Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Apple-based agroforestry systems for biomass production and carbon sequestration: implication for food security and climate change contemplates in temperate region of Northern Himalaya, India

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agroforestry land use systems present a win–win opportunity by acting as carbon sinks while assisting in achieving food security, livelihood income and environmental amelioration. In this context, the present study was carried out at farmer’s field in central Kashmir region of India with the aim to acknowledge the potential of apple based agroforestry system for biomass production and carbon stock assessment for climate change mitigation. For conducting the study four intercrops viz., rajmash (Phaseolus vulgaris), green gram (Vigna radiata), french bean (P. vulgaris) and oats (Avena sativa) were intercropped with 11-year-old plantation of apple. The maximum total crop biomass was registered under control french bean and oats (7.85 t ha−1). Overall highest values of total biomass were observed under agroforestry system of apple + rajmash and Oats. The treatment, apple + rajmash and oats displayed highest values for both total tree biomass (29.16 t ha−1) and overall biomass of system (33.00 t ha−1). Maximum value of soil organic carbon (46.02 t ha−1) was observed under apple + green gram and oats. The highest ecosystem carbon was stored in the treatment involving the tree crop combination of apple + rajmash and oats (64.18 t ha−1) and is around 1.5 to 2 times higher than agriculture based system. The total ecosystem carbon in apple based land use system ranged between 53.23 and 64.18 t ha−1. These agroforestry systems in Himalayas can go a long way in augmenting the overall production and productivity by satisfying the rural livelihoods besides acting as effective carbon sink through carbon stockpiling and sequestration. The outcome of the present study can be significant in selecting different crop combinations for fruit based land use systems, future carbon studies, climate change contemplates, soil carbon stock estimation and land use planning along the lines of REDD + activities in other fragile Himalayan ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajit Handa AK, Dhyani SK, Bhat GM, Malik AR, Dutt V, Masoodi TH, Uma Jain A (2017) Quantification of carbon stocks and sequestration potential through existing agroforestry systems in hilly Kupwara district of Kashmir valley in India. Curr Sci 113(4):782–785

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht A, Kandji ST (2003) Carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 99:15–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Avery TE, Burkhart HE (2002) Forest measurements, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York, pp 137–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Babu AM (2012) Boundary plantation of eucalyptus and its effect on chilli and sweet gourd. M.Sc. Thesis. Dept. of Agroforestry, BAU, Mymensingh, Bangladesh

  • Baker JM, Ochsner TE, Venterea RT, Griffis TJ (2007) Tillage and soil carbon sequestration—what do we really know? Agric Ecosyst Environ 118:1–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Banyal R, Qaiser KN, Abidi RA (2016) Temperate agroforestry systems in Jammu and Kashmir. In: Gupta S (ed) Agroforestry for increased production and livelihood security, Ist New India. Publishing Agency, New Delhi, pp 41–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Basannagari B, Kala CP (2013) Climate change and apple farming in Indian Himalayas: a study of local perceptions and responses. Plos one 8(10):e7797

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bellow JG (2004) Fruit-tree-based agroforestry in the Western highlands of Guatemala: an evaluation of tree-crop interactions and socio-economic characteristics. Ph.D dissertation, University of Florida, USA

  • Bhatt BP, Toderia NP (1992) Fuel wood characteristics of some mountain trees and shrubs. Biomass 21:233–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat SA (2015) Effect of tree spacing and organic manures on growth and yield of vegetable crops under Melia composita wild. based agroforestry system. Ph.D Thesis, Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan, H.P

  • Bijalwan A (2012) Structure, composition and diversity of horticulture trees and agricultural crops productivity under traditional agri-horticulture system in mid hill situation of Garhwal Himalaya, India. Am J Plant Sci 3:480–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown S, Gillespie AJR, Lugo AE (1989) Biomass estimation method for tropical forests with application to forestry inventory data. For Sci 35:881–902

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan SK, Gupta NR, Yadav S, Chauhan R (2009) Biomass and carbon allocation in different parts of agroforestry tree species. Indian For 13:981–993

