Skip to main content
Log in

A novel analytical solution for warping analysis of arbitrary annular wedge-shaped bars

  • Technical notes
  • Published:
Archive of Applied Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article has been updated

Abstract

Structural components with arbitrary cross sections play a key role in several engineering fields. Many engineering structures are subjected to torsional moments, so it is important to design and analyze these type of crucial engineering issues. First, this study offers a novel analytical solution for Prandtl’s stress distribution of arbitrary annular wedge-shaped bars under uniform torsion moment based on eigenfunction expansion. Next, warping function is derived by integration of Cauchy-Riemann type relations in polar coordinate system. The solution encompasses existing solutions for standard wedge-shaped bars as subsets. Finally, accuracy of the proposed analytical method is fully demonstrated through some benchmarks which are available in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Change history

  • 13 January 2021

    Journal abbreviated title on top of the page has been corrected to “Arch Appl Mech”.

References

  1. Bauchau, O.A., Craig, J.I.: Structural analysis: with applications to aerospace structures, vol 163. Springer Science & Business Media, (2009)

  2. Timoshenko, S.P., Gere ,J.M. Theory of elastic stability. Courier Corporation, (2009)

  3. Bassali, W.A.: The classical torsion problem for sections with curvilinear boundaries. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 8(2), 87–99 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(60)90012-0

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Hassenpflug, W.C.: Torsion of Uniform Bars with Polygon Cross-Section. Comput. Math. Appl. 46(2–3), 313–392 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221(03)90033-2

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Ecsedi, I.: Some analytical solutions for Saint-Venant torsion of non-homogeneous cylindrical bars. Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids 28(5), 985–990 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2009.03.010

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chernyshov, A.: Torsion of an elastic rod whose cross-section is a parallelogram, trapezoid, or triangle, or has an arbitrary shape by the method of transformation to a rectangular domain. Mech. Solids 49(2), 225–236 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, C.N.: The warping torsion bar model of the differential quadrature element method. Comput. Struct. 66(2–3), 249–257 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(97)00066-7

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Heise, U.: A finite element analysis in polar co-ordinates of the Saint Venant torsion problem. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 8(4), 713–729 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620080404

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Barone, G., Pirrotta, A., Santoro, R.: Comparison among three boundary element methods for torsion problems: CPM, CVBEM. LEM. Eng. Anal. Boundary Elements 35(7), 895–907 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2011.02.003

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Darılmaz, K., Orakdöğen, E., Girgin, K.: Saint-Venant torsion of arbitrarily shaped orthotropic composite or FGM sections by a hybrid finite element approach. Acta Mech. 229(3), 1387–1398 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-017-2067-1

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Mikeš, K., Jirásek, M.: Free warping analysis and numerical implementation. In: Peng Xu, X. (ed.) Applied Mechanics and Materials, Trans Tech Publications pp 141–148 (2016)

  12. Banić, D., Turkalj, G., Brnić, J.: Finite element stress analysis of elastic beams under non-uniform torsion. Trans. FAMENA 40(2), 71–82 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. May, I.M., Al-Shaarbaf, I.A.S.: Elasto-plastic analysis of torsion using a three-dimensional finite element model. Comput. Struct. 33(3), 667–678 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(89)90241-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baba, S., Kajita, T.: Plastic analysis of torsion of a prismatic beam. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 18(6), 927–944 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620180609

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Freund, J., Karakoҫ, A.: Warping displacement of Timoshenko beam model. Int. J. Solids Struct. 92–93, 9–16 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wagner, W., Gruttmann, F.: Finite element analysis of Saint-Venant torsion problem with exact integration of the elastic–plastic constitutive equations. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 190(29), 3831–3848 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(00)00302-9

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Rinchen, H.G.J., Rasmussen, K.J.R.: Geometric and material nonlinear analysis of thin-walled members with arbitrary open cross-section Thin-Walled Structures 1532020https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.106783

  18. Ecsedi, I.: Non-uniform torsion of functionally graded anisotropic bar of an elliptical cross section. Acta Mech. 231(7), 2947–2953 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-020-02682-y

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Rand, O., Rovenski, V.: Analytical methods in anisotropic elasticity: with symbolic computational tools. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Timoshenko, S., Goodier, J. N. Theory of Elasticity, McGraw-Hill book Company (1951)

  21. Lurie, A. I.: Non-linear theory of elasticity. Elsevier (2012)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahdi Yazdani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A: Derivation of Eq. (2)

