Abstract
Self-governance of e-commerce platform business has become a governance model recognized by the e-commerce industry and state agencies. However, the leakage of user information during the online transaction process, the abuse problem has occurred frequently, seriously jeopardizing the legitimate rights and interests of network users. By analyzing the autonomy rules of the online e-commerce platform business, the author found that the platform obtains the right to use the user’s private information by setting various mandatory clauses, which is not protected and leads to the abuse and disclosure of information. The article proposes that third-party institutions as the evaluation party of the network autonomy rules, through the scientific and rigorous evaluation index system to make a score on the autonomy rules of the online e-commerce platform business, urge the platform to improve its autonomy rules, thereby protecting the legitimate rights and interests of users.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
23 November 2022
This article has been retracted. Please see the Retraction Notice for more detail: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-022-00584-1
References
Bagheri P, Hassan K (2015) Access to information and rights of withdrawal in internet contracts in Iran: the legal challenges. Comput Law Secur Rev 31(1):90–98
Baumann F, Friehe T (2013) Private protection against crime when property value is private information. Int Rev Law Econ 35(1):73–79
Coe P (2015) The social media paradox: an intersection with freedom of expression and the criminal law. Inf Commun Technol Law 24(1):16–40
Gao Y (2017) Forward looking versus backward looking: an empirical study on the effectiveness of credit evaluation system in China’s online P2P lending market. China Finance Rev Int 7(2):228–248
Grace J (2013) Privacy, stigma and public protection: a socio-legal analysis of criminality information practices in the UK. Int J Law Crime Justice 41(4):303–321
Greenleaf G, Park W (2014) South Korea’s innovations in data privacy principles: Asian comparisons. Comput Law Secur Rev Int J Technol Law Pract 30(5):492–505
Jiang H (2016) Platform based e-commerce credit evaluation system based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Paper presented at the international conference on intelligent transportation, big data and smart city
Lee J (2016) The presence and future of the use of DNA-information and the protection of genetic informational privacy: a comparative perspective. Int J Law Crime Justice 44:212–229
Liu P (2014) An open shield: antitrust arguments against extending copyright protection to fashion designs. Inf Commun Technol Law 23(2):159–171
Pelino P (2013) Law enforcement agencies’ activities in the cloud environment: a European legal perspective. Inf Commun Technol Law 22(2):165–190
Volokh A (2013) The new private-regulation skepticism, due process, non-delegation, and antitrust challenges. Soc Sci Electron Publ 37(3):931–1007
Wangmann J (2013) Incidents versus context: how does the NSW protection order system understand intimate partner violence. Syd Law Rev 34(4):695
Wissink L, Duijkersloot T, Widdershoven R (2014) Shifts in competences between member states and the EU in the new supervisory system for credit institutions and their consequences for judicial protection. Utrecht Law Rev 10(5):92
Zhang F, Tadikamalla P, Shang J (2016) Corporate credit-risk evaluation system: integrating explicit and implicit financial performances. Int J Prod Econ 177:77–100
Zhu S, Song X, Cao Y (2016) Based on multi-objective fuzzy decision model to study tech micro enterprise financing credit risk evaluation system. Paper presented at the international conference on intelligent transportation, big data and smart city
Funding
Beijing normal University Zhuhai Branch Teachers’ Scientific Research ability Promotion Program < Research on Autonomous rules of Network Trading platform > Medium-term results.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article has been retracted. Please see the retraction notice for more detail: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-022-00584-1
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, J., Zheng, Y. RETRACTED ARTICLE: User information protection of e-commerce platform business based on credit evaluation system. Inf Syst E-Bus Manage 18, 945–954 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-019-00409-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-019-00409-8