Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

“When you’re here, you’re not a militant feminist”: volunteer professionalization in a rape crisis center

  • Published:
Theory and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many organizations must manage institutional complexity – the presence of competing “logics,” or patterned sets of beliefs, rules, and actions. Some of this management occurs within organizations, such as when managers recruit workers who align with a preferred logic. Often, however, institutional management occurs at the boundaries between organizations that work together despite adhering to competing logics. Boundary-spanners – actors belonging to one organization but interfacing with others – must know how to speak the language of their organizational partners in order to secure resources and accomplish their host organization’s goals. Existing literature on boundary-spanners’ institutional management strategies focuses on organizational elites like executives, top managers, and technical experts. As organizations, particularly social service organizations, become increasingly decentralized, however, boundary-spanning occurs at lower-levels of organizational hierarchies. Drawing on 30 months of participant observation and 20 in-depth interviews in a rape crisis center, I show how low-level organization members like volunteers, who frequently interact with organizational partners including law enforcement and medical professionals, learn to navigate institutional complexity. This advances neoinstitutional theory by showing how in decentralized, diffuse organizations, both organizational elites and members at low-levels of the organizational hierarchy must competently manage their institutional environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. I recognize that phrases like “post-bureaucracy” and “post-Fordism” are contested –new organizational forms represent a shifting configuration of coercive and hierarchical bureaucracy rather than an abandonment of bureaucracy altogether (Briand and Bellemare 2006; Graham 1992; McSweeney 2006). Still, the generally trends associated with the phrase remain common, even if the phrases are overly-binaric.

  2. The Center for Healthy Futures is a pseudonym. Participants’ names, too, are pseudonyms.

References

  • Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977). Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. The Academy of Management Review, 2, 217–230. https://doi.org/10.2307/257905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almandoz, J. (2014). Founding teams as carriers of competing logics: When institutional forces predict banks’ risk exposure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(3), 442–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839214537810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anteby, M. (2010). Markets, Morals, and Practices of Trade: Jurisdictional Disputes in the U.S. Commerce in Cadavers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(4), 606–38. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.4.606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, G., & Ake, J. (2013). Reframing the narrative of the battered Women’s movement. Violence Against Women, 19(5), 557–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213490508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barman, E. (2016). Varieties of field theory and the sociology of the non-profit sector: Field theory and non-profits. Sociology Compass, 10(6), 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. The Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaudry, M. (1985). Battered women. Montreal: Black Rose Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevacqua, M. (2000). Rape on the public agenda: Feminism and the politics of sexual assault. UPNE.

  • Binder, A. (2007). For love and money: Organizations’ creative responses to multiple environmental logics. Theory and society, 36(6), 547–571. Retrieved from JSTOR

  • Birkinshaw, J., Ambos, T. C., & Bouquet, C. (2017). Boundary spanning activities of Corporate HQ executives insights from a longitudinal study. Journal of Management Studies, 54(4), 422–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerregaard, T., & Jonasson, C. (2014). Managing unstable institutional contradictions: The work of becoming. Organization Studies, 35(10), 1507–1536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614530913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerregaard, T., & Lauring, J. (2012). Entrepreneurship as Institutional Change: Strategies of Bridging Institutional Contradictions (SSRN scholarly paper no. ID 2043457). Retrieved from social science research network website: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2043457

  • Briand, L., & Bellemare, G. (2006). A Structurationist Analysis of Post‐bureaucracy in Modernity and Late Modernity” edited by M. Harris and H. Höpfl. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810610643695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape. Open Road Media.

  • Bumiller, K. (2008). In an abusive state: How neoliberalism appropriated the feminist movement against sexual violence. Durham: Duke University Press Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (1998). The extended case method. Sociological Theory, 16(1), 4–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemens, E. S., & Guthrie, D. (Eds.). (2010). Politics and partnerships: The role of voluntary associations in America’s political past and present. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, R. (2013). Up against a wall: Rape reform and the failure of success. NYU Press.

  • D’Aunno, T., Sutton, R. I., & Price, R. H. (1991). Isomorphism and external support in conflicting institutional environments: A study of drug abuse treatment units. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 636–661. https://doi.org/10.5465/256409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L. V., & Carlson, B. E. (1987). Observation of spouse abuse: What happens to the children? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2(3), 278–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Emilio, J., Freedman, E. B., & Freedman, E. E. (1997). Intimate matters: A history of sexuality in America. University of Chicago Press.