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavan DS, Keerthika A, Dhyani SK, Handa AK, Newaj R, Rajarajan K (2015) National Agroforestry Policy in India: a low hanging fruit. Curr Sci 108(10):1826–1834

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisanga K, Bhardwaj DR, Pala NA, Thakur CL (2018) Biomass production and carbon stock inventory of high-altitude dry temperate land use systems in North Western Himalaya. Ecol Process. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-018-0134-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagar JC, Tewari JC (2016) Agroforestry Research Developments: Anecdotal to modern science. In: Agroforestry Research Developments, research gate, pp 1–4

  • Dar M, Qaisar KN, Ahmad S, Wani AA (2018) Inventory and composition of prevalent agroforestry systems of Kashmir Himalaya. Adv Res 14(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dash SK, Hunt JCR (2007) Variability of climate change in India. Curr Sci 93:782–788

    Google Scholar 

  • Dash MC, Behera N (2013) Carbon sequestration and role of earthworms in Indian land uses: a review. Ecoscan 7(2):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhyani SK, Asha R, Dev I (2016) Potential of agroforestry systems in carbon sequestration in India. Indian J Agric Sci 86(9):1103–1112

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dhyani SK (2014) National Agroforestry Policy 2014 and the need for area estimation under agroforestry. Curr Sci 107(1):9–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Directorate of economics and statistics (2011) District statistics and evaluation office, Ganderbal, Jammu and Kashmir

  • FAO (2016) State of the World’s Forests 2016 (Forests and agriculture: land-use challenges and opportunities). Italy, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh SP (1999) Deciduous fruit production in India. In: Papademetriou MK, Herath EM (eds) Deciduous fruit production in Asia and the Pacific. Thailand: Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Food and Agricultural Organization, pp 38–56

  • Girmay G, Singh BR, Mitiku H, Borresen T, Lal R (2008) Carbon stocks in Ethiopian soils in relation to land use and soil management. Land Degrad Dev 19(4):351–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research, 2nd edn. Willey, New York, p 680

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami S, Verma KS, Kaushal R (2013) Biomass and carbon sequestration in different agroforestry systems of a Western Himalayan watershed. Biol Agric Hortic 30:88–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami S, Verma KS, Pala NA (2016) Impact of input use on biomass attributes and carbon mitigation in agroforestry systems of Indian Himalaya. Indian For 142(12):1214–1219

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart K, Allen B, Keenleyside C, Nanni S, Maréchal A, Paquel K, Nesbit M, Ziemann J (2017) Research for agri committee—the consequences of climate change for EU agriculture. Follow-Up To the COP21—Un Paris Climate Change Conference. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2861/295025

  • IPCC (2000) Special report on land use. Land Use Change and Forestry. Summary for Policy Makers (eds.) Land use, land-use change, and forestry. A special report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Iqbal K, Bhat JA, Pala NA, Hussain A, Azeim S, Negi AK (2020) Variation in soil carbon stock of tree based land use system in temperate zone of Kashmir Himalayas. Indian For 146(3):208–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi, p 498

    Google Scholar 

  • Jose S, Bardhan S (2012) Agroforestry for biomass production and carbon sequestration: an overview. Agrofor Syst 86:105–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9573-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kala CP (2007) Local preferences of ethnobotanical species in the Indian Himalaya: Implications for environmental conservation. Curr Sci 93:1828–1834

    Google Scholar 

  • Kala CP (2010) Status of an indigenous agro-forestry system in changing climate: a case study of the middle Himalayan region of Tehri Garhwal, India. J For Sci 56(8):373–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kala CP (2013) Climate change and challenges of biodiversity conservation. In: Kala CP, Silori CS (eds) Biodiversity, communities and climate change. The Energy and Resources Institute, New Delhi, pp 259–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiran K, Kumar A, Nagori T, Boudh S (2013) Effect of tree shade on nodulation, arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization and growth of pea in Dalbergia sissoo Roxb based agroforestry system. Indian J Agrofor 15(1):71–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar BM, Handa AK, Dhyani SK, Arunachalam A (2018) Agroforestry in the Indian Himalayan region: an over-view. In: Gordon AM, Newman SM, Coleman BRW (eds) Temperate agroforestry systems, 2nd edn. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 153–172

