Elsevier

Geomorphology

Volume 378, 1 April 2021, 107594
Geomorphology

Vegetation effects on coastal foredune initiation: Wind tunnel experiments and field validation for three dune-building plants

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107594Get rights and content

Abstract

As the land-sea interface, foredunes buffer upland habitats with plants acting as ecosystem engineers shaping topography, and thereby affecting storm response and recovery. However, many ecogeomorphic feedbacks in coastal foredune formation and recovery remain uncertain in this dynamic environment. We carried out a series of wind tunnel experiments testing how the morphology, density, and configuration of three foredune pioneer dune building plant species influence the most basic stage of dune initiation — nebkha formation around individual plants. We established monocultures of native Ammophila breviligulata and Panicum amarum and invasive Carex kobomugi in 1 m × 1 m planter boxes of sand to simulate approximate natural and managed densities and planting configurations on the US Mid-Atlantic coast. We subjected each box to constant 8.25 m/s wind for 30 min in a moveable-bed unilateral-flow wind tunnel with an unvegetated upwind sand bed. We quantified resulting topography with sub-millimeter precision and related it to plant morphology, density, and configuration. Plant morphology, density, and configuration all influenced the resulting topography. Larger plants produced larger nebkha with greater relief, height, and sand volume. However, nebkha area, height, and planform shape varied among species, and taller plants did not necessarily produce taller nebkha. The erect grasses, Ammophila and Panicum, produced more elongated, high-relief nebkha compared to the low-lying Carex, which produced lower and more symmetrical equant nebkha. A staggered planting configuration produced greater net sediment accumulation than non-staggered. We validated these results against high-resolution field topographies of foredune nebkha and found strong agreement between the datasets. Our results provide species-specific parameters useful in designing foredune plantings and beach management and can be used to parameterize vegetation in models of foredune evolution associated with different plant species. By first understanding the underlying ecogeomorphic feedbacks involved in nebkha formation, we can more effectively scale up to forecast coastal foredune evolution and recovery.

Introduction

Ecosystem engineers directly or indirectly modify habitats by changing biotic and abiotic resources or physical habitat structure (Jones et al., 1994). Plants are capable engineers that can physically alter environments both when living and dead (Tanner, 2001; Badano and Cavieres, 2006: Bos et al., 2007; Hall Cushman et al., 2010). Vegetation is particularly important in the development of coastal foredunes, defined as the shore-parallel vegetated dune ridge in the backshore formed by aeolian sand deposition within vegetation (Hesp, 2002). The physical geomorphological processes surrounding foredune evolution have been studied extensively (Hesp and Walker, 2013; Feagin et al., 2015; Elko et al., 2016; Elko et al., 2019). Similarly, the spatial variability of foredune vegetation related to geomorphological processes was appreciated decades ago (Cowles, 1899; Ranwell, 1972; Carter, 1995). However, despite high investment in beach-dune management efforts (Wootton et al., 2016; Elko et al., 2019), the variability and mechanisms surrounding geomorphological processes and foredune vegetation have only recently gained heightened research attention (e.g. Stallins, 2005; Nield and Baas, 2008; Zarnetske et al., 2012; Durán Vinent and Moore, 2014; Zarnetske et al., 2015; Silva et al., 2016; Goldstein et al., 2017; Feagin et al., 2019; Hacker et al., 2019; Mullins et al., 2019). Our understanding of foredune ecogeomorphic feedbacks is limited (Stallins, 2006; Schlacher et al., 2008; Murray et al., 2008; Corenblit et al., 2011; Stallins and Corenblit, 2018). Efforts to model foredune initiation alongside storm response and recovery are thus constrained by an incomplete understanding of vegetation effects (Walker et al., 2017; Jackson and Nordstrom, 2019).

Foredunes are non-linear self-organizing complex adaptive habitats categorized by physical feedbacks between plants and topography (de Castro, 1995; Hesp, 2002; Nield and Baas, 2008; Hesp and Walker, 2013; Balke et al., 2014; Corenblit et al., 2015). Plants create, modify, and stabilize foredunes, while elevation and coastal processes (e.g. waves, overwash) influence vegetation structure and succession (Stallins, 2005; Durán Vinent and Moore, 2014; Zarnetske et al., 2015; Cheplick, 2016). These ecogeomorphic interactions modulate post-storm foredune recovery back to a pre-storm or new system state (Bendix and Hupp, 2000; Murray et al., 2008; Hesp et al., 2011; Wolner et al., 2013; Stallins and Corenblit, 2018). Aeolian sand transport is steered both by topography and vegetation over a range of physical, ecological, and geological timescales (Arens, 1996; Hesp et al., 2015). Across a landscape, beach physical characteristics vary (Durán Vinent and Moore, 2014; Houser and Mathew, 2011) and vegetation is heterogeneously distributed (Hesp, 1989), varying in morphology and density (Arens et al., 2001; Hesp et al., 2019). These characteristics create a spatiotemporally complex heterogenous system (Hilton et al., 2006; Charbonneau et al., 2017; Stallins and Corenblit, 2018).

