692637705210b5409d41dca273a7701.pdf Accessed 13 August 2020.

  30. Wang S, Karthickeyan V, Sivakumar E, Lakshmikandan M (2020) Experimental investigation on pumpkin seed oil methyl ester blend in diesel engine with various injection pressure, injection timing and compression ratio. Fuel 264:116868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. FAO data, 2019 retrieve from FAO data set http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC/metadata Accessed 25 June 2020.

  32. Bardaa S, Ben Halima N, Aloui F et al (2016) Oil from pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) seeds: evaluation of its functional properties on wound healing in rats. Lipids Health Dis 15:73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-016-0237-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lestari B, Meiyanto E (2018) A review: the emerging nutraceutical potential of pumpkin seeds. Indones J. Cancer Chemoprevent 9(2): 92-101 https://doi.org/10.14499/indonesianjcanchemoprev9iss2pp92-101

  34. Kulczyński B, Gramza-Michalowska A (2019) The profile of carotenoids and other bioactive molecules in various pumpkin fruits (Cucurbita Maxima Duchesne) cultivars. Molecules 24(18):3212. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24183212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Aksoylu Özbek Z, Günç Ergönül P (2020) Cold pressed pumpkin seed oil. Cold Pressed Oils, 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-818188-1.00018-9

  36. Neđeral S, Petrović M, Vincek D, Pukec D, Škevin D, Kraljić K, Obranović M (2014) Variance of quality parameters and fatty acid composition in pumpkin seed oil during three crop seasons. Ind Crop Prod 60:15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.05.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Amin MZ, Rity TI, Uddin MR, Rahman MM, Uddin MJ (2020) A comparative assessment of anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant and anti-bacterial activities of hybrid and indigenous varieties of pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima Linn.) seed oil. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 28:101767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ramadan MF (2019) Fruit oils: chemistry and functionality. Springer, Switzerland, pp 765–788

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Schinas P, Karavalakis G, Davaris C, Anastopoulos G, Karonis D, Zannikos F, Stournas S, Lois E (2009) Pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.) seed oil as an alternative feedstock for the production of biodiesel in Greece. Biomass Bioeneg 33(1):44–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Karthickeyan V, Balamurugan P (2017) Effect of thermal barrier coating with various blends of pumpkin seed oil methyl ester in DI diesel engine. Heat Mass Transf 53(10):3141–3154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-017-2058-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Venkatesan H, Godwin John J, Nagapraveen V, Seralathan S, Premkumar TM (2020) Influence of varying the compression ratios on the emission and performance parameters of pumpkin seed biodiesel blend fueled diesel engine. SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-5089. 10.4271/2020-01-5089

  42. Ghanbari A, Mousavi Z, Heuzey M, Patience GS, Carreau PJ (2020) Experimental methods in chemical engineering: Rheometry. Can J Chem pp1-15 10.1002/cjce.23749

  43. ASTM D2270-10: Standard practice for calculating viscosity index from kinetic viscosity at 400C and 1000C

  44. Liu S, Saha B, Vlachos D (2019) Catalytic production of renewable lubricant base-oils from bio-based 2-alkylfurans and enals. In: Green Chem 21:3606–3614 10.1039/c9gc01044

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bhaumik S, Datta S, Pathak SD (2017) Analyses of tribological properties of castor oil with various carbonaceous micro-and nano-friction modifiers. J Tribol 139(6):061802. 10.1115/1.4036379

  46. Bart JC, Gucciardi E, Cavallero S (2013) Biolubricants. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Woodland publishing. Chapter 5: Renwable feedstocks for lubricant production, pp: 121-248.

  47. Abdullah BM, Zubairi SI, Huri HZ, Hairunisa N, Yousif E, Basu RC (2016) Polyesters based on linoleic acid for biolubricant base stocks: low temperature, tribological and rheological properties. PLoS ONE 11(3):e0151603. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Bruun N, Demesa AG, Tesfaye F, Hemming J, Hupa L (2019) Factors affecting the corrosive behavior of used cooking oils and a non-edible fish oil that are in contact with ferrous metals. Energies 12(24):4812. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12244812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. de Souza MC, Wiesner HM, Kuche Y, Polte J, de Oliveira Gomes J, Uhlmann E (2020) Influence of the fatty acid profile on the lubricating film formation in micro-milling process on 7050-T7451 aluminum alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106:233–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04625-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Gul M, Masjuki HH, Kalam MA, Zulkifli NWM, Mujtaba MA (2019) A review: role of fatty acids composition in characterizing potential feedstock for sustainable green lubricants by advance transesterification process and its global as well as pakistani prospective. BioEnergy Research 13:1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-019-10040-7

  51. Fox FJ, Stachowiak GW (2007) Vegetable oil-based lubricants- a review of oxidation. Tribol Int 40(7):1035–1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2006.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Rashmi W, Osama M, Khalid M, Rasheed AK, Bhaumik S, Wong WY, Datta S, TCSM G (2019) Tribological performance of nanographite-based metalworking fluid and parametric investigation using artificial neaural network. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104:359–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03701-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Reeves CJ, Menezes PL, Jen TC, Lovell MR (2015) The influence of fatty acids on tribological and thermal properties of natural oils as sustainable biolubricants. Tribol Int 90:123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2015.04.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Salaji S., Jayadas N.H. (2020). Evaluation of physicochemical and tribological properties of chaulmoogra (Hydnocarpus wightianus) oil as green lubricant base stock, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350650119899529

  55. Bhaumik S, Kamaraj M, Paleu V (2020) Tribological analyses of a new optimized gearbox biodegradable lubricant blended with reduced grapheme oxide nanoparticles. Proceeding of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology pp 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350650120925590

  56. Fox NJ, Tyrer B, Stachowiak GW (2004) Boundary lubrication performance of free fatty acids in sunflower oil. Tribol Lett 16(4):275–281. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TRIL.0000015203.08570.82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. García-Perez M, Adams TT, Goodrum JW, Das KC, Geller DP (2010) DSC studies to evaluate the impact of bio-oil on cold flow properties and oxidation stability of bio-diesel. Bioresour Technol 101(15):6219–6224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. García-Perez M, Botella L, Gil-Lalaguna N, Arauzo J, Gonzalo A, Sánchez JL (2017) Antioxidants for biodiesel: additives prepared from extracted fraction of bio-oil. Fuel Process Technol 156:407–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Botella L, Stankovikj F, Sánchez J L, Gonzalo A, Arauzo J and Garcia-Pérez M (2018) Bio-Oil hydrotreatment for enhancing solubility in biodiesel and the oxidation stability of resulting blends. Front Chem 6:1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2018.00083

  60. Feng X, Hu Y, Cao Z, Xia Y (2019) Leaves based lubricant additive towards improving tribological properties. J Renew Mater 7(5):441–449. https://doi.org/10.32604/jrm.2019.04881

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the authority of Assam Science and Technology University and Dr. Rajiv Chandra Dev Goswami, Guwahati Biotech Park, IIT Guwahati, for providing technical support and laboratory facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nabajit Dev Choudhury.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 646 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choudhury, N.D., Saha, N., Bhaumik, S. et al. Production and evaluation of physicochemical, rheological, and tribological properties of Cucurbita pepo L. seed oil. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 13, 1101–1114 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01236-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01236-5

Keywords

Navigation