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. (1983). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echols, A. [1989];(2019). Daring to Be Bad: Radical Feminism in America 1967-1975, Thirtieth Anniversary Edition. Minneapolis, MN: U of Minnesota Press.

  • Eliasoph, N. (2013). Making volunteers: Civic life after Welfare’s end. Princeton University Press.

  • Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic Fieldnotes, second edition (Second ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. (2016). The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non)adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms: Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/4131489.

  • Freedman, E. B. (2013). Redefining Rape. Harvard University Press.

  • Friedland, R., & Alford, R. A. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Getman, K. A. (1984). Sexual control in the slaveholding south: The implementation and maintenance of a racial caste system notes. Harvard Women’s Law Journal, 7, 115–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. (1992). Anti-Essentialism and Overdetermination – a Response to Dick Peet. Antipode, 24(2), 141–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.1992.tb00434.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, M. A. (2019). Twelve weeks to change a life: At-risk youth in a fractured state (First ed.). Oakland: University of California Press.

  • Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Meyer, R. E. (2017). The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. New York: Sage Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–71. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.590299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grey, C., & Garsten, C. (2001). Trust, control and post-bureaucracy. Organization Studies, 22(2), 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840601222003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, A. (2020). The Feminist War on Crime: The Unexpected Role of Women’s Liberation in Mass Incarceration (first edition). University of California Press.

  • Gümüsay, A. A., Smets, M., & Morris, T. (2020). ‘God at Work’: Engaging central & incompatible institutional logics through elastic hybridity. Academy of Management Journal, 63(1), 124–154.

  • Hallett, T., & Ventresca, M. J. (2006). Inhabited institutions: Social interactions and organizational forms in Gouldner’s patterns of industrial bureaucracy. Theory and Society, 35(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-006-9003-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy, F., Mook, L., & Quarter, J. (2008). The interchangeability of paid staff and volunteers in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764007303528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1991). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Hasday, J. (2000). Contest and consent: A legal history of marital rape. California Law Review, 88, 1373. https://doi.org/10.2307/3481263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimer, C. A. (1999). Competing institutions: Law, medicine, and family in neonatal intensive care. Law & Society Review, 33(1), 17–66. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/3115095.

  • Henriksen, L. S., Smith, S. R., & Zimmer, A. (2015). Welfare mix and hybridity. Flexible adjustments to changed environments. Introduction to the Special Issue. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(5), 1591–1600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9622-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hensmans, M. (2003). Social Movement Organizations: A Metaphor for Strategic Actors in Institutional Fields. Organization Studies, 24(3), 355–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INCITE. (2017). The revolution will not be funded: Beyond the non-profit industrial complex. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P., Lê, J. K., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Responding to competing strategic demands: How organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes coevolve. Strategic Organization, 11(3), 245–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013481016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jay, J. (2012). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, A. L. (2001). Organizing flexibility: The flexible firm in a new century. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 39(4), 479–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, A. L. (2003). Flexible firms and labor market segmentation: Effects of workplace restructuring on jobs and workers. Work and Occupations, 30(2), 154–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888403251683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, A. L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. (2012). Rethinking industrial relations: Mobilisation. Collectivism and Long Waves: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. E. (2020). The Carceral creep: Gender-based violence, race, and the expansion of the punitive state, 1973–1983. Social Problems, 67(2), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spz013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchener, M. (2002). Mobilizing the Logic of Managerialism in Professional Fields: The Case of Academic Health Centre Mergers. Organization Studies, 23(3), 391–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840602233004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraatz, M. S. and Block, E.S. 2008. “Organizational Implications of Institutional Pluralism.” Pp. 243–75 in The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

  • Lash, S., & Urry, J. (1987). The End of Organized Capitalism (1 edition). University of Wisconsin Press.

  • Lehrner, A., & Allen, N. E. (2009). Still a movement after all these years?: Current tensions in the domestic violence movement. Violence Against Women, 15, 656–677. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801209332185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, M. (2001). Institutional sources of practice variation: Staffing college and university recycling programs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(1), 29–56. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667124.