Topographic heterogeneity is, in part, likely due to plant species-specific morphological traits impacting deposition (Hilton et al., 2006; Houser et al., 2008; Hacker et al., 2011, Hacker et al., 2019). Above- and below-ground differences in plant species morphology and growth habit can yield noticeable species-level differences in the building and stabilizing of already established foredunes (Murray et al., 2008; Hacker et al., 2011; Zarnetske et al., 2012; Duran and Moore, 2013; Charbonneau et al., 2016; Charbonneau et al., 2017; Hacker et al., 2019). For example, some species are associated with more hummocky, erect, taller, or shorter established foredunes (Davies, 1980; Hesp, 1989; Wootton et al., 2005; Hilton et al., 2006; Hacker et al., 2011; Zarnetske et al., 2015; Hacker et al., 2019). Shoots create drag and surface cover, reducing wind and wave erosion (Tanaka et al., 2009; Silva et al., 2016; Feagin et al., 2019) and catch sediment, with species differing in capture efficiency, survival, morphology, establishment, density, and root versus shoot investment (Hesp, 1989; Arens et al., 2001; Zarnetske et al., 2012; Hesp et al., 2019). Changes in plant community structure can thus have cascading consequences on foredune morphology and stability (Wolner et al., 2013; Charbonneau et al., 2017; Bryant et al., 2019). Despite heightened coastal research since the 1960s (Jackson and Nordstrom, 2019), uncertainties remain as to the underlying causes of observed topographic heterogeneity associated with different plant species and densities (van Dijk et al., 1999; Arens et al., 2001; de M Luna et al., 2011; Duran and Moore, 2013; Durán Vinent and Moore, 2014; Zhang et al., 2015; Keijsers et al., 2016; Moore et al., 2016; Hesp et al., 2019).

Examining nebkha formation, one type of precursor to incipient (or embryo) foredune development (Hesp, 2002; Hesp and Walker, 2013), may yield insight into what factors of plant morphology and density are of greatest importance to backshore foredune initiation. Nebkha form from aeolian sand deposition around discrete individuals or groups of plants due to high localized drag and reduced wind velocity (Cooke et al., 1993; Hesp, 2002; Fig. 1). Nebkha vary in size from millimeters to meters, and can grow and merge over time as plants tiller and new nebkha emerge (Hesp, 1989; Cooke et al., 1993; Fig. 1). This deposition can ultimately form a continuous shore-parallel incipient foredune (Hesp, 1984, Hesp, 1989, Hesp, 2002, Hesp, 2013; Fig. 1). Behind plants and the nebkha body, shielding and turbulent eddies create shadow dunes or tails (Hesp, 1981; Hesp and Smyth, 2017). These shadow dunes can vary in size by plant and nebkha shape (Raupach, 1992) and width, independent of plant height and sediment grain size (Hesp, 1981; Hesp and Smyth, 2017). Shadow dune and nebkha morphology are linked, although they are often examined separately (Hesp and Smyth, 2017). When nebkha are referred to in this publication, the nebkha and attached shadow dune complex are grouped as one entity (Charbonneau and Casper, 2018). Similar to studies of foredune ecogeomorphology, nebkha research has frequently focused on established field nebkha (Gillies et al., 2014; Hesp and Smyth, 2017). Nebkha can be thought of as the most basic unit or stage of foredune development whereby underlying physical-biological feedbacks that govern foredune evolution at a greater scale may be illuminated from examining their initiation.

