Skip to main content
Log in

Which Emotion Regulation Strategies are Most Associated with Trait Emotion Dysregulation? A Transdiagnostic Examination

  • Published:
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although definitions of emotion dysregulation infer difficulties in selecting and implementing emotion regulation (ER) strategies, surprisingly few studies have examined the relationship between trait emotion dysregulation and a wide range of specific ER strategies. The present study used a data-driven approach to assess trait- and state-related ER strategy use in 99 women (aged 18–55) recruited from the community with varying levels of trait emotion dysregulation. Participants completed self-report questionnaires assessing habitual ER strategy implementation and self-ratings of ER strategy use in vivo during negative mood inductions. Principal components analysis revealed four self-report questionnaire-based and three mood-induction-based groupings comprising both optimal and suboptimal strategies. After adjusting for demographic and clinical variables, results from self-report questionnaires indicated that trait emotion dysregulation was significantly associated with higher endorsements of suboptimal strategies in two groupings (e.g., self-criticism, rumination, and social withdrawal; catastrophizing and blaming others) and lower endorsements of optimal ER strategies in one grouping (e.g., cognitive reappraisal and problem solving). In the context of mood induction, trait emotion dysregulation was significantly associated with higher endorsements of suboptimal ER strategies from one cluster only (e.g., expressive suppression, thought avoidance, and self-criticism). Such transdiagnostic, data-driven approaches can uncover how the application of specific ER strategies both habitually and during negative mood states is associated with trait emotion dysregulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Consent to deposit our dataset online was not included in the informed consent procedures during data collection.

Notes

  1. The original DERS emphasizes responses to negative emotions, asking participants to often think of times “When I am upset…” and prompting negative affective states such as “ashamed”, “guilty”, and “irritated” suggesting an emphasis on emotion dysregulation in response to negative emotional experiences. Alternate versions address emotion dysregulation in response to positive emotions (Weiss et al. 2015) and current state- versus trait-like experiences in response to negative emotions (Lavender et al. 2017).

  2. Two participant diagnostic reports could not be completed because of incomplete information and were coded as Diagnosis Deferred.

  3. These measures were chosen because of an interest in how individuals downregulate negative emotional experiences associated with depression, anxiety, and BPD. We also chose measures that would allow us to assess a diverse range of strategies and coping tactics while also achieving adequate coverage (e.g., full scale or subscale) for the most commonly researched emotion regulation strategies from the affective science literature: cognitive reappraisal, problem-solving, emotional acceptance, thought and expressive suppression, rumination, experiential and behavioral avoidance.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thoughtful comments and feedback were provided by Shayan Asadi, Hadassah Beggs-Hebert, and Sasha A. Haefner.

Funding

ARD was supported by a Doctoral Canada Graduate Scholarship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. ACR was supported by an Early Researcher Award (ER14–10-185) from the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Research and Innovation, New Investigator Salary Award (MSH130177) from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and Research Excellence Faculty Scholars Award from the University of Toronto Scarborough.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander R. Daros.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest or financial disclosures to declare.

Experiment Participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Ethics Approval

This study received an institutional review board (IRB) ethics approval from the University of Toronto before data collection began.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daros, A.R., Ruocco, A.C. Which Emotion Regulation Strategies are Most Associated with Trait Emotion Dysregulation? A Transdiagnostic Examination. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 43, 478–490 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-020-09864-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-020-09864-x

Keywords

Navigation