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123:1–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Le Quéré C, Andrew RM, Friedlingstein P et al (2018) Global carbon budget 2017. Earth Syst Sci 10:405–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Chen R, Song Y, Han C (2015) Aboveground biomass and water storage allocation in alpine willow shrubs in the Qilian Mountains in China. J Mountain Sci 12:207–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz K, Lal R (2014) Soil organic carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 34(2):443–454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meteorological data (2016) Indian meteorological department, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India

  • Morgan JA, Follett RF, Allen LH, Grosso SD, Derner JD, Dijkstra F, Franzluebbers A, Fry R, Paustian K, Schoeneberger MM (2010) Carbon sequestration in agricultural land of the United States. J Soil Water Conserv 65:6–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Nair VD, Kumar BM, Showalter JM (2010) Carbon sequestration in agroforestry systems. Adv Agron 108:237–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Garrity D (2012) Agroforestry research and development: the way forward. In: Nair PKR, Garrity D (eds) Agroforestry—the global land use. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 515–531

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996). Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America. Book Series no. 5, pp 961–1010

  • Newaj R, Dhyani SK (2008) Agroforestry for carbon sequestration: scope and present status. Indian J Agrofor 10:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Oelbermann M, Voroney RP, Gordon AM (2004) Carbon sequestration in tropical and temperate agroforestry systems: a review with examples from Costa Rica and southern Canada Agriculture. Ecosyst Environ 104:359–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oelbermann M, Voroney RP, Kass DCL, Schlonvoigt AM (2006) Soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics using stable isotopes in 9 and 10-yr old tropical agroforestry systems. Geoderma 130:356–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanate IS, Dean LA (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. Circular No. 939

  • Pandey AK, Gupta VK, Solanki KR (2010) Productivity of Neem based agroforestry system in semi-arid region of India. Range Manag Agrofor 31(2):144–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Pant KS, Mishra VK, Sanwal CS, Dinssa KU (2010) Effect of nitrogen and poplar spacing on yield and nutrient content of Taro (Colocasia esculenta L.). Indian J Agrofor 12(1):18–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Poeplau C, Don A (2015) Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils via cultivation of cover crops—a meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 200:33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.10.024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paustian K, Lehmann J, Ogle S, Reay D, Robertson GP, Smith P (2016) Climate-smart soils. Nature 532:49–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piper CS (1966) Soil and plant analysis. Hans W.S. Publishers, Bombay, p 464

    Google Scholar 

  • Quli SMS, Islam MA, Singh PK (2017) Mitigating livelihood crisis through agroforestry interventions In Rural India. J Dev Manag Stud 15(1):7159–7178

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajput BS, Bhardwaj DR, Pala NA (2015) Carbon dioxide mitigation potential and carbon density of different land use systems along an altitudinal gradient in north-western Himalayas. Agrofor Sys. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-015-9788-8Springer