To examine coupled ecogeomorphic relationships of nebkha formation as foredune precursors, we constructed a moveable-bed, unilateral-flow wind tunnel to test how three U.S. East Coast foredune pioneer plant species and their morphological traits, planting density, and planting configuration affect the initial size, shape, and volume of nebkha. We worked with dominant native and invasive foredune plants at natural and managed densities and configurations. After subjecting experimental stands to wind and sediment supply conditions typical of backshore environments, we related the size and shape of each resulting nebkha to the morphological traits of their individual plants (Fig. 1A), as well as to planting density and configuration. We tested the following hypotheses: (1) larger plants create larger nebkha; (2) a taller plant will build a taller, steeper nebkha; and (3) nebkha shape varies by plant species as a function of morphology and not as a function of plant size. Furthermore, we tested the same hypotheses against quantitative field observations to evaluate the ecological relevance of our findings for sandy beach-dune systems. By first understanding the underlying ecogeomorphic feedbacks of nebkha formation, we can more effectively scale up to forecast foredune evolution over time and develop more effective management strategies.

Section snippets

Study species

We worked with three US East Coast dominant foredune building pioneers (Fig. 2A). Erect C3 Ammophila breviligulata (0.66–1 m tall), is native to the US Mid-Atlantic and Great Lakes, and is a Pacific invasive grass (Hacker et al., 2011). C4 bunchgrass Panicum amarum (1–2 m tall) is a US eastern seaboard and Gulf coast native known for high biomass production. Carex kobomugi (15–30 cm tall) is an Asia native sedge, and US invasive, with a low-lying semi-rosette growth form, small petiole angles,

Plant morphological differences across treatments

The LMMs revealed that no plant traits differed between planting densities, but highlighted species differences in morphology and size 2017 and 2018. Generally, for most metrics, C. kobomugi was smallest and P. amarum was largest (Fig. 3). Both years, A. breviligulata had an equal number of leaves as C. kobomugi, and P. amarum had more stems than both (F2,44 = 48.9, P < 0.0001). Both years, C. kobomugi had the least number of stems and P. amarum had the most (F2,32 = 80.02, P < 0.0001) with all

Discussion

Our findings elucidate a strong feedback between plant ecosystem engineers and surface topography at the initial stages of foredune genesis in nebkha formation, both in a wind tunnel and field setting. We show that feedbacks are explained by plant traits. Specifically: (1) larger plants created larger nebkha regardless of species; (2) the anecdotal adage that a taller, steeper plant may build a taller steeper dune, is unsupported at initialization, as stem width in erect grasses better

Conclusions

This research contributes to our fundamental understanding of the role of intraspecific variation in vegetation morphology, density, and configuration in impacting geomorphological processes in aeolian beach-dune systems. We demonstrated that larger plants build larger nebkha, lending experimental support to the commonly held belief that larger plants build larger foredunes. However, taller plants do not necessarily build taller and steeper nebkha. Rather, stem width, a proxy for frontal area,

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Charbonneau secured funding to build the wind tunnel and conduct the research working, with Zarnetske designing its specifications based on previous blueprints. Wnek secured the wind tunnel location, and worked with students and Charbonneau collecting data. Charbonneau organized and oversaw the wind tunnel construction and carried out the research. Zarnetske, Wnek, Casper, and Barber each contributed to experimental design. Dohner and Charbonneau conducted field validation analyses. All authors

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted with Government support under contract FA9550-11-C-0028 and awarded by the Department of Defense, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) Fellowship, 32 CFR 168a. The wind tunnel was funded and supported by the US Coastal Research Program (USCRP) with USACE ERDC and USGS (Contract #W912HZ18P0090) organized by the American Shore and Beach Preservation Society. It was additionally funded by USACE ERDC BAA

References (100)

  • J.A. Gillies et al.

    A wind tunnel study of the aerodynamic and sand trapping properties of porous mesh 3-dimensional roughness elements

    Aeolian Res.

    (2017)
  • P.A. Hesp

    Morphodynamics of incipient foredunes in New South Wales, Australia

  • P.A. Hesp

    Foredunes and blowouts: initiation, geomorphology and dynamics

    Geomorphology

    (2002)
  • P.A. Hesp et al.

    Nebkha flow dynamics and shadow dune formation

    Geomorphology

    (2017)
  • P.A. Hesp et al.

    Flow deflection over a foredune

    Geomorphology

    (2015)
  • P.A. Hesp et al.

    Wind flow and sedimentation in artificial vegetation: Field and wind tunnel experiments

    Geomorphology

    (2019)
  • C. Houser et al.

    Alongshore variation in foredune height in response to transport potential and sediment supply: South Padre Island, Texas

    Geomorphology

    (2011)
  • C. Houser et al.

    Controls on coastal dune morphology, shoreline erosion and barrier island response to extreme storms

    Geomorphology

    (2008)
  • J. Järvelä

    Flow resistance of flexible and stiff vegetation: a flume study with natural plants

    J. Hydrol.

    (2002)
  • J.G.S. Keijsers et al.

    Vegetation and sedimentation on coastal foredunes

    Geomorphology

    (2015)
  • M. Luhar et al.

    From the blade scale to the reach scale: a characterization of aquatic vegetative drag

    Adv. Water Resour.

    (2013)
  • R. Silva et al.

    Response of vegetated dune-beach systems to storm conditions

    Coast. Eng.

    (2016)
  • J.A. Stallins

    Stability domains in barrier island dune systems

    Ecol. Complex.

    (2005)
  • J.A. Stallins

    Geomorphology and ecology: unifying themes for complex systems in biogeomorphology

    Geomorphology

    (2006)
  • I.J. Walker et al.

    Scale-dependent perspectives on the geomorphology and evolution of beach-dune systems

    Earth Sci. Rev.

    (2017)
  • C.W.V. Wolner et al.

    Ecomorphodynamic feedbacks and barrier island response to disturbance: insights from the Virginia Barrier Islands, Mid-Atlantic Bight, USA

    Geomorphology

    (2013)
  • O. Yagci et al.

    Scour patterns around isolated vegetation elements

    Adv. Water Resour.

    (2016)
  • W. Zhang et al.

    Land–sea interaction and morphogenesis of coastal foredunes—a modeling case study from the southern Baltic Sea coast

    Coast. Eng.

    (2015)
  • AgiSoft

    Agisoft Metashape User Manual - Professional Edition

    Version

    (2018)
  • S.M. Arens et al.

    Influence of reed stem density on foredune development

    Earth Surf. Process. Landf.

    (2001)
  • E.I. Badano et al.

    Impacts of ecosystem engineers on community attributes: effects of cushion plants at different elevations of the Chilean Andes

    Diversity Distributions

    (2006)
  • T. Balke et al.

    Critical transitions in disturbance-driven ecosystems: identifying Windows of Opportunity for recovery

    J. Ecol.

    (2014)
  • J. Bendix et al.

    Hydrological and geomorphological impacts on riparian plant communities

    Hydrol. Process.

    (2000)
  • R.J. Boothroyd et al.

    The importance of accurately representing submerged vegetation morphology in the numerical prediction of complex river flow

    Earth Surf. Process. Landf.

    (2016)
  • K. Burri et al.

    Aeolian sediment transport over vegetation canopies: a wind tunnel study with live plants

    Aeolian Res.

    (2011)
  • R.W.G. Carter

    Coastal Environments: An Introduction to the Physical, Ecological and Cultural Systems of Coastlines

    (1995)
  • B.R. Charbonneau et al.

    Wind tunnel tests inform Ammophila planting spacing for dune management

    Shore & Beach

    (2018)
  • B.R. Charbonneau et al.

    A species effect on storm erosion: Invasive sedge stabilized dunes more than native grass during Hurricane Sandy

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (2017)
  • G.P. Cheplick

    Changes in plant abundance on a coastal beach following two major storm surges 1

    Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society

    (2016)
  • R. Cooke et al.

    Desert Geomorphology

    (1993)
  • D. Corenblit et al.

    Engineer pioneer plants respond to and affect geomorphic constraints similarly along water-terrestrial interfaces world-wide

    Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.

    (2015)
  • H.C. Cowles

    The ecological relations of the vegetation on the sand dunes of Lake Michigan

    Bot. Gaz.

    (1899)
  • S. Czarnes et al.

    Root- and microbial-derived mucilages affect soil structure and water transport

    Eur. J. Soil Sci.

    (2000)
  • J.L. Davies

    Geographical Variation in Coastal Development

    (1980)
  • S.M. Dohner et al.

    A tale of three storms: morphologic response of Broadkill Beach, Delaware, following Superstorm Sandy, Hurricane Joaquin, and Winter Storm Jonas

    Shore & Beach

    (2016)
  • Dunham, A.E., and S.J. Beaupre. 1998. Ecological experiments: scale, phenomenology, mechanism, and the illusion of...
  • O. Duran et al.

    Vegetation controls on the maximum size of coastal dunes

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2013)
  • O. Durán Vinent et al.

    Barrier island bistability induced by biophysical interactions

    Nat. Clim. Chang.

    (2014)
  • N. Elko et al.

    Dune management challenges on developed coasts

    Shore & Beach

    (2016)
  • N. Elko et al.

    Advancing the understanding of storm processes and impacts

    Shore & Beach

    (2019)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text