The method of eigenfunction expansion constructs a series solution for the stress function containing products of radial and angular components as given by:

$$\psi \left( {r,\theta } \right) = \mathop \sum \limits_{n = 1}^{\infty } U_{n} \left( r \right)\sin \left( {\omega \theta } \right)$$
(A.1)

Obviously the angular component obeys the boundary conditions along the straight edges \(\theta = 0\) and \(\theta = \beta\). Similarly, the RHS of Eq. (1) is expanded into a Fourier trigonometric series:

$$- 2 = - \frac{8}{\pi }\mathop \sum \limits_{n = 1,3,5 \ldots }^{\infty } \frac{{\sin \left( {\omega \theta } \right)}}{n}$$
(A.2)

Given the uniqueness of Fourier series coefficients and inserting (A.1) and (A.2) into the BVP formulated by Eq. (1), one arrives at a nonhomogeneous ODE for the radial component which applies to odd values of integer \(n\):

$$\frac{{{\text{d}}^{2} U_{n} \left( r \right)}}{{{\text{d}}r^{2} }} + \frac{1}{r}\frac{{{\text{d}}U_{n} \left( r \right)}}{{{\text{d}}r}} - \left( {\frac{\omega }{r}} \right)^{2} U_{n} \left( r \right) = - \frac{8}{n\pi }$$
(A.3)

The method of variation of parameters presents the solution of (A.3) as follows:

$$U_{n} \left( r \right) = \frac{8}{{n\pi \left( {\omega^{2} - 4} \right)}}\left\{ {\frac{{\left[ {\left( \frac{a}{r} \right)^{\omega } - \left( \frac{r}{a} \right)^{\omega } } \right]b^{2} + \left[ {\left( \frac{r}{b} \right)^{\omega } - \left( \frac{b}{r} \right)^{\omega } } \right]a^{2} }}{{\left( \frac{b}{a} \right)^{\omega } - \left( \frac{a}{b} \right)^{\omega } }} + r^{2} } \right\}$$
(A.4)

which satisfies the boundary conditions along the curved edges \(r = a\) and \(r = b\). This completes the desired expression for the stress function in (A.1), leading to Eq. (2).

Appendix B: Derivation of Eq. (6)

The warping function and Prandtl’s stress function are interconnected through Cauchy-Riemann type equation, satisfying the following set of two linear PDEs in the Cartesian coordinates [21]:

$$\begin{gathered} \varphi_{,x} - y = \psi_{,y} \hfill \\ \varphi_{,y} + x = - \psi_{,x} \hfill \\ \end{gathered}$$
(B.1)

This is converted to the polar coordinates:

$$\begin{gathered} \varphi_{,r} = r^{ - 1} \psi_{,\theta } \hfill \\ \varphi_{,\theta } = - r\left( {\psi_{,r} + r} \right) \hfill \\ \end{gathered}$$
(B.2)

with the RHSs computed from Eqs. (4)-(5). To solve for the warping function, the first equation in (B.2) is integrated with respect to radial coordinate resulting in:

$$\varphi \left( {r,\theta } \right) = \frac{8}{\pi }\mathop \sum \limits_{n = 1,3,5 \ldots }^{\infty } \frac{{\cos \left( {\omega \theta } \right)}}{{n\left( {\omega^{2} - 4} \right)}}\left\{ {\frac{{\left[ {\left( \frac{r}{b} \right)^{\omega } + \left( \frac{b}{r} \right)^{\omega } } \right]a^{2} - \left[ {\left( \frac{r}{a} \right)^{\omega } + \left( \frac{a}{r} \right)^{\omega } } \right]b^{2} }}{{\left( \frac{b}{a} \right)^{\omega } - \left( \frac{a}{b} \right)^{\omega } }} + \frac{{\omega r^{2} }}{2}} \right\} + f\left( \theta \right)$$
(B.3)

where \(f\left( \theta \right)\) arises as constant of integration because it is independent from \(r\). Substituting (B.3) in the second equation in (B.2) after some algebra gives \(f^{\prime}\left( \theta \right) = 0\) implying that \(f\left( \theta \right)\) is arbitrary constant which is set equal to zero in the present calculations. Equation (6) expresses Eq. (B.3) in a rather compact form.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahdavi, A., Yazdani, M. A novel analytical solution for warping analysis of arbitrary annular wedge-shaped bars. Arch Appl Mech 91, 1247–1255 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-020-01858-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-020-01858-1

Keywords

Navigation