Abstract
This article explores contemporary film genre preferences through an in-depth sociological analysis of taste cultures in film preferences amongst youth aged 16–18 in Flanders (the northern Dutch-speaking part of Belgium). Building on a representative sample of 1015 respondents we statistically analyze the assumption that contemporary media audiences demonstrate mobility and that they are eager to shape their media consumption in accordance with their personal preferences. This article examines whether societal structures that have been found to reflect media preferences remain in place, or whether these structures have eroded with the (supposed) increase in individual choice – an argument often voiced in the context of convergence culture. An analysis of the variables gender, educational level and ethnicity illustrates that societal structures are still reflected through film genre preferences amongst Flemish youth.
References
Altman, R. (1984). A semantic/syntactic approach to film genre. Cinema Journal, 23(3), 6–18.10.7560/742055-006Search in Google Scholar
Bennett, A., & Robards, B. (2014). Introduction: Youth, cultural practice and media technologies. In A. Bennett & B. Robards (Eds.), Mediated youth cultures: The internet, belonging and new cultural configurations (pp. 1–7). Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137287021_1Search in Google Scholar
Biltereyst, D., & Meers, P. (2011). The political economy of audiences. In J. Wasko, G. Murdock & H. Sousa (Eds.), The handbook of political economy of communications (pp. 415–435).10.1002/9781444395402.ch19Search in Google Scholar
Bird, S. E. (2011). Are we all produsers now? Convergence and media audience practices. Cultural Studies, 25(4–5), 502–516. doi:10.1080/09502386.2011.60053210.1080/09502386.2011.600532Search in Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (2009 [1979]). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315680347-10Search in Google Scholar
Bryson, B. (1996). ʻAnything but heavy metalʼ: Symbolic exclusion and musical dislikes. American Sociological Review, 884–899.10.2307/2096459Search in Google Scholar
Butsch, R. (2001). Class and audience effects: A history of research on movies, radio, and television. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 29(3), 112–120.10.1080/01956050109601016Search in Google Scholar
Chan, T. W., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2005). The social stratification of theatre, dance and cinema attendance. Cultural Trends, 14(3), 193–212.10.4324/9780429494468-67Search in Google Scholar
Couldry, N. (2011). More sociology, more culture, more politics. Or, a modest proposal for ʻconvergenceʼ studies. Cultural Studies, 25(4–5), 487–501. doi:10.1080/09502386.2011.60052810.1080/09502386.2011.600528Search in Google Scholar
Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Cambridge, Malden: Polity.Search in Google Scholar
Cui, D. (2015). Capital, distinction, and racialized habitus: Immigrant youth in the educational field. Journal of Youth Studies, ahead-of-print, 1–16.10.1080/13676261.2015.1020932Search in Google Scholar
Daenekindt, S., & Roose, H. (2013). A mise-en-scène of the shattered habitus: The effect of social mobility on aesthetic dispositions towards films. European Sociological Review, 29(1), 48–59.10.1093/esr/jcr038Search in Google Scholar
Dhoest, A. (2012). Imagined communities of television viewers: Reception research on national and ethnic miority audiences. In H. Bilandzic, G. Patriarche & P. J. Traudt (Eds.), The social use of media: Cultural and social scientific perspectives on audience research (pp. 87–104). Bristol, Chicago: Intellect.Search in Google Scholar
Dhoest, A. (2015). Connections that matter: The relative importance of ethnic-cultural origin, age and generation in media uses among diasporic youth in Belgium. Journal of Children and Media, 9(3), 277–293.10.1080/17482798.2015.1022562Search in Google Scholar
Fischoff, S., Antonio, J., & Lewis, D. (1998). Favorite films and film genres as a function of race, age, and gender. Journal of Media Psychology, 3(1), 1–9.Search in Google Scholar
Gripsrud, J. (2002). Distinctions: Social difference, lifestyle and taste. In J. Gripsrud (Ed.), Understanding media culture (pp. 60–98). London: Hodder Education.Search in Google Scholar
Hall, S. (2002). Tall revenue features: The Genealogy of the Modern Blockbuster. In S. Neale (Ed.), Genre and contemporary Hollywood (pp. 11–26). London: British Film Institute.Search in Google Scholar
Jancovich, M. (2000). ʻA real shockerʼ: Authenticity, genre and the struggle for distinction. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 14(1), 23–35.10.1080/713657675Search in Google Scholar
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262036016.003.0012Search in Google Scholar
Krijnen, T., & Van Bauwel, S. (2015). Gender and Media: Representing, Producing, Consuming. Abingdon: Routledge.10.4324/9781315694597Search in Google Scholar
Kuipers, G. (2006). Television and taste hierarchy: The case of Dutch television comedy. Media, Culture & Society, 28(3), 359–378. doi:10.1177/016344370606288410.1177/0163443706062884Search in Google Scholar
Lassner, R. (1944). Sex and age determinants of theatre and movie interests. The Journal of General Psychology, 31(2), 241–271.10.1080/00221309.1944.10543192Search in Google Scholar
Maltby, R. (1999). Sticks, hicks and flaps: Classical Hollywoodʼs generic conception of its audiences. In R. Maltby & M. Stokes (Eds.), Identifying Hollywoodʼs audiences: Cultural identity and the movies (pp. 23–41). London: British Film Institute Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
McRobbie, A. (2008). Young women and consumer culture. Cultural Studies, 22(5), 531–550. doi:10.1080/0950238080224580310.1080/09502380802245803Search in Google Scholar
Meers, P. (2004). ʻItʼs the language of film!ʼ: Young film audiences on Hollywood and Europe. In R. Maltby & M. Stokes (Eds.), Hollywood abroad: Audiences and cultural exchange (pp. 158–175). London British Film Institute Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Peterson, R. A. (1992). Understanding audience segmentation: From elite and mass to omnivore and univore. Poetics, 21(4), 243–258.10.1016/0304-422X(92)90008-QSearch in Google Scholar
Peterson, R. A. (2005). Problems in comparative research: The example of omnivorousness. Poetics, 33(5), 257–282.10.1016/j.poetic.2005.10.002Search in Google Scholar
Staiger, J. (2005). Media reception studies. New York, London: NYU Press.10.18574/nyu/9780814786741.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Van Eijck, K. (2000). Richard A. Peterson and the culture of consumption. Poetics, 28(2), 207–224.10.1016/S0304-422X(00)00022-XSearch in Google Scholar
Vandevelde, I., Smets, K., Meers, P., Vande Winkel, R., & Van Bauwel, S. (2011). Bollywood and Turkish films in Antwerp (Belgium): Two case studies on diasporic distribution and exhibition. Javnost – the Public, 18(3), 55–70.10.1080/13183222.2011.11009062Search in Google Scholar
Warde, A., Wright, D., & Gayo-Cal, M. (2007). Understanding cultural omnivorousness: Or, the myth of the cultural omnivore. Cultural Sociology, 1(2), 143–164.10.1177/1749975507078185Search in Google Scholar
Willekens, M., Daenekindt, S., & Lievens, J. (2014). Whose education matters more? Mothers’ and fathers’ education and the cultural participation of adolescents. Cultural Sociology, 291–309. doi:10.1177/174997551453368610.1177/1749975514533686Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
