Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of firm-, industry-, and country-level innovation on firm performance

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Marketing strategists seek to identify drivers of firm performance and their relevant boundaries. To date, most research evidence would tell them that competition is a negative force, but this study challenges that conventional wisdom by drawing on network externalities theory and related strategy research. In particular, resources that exist outside the organization may benefit the performance of firms in a network, through positive spillover effects. For example, innovation efforts at the industry and country levels can have positive impacts on a focal firm’s performance, with influences that are even more prominent than the effect of its firm-level innovation. Due to their distinctions from firm-level innovation, these innovation efforts should be leveraged strategically and uniquely, according to the specific business environment. This research therefore broadens understanding of drivers of firm performance beyond the firm level; it also provides important implications for marketing practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Average cash flows of all firms in a given industry

  2. Ratio of current assets to current liabilities (Cheng and Kesner 1997)

References

  • Atuahene-Gima, K. (1996). Differential potency of factors affecting innovation performance in manufacturing and services firms in Australia. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(1), 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamiatzi, V., Bozos, K., Cavusgil, S. T., & Hult, G. T. M. (2016). Revisiting the firm, industry, and country effects on profitability under recessionary and expansion periods: a multilevel analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1448–1471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, A. S., Bharadwaj, S. G., & Konsynski, B. R. (1999). Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s q. Management Science, 45, 1008–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2002). Patents, real options and firm performance. The Economic Journal, 112(478), C97–C116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borensztein, E., De Gregorio, J., & Lee, J. W. (1998). How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? Journal of International Economics, 45, 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brower, J., & Nath, P. (2018). Antecedents of market orientation: marketing CEOs, CMOs, and top management team marketing experience. Marketing Letters, 29(4), 405–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbonell, P., Escudero, A. I. R., & Aleman, J. L. M. (2004). Technology newness and impact of go/no-go criteria on new product success. Marketing Letters, 15(2-3), 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. J., & Park, S. (2005). Types of firms generating network externalities and MNCs’ co-location decisions. Strategic Management Journal, 26(7), 595–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. J., & Xu, D. (2008). Spillovers and competition among foreign and local firms in China. Strategic Management Journal, 29(5), 495–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Joshi, Y. V., Raju, J. S., & Zhang, Z. J. (2009). A theory of combative advertising. Marketing Science, 28(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J. L., & Kesner, I. F. (1997). Organizational slack and response to environmental shifts: the impact of resource allocation patterns. Journal of Management, 23, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felin, T., & Zenger, T. R. (2014). Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice. Research Policy, 43(5), 914–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, H., & Xuereb, J. M. (1997). Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, R., Huergo, E., Mairesse, J., & Peters, B. (2006). Innovation and productivity across four European countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(4), 483–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1989). No business is an island: the network concept of business strategy. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 5, 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckler, D. (1999). High-technology employment: a broader view. Monthly Laboratory Review, 122, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, A. M., & Rothaermel, F. T. (2011). When are assets complementary? Star scientists, strategic alliances, and innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 32, 895–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G. T. M., Hurley, R. F., & Knight, G. A. (2004). Innovativeness: its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(5), 429–438 -909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayachandran, S., Kalaignanam, K., & Eilert, M. (2013). Product and environmental social performance: varying effect on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 1255–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, G., Lopez, J. A., & Saurina, J. (2013). How does competition affect bank risk-taking? Journal of Financial Stability, 9, 185–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 408–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, K. N., & Park, H. (2012). Influence of government R&D support and inter-firm collaborations on innovation in Korean biotechnology SMEs. Technovation, 32, 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karniouchina, E. V., Carson, S. J., Short, J. C., & Ketchen Jr., D. J. (2013). Extending the firm vs. industry debate: Does industry life cycle stage matter? Strategic Management Journal, 34(8), 1010–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keats, B. W., & Hitt, M. A. (1988). A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 570–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keizer, J. A., Dijkstra, L., & Halman, J. I. (2002). Explaining innovative efforts of SMEs: an exploratory survey among SMEs in the mechanical and electrical engineering sector in The Netherlands. Technovation, 22, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R. (1997). Financial development and economic growth: views and agenda. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 688–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2001). Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1123–1134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X., Rindfleisch, A., & Tse, D. K. (2007). Working with rivals: the impact of competitor alliances on financial performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makino, S., Isobe, T., & Chan, C. M. (2004). Does country matter? Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 1027–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S.W. (2004). HLM 6: hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Scientific Software International.

  • Rothaermel, F. T., & Hess, A. M. (2007). Building dynamic capabilities: innovation driven by individual-, firm-, and network-level effects. Organization Science, 18(6), 898–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubera, G., & Kirca, A. H. (2012). Firm innovativeness and its performance outcomes: a meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Marketing, 76, 130–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. C., Ketchen, D. J., Palmer, T. B., & Hult, G. T. M. (2007). Firm, strategic group, and industry influences on performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 147–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, S. F., Olson, E. M., & Finnegan, C. (2011). Business strategy, marketing organization culture, and performance. Marketing Letters, 22(3), 227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, S. (2006). Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high-and low-technology regimes. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(5), 687–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A. (1996). Technology strategy and financial performance: examining the moderating role of the firm’s competitive environment. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(3), 189–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Tomas M. Hult.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Hult, G.T.M., Ketchen, D.J. et al. Effects of firm-, industry-, and country-level innovation on firm performance. Mark Lett 31, 231–245 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-020-09530-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-020-09530-y

Keywords

Navigation