  • Mair, J., Mayer, J., & Lutz, E. (2015). Navigating institutional plurality: Organizational governance in hybrid Organizations: Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615580007.

  • Maravelias, C. (2003). Post-bureaucracy – Control through professional freedom. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16(5), 547–566. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810310494937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, L., & Tice, K. W. (2002). Paradoxes of professionalization: Parallel dilemmas in Women’s organizations in the Americas. Gender & Society, 16(6), 941–958. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124302237896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. (1987). The historical roots of domestic violence. In D. J. Sonkin (Ed.), Domestic violence on trial: Psychological and legal dimensions of family violence. New York: Springer Publishing Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. Y. (1990). Rethinking feminist organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 182–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. Y. (2005). Rape work: Victims, gender, and emotions in organization and community context. Routledge.

  • McGuire, D. L. (2011). At the dark end of the street: Black women, rape, and resistance- a new history of the civil rights movement from Rosa parks to the rise of black power. Vintage Books.

  • McPherson, C. M., & Sauder, M. (2013). Logics in action: Managing institutional complexity in a drug court. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2), 165–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213486447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McSweeney, B. (2006). “Are We Living in a Post‐bureaucratic Epoch?” edited by M. Harris and H. Höpfl. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810610643668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, M. A., Greenberg, M. A., & Peretz, T. (2015). Some men: Feminist allies and the movement to end violence against women. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. (2003). Managing the hollow state collaboration and contracting. Public Management Review, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461667022000028834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R., & Swift, T. (2011). Leveraging knowledge and competencies across space: The next frontier in international business. Journal of International Management, 17(3), 186–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2011.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, J. (2003). Race, ethnicity, and sexuality: Intimate intersections. Forbidden Frontiers: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2013). Embedded in hybrid contexts: How individuals in organizations respond to competing institutional logics. In Research in the Sociology of Organizations: Vol. 39 Part B. Institutional Logics in Action, Part B (pp. 3–35). https://doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X(2013)0039AB014.

  • Pizzey, E. (1974). Scream quietly or the Neighbours will hear. London: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. (2003). Institutional change in toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, 108(4), 795–843. https://doi.org/10.1086/367917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30(6), 629–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609104803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richie, B. E. (2012). Arrested justice: Black women, violence, and America’s prison nation. NYU Press.

  • Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in Public Service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Schotter, A., & Beamish, P. W. (2011). Performance effects of MNC headquarters–subsidiary conflict and the role of boundary spanners: The case of headquarter initiative rejection. Journal of International Management, 17(3), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2011.05.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. SAGE Publications.

  • Scott, W. R., Ruef, M., Mendel, P., & Caronna, C. (2000). Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smets, M., Jarzabkowski, P., Burke, G. T., & Spee, P. (2014). Reinsurance trading in Lloyd’s of London: Balancing conflicting-yet-complementary logics in practice. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 932–970. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. R., & Lipsky, M. (1995). Nonprofits for Hire: The Welfare State in the Age of Contracting. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. R., & Lipsky, M. (2010). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. H. (2001). Personal Versus Market Logics of Control: A Historically Contingent Theory of the Risk of Acquisition. Organization Science, 12(3), 294–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. H., Lounsbury, M., & Ocasio, W. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process (1 edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press, USA.

  • Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958-1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843. https://doi.org/10.1086/210361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, R. G., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin Andersson, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 99–129). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Turco, C. (2012). Difficult decoupling: Employee resistance to the commercialization of personal settings. American Journal of Sociology, 118(2), 380–419. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.1086/666505.

  • Tushman, M. L., & Scanlan, T. J. (1981). Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.5465/255842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waring, J., Currie, G., & Bishop, S. (2013). A contingent approach to the organization and Management of Public–Private Partnerships: An empirical study of English health care. Public Administration Review, 73(2), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zilber, T. B. (2002). Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: The case of a rape crisis Center in Israel. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 234–254. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Benjamin R. Weiss

Authors
  1. Benjamin R. Weiss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin R. Weiss.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The author has no conflicts of interest to report.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weiss, B.R. “When you’re here, you’re not a militant feminist”: volunteer professionalization in a rape crisis center. Theor Soc 50, 231–254 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-020-09420-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-020-09420-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation