Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Portfolio Ideal Worker: Insecurity and Inequality in the New Economy

  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The white-collar ideal worker norm helps to explain why social inequality persists in the workplace, yet the concept reflects corporate workplaces of the mid-twentieth century. This article identifies emerging cultural ideals for white-collar workers in today’s economy by examining the experiences of high earners in financial services. Despite its glorification of flexibility and independence, scholars have shown how the “new economy” produces different forms of inequality at work than in the post-World War II era. Drawing from interviews with 48 hedge fund workers and field observations at workplaces and industry events, I bring together well-known features of work in the new economy to update the white-collar ideal worker norm to reflect changes in the organization of work. I call this the portfolio ideal because it captures how white-collar workers must make ongoing investments in resources and development to create a portfolio of skills and experiences that allows them to navigate the turbulence of the neoliberal new economy. As portfolio workers, hedge fund workers identify as independent workers, value a passion for the work, take risks to get ahead, and invest in social capital. Although it appears to be disembodied, the portfolio norm reflects implicit assumptions about gender, race, and social class. By shedding light on cultural responses to job polarization and income inequality, this research helps to identify a shift from a more collective work arrangement to one that is individually oriented, which transfers the risks of employment from employers to workers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Comparable demographic information for race and ethnicity is not available.

References

  • Acker, Joan. 1990. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society 4 (2): 139–158.

  • Acker, Joan. 2006. Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society 20 (4): 441–464.

  • Adkins, Lisa. 2018. The time of money. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Alegria, Sharla. 2019. Escalator or step stool? Gendered labor and token processes in tech work. Gender & Society 33 (5): 722–745.

  • Alfrey, Lauren, and France Winddance Twine. 2017. Gender-fluid geek girls: Negotiating inequality regimes in the tech industry. Gender & Society 31 (1): 28–50.

  • Anteby, Michel, and Nicholas Occhiuto. 2020. Stand-in labor and the rising economy of self. Social Forces 98 (3): 1287–1310

  • Arthur, Michael, and Denise M. Rousseau. 1996. The Boundaryless career: A new employment principle for a new organizational era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Barclays Global. 2011. “Affirmative investing: Women and minority owned hedge funds.” Capital Solutions Group.

  • Bettie, Julie. 2002. Exceptions to the rule: Upwardly mobile white and Mexican American high school girls. Gender and Society 16 (3): 403–422.

  • Bidwell, Matthew, and Forrest Briscoe. 2010. The dynamics of interorganizational careers. Organization Science 21 (5): 1034–1053.

  • Blair-Loy, Mary. 1999. Career patterns of executive women in finance: An optimal matching analysis. American Journal of Sociology 104 (5): 1346–1345.

  • Blair-Loy, Mary. 2001. It’s not just what you know, it’s who you know: Technical knowledge, rainmaking, and gender among finance executives. Research in the Sociology of Work 10: 51–83.

  • Blair-Loy, Mary. 2005. Competing devotions: Career and family among women executives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Blair-Loy, Mary, and Jerry Jacobs. 2003. Globalization, work hours, and the care deficit among stockbrokers. Gender & Society 17 (2): 230–249.

  • Branch, Enobong Hannah, and Melissa E. Wooten. 2012. Suited for service: Racialized rationalizations for the ideal domestic servant from the nineteenth to the early twentieth century. Social Science History 36 (2): 169–189.

  • Brumley, Krista. 2014. The gendered ideal worker narrative: Professional women’s and men’s work experiences in the new economy at a Mexican company. Gender & Society 28 (6): 799–823.

  • Cech, Erin. 2018. “The passion principle: Self-expression, career choice, and inequality among career aspirants.” Working Paper.

  • Cha, Youngjoo. 2013. Overwork and the persistence of gender segregation in occupations. Gender & Society 27 (2): 158–184.

  • Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Collins, Sharon. 1996. Black corporate executives. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

  • Cooper, Marianne. 2000. Being the ‘go-to guy’: Fatherhood, masculinity, and the organization of work in Silicon Valley. Qualitative Sociology 23 (4): 379–405.

  • Cooper, Marianne. 2014. Cut adrift: Families in insecure times. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Davies, Andrea Rees, and Brenda D. Frink. 2014. The origins of the ideal worker: The separation of work and home in the United States from the market revolution to 1950. Work and Occupations 41 (1): 18–39.

  • Davis, Gerald. 2009. Managed by the markets: How finance re-shaped America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Deterding, Nicole M., and Mary C. Waters. 2018. Flexible coding of in-depth interviews: A twenty-first-century approach. Sociological Methods & Research 1–32.

  • DiMaggio, Paul. 2001. The twenty-first-century firm: Changing economic organization in international perspective. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • du Gay, Paul. 1996. Consumption and identity at work. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Eagly, Alice H., and Steven J. Karau. 2002. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review 109 (3): 573–598.

  • Emerson, Robert, Rachel Fretz, and Linda Shaw. 2011. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Emigh, Rebecca Jean. 1997. The power of negative thinking: The use of negative case methodology in the development of sociological theory. Theory and Society 26 (5): 649–684.

  • England, Paula, Jonathan Bearak, Michelle J. Budig, and Melissa J. Hodges. 2016. Do highly paid, highly skilled women experience the largest motherhood penalty? American Sociological Review 81 (6): 1161–1189.

  • Ewens, Michael, and Richard R. Townsend. 2019. Are early stage investors biased against women? Journal of Financial Economics 135 (3): 653–677.

  • Fisher, Melissa S. 2012. Wall Street women. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

  • Foschi, Martha. 2000. Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology 26 (1): 21–42.

  • Fridman, Daniel. 2010. From rats to riches: Game playing and the production of the capitalist self. Qualitative Sociology 33 (4): 423–446.

  • Galbraith, James K. 2000. Created unequal: The crisis in American pay. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Gershon, Ilana. 2017. Down and out in the new economy: How people find (or don’t find) work today. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Godechot, Olivier. 2016. The working rich: Wages, bonuses and appropriation of profit in the financial industry. London: Taylor & Francis Group.

  • Gorman, Elizabeth H. 2006. Work uncertainty and the promotion of professional women: The case of law firm partnership. Social Forces 85 (2): 865–890.

  • Guillen, Laura. 2018. Is the confidence gap between men and women a myth? Harvard Business Review, March 26, 2018.

  • Hacker, Jacob S. 2006. The great risk shift: The assault on American jobs, families, health care and retirement and how you can fight back. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Hall, Douglas T. 1996. Protean careers of the 21st century. The Academy of Management Executive 10 (4): 8–16.

  • Handy, Charles. 1989. The age of unreason. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

  • Harjani, Ansuya. 2014. “Hedge fund manager pay rises to $2.4 million.” CNBC, November 6, 2014.

  • Heilman, Madeline E. 2001. Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues 57 (4): 657–674.

  • Ho, Karen. 2009. Liquidated: An ethnography of Wall Street. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

  • Hoang, Kimberly Kay. 2015. Dealing in desire: Asian ascendancy, Western decline, and the hidden currencies of global sex work. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Inkson, Kerr, and Michael B. Arthur. 2001. How to be a successful career capitalist. Organizational Dynamics 30 (1): 48–61.

  • Johnson, Jenna. 2013. “Paul Tudor Jones: In macro trading, babies are a ‘killer’ to a woman’s focus.” The Washington Post, May 23, 2013.

  • Jung, Jiwook. 2015. Shareholder value and wkorkforce downsizing, 1981–2006. Social Forces 93 (4): 1335–1368.

  • Kalleberg, Arne. 2011. Good jobs, bad jobs: The rise of polarized and precarious employment systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. New York: Russell Sage.

  • Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1977. Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

  • Kelly, Erin L., Samantha K. Ammons, Kelly Chermack, and Phyllis Moen. 2010. Gendered challenge, gendered response: Confronting the ideal worker norm in a white-collar organization. Gender & Society 24 (3): 281–303.

  • Kollock, Peter. 1994. The emergence of exchange structures: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment, and trust. American Journal of Sociology 100 (2): 313–345.

  • Kruppa, Miles. 2018. The ‘David’ problem. Absolute Return 7: 2018.

  • Lane, Carrie M. 2011. A company of one: Insecurity, independence, and the new world of white-collar unemployment. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • Lin, Ken-Hou. 2015. The financial premium in the US labor market: A distributional analysis. Social Forces 94 (1): 1–30.

  • Lin, Ken-Hou, and Megan Tobias Neely. 2017. Gender, parental status, and the wage premium in finance. Social Currents 4 (6): 535–555.

  • Lofland, John, David Snow, Leon Anderson, and Lyn Lofland. 2005. Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.

  • Lyons-Padilla, Sarah, Hazel Rose Markus, Ashby Monk, Sid Radhakrishna, Radhika Shah, A. Norris, Daryn Dodson, and Jennifer L. Eberhardt. 2019. Race influences professional investors’ financial judgments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (35): 17225–17230.

  • Martin, John Levi. 2009. Social structures. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Martin, Patricia Yancey. 2003. ‘Said and done’ versus ‘saying and doing’ gendering practices, practicing gender at work. Gender & Society 17 (3): 342–366.

  • McDowell, Linda. 1997. Capital culture: Gender at work in the city. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • McGuire, Gail M. 2012. Race, gender, and social support: A study of networks in a financial services organization. Sociological Focus 45 (4): 320–337.

  • Mills, C. Wright. 1951. White collar: The American middle classes. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Musto, Michela. 2019. School regulations of boys’ rule-breaking and the gendered social construction of exceptionalism in early adolescence. American Sociological Review 84 (3): 369–393.

  • Nau, Michael. 2013. Economic elites, investments, and income inequality. Social Forces 92 (2): 437–461.

  • Neely, Megan Tobias. 2018. Fit to be king: How patrimonialism on Wall Street leads to inequality. Socio-Economic Review 16 (2): 365–385.

  • Nelson, Julie A. 2017. Gender and risk-taking. New York: Routledge.

  • Padavic, Irene, Robin J. Ely, and Erin M. Reid. 2020. Explaining the persistence of gender inequality: The work–family narrative as a social defense against the 24/7 work culture. Administrative Science Quarterly 65 (1): 61–111. 

  • Peters, Tom. 1997. “The brand called you.” Fast Company, August 31, 1997. 

  • Piketty, Thomas, and Emmanuel Saez. 2003. Income inequality in the United States, 1913–1998. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (1): 1–41.

  • Preqin. 2017a. “Preqin global hedge fund report.” Preqin, Ltd.

  • Preqin. 2017b. “Preqin private capital compensation and employment review.” New York: Preqin, Ltd.

  • Preqin. 2017c. “Preqin special report: Women in alternative assets.” New York: Preqin, Ltd.

  • Preqin. 2018. “Preqin Special Report: Hedge Funds in the U.S.” New York: Preqin, Ltd.

  • Pugh, Allison J. 2015. The tumbleweed society: Working and caring in an age of insecurity. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Rao, Aliya Hamid. 2017. Stand by your man: Wives’ emotion work during men’s unemployment. Journal of Marriage and Family 79 (3): 636–656.

  • Ray, Victor. 2019. “A theory of racialized organizations.” American Sociological Review 84 (1): 26–53.

  • Riach, Kathleen, and Leanne Cutcher. 2014. Built to last: Ageing, class and the masculine body in a U.K. hedge fund. Work, Employment & Society 28 (5): 771–787.

  • Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 2014. Why status matters for inequality. American Sociological Review 79 (1): 1–16.

  • Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and Shelley J. Correll. 2004. Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society 18 (4): 510–531.

  • Risman, Barbara J. 2004. Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender & Society 18 (4): 429–450.

  • Rivera, Lauren. 2015. Pedigree: How elite students get elite jobs. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Ross, Andrew. 2004. No-collar: The humane workplace and its hidden costs. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

  • Roth, Louise Marie. 2004. Engendering inequality: Processes of sex-segregation on Wall Street. Sociological Forum 19 (2): 203–228.

  • Roth, Louise Marie. 2006. Selling women short: Gender and money on Wall Street. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Schilt, Kristen. 2011. Just one of the guys?: Transgender men and the persistence of gender inequality. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.

  • Sewell, William H. 1992. A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology 98 (1): 1–29.

  • Sharone, Ofer. 2007. Constructing unemployed job seekers as professional workers: The depoliticizing work–game of job searching. Qualitative Sociology 30 (4): 403–416.

  • Smith, Vicki. 2010. Enhancing employability: Human, cultural, and social capital in an era of turbulent unpredictability. Human Relations 63 (2): 279–300.

  • Swidler, Ann. 1986. Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review 51 (2): 273–286.

  • Tak, Elise, Shelley J. Correll, and Sarah A. Soule. 2019. Gender inequality in product markets: When and how status beliefs transfer to products. Social Forces 98 (2): 548–577.

  • Thistle, Susan. 2006. From marriage to the market: The transformation of women’s lives and work. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Tomaskovic-Devey, Donald, and Ken-Hou Lin. 2011. Income dynamics, economic rents, and the financialization of the U.S. economy. American Sociological Review 76 (4): 538–559.

  • Turco, Catherine. 2010. Cultural foundations of tokenism: Evidence from the leveraged buyout industry. American Sociological Review 75 (6): 894–913.

  • Vallas, Steven, and Emily R. Cummins. 2015. Personal branding and identity norms in the popular business press: Enterprise culture in an age of precarity. Organization Studies 36 (3): 293–319.

  • Vallas, Steven, and Christopher Prener. 2012. Dualism, job polarization, and the social construction of precarious work. Work and Occupations 39 (4): 331–353.

  • Vosko, Leah F. 2009. Managing the margins: Gender, citizenship, and the international regulation of precarious employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Whyte, William H. 1956. The organization man. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

  • Williams, Christine L. 2017. The gender of layoffs in the oil and gas industry. Research in the Sociology of Work 31: 215–41. 

  • Williams, Christine L., Chandra Muller, and Kristine Kilanski. 2012. Gendered organizations in the new economy. Gender & Society 26 (4): 549–573.

  • Williams, Christine L., and Megan Tobias Neely. 2015. “Gender and work.”  Pp. 1–14 in Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Edited by Robert Scott and Stephen Kosslyn. New York: Sage. 

  • Williams, Joan C. 2001. Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Wingfield, Adia Harvey. 2010. Are some emotions marked ‘whites only’? Racialized feeling rules in professional workplaces. Social Problems 57 (2): 251–268.

  • Wingfield, Adia Harvey. 2013. No more invisible man: Race and gender in men’s work. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

  • Wooten, Melissa E., and Enobong H. Branch. 2012. Defining appropriate labor: Race, gender, and idealization of black women in domestic service. Race, Gender & Class 19 (3/4): 292–308.

  • Wooten, Melissa E., and Lucius Couloute. 2017. The production of racial inequality within and among organizations. Sociology Compass 11 (1): 1–10.

  • Wynn, Alison T. 2018. Misery has company: The shared emotional consequences of everwork among women and men. Sociological Forum 33 (3): 712–734.

  • Yavorsky, Jill, Lisa Keister, Yue Qian, and Michael Nau. 2019. Women in the one percent: Gender dynamics in top income positions. American Sociological Review 84 (1): 54–81.

  • Zaloom, Caitlin. 2006. Out of the pits: Traders and technology from Chicago to London. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank Christine Williams, Javier Auyero, Ken-Hou Lin, Mary Blair-Loy, Rachel Sherman, Kathleen Averett, Caitlyn Collins, Erika Grajeda, Kristine Kilanski, Katherine Sobering, and Allyson Stokes for their insightful comments on previous versions of this paper. Previous versions were presented at the New School for Social Research and the 2017 annual meeting of the American Sociological Association. Funding was provided by the Urban Ethnography Lab at the University of Texas at Austin.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Megan Tobias Neely.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendices

Table 1 Respondents’ Characteristics
Table 2 The Fordist Ideal vs. the Portfolio Ideal

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neely, M.T. The Portfolio Ideal Worker: Insecurity and Inequality in the New Economy. Qual Sociol 43, 271–296 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-020-09444-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-020-09444-1

Keywords

Navigation