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajput BS, Bhardwaj DR, Pala NA (2017) Factors influencing biomass and carbon storage potential of different land use systems along an elevational gradient in temperate northwestern Himalaya. Agrofor Syst 91:479–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9948-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renton A (2009) Suffering the science: climate change, people and poverty. Oxfam briefing paper number 130. Oxfam International, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds PE, James A, Simpson NV, Thevasan GAM (2007) Effects of tree competition on corn and soyabean photosynthesis, growth and yield in a temperate tree-based agroforestry intercropping system in southern Ontario, Canada. Ecol Eng 29:362–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha SK, Nair PKR, Nair VD, Kumar BM (2010) Carbon storage in relation to soil size-fractions under tropical tree-based land-use systems. Plant Soil 328:433–446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sehgal S (2011) Growth and productivity of Ocimum basilicum influenced by the application of organic manures under Leucaena leucocephala hedgerows in western Himalayan mid hills. Range Manag and Agrofor 32(2):83–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma K, Thakur S, Sharma R, Kashyap SD (2008) Production and economics of Kinnow cultivation with wheat and gobhi sarson in Himachal Pradesh. Indian J Soil Conserv 36(2):112–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd D, Montagnini F (2001) Carbon sequestration potential in mixed and pure tree plantations in the humid tropics. J Trop For Sci 13:450–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi L, Feng W, Xu J, Kuzyakov Y (2018) Agroforestry systems: Meta-analysis of soil carbon stocks, sequestration processes, and future potentials. Land Degrad Dev 29:3886–3897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh RA (1980) Soil physical analysis. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh B (2010) Bioeconomic appraisal and carbon sequestration potential of different land use systems in temperate north-western Himalayas. Ph.D thesis. Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan

  • Singh B, Gill RIS, Gill PS (2010) Soil fertility under various tree species and poplar-based agroforestry system. J Res Punjab Agric Univ 47(3–4):160–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Bhardwaj DR, Pala NA, Rajput BS (2017) Variation in floral diversity of eight agro-ecosystems along elevational gradient in northwestern Himalaya. Range Manage Agrofor 38(2):181–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Bhardwaj DR, Pala NA, Rajput BS (2018) Variation in soil properties under different land uses and attitudinal gradients in soils of the Indian Himalayas. Acta Ecol Sinica 38:302–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DM (1954) Maximum moisture content for determining specific gravity of small wood samples. Forest product laboratory. USDA Forest Service report

  • Stavi I, Lal R (2013) Agroforestry and biochar to offset climate change: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 33:81–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-012-0081-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subbiah BV, Asija GL (1956) A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Curr Sci 25:259–260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uthappa AR, Chavan SB, Handa AK, Newaj R, Kumar D, Sridhar KB, Chaturvedi OP (2018) Agroforestry—a sustainable solution to address climate change challenges. In: Agroforestry for increased production and livelihood security, pp 1–22

  • Walden P, Ollikainen M, Kahiluoto H (2020) Carbon revenue in the profitability of agroforestry relative to monocultures. Agrofor Syst 94:15–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A, Black TA (1934) An examination of the digestion method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav RP, Bisht JK, Pandey BM (2015) Above ground biomass and carbon stock of fruit tree based land use systems in Indian Himalaya. Ecoscan 9(3):779–783

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav RP, Bisht JK (2014) Litter fall and potential nutrient returns from pecan nut (Carya illinoinensis) in agroforestry system in Indian Himalaya. Int J Herb Med 2:51–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Yimer F, Ledin S, Abdelkadir A (2007) Changes in soil organic carbon and total nitrogen contents in three adjacent land use types in the Bale Mountains, south-eastern highlands of Ethiopia, Forest. For Ecol Manag 242(2–3):337–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahoor S. (2017) Evaluation of apple based agroforestry system in Benhama, Ganderbal. M.Sc. Thesis. Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Kashmir, India

  • Zomer RJ, Neufeldt H, Xu J (2016) Global tree cover and biomass carbon on agricultural land: the contribution of agroforestry to global and national carbon budgets. Sci Rep 6:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29987

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Forestry, Benhama Ganderbal, Sher-E-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Kashmir, India

    Shiba Zahoor, Vaishnu Dutt, A. H. Mughal, Nazir A. Pala, K. N. Qaisar & P. A. Khan

Authors
  1. Shiba Zahoor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vaishnu Dutt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. H. Mughal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nazir A. Pala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. K. N. Qaisar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. P. A. Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nazir A. Pala.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zahoor, S., Dutt, V., Mughal, A.H. et al. Apple-based agroforestry systems for biomass production and carbon sequestration: implication for food security and climate change contemplates in temperate region of Northern Himalaya, India. Agroforest Syst 95, 367–382 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-021-00593-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-021-00593-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation