Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

RETRACTED ARTICLE: User information protection of e-commerce platform business based on credit evaluation system

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Information Systems and e-Business Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article was retracted on 23 November 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Self-governance of e-commerce platform business has become a governance model recognized by the e-commerce industry and state agencies. However, the leakage of user information during the online transaction process, the abuse problem has occurred frequently, seriously jeopardizing the legitimate rights and interests of network users. By analyzing the autonomy rules of the online e-commerce platform business, the author found that the platform obtains the right to use the user’s private information by setting various mandatory clauses, which is not protected and leads to the abuse and disclosure of information. The article proposes that third-party institutions as the evaluation party of the network autonomy rules, through the scientific and rigorous evaluation index system to make a score on the autonomy rules of the online e-commerce platform business, urge the platform to improve its autonomy rules, thereby protecting the legitimate rights and interests of users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  • Bagheri P, Hassan K (2015) Access to information and rights of withdrawal in internet contracts in Iran: the legal challenges. Comput Law Secur Rev 31(1):90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann F, Friehe T (2013) Private protection against crime when property value is private information. Int Rev Law Econ 35(1):73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coe P (2015) The social media paradox: an intersection with freedom of expression and the criminal law. Inf Commun Technol Law 24(1):16–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y (2017) Forward looking versus backward looking: an empirical study on the effectiveness of credit evaluation system in China’s online P2P lending market. China Finance Rev Int 7(2):228–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grace J (2013) Privacy, stigma and public protection: a socio-legal analysis of criminality information practices in the UK. Int J Law Crime Justice 41(4):303–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf G, Park W (2014) South Korea’s innovations in data privacy principles: Asian comparisons. Comput Law Secur Rev Int J Technol Law Pract 30(5):492–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang H (2016) Platform based e-commerce credit evaluation system based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Paper presented at the international conference on intelligent transportation, big data and smart city

  • Lee J (2016) The presence and future of the use of DNA-information and the protection of genetic informational privacy: a comparative perspective. Int J Law Crime Justice 44:212–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P (2014) An open shield: antitrust arguments against extending copyright protection to fashion designs. Inf Commun Technol Law 23(2):159–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelino P (2013) Law enforcement agencies’ activities in the cloud environment: a European legal perspective. Inf Commun Technol Law 22(2):165–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volokh A (2013) The new private-regulation skepticism, due process, non-delegation, and antitrust challenges. Soc Sci Electron Publ 37(3):931–1007

    Google Scholar 

  • Wangmann J (2013) Incidents versus context: how does the NSW protection order system understand intimate partner violence. Syd Law Rev 34(4):695

    Google Scholar 

  • Wissink L, Duijkersloot T, Widdershoven R (2014) Shifts in competences between member states and the EU in the new supervisory system for credit institutions and their consequences for judicial protection. Utrecht Law Rev 10(5):92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Tadikamalla P, Shang J (2016) Corporate credit-risk evaluation system: integrating explicit and implicit financial performances. Int J Prod Econ 177:77–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu S, Song X, Cao Y (2016) Based on multi-objective fuzzy decision model to study tech micro enterprise financing credit risk evaluation system. Paper presented at the international conference on intelligent transportation, big data and smart city

Download references

Funding

Beijing normal University Zhuhai Branch Teachers’ Scientific Research ability Promotion Program < Research on Autonomous rules of Network Trading platform > Medium-term results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article has been retracted. Please see the retraction notice for more detail: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-022-00584-1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, J., Zheng, Y. RETRACTED ARTICLE: User information protection of e-commerce platform business based on credit evaluation system. Inf Syst E-Bus Manage 18, 945–954 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-019-00409-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-019-00409-8

Keywords

Navigation